|
---|
Category:Legal-Pleading
MONTHYEARML20279A4812020-10-0505 October 2020 C-10 Research and Education Foundation'S Reply to Oppositions to Motion for Partial Reconsideration and Motion to Re-Open the Record for Consideration of Supplemental Testimony Regarding License Conditions in LBP-20-09 ML20272A2742020-09-28028 September 2020 Nextera'S Answer Opposing C-10's Motion for Leave to File a Reply and Motion for Leave to File INT053 ML20254A2342020-09-10010 September 2020 Nextera'S Answer Opposing C-10 Motion for Leave and Motion for Partial Reconsideration of LBP-20-9 ML20254A2352020-09-10010 September 2020 Nextera'S Answer Opposing C-10 Motion to Reopen the Record for Consideration of Supplemental Testimony ML20244A3212020-08-31031 August 2020 C-10 Research and Education Foundation'S Motion for Partial Reconsideration and Motion to Re-Open the Record for Consideration of Supplemental Testimony Regarding License Conditions in LBP-20-09 ML20244A3202020-08-31031 August 2020 C-10 Research and Education Foundation'S Motion for Leave to File Motion for Partial Reconsideration of LBP-20-09 ML20043E2542020-01-31031 January 2020 Redacted C-10 Research and Education'S Supplemental Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law ML20031D6992020-01-31031 January 2020 NRC Staff Supplemental Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law ML20031E7222020-01-31031 January 2020 NextEra Energy Seabrook Llc'S Supplemental Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law ML19354C4482019-12-20020 December 2019 C-10 Research and Education Foundation'S Response to Nextera'S Motion for Leave to File Responsive Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law ML19353D4192019-12-19019 December 2019 C-10 Research and Education Foundation'S Response to Nextera'S Motion for Leave to File Responsive Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law ML19347D0672019-12-13013 December 2019 NextEra Energy Seabrook Llc'S Motion for Leave to File Responsive Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law ML19347D0702019-12-13013 December 2019 NextEra Energy Seabrook Llc'S Responsive Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law ML19333B9702019-11-29029 November 2019 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Seek Leave to File Responsive Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law ML20043E2522019-11-27027 November 2019 Redacted Corrected C-10 Research and Education Foundation'S Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law ML19325D9092019-11-21021 November 2019 NRC Staff Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of the Law for the Admitted Contention ML19325F3902019-11-21021 November 2019 NextEra Energy Seabrook Llc'S Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law ML19310E2592019-11-0606 November 2019 Nextera'S Answer Opposing C-10's Third Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Testimony ML19304B3522019-10-31031 October 2019 C-10 Research and Education Foundation'S Response to ASLB Memorandum and Motion to Submit Additional Exhibits Regarding Petrographic Observations and Analyses of ASR at Seabrook ML19283A0362019-10-0909 October 2019 Nextera'S Answer Opposing C-10's Motions to Compel Production of Mineralogical Data and to Submit Additional Post-Hearing Testimony ML19272B3252019-09-30030 September 2019 C-10 Research and Education Foundation'S Motion to Compel Production of Mineralogy Data and Request for Opportunity to Submit Supplemental Written Testimony Regarding the Data ML19262K7512019-09-19019 September 2019 C-10 Research and Education Foundation'S Opposition to Nextera'S Second Motion in Limine ML19261B8802019-09-18018 September 2019 NRC Staff'S Answer to Nextera'S Motion in Limine ML19254F1582019-09-11011 September 2019 Appendix a Revised Exhibit List for September 2019 Evidentiary Hearing Exhibits ML19253D6782019-09-10010 September 2019 NRC Staff'S Answer to C-10's Motion to Supplement Rebuttal Testimony ML19252B3072019-09-0909 September 2019 NextEra Answer Opposing C-10 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Rebuttal ML19252B2322019-09-0909 September 2019 Nextera'S Motion in Limine to Strike or Exclude Portions of C-10's Testimony and Exhibits ML19247D5932019-09-0404 September 2019 C-10 Research and Education Foundation'S Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Rebuttal Testimony ML19235A3172019-08-23023 August 2019 C-10 Research and Education Foundation, Inc. Rebuttal Statement of Position on C-10's Contentions Regarding Nextera'S Program for Managing ASR at Seabrook Station Nuclear Power Plant ML19235A3182019-08-23023 August 2019 Appendix a Revised Exhibit List ML19205A3412019-07-24024 July 2019 NRC Staff Initial Written Statement of Position ML19205A4882019-07-24024 July 2019 NextEra Energy Seabrook LLC Statement of Position and Certificate of Service ML19171A4012019-06-20020 June 2019 C-10 Research and Education Foundation'S Errata to Exhibit INT-001, Testimony of Dr. Victor E. Saouma ML19161A3722019-06-10010 June 2019 Appendix a Exhibit List ML19161A3712019-06-10010 June 2019 C-10 Research and Education Foundation, Inc. Initial Statement of Position on Contentions Re Nextera'S Program for Managing ASR at Seabrook Station ML19123A1912019-05-0303 May 2019 C-10 Research and Education Foundation'S Opposition to Nextera'S Motion in Limine ML19114A0762019-04-23023 April 2019 Nextera'S Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony and Exhibits Regarding Structure Deformation Monitoring ML19105B2822019-04-15015 April 2019 Nextera'S Answer Opposing C-10's Motion Regarding Seabrook Station Site Tour ML19101A4082019-04-11011 April 2019 C-10 Research and Education Foundation'S Motion Regarding Seabrook Station Site Tour ML19064B4022019-03-0505 March 2019 Nextera'S Answer Opposing C-10's Motion for Leave to File a Reply to Answers to C-10's Emergency Petition ML19064A6322019-03-0505 March 2019 Notice of Appearance for Jennifer E. Scro ML19060A3042019-03-0101 March 2019 C-10 Research and Education Foundation'S Reply to Oppositions by NextEra and NRC Staff to Emergency Petition for Exercise of Commission'S Supervisory Authority to Reverse No Significant Hazards Determination and Immediately Suspend License ML19060A3032019-03-0101 March 2019 C-10 Research and Education Foundation'S Motion for Leave to File Reply to Oppositions by NextEra and NRC Staff to Emergency Petition ML19056A5882019-02-25025 February 2019 NRC Staff Answer to C-10's Emergency Petition ML19056A5862019-02-25025 February 2019 Nextera'S Answer Opposing C-10 Emergency Petition ML19044A7702019-02-13013 February 2019 Exhibit 1 to Saouma Declaration: Curriculum Vitae for Dr. Victor E. Saouma ML19044A7682019-02-13013 February 2019 Emergency Petition by C-10 Research and Education Foundation for Exercise of Commission'S Supervisory Authority to Reverse No Significant Hazards Determination and Immediately Suspend License Amendment and License Renewal Decisions ML19044A7692019-02-13013 February 2019 Declaration of Victor E. Saouma, Ph.D ML19044A7722019-02-13013 February 2019 Exhibit 3 to Saouma Declaration: Sauoma, Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Alkali Silica Reaction in Nuclear Reactors, Final Summary Report ML19044A7732019-02-12012 February 2019 Exhibit 4a to Saouma Declaration: Introduction and Executive Summary 2020-09-28
[Table view] |
Text
April 11, 2019 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
)
In the Matter of )
NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC ) Docket No. 50-443 (Seabrook Station, Unit 1) )
_____________________________________)
C-10 RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATIONS MOTION REGARDING SEABROOK STATION SITE TOUR Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.323, C-10 Research and Education Foundation (C-10) moves to establish June 26 or 27 as the date for a tour of relevant portions of Seabrook Station Unit 1 in preparation for the hearing in this proceeding. C-10 also requests leave to have the following representatives attend the site tour: Diane Curran (undersigned counsel), Dr. Victor Saouma (C-10s primary expert witness), Natalie Hildt Treat (C-10s Director), and Christopher Nord (board member and chair of C-10s LAR Working Group). In support of this motion, C-10 states the following:
- Setting a date for the site tour in advance will assist C-10 in conserving resources, by allowing it to purchase plane tickets for undersigned counsel and Dr. Saouma well ahead of time; and by allowing C-10 to plan in-person meetings with counsel and Dr. Saouma to prepare for the September hearing. June 26 and 27 are feasible dates for the C-10 team.1 1
C-10 understands that it may not be possible for NextEra to set a firm date for the site tour until it learns what particular parts of the Seabrook site the Board wants to see, and that this may not be possible until late April. C-10 makes this request now in order to ensure timely consideration of the dates that are most feasible for C-10.
- During the April 4, 2019 teleconference with the ASLB panel members and parties, it was suggested that the purpose of the site tour is to familiarize the Board with the Seabrook site, not to educate the parties; and therefore attendance at the site tour should be limited to the Board members and counsel. C-10 respectfully submits that it is appropriate to include the three other C-10 representatives, in addition to undersigned counsel, for the following reasons:
o Dr. Saouma should be allowed to attend, in order to ensure that if the Board asks questions about particular locations in the site, he has had the opportunity to see the same thing. That will assist him in making accurate and meaningful responses.
o Ms. Treat and Mr. Nord should be allowed to attend because of the critical role they have played and continue to play on C-10s behalf in this proceeding. For most of the duration of the proceeding, Mr. Nord, other C-10 board members and Ms. Treat have represented C-10 pro se, including reviewing the license application, working with C-10s expert, and preparing the hearing request. They continue to play a major role in reviewing documents and working with Dr.
Saouma to prepare for the hearing. As with Dr. Saouma, it is important for them to see the same things the ASLB members see at the site, in order to ensure that they have a common understanding with the Board of the relevant physical features of the site. This will assist C-10 in understanding colloquies between the Board members and counsel and experts during the hearing; and in preparing all of its pleadings, including its statements of position and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.
2
The considerations described above relate to providing a reasonable opportunity for meaningful participation by C-10 in the adjudicatory hearing process, not to education of C-10 and its expert.
For the foregoing reasons, the motion should be granted.
Respectfully submitted,
__/signed electronically by/___
Diane Curran Harmon, Curran, Spielberg, & Eisenberg, L.L.P.
1725 DeSales Street N.W., Suite 500 Washington, D.C. 20036 240-393-9285 dcurran@harmoncurran.com April 11, 2019 3
CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(b), I certify that on April 11, 2019, I consulted counsel for NextEra and the NRC Staff in a sincere effort to resolve the issues raised by this motion for leave to reply. Counsel for NextEra stated that Next Era opposes the motion. Counsel for the NRC Staff stated that the Staff opposes the motion and reserves the right to respond.
[Electronically signed by]
Diane Curran 4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
)
In the Matter of )
NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC ) Docket No. 50-443 (Seabrook Station, Unit 1) )
_____________________________________)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on April 11, 2019, C-10 RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATIONS MOTION REGARDING SEABROOK STATION SITE TOUR was posted on the NRCs electronic hearing docket.
__/signed electronically by/___
Diane Curran 5