ML19178A202

E-Mail 43 Documents That Were Not Released

ML19178A202
Person / Time
Site:	Erwin
Issue date:	06/27/2019
From:	Kevin Ramsey Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, Safeguards, and Environmental Review
To:	Overall P - No Known Affiliation
Ramsey K
References
Download: ML19178A202 (1)

Text

From: Ramsey, Kevin To: olparko@aol.com; apharris40@gmail.com Cc: Williams, Robert; Zimmerman, Jacob; Bartlett, Matt; Rivera Ortiz, Joel; Rivera Diaz, Carmen; Harris, Larry; Hannah, Roger; Ledford, Joey

Subject:

RE: 43 Documents Date: Monday, May 06, 2019 1:07:00 PM The estimated number of legacy documents may vary, but as I explained in my April 19 message, the staff redacted and released only a subset of those legacy documents to provide the public with a record of NRCs regulatory actions. The subset of documents included inspection reports, licensee performance reviews, enforcement actions, event reports, and other documents which the staff determined to be relevant.

Please note that our resources are limited and I cannot process your requests myself.

Requests for documents should be submitted as follows:

1. For documents available to the public, contact the Public Document Room (PDR) staff. Contact information is available at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/contact-pdr.html. If you are unsure whether a document is public, start with the PDR staff.

2. For documents withheld from the public, you will need to submit a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. Information on FOIA requests is available at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/foia/foia-privacy.html.

Kevin M. Ramsey Senior Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-7506 From: olparko@aol.com [1]

Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2019 2:02 PM To: Ramsey, Kevin <Kevin.Ramsey@nrc.gov>; apharris40@gmail.com

Subject:

[External_Sender] 43 Documents May 5, 2019 Kevin, there is a discrepancy on how many secret documents were declassified. Some sources say 1900, some say 1100 documents were allowed to be released to the public. In our Diane Curran lawsuit with you, there are 43 that were not released. So now that the BLEU is decommissioned, I require those 43 documents, redacted if necessary.

For instance- "Additional information to support an environmental review for BLEU Project ML020290471" Jan. 2--- is not there.......4 docs from 2004 are three. Why? Where is the actual document?.I am finding letters, not the docs pertaining to the letters, consistently.

"Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Caller Box 2500 Rockville, MD 20852

Subject:

PHYSICAL SECURITY PLAN FOR SNM OF LOW STRATEGIC SIGNIFICANCE

References:

1) Docket No.70-143; SNM License 124

2) Letter from B.M. Moore to NRC, Licensing Plan of Action to Support the Blended Low-Enriched Uranium Project at Nuclear Fuel Services, dated October 4, 2001 (21G-01-0180)"

^ Letter from Marie Moore- telling us nothing....Nothing. And this is 2002.^ Anymore secrets we orta know

about?

This # of milquetoast documents, dumped on retired women, who are not paid for their important work, is an unfair burden and I think NRC should now be much more helpful in providing those documents that you withheld from us - particularly in light of Sapphire and the Near Criticality.

Look Kevin, we've been at this for 20 years, and to make us run rabbits, on this facility--- on NFS- the legendary, notorious, rattle trap, NFS---- at this point in time-, is abhorrent. I don't expect everyone to have a southern sensibility, but I do expect everyone at the NRC to have good sense.

As our work is professional and formidable, I will drive there and sit in a room and read those 43 docs -

and take an oath or whatever you all require.. Clearly, an aging retired actress poses no threat to National Security. And if you prefer another one of the ladies to visit, someone less flamboyant than I, I'm sure that can be arranged!

Park.