ML19168A197
| ML19168A197 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/17/2019 |
| From: | Mayer A Division of Inspection and Regional Support |
| To: | |
| Govan T, 415-6197, NRR/DIRS | |
| References | |
| Download: ML19168A197 (9) | |
Text
Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment Annie Mayer, Self Assessment Lead Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Key Messages
- Results of CY 2018 ROP self-assessment indicate that the ROP provided objective, risk-informed, understandable, and predictable oversight
- Identified improvements to the ROP 2
Monthly ROP Public Meetings ROP Feedback Form Process Reactive & Supplemental Inspection Evaluations NRC Regulatory Information Conference Sessions ROP Self-Assessment Process 3
Continuous ROP Feedback Element 1 Measure implementation and effectiveness of ROP Element 2 Assess effectiveness of changes to the ROP Element 3 Conduct deep-dive reviews of ROP programs
CY 2018 ROP Self-Assessment Results 4
Self-Assessment Elements 2018 Results Metrics Yes 25 of 26 ROP metrics were Green 1 Red metric with action plan Program Area Evaluations Yes Complete - All ROP Program Areas Effective Monitor ROP Revisions Yes Monitored Effectiveness Reviews Yes 3 Reviews Completed -
Changes Were Effective Regional Peer Reviews Yes Region III - Implementing ROP per Governance Documents Focused Assessments Yes Emergency Preparedness SDP -
Effective Baseline IP Assessments Yes Complete - Baseline Inspection Procedures Are Effective Element 1 Element 2 Element 3
CY 2018 Results Element 1: Measure effectiveness of and adherence to the current program
- Metrics assessment: 25 of 26 metrics were Green
- One Red metric - Efficiency metric for responsiveness to ROP feedback forms
- Staff taking actions to address performance in this area
- Program area evaluations:
- PI, inspection, SDP, and assessment programs 5
ROP was consistently and effectively implemented in CY 2018 and all 4 ROP Program Areas are effective.
Element 2: Monitor ROP revisions and assess effectiveness of recent program changes
- Three effectiveness reviews were conducted in CY 2018:
- Inspection Finding Resolution Management Pilot
- Recent changes to IP 95001, Supplemental Inspection Response to Action Matrix Column 2 Inputs
- Implementation of safety culture common language initiative 6
CY 2018 Results All three ROP changes were determined to be effective with no unintended consequences identified.
Element 3: Perform focused, in-depth assessments of specific program area(s)
- Regional peer review:
- Region III implements ROP effectively and consistent with ROP governance documents.
- Focused assessment:
- Emergency Preparedness SDP - effective with some recommendations for improvement.
- ROP Baseline IP review:
- All Baseline IPs effective with some recommended adjustments.
7 CY 2018 Results, Continued
CY 2018 Conclusions
- ROP provided effective oversight by meeting program goals and achieving intended outcomes
- Ensured openness and effectiveness in supporting NRC mission and strategic goals of safety and security
- ROP was successful in being objective, risk-informed, understandable, and predictable
- ROP improvements implemented and underway based on lessons learned and feedback from stakeholders 8
Limited CY 2019 ROP Self-Assessment
- Prioritize ROP enhancement
- Conduct ROP self-assessment holistic review
- Metrics, Program Evaluations, and Effectiveness Review only
- SECY Info Paper
- Implement changes in time for CY 2020 9
Self-Assessment Elements 2018 2019 Metrics Yes Yes Program Evaluations Yes Yes Monitor ROP Revisions Yes Deferred Effectiveness Reviews Yes Yes Regional Peer Reviews Yes Not Required Focused Assessments Yes Deferred Baseline IP Assessments Yes Not Required