ML19199A291

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs Board That NRC Has Used Effective Target Area Value Other than 0.1 Square Miles in Hartsville,Pilgrim,Seabrook, Hope Creek,Surry,Bellefonte,Delmarva & Vogtle Proceedings
ML19199A291
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 03/23/1979
From: Chandler L
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To: Johnson W, Rosenthal A, Sharfman J
NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
References
NUDOCS 7904100513
Download: ML19199A291 (1)


Text

-

fga arc \\

o UNITED STATES 4

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION fI 1 j

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20S55

'.Nd4[/

9 8

Afarch 23, 1979 Alan S. Rosenthal, Esq., Chairman Dr. W. Reed Johnson, hieniber Aton ic Safety and Licensing Appeal Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Pa nel Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Washington, D. C. 20555 Jerome E. Sharfman, Esq., Afember Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washing ton, D. C. 20555 In the Atatter of Afetropolitan Edison Comp,any, et al.

(Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 2)

~'

Docket No. 50-320 Gentlemen:

~

During the hearing in this proceeding on December 12, 1978, the Stdi's witness, Darrell G. Eisenhut, was examined concerning the use of the effective target area of the TMI-2 facility particularly concerning the use of a value other than 0.01 sq. miles (Tr. 506-513). For your information, the Staff has used a value other than 0.01 sq. miles for the effective target area in a number of proceedings, among them, the Hartsville proceeding

-~

(Safety Evaluation Report (SER) Section 2.2; Tr. 5608-5612; Second Supplemental. ial Decision, LBP-76-44, 4 NRC 637, 640-642), the Pilgrim Unit 2 proceeding (Tr. 4670) and the Seabrook proceeding (SER, Supple-ment No. 2 at 2-4). Other values have been used in several other pro-ceedings, as well, although they were not expressly set out in the Staff's Safety Evaluation Report or in the hearing record. Such cases include Hooe Creek, Surry, Bellefonte, Delmarva, and Vogtle. If the Appeal Board se desires, the affidavits of the Staff reviewers for these cases can be obtained.

Sinc /erely,

'/

f p ;'awrelnce J. Chandleri. -d

l*/L.Cy,6'if 22 d'r fW l.

. ~.-

L Counsel for NRC Staff cc:

Service List 7 9 0410 0 S G 13 C#