ML18355A894
| ML18355A894 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 12/18/2018 |
| From: | Operations Branch I |
| To: | |
| References | |
| 000491 | |
| Download: ML18355A894 (6) | |
Text
n
()
I
,J :,
CJ
~
)
0 x:>
~
,J
,J ES-301 Facility:
1 ADMIN Admin JPMs Topic and KIA A (
.,/
A 1..
v' l;) J v"
A<,f i/
t} )
Simulator/In-Plant I Safety Function JPMs and KIA Operating Test Review Worksheet 2
I 3
4 5
Attributes Job Content LOO '
(1-5) I i---~--.~~-,-~~--.--~~-,-~~--,~~-,-~~i---~~-.-~~--t U/E/S 1/C I I Critical I Scope I I Perf.
Cues Overlap Focus Steps (N/B)
Std.
J J
)
1 Key I Minutia Job Link
~
~
-~------
c t-Form ES-301-7 Exam Date:
6 Explanation INC. (L~'-'-[
n'""'r JrcV" 1. 3
/./. ~ "'cc">
.l'f l-).$f{,.,J
m U)
I
(.,.)
0
-u Q) co CD N
c.o 0 -
(.,.)
(.,.)
ES-301 Operating Test Review Worksheet Form ES-301-7 I
I Instructions for Completing This Table:
Check or mark any item(s) requiring a comment and explain the issue in the space provided using the guide below.
- 1.
Check each JPM for appropriate administrative topic requirements (COO, EC, Rad, and EP) or safety function requirements and corresponding KIA.
Mark in column 1.
(ES-301, D.3 and D.4)
- 2.
Determine the level of difficulty (LOD) using an established 1-5 rating scale. Levels 1 and 5 represent an inappropriate (low or high) discriminatory level for the license that is being tested. Mark in column 2 (Appendix D, C.1.f)
- 3.
- 4.
In column 3, "Attributes," check the appropriate box when an attribute is not met:
The initial conditions and/or initiating cue is clear to ensure the operator understands the task and how to begin. (Appendix C, B.4)
The JPM contains appropriate cues that clearly indicate when they should be provided to the examinee. Cues are objective and not leading. (Appendix C, D.1)
All critical steps (elements) are properly identified.
The scope of the task is not too narrow (N) or too broad (B).
Excessive overlap does not occur with other parts of the operating test or written examination. (ES-301, D.1.a, and ES-301, D.2.a)
The task performance standard clearly describes the expected outcome (i.e., end state). Each performance step identifies a standard for successful completion of the step.
A valid marked up key was provided (e.g., graph interpretation, initialed steps for handouts).
For column 4, "Job Content," check the appropriate box if the job content flaw does not meet the following elements:
Topics are linked to the job content (e.g., not a disguised task, task required in real job).
The JPM has meaningful performance requirements that will provide a legitimate basis for evaluating the applicant's understanding and ability to safely operate the plant. (ES-301, D.2.c)
- 5.
Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the JPM as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)nhancement, or (S)atisfactory? Mark the answer in column 5.
- 6.
In column 6, provide a brief description of any (U)nacceptable or (E)nhancement rating from column 5.
Save initial review comments and detail subsequent comment resolution so that each exam-bound JPM is marked by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form.
n
/)
I
,J 0
I)
)
D
,J
~
,J
,J ES-301 Facility:
1 Event 2
3 Realism/Cred.
Required Actions
/
,,,,/,..,.
/
4 5
6 Verifiable LOD TS actions
/
/
/
/
/
/
Operating Test Review Worksheet Form ES-301-7 Scenario:
Exam Date:
7 8
9 10 CTs Seen.
U/E/S Explanation Overlap
/
/
/
/
/
/
/'/
I II V
/
.J I I I
/
/
I
,,,,/
/
/
n n I
,J u
I)
- i D
,J v
- a,
,J
,J ES-301 Operating Test Review Worksheet Form ES-301-7 Facility:
Exam Date:
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
11 Scenario Event Events TS TS CT CT
% Unsat.
Explanation Totals Unsat.
Total Unsat.
Total Unsat.
Scenario U/E/S Elements
~~
~
~
) /A ~
~
,/ ~
./
v-Instructions for Completing This T Check or mark any item(s) re
- mg comment and explain the issue in the space provided.
1, 3, 5 For each simulator scenario, enter the total number of events (column 1 ), TS entries/actions (column 3), and CTs (column 5).
This number should match the respective scenario from the event-based scenario tables (the sum from columns 1, 6, and 7, respectively).
2,4,6 For each simulator scenario, evaluate each event, TS, and CT as (S)atisfactory, (E)nhance, or (U)nsatisfactory based on the following criteria:
- a.
Events. Each event is described on a Form ES-D-2, including all switch manipulations, pertinent alarms, and verifiable actions. Event actions are balanced between at-the-controls and balance-of-plant applicants during the scenario. All event-related attributes on Form ES-301-4 are met. Enter the total number of unsatisfactory events in column 2.
- b.
TS. A scenario includes at least two TS entries/actions across at least two different events. TS entries and actions are detailed on Form ES-D-2. Enter the total number of unsatisfactory TS entries/actions in column 4. (ES-301, D.5d)
C.
CT. Check that a scenario includes at least two preidentified CTs. This criterion is a target quantitative attribute, not an absolute minimum requirement.
Check that each CT is explicitly bounded on Form ES-D-2 with measurable performance standards (see Appendix D).
Enter the total number of unsatisfactory CTs in column 6.
7 In column 7, calculate the percentage of unsatisfactory scenario elements: (2 + 4 + 6) 1 + 3 + 5 100%
8 If the value in column 7 is > 20%, mark the scenario as (U)nsatisfactory in column 8.
If column 7 is s; 20%, annotate with (E)nhancement or (S)atisfactory.
9 In column 9, explain each unsatisfactory event, TS, and CT. Editorial comments can also be added here.
Save initial review comments and detail subsequent comment resolution so that each exam-bound scenario is marked by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form.
ES-301 ite name:
Admin.
JPMs Sim.Jin-Plant JPMs Scenarios Op. Test Totals:
Total Total Unsat.
s D
rJ/-1 Operating Test Review Worksheet Form ES-301-7 Exam Date:
OPERATING TEST TOTALS Total Total Explanation Edits Sat.
- 2.
j
,J IA
- 1.
Instructions for Completing This Table:
Update data for this table from quality reviews and totals in the previous tables and then calculate the percentage of total items that are unsatisfactory and give an explanation in the space provided.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
Enter the total number of items submitted for the operating test in the "Total" column. For example, if nine administrative JPMs were submitted, enter "9" in the "Total" items column for administrative JPMs.
For scenarios, enter the total number of simulator scenarios.
Enter the total number of (U)nsatisfactory JPMs and scenarios from the two JPMs column 5 and simulator scenarios column 8 in the previous tables. Provide an explanation in the space provided.
Enter totals for (E)nhancements needed and (S)atisfactory JPMs and scenarios from the previous tables. This task is for tracking only.
Total each column and enter the amounts in the "Op. Test Totals" row.
Calculate the percentage of the operating test that is (U)nsatisfactory (Op. Test Total Unsat.)/(Op. Test Total) and place this value in the balded"% Unsat." cell.
Refer to ES-501, E.3.a, to rate the overall operating test as follows:
satisfactory, if the "Op. Test Total""% Unsat." is s 20%
unsatisfactory, if "Op. Test Total""% Unsat." is> 20%
Update this table and the tables above with post-exam changes if the "as-administered" operating test required content changes, including the following:
The JPM performance standards were incorrect.
The administrative JPM tasks/keys were incorrect.
CTs were incorrect in the scenarios (not including postscenario critical tasks defined in Appendix D).
The EOP strategy was incorrect in a scenario(s).
TS entries/actions were determined to be incorrect in a scenario(s).
ES-301, Page 33 of 33