ML19193A233
| ML19193A233 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/12/2019 |
| From: | Helen Chang Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards |
| To: | Taylor M - No Known Affiliation |
| Chang H | |
| References | |
| NRC-2019-0071, PRM-50-118 | |
| Download: ML19193A233 (2) | |
Text
From: Chang, Helen To: Mike Taylor
Subject:
RE: Re: Status of Petition for Rulemaking; Measurement Standards Used at U.S. Nuclear Power Plants (Docket ID NRC-2019-0071)
Date: Friday, July 12, 2019 4:47:29 PM Good afternoon, Mr. Taylor.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions regulations at § 2.802(b)(1)(i), Consultation with the NRC, permit me to describe the agencys process for a petition for rulemaking. If you wish to provide changes, you can submit a comment that clarifies or corrects the information in your petition through Regulations.gov (PRM-50-118; NRC-2019-0071). The NRC will consider your input with the other public comments submitted by the end of the comment period, July 29, 2019.
Please note that the NRC will not issue another comment period for non-substantive changes to your petition for rulemaking.
Sincerely, Helen Chang U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Division of Rulemaking Regulatory Analysis and Rulemaking Support Branch E-mail: Helen.Chang@nrc.gov Phone: 301-415-3228 From: Mike Taylor <miketaylor0001@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2019 4:51 PM To: Chang, Helen <Helen.Chang@nrc.gov>
Subject:
[External_Sender] Re: Status of Petition for Rulemaking; Measurement Standards Used at U.S. Nuclear Power Plants (Docket ID NRC-2019-0071)
Ms. Chang, Thank you again for your your previous response to the questions that I asked. I have an additional question; this is whether it would be appropriate for me to submit a slight revision of the original document. This proposed revision would correct a few grammatical errors, and also clarify some statements that I feel are currently not as clear as they might be. I am not proposing any changes to the actual information or to the original request for a rule change.
If this would cause delays, I would prefer not to make these changes.
Thank you, Michael L. Taylor On Jun 27, 2019, at 3:29 PM, Chang, Helen <Helen.Chang@nrc.gov> wrote:
Good afternoon, Mr. Taylor.
I am sending this e-mail to follow up my voice mail message to you. Thank you for your phone call requesting the current status of your petition for rulemaking regarding measurement standards used at U.S. Nuclear Power Plants (Docket ID NRC-2019-0071).
Your request was noticed and docketed for public comment on May 15, 2019 (84 FR 21727),
and the comment period ends on July 29, 2019. You also can find the current status of your petition on the NRCs public Web site as well as more information on the petition for rulemaking process:
For the current status of your petition for rulemaking: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/rulemaking-ruleforum/active/PetitionDetails.html?id=28 For an overview of the petition for rulemaking process https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/petition-rulemaking-process.html Backgrounder on the Petition for Rulemaking Process: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1531/ML15313A454.pdf and https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/rulemaking/rules-petitions.html For the current status of petitions for rulemaking at the NRC: https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/rulemaking/rules-petitions.html Please let me know if I have addressed your request and if you had any additional questions.
Sincerely, Helen Chang U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Division of Rulemaking Regulatory Analysis and Rulemaking Support Branch E-mail: Helen.Chang@nrc.gov Phone: 301-415-3228