ML19030A656
| ML19030A656 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinch River |
| Issue date: | 01/18/2019 |
| From: | James Shea Tennessee Valley Authority |
| To: | Office of New Reactors |
| Fetter A | |
| References | |
| TVACLINCHRIVERESP, TVACLINCHRIVERESP.SUBMISSION.6, CRN.P.PART08, CRN.P.PART08.2 | |
| Download: ML19030A656 (31) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:SPT Energy Measurements- Tri-State Drilling CME 75 Drill Rig January 10, 2014 AMEC Project No. 6468-13-1072 Page2 included in the drill rod string were hollow rods in 5- to 10-foot long sections, with outside and inside diameters of approximately 1. 75 and 1.375 inches, respectively. Due to the closed hammer system, the hammer lubrication condition could not be observed. Calibration Records The calibration records for the equipment associated with this testing are filed in the project record control center. The calibration services were procured and approved in accordance with the commercial grade dedication process as outlined in AMEC's nuclear quality assurance program. Calculations for EFV The work was performed in accordance with ASTM D 4633-10. The strain and acceleration signals were converted to force and velocity by the PDA. The maximum energy transmitted to the drill rod string (EFV), as measured at the location of the strain gages and accelerometers, was calculated by the SPT Analyzer using the equation shown below: EFV =f F(t)
- V(t)
- dt Where: EFV =Transferred energy (EFV equation), or Energy of FV F(t) = Calculated force at timet V(t) =Calculated velocity at time t As recommended by ASTM D 4633-10, the force-velocity method of energy calculation was used. The equation shown above for calculating EFV, integrated over the complete wave event, measures the total energy of the event using both force and velocity measurements. The EFV values associated with each blow analyzed are tabulated in the attached PDIPLOT tables and are also shown graphically in the PDIPLOT charts.
Calculations for ETR The ratio of the measured transferred energy (EFV) to the theoretical potential energy of the SPT system (140 lb weight with the specified 30 inch fall) is the ETR. The ETR values (as a percentage of the theoretical value) are shown in Table 1. Comparison of ETR to Typical Energy Transfer Ratio Range Based on a research report published by the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) (Report WPI No. 0510859, 1999), the average ETR measured for automatic hammers was 79.6%. The standard deviation was 7.9%; therefore, the range of ETRs within one standard deviation of the average was reported to be 71.7% to 87.5%. This range of ETRs was also consistent with other research that was cited in the FOOT research paper; however, maximum and minimum ETR values of up to 98% and 56%, respectively, were reported in the literature. The ETR values shown in Table 1 are within the range of typical values for automatic hammers as reported in the literature. RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 47 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-50 of 168
SPT Energy Measurements- Tri-State Drilling CME 75 Drill Rig January 10, 2014 AMEC Project No. 6468-13-1072 Page3 Evaluation and Conclusions Based on the field testing results, our evaluation and conclusions from the SPT energy measurements are summarized below:
- The average energy transferred from the hammer to the drill rods for each individual depth interval ranged from 296 foot-pounds to 315 foot-pounds.
These average energy transfers correspond to energy transfer ratios (ETR) of 85% to 90% of the theoretical energy (350 foot-pounds) of the SPT hammer.
- The average at each depth interval was calculated as the transferred energy for each analyzed blow at the depth interval divided by the total number of hammer blows analyzed. The overall average energy transfer of the SPT system (for all the depth intervals tested) was 305.1 foot-pounds, with an average ETR of 87 .2%.
Closing Please contact us when we can be of further service or if you have any questions concerning this report. Sincerely, AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
-~~q(.~
Mike Hamilton, E.I.T. Steven E. Kiser Technical Professional Principal Geotechnical Professional For~ With Permission
~
Attachments: Page 4 -Table 1 - Summary of SPT Energy Measurements - 1 Page Page 5 - Record of SPT Energy Measurement- 1 Page Pages 6 PO IPLOT Output- 10 Pages Page 16 - Example Force Velocity Plot RCN : CRP-1215.0 Page 48 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-51 of 168
"'C(") ~= t1) ~ m:T TABLE 1 N;u
SUMMARY
OF SPT ENERGY MEASUREMENTS (ASTM 04633-10) ln ;::* Ntl) .., Tri-State Drilling SPT Energy Measurements S,c ..... ~~~ Oak Ridge, Tennessee .,iii CO;Q AMEC Project No. 6468-13-1072 t1)
"'C 0
~
;u "0 ..-.. ~ "0 t1) ~ "0 ~ 0 ~ -or;.
> .::~~. -.
~ eJ .. ~ ~ ~
~
- C-;;- ..Q ~r;"l ~E-o
.a ~ ; ~ ~ ~~ '-' '::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
(") =~ c:
.s:::
;u E-c ..... CZl : =~ < O:a:~ ~ QJ
- 0 ~ :u * ~ "0 c. ::l
"'=" 0 c. E- 0 <a> 0 *-
= ~ :.. "' "' ~
7' Z It!: "' :;2 0 .Q ::: :..
..... Z0 ~ ~ Ux ~ > - C::o
..... ": :.0 1:)!1 Q ~ ::.. *-
..... 0 ~ < C::: ~ >
-~ *-- *- eJ) ~ riJ -
~ :.. 0::: 0::: c~n bJJ '-' ~ c- <
*- *- Q :.. 0 :..
Q) ~ 0:::
= c.
;. !:0. :- >. >. .._,
5 A E s:i ~ 'o ~ ~ e.'l""'- e.o !:0. ,~ E- o" Q) ~
\1.1. ~
0::: 00 :z = 1=1 - "$'-" r=l 3.5-5 .0 3-6-8 14 305 87.1%
- T .S Test hole #4 5.0-6.5 8-9-11 20 315 90.0%
272 :;, 67 n - tate . CME S Drillino Glen Bilbrey (near MET 6/5/2013 AW-J 6.5-8.0 8-10-8 18 296 84.6% 7
., Tower) 8.0-9.5 5-8-8 16 297 84.9%
9.5-11.0 9-15-18 33 308 88.0% I Average for Rig: I 305.1 I 87.2% I aMeasured Energy is energy based on the EFV method, as outlined in ASTM 04633-10, for each blow recorded by the PDA. Only blows used to calculate N-va!ues were considered per ASTM D4633-l 0. In some cases, the initial and/or final one to two blows produced poor quality data, and were not used to calculate the Average Measured Energy. EFV = EMX
- 1000 lbs/kip, where E1vDC equals the transferred energy measured by the PDA (see attached PDA data).
bEnergy Transfer Ratio is the Measured Energy divided by the theoretical SPT energy of350 foot-pounds (140 pound hammer falling 2.5 feet). The average EFV and ETR values may differ slightly and insignificantly from those in the PDIPLOT tables due to roundoff. Prepared By: ~ Date: l-lo~l~ Checked By: ~ Date: {-to~/~
;o 0
"'OZ OJ . .
<eo t1) ;o t5 "P
~
0....,~
~(Jl
~ 0
2801 YORKMONT ROAD, SUITE 100 i CHARLOTTE, NC 28208
.ame TeiE?phone: (704) 357-8600 I Facsimile: (704) 357-8638 RECORD OF SPT ENERGY MEASUREMENT- ASTM 04633 -10 GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: C.J./11!.-M k', u!?r 'f.l//1!..
1 . DATE: (] - 5~ /3 PROJECT NO.: flt-Jfo5 I&'J:J. INSPECTOR: . fJ1 1"-' *1t-LOCATION: 11 t'T. I t>r_ue r WEATHER: ~ft'lttli!rA 9"! ()
.. A'~
BORING AND DRILL RIG DATA v BORING NUMBER: !e~-s*J- ~{r,fe j=t_ll ..i DRILLING COMPANY: /r,'- :;1-af.r-_ Dr .*tt'ri./1 RIG OPERATOR: f?, 'j h-1'-hA DRILL RIG MAKE: C.MI~- A--' u ( ; - { </) #") '* HAMMER OPERATOR: -r;..~h l.Jalk"'-4 DRILL RIG MODEL: rJv1~76 PAK SERIAL NO.: 3622L RIG SERIAL NO.: Qry*-;L6{p~ INSTR. ROD AREA: / . ?.A .II.'- HAMMER TYPE: Automatic ACCEL. SERIAL NOS.: A3: I J?*.~'?l70 A4: I f?_oCtiJ(/J ROPE CONDITION: N/A STRAIN SERIAL NOS.: F3: IAu> -7.$ ... r F4: IAw-"7!-=, -"'Z NO. OF SHEAVES: N/A SPT OBSERVATION ROD ROD SAMPLE SPT OR SIZE LENGTH DEPTH N-VALUE COMMENTS SPT DATA RECORD (AW-J, NW, etc) (feet) (feet) (bpf) k!VT.Vr.l~ iZe_,-_.c-) {\(.A) - '\ _ q ~ . 5'-s' '3 ; {~ - '$? 1ft;: ;q ~()<¥j) 16 -.t; 5- l'n. ~S I 9- '1- II 1.t I i~*ntSd.
\
/1} ;;;
5- 1o - :S tAJ:: I?: ("yer_.,J)
~
J-:1 (p.6>;1 '
/1~-
/
~~~&15' 5 - ~"'.-<6 tJ ~ f{ p ~.l>>A Ci-- /'5'-t~AJ';83 f'rooJ..
{ ( 16- 1
~ ll
-I REMARKS
'<;PI v t.*"$:1.11"1 :l j_ 5 ~ I.Q. C> rnrs Form 4633 REV.2 (11-4-11) *I PREPARED BY: tfl . CHECKED BY: DATE: & t DATE: I Clinch River Data Report _lfEWJ"Q &R_~crrrlf£.fij~r Use on Clinch River SMR Project by J. A . Tlce, TL RCN : CRP-1215.0 Page 50 of 165 ) Page 8.2-53 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (GLEN B) 3.5'-5' CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 o-r---~----~----+---~
\
\
1/ (( >-+----+~--+--t-+----+----------1 10-r--~-+----+-+----~---~ B I e 20-r----+-----+----~---~ 25-r----+-----+-----r---~ 30~----+-----+----~---~ 0 10 20 30 40 0 2 3 4 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsi on Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy Transfer Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 51 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-54 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (GLEN B) 3.5'-5' CME 75 (s/n 272567) OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 9.00 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 5 0.00 19.3 17.1 6.4 24.7 21 1.52 1.54 0.284 81.1 6 0.00 19.3 17.7 6.8 24.6 21 1.49 1.49 0.295 84.3 7 0.00 19.5 17.5 7.1 24.9 21 1.41 1.42 0.302 86.3 8 0.00 19.1 17.8 7.2 25.0 22 1.39 1.39 0.310 88.5 9 0.00 19.6 17.8 6.0 24.5 22 1.27 1.27 0.303 86.6 10 0.00 19.6 17.8 6.7 24.9 22 1.30 1.30 0.305 87.1 11 0.00 19.4 18.1 6.1 24.8 22 1.17 1.17 0.304 86.8 12 0.00 19.4 17.8 6.7 24.8 22 1.10 1.10 0.302 86.3 13 0.00 19.6 18.1 6.8 25.1 22 1.15 1.15 0.311 89.0 14 0.00 19.7 18.0 6.3 25.0 22 1.05 1.05 0.309 88.3 15 0.00 20.8 18.2 5.9 25.0 22 1.05 1.05 0.312 89.1 16 0.00 19.9 18.0 6.0 25.0 22 1.07 1.07 0.312 89.1 17 0.00 19.2 17.5 7.0 25.0 21 1.10 1.10 0.315 90.1 18 0.00 19.6 18.0 6.7 25.0 22 0.93 0.94 0.312 89.0 Average 19.6 17.8 6.5 24.9 22 1.21 1.22 0.305 87.3 Total number of blows analyzed: 14 Time Summary Drive 29 seconds 1:23:29 PM - 1 :23:58 PM (6/5/2013) BN 1 - 18 RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 52 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-55 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (GLEN B) 5'-6.5' CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 o-r---~----~----+---~ 5~---~----+-----+---~
/)) I! !
10~--~-+-----rt----~---~ B I 0 w l0 N 15~---+-+----~----~---~ m b e If 20~---+-+-----H----~---~ 25-r---+-+----~-----r---~ (r 30~----+-----+----~---~ 0 10 20 30 40 0 2 3 4 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsion Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy T ransfe r Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 53 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-56 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (GLEN B) 5'-6.5' CME 75 (s/n 272567) OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 10.50 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 10 0.00 21.4 19.2 7.3 22.4 23 1.20 1.20 0.314 89.7 11 0.00 21.4 19.1 7.6 22.4 23 1.23 1.23 0.313 89.3 12 0.00 21.3 19.1 7.0 22.1 23 1.37 1.37 0.307 87.6 13 0.00 21.0 19.1 7.6 22.9 23 1.34 1.34 0.314 89.7 14 0.00 21.5 19.0 7.5 22.2 23 1.19 1.19 0.309 88.3 15 0.00 21.7 19.0 7.8 22.4 23 1.12 1.12 0.311 88.8 16 0.00 21.6 18.6 7.8 22.3 22 1.02 1.02 0.308 88.0 17 0.00 21.5 18.9 7.3 22.3 23 1.04 1.04 0.309 88.4 18 0.00 21.5 19.1 7.5 22.2 23 1.02 1.02 0.311 88.8 19 0.00 21.2 19.4 7.1 22.1 23 1.33 1.33 0.322 92.0 20 0.00 21.2 19.3 6.8 22.2 23 1.19 1.19 0.322 92.1 21 0.00 21.0 19.2 6.9 22.4 23 1.14 1.14 0.322 91.9 22 0.00 21.1 19.4 7.1 22.4 23 1.07 1.07 0.321 91.7 23 0.00 21.1 19.1 7.1 22.5 23 1.10 1.10 0.317 90.7 24 0.00 20.9 19.0 7.7 22.4 23 1.00 1.00 0.316 90.4 25 0.00 21.1 19.1 7.6 22.6 23 1.05 1.05 0.322 91.9 26 0.00 21.0 19.1 7.9 22.6 23 1.00 1.00 0.319 91.2 27 0.00 20.9 19.1 7.8 22.5 23 0.92 0.92 0.320 91.3 28 0.00 21.0 19.1 7.9 22.5 23 0.92 0.92 0.317 90.5 29 0.00 21.2 19.0 8.0 22.4 23 0.91 0.91 0.313 89.5 Average 21.2 19.1 7.5 22.4 23 1.11 1.11 0.315 90.1 Total number of blows analyzed: 20 Time Summary Drive 33 seconds 1:32:34 PM - 1 :33:07 PM (6/5/2013) BN 1 - 29 RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 54 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-57 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (GLEN B) 6.5'-8' CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 5
) )
10 B I 1/ <; 0 J/ w N 15 I < I ~ m ( b e ( 20 25 \
\
t!
<< (
30 0 10 20 30 40 0 2 3 4 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsi on Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy Transfer Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 55 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-58 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (GLEN B) 6.5'-8' CME 75 (s/n 272567) OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 12.00 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 10 0.00 25.4 22.2 10.5 20.2 27 1.23 1.24 0.299 85.5 11 0.00 25.5 22.0 11.5 20.0 27 1.09 1.10 0.295 84.3 12 0.00 24.9 21.3 12.3 19.7 26 1.17 1.18 0.300 85.6 13 0.00 25.1 21.4 12.9 19.5 26 1.03 1.03 0.295 84.4 14 0.00 24.6 20.5 11.8 19.1 25 1.24 1.24 0.286 81.8 15 0.00 25.2 21.4 10.9 19.8 26 1.12 1.13 0.298 85.2 16 0.00 24.9 20.8 9.8 19.3 25 1.03 1.03 0.292 83.5 17 0.00 25.2 21.0 8.4 19.6 25 0.99 0.99 0.296 84.6 18 0.00 25.3 21.2 7.5 19.7 26 0.95 0.95 0.304 86.8 19 0.00 25.0 21.0 5.6 19.4 25 0.71 0.71 0.291 83.2 20 0.00 25.0 20.7 5.7 19.2 25 0.96 0.96 0.296 84.7 21 0.00 24.9 20.5 5.8 19.2 25 1.03 1.04 0.300 85.7 22 0.00 25.2 20.7 5.7 19.3 25 0.87 0.87 0.297 84.9 23 0.00 25.6 21.0 6.8 19.8 25 0.96 0.96 0.297 85.0 24 0.00 25.5 21.4 8.4 20.1 26 0.89 0.89 0.298 85.2 25 0.00 25.3 21.6 9.3 20.3 26 0.96 0.97 0.300 85.7 26 0.00 25.3 21.5 8.4 20.1 26 0.83 0.83 0.292 83.6 27 0.00 25.3 21.7 9.7 20.2 26 0.95 0.95 0.295 84.3 Average 25.2 21.2 8.9 19.7 26 1.00 1.00 0.296 84.7 Total number of blows analyzed: 18 Time Summary Drive 6 minutes 37 seconds 1:39:45 PM - 1 :46:22 PM (6/5/2013) BN 1 - 27 RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 56 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-59 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (GLEN B) 8'-9.5' CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 o-r---~----~----+---~ 5~---~----+-----+---~ I 10~--+--+-----+~---~---~ B I 0 w N 15~--~-+-----+-~--~---~
))
m b e
\\
20~---+-+-----+-+---~---~ 25-r----+-----+-----r---~ 30~----+-----+----~---~ 0 10 20 30 40 0 2 3 4 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsion Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy T ransfe r Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 57 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-60 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (GLEN B) 8'-9.5' CME 75 (s/n 272567) OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 13.50 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 7 0.00 25.4 21.3 6.7 21.7 26 0.86 0.86 0.291 83.0 8 0.00 25.7 21.4 6.1 21.6 26 0.55 0.67 0.298 85.1 9 0.00 25.7 21.1 6.1 21.7 26 0.81 0.81 0.298 85.0 10 0.00 26.0 21.4 6.1 21.6 26 0.64 0.75 0.295 84.3 11 0.00 25.6 22.0 7.3 21.6 27 0.88 0.88 0.292 83.5 12 0.00 25.8 22.6 6.9 21.7 27 0.81 0.88 0.294 84.1 13 0.00 26.1 23.0 6.8 21.7 28 0.82 0.82 0.295 84.4 14 0.00 25.7 22.7 6.5 21.5 27 0.90 0.90 0.301 86.1 15 0.00 25.1 22.6 6.5 21.6 27 0.81 0.81 0.297 84.8 16 0.00 25.4 22.7 6.6 21.5 27 0.95 0.95 0.294 84.0 17 0.00 25.8 23.1 6.7 21.7 28 0.76 0.82 0.295 84.3 18 0.00 25.8 23.2 6.8 21.7 28 0.97 0.97 0.300 85.6 19 0.00 25.6 23.1 6.9 21.8 28 0.92 0.92 0.299 85.4 20 0.00 25.8 23.0 6.9 21.7 28 0.80 0.82 0.298 85.1 21 0.00 25.6 22.9 7.2 21.6 28 0.89 0.89 0.300 85.8 22 0.00 25.5 22.8 7.5 21.7 28 1.02 1.02 0.301 86.0 Average 25.7 22.4 6.7 21.6 27 0.84 0.86 0.297 84.8 Total number of blows analyzed: 16 Time Summary Drive 40 seconds 1:52:45 PM - 1 :53:25 PM (6/5/2013) BN 1 - 22 RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 58 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-61 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (GLEN B) 9.5'-11' CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 7
))
l
})
14 I B I 0 w 1\ IJ v )> I) ) N 21 m b e 28 / 35 / 42
~~ ( \? (
0 10 20 30 40 0 2 3 4 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsi on Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy Transfer Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 59 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-62 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (GLEN B) 9.5'-11' CME 75 (s/n 272567) OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 15.00 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 11 0.00 22.7 21.0 9.5 22.3 25 0.76 0.76 0.305 87.0 12 0.00 22.8 21.2 10.0 22.4 26 0.90 0.90 0.307 87.7 13 0.00 22.5 20.7 9.7 22.2 25 0.93 0.93 0.308 87.9 14 0.00 22.5 20.9 8.7 22.1 25 0.75 0.75 0.303 86.6 15 0.00 22.7 21.1 8.7 22.4 26 0.76 0.76 0.306 87.4 16 0.00 22.7 21.0 8.5 22.3 25 0.71 0.71 0.307 87.8 17 0.00 23.2 21.2 9.9 22.6 26 0.82 0.82 0.314 89.6 18 0.00 22.7 20.9 10.4 22.3 25 0.82 0.82 0.310 88.6 19 0.00 22.2 20.6 10.5 22.2 25 0.88 0.88 0.311 89.0 20 0.00 22.3 20.6 10.8 22.2 25 0.81 0.81 0.304 86.8 21 0.00 22.5 20.4 11.8 22.5 25 0.74 0.74 0.306 87.5 22 0.00 22.5 20.6 12.5 22.4 25 0.75 0.75 0.308 88.1 23 0.00 22.4 20.5 11.5 22.4 25 0.74 0.74 0.306 87.5 24 0.00 21.6 20.3 11.1 22.0 25 0.86 0.86 0.320 91.4 25 0.00 21.9 20.3 10.4 21.9 25 0.79 0.79 0.316 90.4 26 0.00 21.9 20.3 11.1 22.0 25 0.68 0.68 0.309 88.4 27 0.00 21.9 20.4 9.6 22.0 25 0.48 0.48 0.304 86.8 28 0.00 21.7 20.3 8.1 22.2 25 0.45 0.47 0.307 87.6 29 0.00 22 .3 20.4 10.2 22.5 25 0.41 0.43 0.305 87.2 30 0.00 22.6 20.6 8.4 22.6 25 0.48 0.48 0.309 88.1 31 0.00 22.5 20.5 10.3 22.5 25 0.47 0.47 0.305 87.1 32 0.00 22.7 20.4 9.7 22.5 25 0.48 0.48 0.304 86.8 33 0.00 22.5 20.2 8.0 22.6 24 0.55 0.55 0.309 88.2 34 0.00 21.8 19.8 8.1 22.6 24 0.53 0.53 0.308 88.1 35 0.00 21.3 19.4 6.4 22.2 23 0.49 0.49 0.308 88.0 36 0.00 22.1 19.8 8.7 22.6 24 0.49 0.49 0.309 88.2 37 0.00 21.5 19.5 5.9 22.4 24 0.47 0.48 0.309 88.3 38 0.00 21.5 19.3 5.2 22.2 23 0.50 0.50 0.305 87.2 39 0.00 22.2 19.7 8.1 22.6 24 0.61 0.61 0.312 89.1 40 0.00 21.7 19.5 5.8 22.3 24 0.42 0.42 0.308 87.9 41 0.00 21.4 18.9 5.3 22.1 23 0.47 0.47 0.304 87.0 42 0.00 21.6 19.5 7.9 22.4 24 0.52 0.52 0.305 87.1 43 0.00 21.9 19.5 7.6 22.6 24 0.59 0.59 0.309 88.3 Average 22.2 20.3 9.0 22.3 25 0.64 0.64 0.308 88.0 Total number of blows analyzed: 33 Time Summary Drive 1 minute 4 seconds 1:58:18 PM - 1 :59:22 PM (6/5/2013) BN 1 - 44 RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 60 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-63 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, lntPile Driving Analyzer CLINCH RIVER SMR CLINCH RIVER TSD (GLEN B) 3.5'-5' A3 F34 TS: TB: wu (41 ---l=-I~====~----------------------------------------------1 D (3. 9 4 ) - - TS: TB:
~...- ___....i.§_ @ 4
- 33 ft Project Information Quantity Results PROJECT: CLINCH RIVER SMR CSI 19.6 ksi PILE NAME: CLINCH RIVER TSD (GLEN B) 3.5'-!CSX 18.0 ksi DESCR: CME 75 (s/n 272567) TSX 6. 7 ksi OPERATOR: MEH VMX 25.0 f/s FILE: CLINCH RIVER TSD (GLEN B) 3.5'-5'.W01FMX 22 kips 6/5/2013 1:23:58 PM DFN 0.93 in Blow Number 17/18 DMX 0.94 in EMX 0.3 k-ft Pile Properties ETR 89.0 (%)
LE 9.00 ft AR 1.21 in"'2 Sensors EM 30000 ksi F3: [75AW1] 208.84 (1) SP 0.492 k/ft3 F4: [75AW2] 209.17 (1) WS 16807.9 f/s A3: [K3370] 325 mv/5000g's (1) EA/C 2. 2 ksec/ft CLIP: OK 2L/C 1.08 ms F3/F4: OK 0.91 JC [] V1/V2: USE 2 ACCELS Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-64 of 168
I 25 February 2014 Mr. Steve Criscenzo AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 4021 Stirrup Creek Drive Suite 100 Durham, North Carolina 27703
Subject:
Report of SPT Hammer Energy Measurements, Rev. 1 Tri-State Drilling CME 55 Drill Rig Rig Serial No. 11-10 Automatic Hammer Clinch River SMR Site AMEC Project No. 6468-13-1072 AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC) is pleased to present the results of Standard Penetration Test (SPT) hammer energy measurements for the subject drill rig at the Clinch River SMR site in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This report summarizes the field testing activities and presents the results of the hammer energy measurements. SPT Hammer Energy Field Measurements SPT energy measurements were made at the referenced site on June 5 and 6, 2013. A separate boring from the planned exploratory borings was used (test hole #5 near MET Tower). Per an approved deviation request testing was performed at depths shallower than those recommended in ASTM D4633-10 due to the presence of relatively shallow rock at the site. The testing was performed by Michael Hamilton, an AMEC representative, from approximately 3:00PM to 4:00 PM (June 5) and 8:00AM to 8:30AM (June 6) under cloudy skies and an air temperature of about 80 degrees Fahrenheit. The boring was drilled with personnel and equipment from Tri-State Drilling. The drilling equipment consisted of a CME 55 drill rig with an automatic SPT hammer. The drilling tools consisted of AW-J sized drilling rods and a 2-foot long split tube sampler. The drill rig operator during sampling was Shannon Snow. Energy measurements were recorded during sampling at the depth intervals shown in Table 1. The energy measurements were performed with a SPT Analyzer (Serial No.3622L) with SPT Analyzer software, accelerometers (Serial Nos. K3370 and K1050) and strain gages (Serial Nos. 75 AW-1 and 75 AW-2). A steel drill rod, 2 feet long and instrumented with dedicated strain gages, was inserted at the top of the drill rod string immediately below the SPT hammer anvil. The inserted rod was also instrumented with two piezoresistive accelerometers that were bolted to the outside of the rod. The instrumented rod insert had a cross-sectional area of approximately 1.21 square inches and an outside diameter of approximately 1.75 inches at the gage location. The drill rods Correspondence: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 2801 Yorkmont Road Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28208 Tel (704) 357-8600 Fax (704) 357-8638 arnec.com Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-65 of 168 Page 62 of 165
SPT Energy Measurements- Tri-State Drilling CME 55 Drill Rig February 25, 2014 AMEC Project No. 6250-13-0013 Page2 included in the drill rod string were hollow rods in 5- to 10-foot long sections, with outside and inside diameters of approximately 1. 75 and 1.375 inches, respectively. Due to the closed hammer system, the hammer lubrication condition could not be observed. Calibration Records The calibration records for the equipment associated with this testing are filed in the project record control center. The calibration services were procured and approved in accordance with the commercial grade dedication process as outlined in AMEC's nuclear quality assurance program. Calculations for EFV The work was performed in accordance with ASTM D 4633-10. The strain and acceleration signals were converted to force and velocity by the PDA. The maximum energy transmitted to the drill rod string (EFV), as measured at the location of the strain gages and accelerometers, was calculated by the SPT Analyzer using the equation shown below: EFV =f F(t)
- V(t)
- dt Where: EFV =Transferred energy (EFV equation), or Energy of FV F(t) = Calculated force at timet V(t) =Calculated velocity at time t As recommended by ASTM D 4633-10, the force-velocity method of energy calculation was used. The equation shown above for calculating EFV, integrated over the complete wave event, measures the total energy of the event using both force and velocity measurements. The EFV values associated with each blow analyzed are tabulated in the attached PDIPLOT tables and are also shown graphically in the PDIPLOT charts.
Calculations for ETR The ratio of the measured transferred energy (EFV) to the theoretical potential energy of the SPT system (140 lb weight with the specified 30 inch fall) is the ETR. The ETR values (as a percentage of the theoretical value) are shown in Table 1. Comparison of ETR to Typical Energy Transfer Ratio Range Based on a research report published by the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) (Report WPI No. 0510859, 1999), the average ETR measured for automatic hammers was 79.6%. The standard deviation was 7.9%; therefore, the range of ETRs within one standard deviation of the average was reported to be 71.7% to 87.5%. This range of ETRs was also consistent with other research that was cited in the FOOT research paper; however, maximum and minimum ETR values of up to 98% and 56%, respectively, were reported in the literature. The ETR values shown in Table 1 are within the range of typical values for automatic hammers as reported in the literature. Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-66 of 168 Page 63 of 165
SPT Energy Measurements- Tri-State Drilling CME 55 Drill Rig February 25, 2014 AMEC Project No. 6250-13-0013 Page3 Evaluation and Conclusions Based on the field testing results, our evaluation and conclusions from the SPT energy measurements are summarized below:
- The average energy transferred from the hammer to the drill rods for each individual depth interval ranged from 282 foot-pounds to 309 foot-pounds.
____Jbesaav.erage_ener_gy_transfers cor.respond-t ener:gy-tr.ansfer- ratios-(E-Ta)- - - - -* of 81% to 88% of the theoretical energy (350 foot-pounds) of the SPT hammer.
- The average at each depth interval was calculated as the transferred energy for each analyzed blow at the depth interval divided by the total number of hammer blows analyzed. The overall average energy transfer of the SPT system (for all the depth intervals tested) was 295.3 foot-pounds, with an average ETR of 84.4%.
Closing Please contact us when we can be of further service or if you have any questions concerning this report. Sincerely, AMEC Envirotlmen & Infrastructure, Inc.
~mi Steven E. Kiser, P.E.
Principal Geotechnical Engineer Attachments: Page 4- Table 1 - Summary of SPT Energy Measurements- 1 Page Page 5 - Record of SPT Energy Measurement- 1 Page Pages 6 PDIPLOT Output -10 Pages Page 16- Example Force Velocity Plot Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN : CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-67 of 168 Page 64 of 165
"tl(")
Ill-IC -* TABLE!
~ ~
IIJ:::r
SUMMARY
OF SPT ENERGY MEASUREMENTS (ASTM D4633-10) N;:c Tri-State Drilling SPT Energy Measurements co~
... Oak Ridge, Teru1essee S,c AMEC Project No. 6468-13-1072
~s-CO;:c
~ ~
"0 "0 0 0 q,j ;~
~ Z' q,j
~0
~r:.
~ = CIS C:::
lo. .2:! q,j ::c,...., fr;:;J N ~
.; ~ E-<
~ ~-<U
.0 0 .._..
.... "' < "'~ ;> I lo.
<:.1 e.o e.o 0 e.o .s q,j 0 q,j <;;::
~ > *- e.o .._.. .._.. E-< >
-~ *-
.... *:::: ~ e.o "i: lo.
0... "'
.... <U ~ = ~ = c.. - <:.1 f ..... ,....$
.... Cl) ~ 0
. Q e .....0 q,j e.o ~.c
~
.... e.o ~ CIS =
E-< c..
= ""'
Cl) 0 ~ a> ii: <> ~
~ :z: 1':;1 ~-
3.5-5.0 3-5-12 17 302 86.3% Test hole #5 5.0-6.5 4-7-11 18 309 88.3% 11-10 Tri-State Shannon (near MET 6/5/2013 I AW-J 6.5-8.0 10-11-11 22 298 85.1% CM£ 55 Drilling Snow Tower) 8.0-9.5 10-8-17 25 292 83.4% 9.5-11 14-15-10 25 282 80.6% I A.Ver3geior rug: II 295.3 1 84.4%] aMeasured Energy is energy based on the EFV method, as outlined in ASTM 04633-10, for each blow recorded by the PDA. Only blot s used to calculate N-val ues were considered per ASTM 04633-1 0. In some cases, the initial and/or frnal one to two blows produced poor qualit data, and were not used to calculate the Average Measured Energy. EFV = EMX
- I 000 lbs/kip, where EMX equals the transferred energy measured by the PDA (see attached PDA data). I bEnergy Transfer Ratio is the Measured Energy divided by the theoretical SPT energy of350 foot-pounds (140 pound hammer falling 2.5 feet).
The average EFV and ET~ vall}es may differ slightly and insignificantly from those in the PDIPLOT tables due to roundoff. I Prepared By: Checked By: g.. Date: 1.-~)-l"'
;;u
(')
-uz Q) **
IC(') CD ;;u m-u
<.no o;:; -~ ~<.n
- 0) .
tn~
2801 YORKMONT ROAD, SUITE 100
- CHARLOTTE, NC 28208 ame&
Telephone: (704) 357-8600 I Facsimile: (704) 357-8638 RECORD OF SPT ENERGY MEASUREMENT* ASTM 04633 -10 GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: N /AP.h k'.'v-( r Srvu1 DATE: fo - 5 '13 PROJECT NO.: (11(111,- /~ *-lo'7'J INSPECTOR:
- JVI er H-LOCATION: MET. loCP't/1 WEATHER: {'lou-d.-A "8/J v
.-v BORING AND DRILL RIG DATA BORING NUMBER: .'"'f:J<J..- /JeJ I/'. '#- 6 DRILLING COMPANY: -, ,.-{ _')~~{-e.
RIG OPERATOR: .5J, /ut. &l7llll S'.~u~t: DRILL RIG MAKE: CI\IVR HAMMER OPERATOR: Tin n~~t-ll t;.vur DRILL RIG. MODEL: c!Y7 e -- 6'.!5 PAK SERIAL NO. : (j 3622Y RIG SERIAL NO.: JI .... IU INSTR. ROD AREA: 1.:1 j.,.'L v HAMMER TYPE: Automatic ACCEL. SERIAL NOS.: A3: I 1i :3'!37A A4:j {;{ /656 ROPE CONDITION: N/A STRAIN SERIAL NOS.: F3 : IA~~5 ~ J F4: IJlt.J'7.5 .. -z. NO. OF SHEAVES: N/A SPT OBSERVATION ROD ROD SAMPLE SPT OR SIZE LENGTH DEPTH N-VALUE COMMENTS SPT DATA RECORD (AW-J, NW, etc) (feet) (feet) (bpf) 1--((Jr Dar-c.. fl*era:: 01
~
/l{M - -5 tf J
'3,5 ~ 5
' 6-!:J- I L tU: 1'7 C..tJ~'>l () /,,jIJ.P/j)
If' \.
~ ~~ r.'~) .'- t~'Q. s' I.J- 7 ---1( /v'.: 19 /..~"n~J
()d'~'"
.1~ ;g"'fo, '0 :_ 6" t.0-- 11-11 t/V-7.-'C. G-6ool J
t11~ !.--1'1 'i'~ 1.S' 4 ~~~~u>S' f" /, 1 AA(/j!J 1~*5 *~~- '*f:J
.~ '(1-?*G tb*-1!- ~~ ~:::...1'Y ~A (!!,/r~~eJ
~Je;,
~'.S/ .... II tllf - 14*-- t"O tt.::O s G-eca( e-r'#nd/
I I' \
* (*_..
REMARK~ '£'#.~~*"-wd'C. nc--f- o.t/ J;l'-e. f-o S'ou~f (-e ~f/11, i?-e nu*t if (J.)d'- po)C 3 iP7 ~~~-* SPT Ve0'v~v1 ~ 1 I, S~ 1<:> f?-;J7 15:5 Form 4633 REV.2 (11-4-11) I CHECKED BY: DATE: I Clinch River Data Report Ffe¥.1li ~~rw-t~ih~ r Use on Clinch River SMR Project by J. A. Tice, TL RCN: CRP-1215.1 .] Page 8.2-69 ot'168
- Page 66 of 165
*l
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 9-Aug-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (TEST HOLE #5 CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 I) \ 17/ ( 4 (; 8 I B I 0 w N 12 r m b
\\
e 16 20 I I) ( 24 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsion Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy T ransfe r Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 67 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-70 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 20-Nov-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (TEST HOLE #5 CME55 OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 7.00 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 4 0.00 23.0 22.7 11.6 19.1 27 1.82 1.82 0.304 86.9 5 0.00 24.8 23.5 12.0 19.5 28 1.46 1.46 0.302 86.4 6 0.00 24.9 23.7 10.2 19.1 29 1.26 1.27 0.301 86.0 7 0.00 25.7 24.1 10.5 19.1 29 1.11 1.13 0.298 85.1 8 0.00 25.0 23.6 8.8 19.2 29 1.04 1.04 0.298 85.2 9 0.00 25.3 23.8 8.1 19.5 29 0.90 0.93 0.301 85.9 10 0.00 25.4 23.9 7.3 19.4 29 0.78 0.81 0.295 84.2 11 0.00 24.9 23.6 6.6 19.7 29 0.98 0.98 0.310 88.5 12 0.00 24.9 23.6 6.1 19.6 29 0.79 0.79 0.299 85.5 13 0.00 25.3 24.2 7.3 19.6 29 0.76 0.76 0.300 85.8 14 0.00 25.1 23.8 6.0 19.3 29 0.81 0.81 0.301 85.9 15 0.00 24.4 22.9 5.8 19.8 28 0.85 0.85 0.305 87.2 16 0.00 24.6 23.4 5.9 19.9 28 0.80 0.80 0.303 86.5 17 0.00 24.1 22.9 4.9 20.0 28 0.74 0.74 0.304 86.8 18 0.00 24.7 23.4 6.0 20.1 28 0.77 0.78 0.304 86.8 19 0.00 24.5 22.9 5.2 19.9 28 0.88 0.88 0.306 87.3 20 0.00 24.3 23.1 5.0 19.9 28 0.66 0.67 0.303 86.5 Average 24.8 23.5 7.5 19.6 28 0.96 0.97 0.302 86.3 Total number of blows analyzed: 17 Time Summary Drive 1 minute 40 seconds 3:16:44 PM- 3:18:24 PM (6/5/2013) BN 1-22 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-71 of 168 Page 68 of 165
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 20-Nov-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (TEST HOLE #5 5'-6.5' CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 v 5 (( ~ I! I ( 10
~~ I~ ~
B I 0 w N 15
~( 1/ ~
m b e ( \\ ( 20 25 30 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsi on Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy Transfer Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 69 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-72 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 20-Nov-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (TEST HOLE #5 5'-6.5' CME55 OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 8.50ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 6 0.00 26.8 24.6 13.0 20.1 30 1.61 1.61 0.316 90.3 7 0.00 26.2 24.3 13.2 20.4 29 1.59 1.59 0.317 90.7 8 0.00 26.8 24.6 11.4 20.6 30 1.15 1.16 0.315 89.9 9 0.00 26.5 24.4 10.7 20.2 30 0.83 0.89 0.306 87.4 10 0.00 26.1 24.1 8.9 20.2 29 0.88 0.88 0.305 87.1 11 0.00 26.4 24.6 8.1 20.3 30 0.98 0.98 0.311 88.8 12 0.00 26.0 24.0 7.4 20.9 29 0.89 0.90 0.313 89.5 13 0.00 26.6 24.6 7.4 20.7 30 0.94 0.94 0.313 89.4 14 0.00 26.3 24.4 6.7 20.6 30 0.79 0.80 0.305 87.2 15 0.00 26.2 24.3 7.0 20.9 29 1.02 1.02 0.316 90.2 16 0.00 25.8 24.3 6.6 20.7 29 0.98 0.98 0.309 88.3 17 0.00 25.4 23.7 6.3 21.0 29 0.78 0.82 0.306 87.6 18 0.00 25.8 24.1 6.0 20.7 29 0.59 0.68 0.299 85.5 19 0.00 25.8 24.2 6.0 20.7 29 0.74 0.76 0.306 87.5 20 0.00 24.7 23.2 5.6 21.2 28 0.82 0.82 0.309 88.4 21 0.00 25.8 24.0 5.2 20.9 29 0.68 0.68 0.303 86.7 22 0.00 24.0 22.7 5.6 21.0 28 0.79 0.79 0.304 86.8 23 0.00 24.2 22.7 5.5 21.1 27 0.89 0.89 0.311 88.9 Average 25.9 24.1 7.8 20.7 29 0.94 0.95 0.309 88.3 Total number of blows analyzed: 18 Time Summary Drive 34 seconds 3:22:03 PM- 3:22:37 PM (6/5/2013) BN 1 -23 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-73 of 168 Page 70 of 165
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 9-Aug-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (TEST HOLE #5 6.5'-8' CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 4 8 B I 0 w N 12 I II
\
m b e I I II 16 I 20 24 ~ (( 0 10 20 30 40 0 2 3 4 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsion Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy T ransfe r Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 71 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-74 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 20-Nov-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (TEST HOLE #5 6.5'-8' CME55 OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 10.00 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 11 0.00 26.0 24.3 9.1 21.4 29 0.76 0.79 0.306 87.4 12 0.00 25.3 23.6 9.3 21.5 29 0.52 0.64 0.292 83.5 13 0.00 24.8 23.4 10.1 21.7 28 0.69 0.76 0.301 86.0 14 0.00 25.6 23.8 10.0 21.1 29 0.42 0.62 0.287 81.9 15 0.00 25.1 23.5 9.4 21.6 28 0.69 0.74 0.296 84.7 16 0.00 24.7 23.5 9.2 21.6 28 0.95 0.95 0.301 86.1 17 0.00 24.9 23.8 7.8 21.3 29 0.84 0.84 0.300 85.6 18 0.00 24.5 23.5 8.1 21.6 28 0.77 0.77 0.298 85.1 19 0.00 24.8 23.5 7.9 21.4 28 0.74 0.74 0.297 84.9 20 0.00 24.6 23.8 8.0 21.2 29 0.49 0.62 0.284 81.2 21 0.00 24.2 23.4 7.4 21.1 28 0.60 0.64 0.289 82.4 22 0.00 23.4 22.5 7.8 21.6 27 0.92 0.92 0.301 86.1 23 0.00 24.8 23.8 7.2 20.8 29 0.38 0.62 0.283 81.0 24 0.00 24.8 23.8 7.7 21.2 29 0.74 0.76 0.299 85.5 25 0.00 24.0 22.6 7.8 21.3 27 0.93 0.93 0.304 86.8 26 0.00 25.2 24.0 7.5 20.8 29 0.77 0.77 0.296 84.6 27 0.00 23.5 22.7 7.9 21.6 28 0.89 0.89 0.304 86.7 28 0.00 24.8 23.3 7.7 21.4 28 0.91 0.92 0.310 88.7 29 0.00 24.6 23.7 7.5 21.2 29 0.43 0.60 0.293 83.6 30 0.00 23.8 23.0 7.7 21.7 28 0.79 0.79 0.301 86.0 31 0.00 24.4 23.2 7.8 21.5 28 0.75 0.75 0.306 87.4 32 0.00 24.4 23.7 7.6 21.1 29 0.54 0.62 0.299 85.4 Average 24.7 23.5 8.2 21.3 28 0.71 0.76 0.298 85.0 Total number of blows analyzed: 22 Time Summary Drive 45 seconds 3:26:17 PM - 3:27:02 PM (6/5/2013) BN 1 - 33 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-75 of 168 Page 72 of 165
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 20-Nov-2013 Test date: 6-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (TEST HOLE #5 8'-9.5 RE CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 6
\ // /
I \ 12 ( B I \ 0 w I N 18 m b ( e
\
( 24
~ (
1\ 30 36 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsi on Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy Transfer Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 73 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-76 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 20-Nov-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (TEST HOLE #5 8'-9.5 RE CME 55 (11-10) OP: MEH Test date: 6-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 11.50 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 11 0.00 27.7 26.0 11.1 19.8 31 1.40 1.40 0.306 87.3 12 0.00 28.6 26.2 11.8 19.8 32 1.12 1.12 0.288 82.4 13 0.00 28.0 26.0 11.5 19.7 31 0.96 0.96 0.284 81.2 14 0.00 28.2 26.1 10.8 19.9 32 1.08 1.08 0.297 84.9 15 0.00 28.9 26.1 10.3 19.7 32 1.02 1.02 0.291 83.2 16 0.00 28.7 26.2 10.5 19.8 32 1.03 1.03 0.291 83.1 17 0.00 29.0 26.2 9.7 19.7 32 1.01 1.01 0.291 83.0 18 0.00 29.5 26.4 9.1 19.8 32 1.00 1.00 0.295 84.3 19 0.00 29.2 26.2 9.3 19.7 32 0.88 0.88 0.294 84.0 20 0.00 29.2 26.3 8.5 19.8 32 0.78 0.78 0.295 84.2 21 0.00 28.5 26.1 8.3 19.7 32 0.70 0.70 0.294 83.9 22 0.00 28.2 25.9 8.1 19.6 31 0.69 0.69 0.290 83.0 23 0.00 28.2 25.8 7.8 19.6 31 0.62 0.62 0.287 82.1 24 0.00 27.5 25.7 7.3 19.7 31 0.75 0.75 0.300 85.8 25 0.00 28.1 25.9 7.0 19.9 31 0.73 0.73 0.305 87.2 26 0.00 27.6 25.7 7.0 19.4 31 0.33 0.39 0.284 81.1 27 0.00 28.1 25.8 7.3 19.5 31 0.42 0.43 0.286 81.7 28 0.00 28.0 25.9 7.6 19.8 31 0.66 0.66 0.294 84.1 29 0.00 28.0 26.0 7.8 19.7 31 0.66 0.66 0.292 83.3 30 0.00 27.9 26.0 7.8 19.7 31 0.61 0.61 0.290 82.8 31 0.00 28.1 26.0 8.0 19.8 31 0.60 0.61 0.290 82.9 32 0.00 26.1 25.0 7.6 19.8 30 0.68 0.68 0.294 84.0 33 0.00 25.2 24.7 8.2 19.7 30 0.46 0.47 0.284 81.0 34 0.00 25.4 24.7 8.0 19.7 30 0.49 0.50 0.286 81.8 35 0.00 24.8 24.5 7.7 19.6 30 0.31 0.38 0.280 80.1 Average 27.9 25.8 8.7 19.7 31 0.76 0.77 0.292 83.3 Total number of blows analyzed: 25 Time Summary Drive 1 minute 57 seconds 8:00:24 AM - 8:02:21 AM (6/6/2013) BN 1 - 37 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-77 of 168 Page 74 of 165
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 20-Nov-2013 Test date: 6-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (TEST HOLE#5 9.5'-11' CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 7
\\
14 B
~~
I 0 w N 21
~'
m z b e
)v 28 I ~) /
5 \ [\ 35
~
42 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsi on Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy Transfer Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 75 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-78 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 20-Nov-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER TSD (TEST HOLE #5 9.5'-11' CME 55 (11-10) OP: MEH Test date: 6-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 15.00 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 15 0.00 23.0 21.7 7.7 19.2 26 0.60 0.60 0.277 79.2 16 0.00 22.9 21.8 7.3 19.3 26 0.52 0.55 0.283 80.8 17 0.00 23.2 22.0 7.0 19.5 27 0.66 0.66 0.288 82.4 18 0.00 23.0 22.1 7.6 19.5 27 0.64 0.65 0.285 81.6 19 0.00 23.3 22.7 7.4 19.4 27 0.56 0.57 0.282 80.5 20 0.00 23.3 22.7 7.4 19.6 27 0.68 0.69 0.290 82.9 21 0.00 23.0 22.2 7.8 19.5 27 0.72 0.72 0.285 81.3 22 0.00 23.0 22.5 7.4 19.3 27 0.62 0.62 0.283 80.8 23 0.00 23.0 22.4 7.6 19.3 27 0.61 0.61 0.284 81.2 24 0.00 23.1 22.6 8.3 19.4 27 0.56 0.56 0.280 80.1 25 0.00 23.5 22.3 8.1 19.4 27 0.71 0.72 0.284 81.1 26 0.00 23.4 22.9 8.7 19.2 28 0.51 0.53 0.275 78.5 27 0.00 23.8 23.0 8.4 19.4 28 0.74 0.74 0.286 81.8 28 0.00 23.3 22.9 8.7 19.2 28 0.90 0.90 0.290 82.7 29 0.00 23.8 23.1 8.8 19.4 28 0.78 0.78 0.283 80.8 30 0.00 23.9 23.4 8.6 19.4 28 0.70 0.71 0.282 80.7 31 0.00 23.7 23.2 8.1 19.3 28 0.80 0.80 0.288 82.3 32 0.00 24.1 23.7 8.7 19.4 29 0.82 0.83 0.287 82.1 33 0.00 24.1 23.3 8.0 19.6 28 0.88 0.88 0.286 81.7 34 0.00 24.1 23.0 8.2 19.6 28 0.72 0.73 0.277 79.2 35 0.00 23.1 22.6 7.9 19.7 27 0.70 0.70 0.273 78.1 36 0.00 23.8 23.2 8.2 19.8 28 0.80 0.80 0.276 78.8 37 0.00 22.9 21.6 7.9 19.3 26 0.56 0.56 0.260 74.3 38 0.00 23.2 22.4 8.2 19.5 27 0.68 0.69 0.275 78.5 39 0.00 22.5 21.1 8.3 19.5 26 0.95 0.95 0.280 79.9 Average 23.4 22.6 8.0 19.4 27 0.70 0.70 0.282 80.4 Total number of blows analyzed: 25 Time Summary Drive 1 minute 16 seconds 8:09:03 AM - 8:10:19 AM (6/6/2013) BN 1 - 42 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-79 of 168 Page 76 of 165
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, lntPile Driving Analyzer CLINCH RIVER SMR CLINCH RIVER TSD (TEST HOLE #5 A34 F34 TB: 2 1 II wu (44Gl~=====----------------------------------------------, D (3. ~ 4)-- TS: TB: Project Information Quantity Results PROJECT: CLINCH RIVER SMR CSI 24.9 ksi PILE NAME: CLINCH RIVER TSD (TEST HOLE #~CSX 23.7 ksi DESCR: CME 55 TSX 10.2 ksi OPERATOR: MEH VMX 19.2 f/s FILE: CLINCH RIVER TSD (Shannon S.).W01 FMX 29 kips 6/5/2013 3:17:51 PM DFN 1.32 in Blow Number 5/6 DMX 1.33 in EMX 0.3 k-ft Pile Properties ETR 87.0 (%) LE 7.00 ft AR 1.21 in"'2 Sensors EM 30000 ksi F3: [75AW1] 208.84 (1) SP 0.492 k/ft3 F4: [75AW2] 209.17 (1) WS 16807.9 f/s A3: [K3370] 325 mv/5000g's (1) EA/C 2. 2 ksec/ft A4: [K1050] 340 mv/5000g's (1) 2L/C 0.84 ms CLIP: OK JC [] F3/F4: OK 1.11 V3/V4: HIGH 1.28 Version 2011.104 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-80 of 168 Page 77 of 165}}