ML18338A208
| ML18338A208 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07003103 |
| Issue date: | 11/28/2018 |
| From: | Cowne S Louisiana Energy Services, URENCO USA |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards |
| References | |
| LES-18-159-NRC | |
| Download: ML18338A208 (16) | |
Text
LES-18-159-NRC NOV 2 8 2018 Attn: Document Control Desk Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Louisiana Energy Services, LLC NRC Docket No. 70-3103
Subject:
Semi-Annual Safety Analysis Report (SAR) Update In accordance with Materials License SNM-2010, Condition 30, Louisiana Energy Services (LES), dba URENCO USA (UUSA) herewith submits the Safety Analysis Report (SAR) for the semi-annual period May 30, 2018 through November 30, 2018, changes made under UUSA's authority. contains the marked up pages to the Safety Analysis Report for revision 44.
A description of each change is provided in the revision history. Revision bars, strikethroughs and underlines were utilized.
Should there be any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Wyatt Padgett, UUSA Licensing and Performance Assessment Manager, at 575-394-5257.
Respectfu I ly, Ste en Cowne Chi f Nuclear Officer and Compliance Manager
Enclosure:
- 1)
Marked up pages of the Safety Analysis Report.
LES,PO Box 1789, Eunice, New Mexico 88231,USA T: +1575394 4646 F: +1 575 394 4545 W: www.urenco.com/LES
LES-18-159-NRC CC: via email (without attachments)
Karl Sturzebecher, Project Manager - UUSA U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Karl.Sturzebecher@NRC.gov Omar Lopez-Santiago, Chief - Region II Projects Branch I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Omar.Lopez-Santiago@NRC.gov Jacob Zimmerman, Branch Chief - Enrichment and Conversion Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Jacob.Zimmerman@nrc.gov Marked up pages of the Safety Analysis Report (revision bars, strikethroughs and underlines utilized)
\\
Table of Contents Rev44 11/26/2018 Summary of Changes Rev 44 Removal of spare fire hose boxes from UUSA site LBDCR-18-004 CC-FP-2017-0001 70.72 - 2018-0021 LBDCR-18-013 Add Materials License commitments from 16d to Section 10 Changes to chapters 6 and 7 to incorporate incipient fire LBDCR-18-014 brigade scope.
CC-OP-2017-0007 70.72 - 2018-0088 LBDCR-18-016 Changes to Section 1.2.1.2, Organization and Management LBDCR-18-022 Figure 1.1-3 & 1.1-4, changed building designations.
LBDCR-18-023 Remove chemical and industrial continued training requirements for radiation protection, Section 4.5.
Replace review and update of radiation protection program two year reguirement in section 4.5.1 with annual.
Changing a statement in the SAR to more accurately describe the requirements in which penetration openings are designed.
LBDCR-18-015 Clarify applicability of code requirements that apply to UUSA Chapter 11.
CC-EG-2018-0002; 70.72-2018-0121 Change SAR Section 7.3.5 to Clarify the phrase "non-radioactive areas". The change revises the last sentence to LBDCR-18-020 clarify non-radioactive areas are areas not posted Radioactive Material(s), as defined in 10 CFR 20.1902.
MOD-18-0078;
- 70. 72 - 2018-0156 Safety Analysis Report Revision 44
1.2 Institutional Information g
0 Mr. Sexton is a citizen of the United States of America Dr. Thomas Haeberle Chief Executive Officer URENCO Court Stoke Pages, United Kingdom Dr. Haeberle is a citizen of Germany Ms. Melissa Mann Executive Director. Strategy and Government Affairs URENCO Court Stoke Pages, United Kingdom Ms. Mann is a citizen of the United States of America Dr. Helmut Engelbrecht Chief Executive Officer URENCO Limited 18 Oxf.ord Road Marlow Bucks SL? 2NL, United Kingdom Dr. Engelbrecht is a citizen of the Federal Republic of Germany Mr. Marcel Niggebrugge Chief Financial Officer URENCO Limited 18 Oxf.ord Road Marlov, Bucks SL? 2NL, United Kingdom Mr. Niggebrugge is a citizen of the Netherlands Dr. Charles W. Pryor, Jr.
Chairman of the Board URENCO USA, Ina.
1164 Pryor Ridge Trail Lynchburg, VA24503 Dr. Pryor is a citizen of the United States of America Mr. Christopher Chater Board of Managers Member Bahnhofstrasse 8 48455 Bad Bentheim Germany Mr. Chater is a citizen of the United Kingdom Safety Analysis Report Page-1.2-13 LBDCR-18-016 Rev44
6.3 Chemical Hazards Analysis protective action to escape a release area upon detecting any significant HF odor. (See and flee)
Other facilities have successfully assumed that the gas hemisphere radius expands at a rate of 1 mis and the receptor (facility worker) walks away from the release point at*1 mis within the cloud. This assumption is supported by the Society of Fire Protection Engineers which reference:
o 1.27 mis (250 ft/min) for minimum crowd conditions, and o
1.02 mis (200 ft/min) for moderate crowd conditions for fire evacuation.
Workers in restricted areas could evacuate at a faster rate, putting themselves ahead of the leading edge of the expanding cloud or minimizing exposure during evacuation even if they evacuate in the direction of the plume. At a speed of 1 mis, facility workers originally at the release point are outside the immediate area of the release (i.e., 1.5 m radius) in less than 2 seconds, and are accurately classified as facility workers for consequence assessments. (Worker evacuation speed)
Consistent with the Safety Evaluation Report for the NEF, Appendix A (Reference 9), a time weighted average (TWA) of dose or exposure is acceptable to calculate consequences to the workers in the room. The use of the TWA concept combined with the other concepts discussed here demonstrated that the risk of exposure is minimal to the facility worker that causes the release. For example, at the intermediate consequence threshold of 78 mglm3 HF, the TWA contribution of the former "local worker" 10-second exposure over 2.5 minutes is merely 5.2 mg/m3 HF (78 mglm3 HF x 10 secl150 sec).
(Time weighted average)
Consequence methodology applies the 10-minute AEGL limits for the facility worker.
These limits are 10-minute exposures that are applied to the 2.5-minute exposure; therefore, there is a built-in conservatism that applies to all consequence analysis. The conservatism is due to the more stringent AEGL values for 10-minute exposure being applied to the shorter 2.5-minute facility worker exposure. (AEGL 10-min limit)
Another assumption made in conducting consequence severity analysis is that for releases precipitated by a fire event, only public exposure was considered in determining consequence severity; worker exposures were not considered. The worker is assumed to evacuate the area of concern once the fire is detected by the worker. Fires of sufficient magnitude to generate chemical/radiological release must either have caused failure of a mechanical system/component or involve substantive combustibles containing uranic content. In either case, the space would be untenable for unprotected workers. Sufficient time is available for the worker to reliably detect and evacuate the area of concern prior to any release. Fife brigade/fEire department members responding to emergencies are required by emergency response procedure (and regulation)OSHA and other applicable regulations to have suitable respiratory and personal protective equipment.
It is recognized that there are still locations within the ISA where the "local worker receptor is still referenced in HAZOP and Risk Assessments. This is acceptable because in all cases the local worker maintains at least the same level of conservative assumptions as the facility worker; therefore, in all cases the local worker is bounded within the safety basis. The "consequences to the worker elsewhere in the room" (Area Worker) is identical to the facility worker described above; therefore, in all cases the area worker is bounded within the safety basis. The local and area worker receptors will be revised to facility worker throughout the entire ISA as part of the ISA update process.
Safety Analysis Report Page-6.3-3 Rev 44 LBDCR-18-014
7.3 Facility Design The Site Security Buildings are steel frame buildings with insulated metal panel exterior walls and with built-up roofing on metal deck roof. This is classified as Type 11-B Construction by the NMCBC and Type II (000) Construction by NFPA 220.
The UBC Storage Pad is an open lay-down area and consists of a concrete pad with a dedicated collection and drainage system. Cradles are used for storage of cylinders. There is no building for the UBC Storage Pad.
7.3.2 Fire Area Determination and Fire Barriers The facility is subdivided into fire areas by barriers with fire resistance commensurate with the potential fire severity, in accordance with International Fire Code and the NMCBC. The design and construction of fire barrier walls is in accordance with NFPA 221. These fire areas are provided to limit the spread of fire, protect personnel and limit the consequential damage to the facility. The fire resistance rating of fire barrier assemblies is determined through testing in accordance with NFPA 251. Openings in fire barriers are protected consistent with the designated fire resistance rating of the barrier. Penetration seals provided for electrical and mechanical openings are listed to meet the guidance of ASTM E-814 or UL 1479. Penetration openings for ventilation systems are protected by fire dampers having a rating equivalent to that of the barrier.Penetration openings for ventilation systems are protected by fire dampers in accordance with the requirements of the International Fire Code, the International Building Code, and NFPA 90A (2002). Door openings in fire rated barriers are protected with fire rated doors, frames and hardware in accordance with NFPA 80.
7.3.3 Electrical Installation All electrical systems at the facility are installed in accordance with the New Mexico Electric Code (based on the National Electric Code, NFPA 70). Switchgear, motor control centers, panel boards, variable frequency drives, uninterruptible power supply systems and control panels are mounted in metallic enclosures and contain only small amounts of combustible material. Cable.used in this equipment is flame retardant and tested (FT1 or VW-1 type test) in accordance with the guidance of UL 1581, UL 508A, UL 1063, or UL 83. Cable trays and conduits are metallic and the cables in the cable trays are flame retardant and tested (FT 4 or IEEE 1202 type test) in accordance with the guidance provided in ANSI/IEEE 383, IEEE 1202, UL 1277, UL 1685, UK 83 (FT4), UL 1581 (FT4), CSA C22.2 (FT4), or ICEA T-30-520.
Lighting fixtures are constructed of non-combustible materials and their ballasts are electronic and contain only an insignificant amount of combustible material.
All indoor transformers are dry type. Outdoor oil filled transformers are located in the local utilities substation yard which is located at the south end of the NEF property between the CM fence and the property line of the facility.
An auxiliary power system is provided to supply power for temporary lighting, ventilation and radiation-monitoring equipment where potential radiation hazard exists.
Electrical conduits leading to or from areas with uranic material are sealed internally to prevent the spread of radioactive materials. Only utilities required for operation within areas having uranic material enter into these areas.
Safety Analysis Report Page-7.3-2 Rev44 LBDCR-018-015
7.3 Facility Design 7.3.4 Life Safety The buildings are provided with means of egress, illumination, and protection in accordance with International Fire Code. Barriers with fire resistance ratings consistent with International Fire Code and the FHA are provided to prevent unacceptable fire propagation.
All buildings are provided with emergency lighting for the illumination of the primary exit paths and in critical operations areas where personnel are required to operate valves, dampers and other controls in an emergency. Emergency lighting is considered as a critical load. All critical loads are fed from the uninterruptible power supplies (UPS) in areas where the normal lighting power source is not diesel backed adequate emergency lighting will be provided for egress in accordance with requirements for life safety. Subsequent entries into these area made by personnel may require portable lighting. In critical operation areas the UPS are connected to power sources which can be fed from diesel powered electric generators.
Marking of means of egress, including illuminated exit signs, are provided in accordance with the International Fire Code and the NMCBC.
7.3.5 Ventilation The building heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) system provides the primary form of ventilation employed at the facility. The HVAC system is designed to maintain room temperature and the specific environmental conditions associated with processes undertaken within a particular area.
The ventilation system is not engineered for smoke control. It is designed to shutdown in the event of a fire except for the centrifuge test and post mortem facilities exhaust filtration system.
Ductwork, accessories and support systems are designed and tested in accordance with NFPA 801, NFPA 90A, NFPA 908, and NFPA 91. Flexible air duct couplings in ventilation and filter systems are noncombustible. Air entry filters are UL Class I.
The power supply and controls for mechanical ventilation systems are located outside the fire area served, with the exception of the HVAC units serving the CAB electrical rooms. The ventilation system is designed such that the areas containing dispersible radioactive materials remain at a lower pressure than that of adjoining areas of the facility. These areas include the Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, the Chemical Laboratory, the Ventilated Room, and the Decontamination Workshop. Ductwork from areas containing dispersible radioactive materials that pass through non radioaative areas not posted Radioactive Material(s), as defined in 10 CFR 20.1920(e). are constructed of non-combustible material and are protected from possible exposure to fire by materials having an appropriate fire resistance rating.
HEPA filtration systems are utilized in various areas in the plant HVAC Systems, GEVS, and in the Centrifuge Test and Post Mortem Facilities Exhaust Filtration System. HEPA filters are UL 586 and UL 900 Class I, which are non-combustible. In the GEVS and Centrifuge Test and Post Mortem Exhaust Filtration System the HEPA filters are enclosed in ductwork. The HEPA filtration systems are analyzed in the FHA. They are designed to shutdown in the event of a fire.
Safety Analysis Report Page-7.3-3 Rev44 LBDCR-018-020
7.5 Fire Protection and Emergency Response 7.5 Fire Protection and Emergency Response This section documents the fire protection systems and fire emergency response organizations provided for the facility.
7.5.1 Fire Protection System The facility fire protection systems consist of a dedicated fire water supply and distribution system, automatic suppression systems, standpipe and hose systems, portable fire extinguishers, fire detection and alarm systems, fire pump control systems, valve position supervision, system maintenance and testing, fire prevention program, fire department#ife brigade response response and pre-fire plans.
LBDCR 014 In the SBM cascade halls, the CAAS is utilized for both criticality and fire/general emergency condition evacuation notification. In the unlikely event of a criticality accident, the CAAS uses a criticality tone in the SBM cascade halls and other process areas in initiate area evacuation.
For fire/emergency conditions notification, the CAAS utilizes a tone readily discernable from the criticality tone. Due to the high ambient noise level in the SBM cascade halls a PA system is not utilized.
7.5.1.1 Fire Water Supply and Distribution System A single Fire Protection Water Supply System provides storage and distribution of water to the Fire Protection System that protects the entire facility as shown in Figure 7.5-1, Exterior Fire Protection System Overall Site Plan.
7.5.1.1.1 System Description A reliable fire protection water supply and distribution system of adequate flow, pressure, and duration is provided based on the characteristics of the site and the FHA. The fire protection water supply and distribution system is based on the largest fixed fire suppression system demand, including a hose stream allowance, in accordance with NFPA 13. The fire protection water supply consists of two 946,074 L (250,000-gal) (minimum) water storage tanks designed and constructed in accordance with NFPA 22. The tanks are used for both fire protection water supply and process water supply. A reserve quantity of 681,173 L (180,000 gal) is maintained in the bottom of each tank for fire protection purposes. The elevation of the suction line for the process water pump is above the level of the required fire protection water supply in each tank.
Thus the process water pump cannot pump water required for fire protection purposes. The fire protection water supply in each tank is sized for the maximum anticipated water supply needed to control and extinguish the design basis fire at the facility. Two horizontal, centrifugal, fire pumps designed and installed in accordance with NFPA 20 are provided. For redundancy the capacity of the fire protection water supply is designed to ensure that 100% of the required flow rate and pressure are available in the event of failure of one of the water storage tanks or fire pumps. The maximum demand anticipated is based on the maximum combined sprinkler and hose stream demand and duration determined in accordance with NFPA 13.The tanks are arranged so that one will be available for suction at all times.
Fill and make up water for the storage tanks is from the city water supply and/or the Process Water system. Each tank can be filled:
Safety Analysis Report Page-7.5-1 Rev44
7.5 Fire Protection and Emergency Response 7.5.1.2 Standpipe and Hose Systems As required by the FHA, standpipe systems and interior fire hose stations are provided and installed in accordance with NFPA 14 in the following locations:
Class I or Class Ill standpipe systems for are provided in the CUB, CAB, CRDB, TSB, USM, and the SBMs.
The systems are designed in accordance with NFPA 14. The systems are separated from the building sprinkler system either by check valve or separate piping. Where the standpipe and sprinkler systems are fed from a common lead in to the building, connections are provided to allow pressurizing the standpipe or sprinkler system or both, from a nearby fire hydrant separated from the lead in supply line. The separation ensures that a single impairment will not disable both the sprinklers and the hose systems.
In addition to fixed standpipes and fire hose stations, the NEF will be provided with fire hose on mobile apparatus and/or at strategic locations throughout the facility. The amount of hose provided will be sufficient to ensure that all points within the facility will be consistent with NFPA 1410. These lines are intended for use by the fire brigade/offsite responders in the event of a structural fire. Hydraulic margin for these hose lines will be sufficient to ensure minimum nozzle pressures for attack hose line(s) and for the backup hose line.
7.5.1.3 Portable Extinguishers Portable fire extinguishers are installed throughout all buildings in accordance with NFPA 10.
Multi-purpose extinguishers are provided generally for Class A, B, or C fires.
The portable fire extinguishers are spaced within the travel distance limitation and provide the area coverage specified in NFPA 10. Specialized extinguishers are located in areas requiring protection of particular hazards.
In areas with moderator control issues, the fill for the extinguishers has been selected so as not to create an uncontrolled moderator source.
7.5.1.4 Automatic Suppression Systems Wet pipe sprinkler systems are engineered to protect specific hazards in accordance with parameters established by the FHA. Water flow detectors are provided to alarm and annunciate sprinkler system actuation. Sprinkler system control valves are monitored under a periodic inspection program and their proper positioning is supervised in accordance with NFPA 801 to ensure the systems remain operable.
Automatic wet pipe sprinkler systems, designed and tested in accordance with NFPA 13, are provided in the following buildings:
Administration Building Technical Services Building (TSB)
Centrifuge Assembly Building (CAB)
Fire Pump House Safety Analysis Report Page-7.5-3 Rev44 LBDCR 014 LBDCR 004
7.5 Fire Protection and Emergency Response Both pumps are maintained in the automatic start condition at all times, except during periods of maintenance and testing. Pumps are arranged for manual shut-off at the controllers only.
All fire protection water system control valves are monitored under a periodic inspection program and their proper positioning is supervised in accordance with NFPA 801.
7.5.2 Fire Emergency Response 7.5.2.1 Fire Brigade The facility maintains an incipient fire brigade made up of employees trained in fire prevention, fire fighting techniques, first aid procedures, emergency response, and criticality safety. The criticality safety training addresses water moderation, water reflection, product cylinder safety by moderation control, and water flooding. The fire brigade is organized, operated, trained and equipped in accordance with NFPA 600. The fire brigade is considered an incipient fire brigade as classified under NFPA 600, e.g., not required to wear thermal protective clothing nor self-contained breathing apparatus during firefighting. The intent of the facility fire brigade is to be able to handle allextinguish all minor firesand to be a first response. Effort designed to supplement the looal fire department for major fires at the plant The fire brigade members are trained and equipped to provide initial responserespond to fire emergencies and oontain fire damage until offsite help from a neighboring fire department arrives. This will include the use of hand portable and wheeled fire extinguishers. As 1.vell as hoselines to fight interior/exterior inoipient fires and to fight larger exterior fires in a defensive mode (e.g., vehiole fires). When the local fire department arrives onsite, the local fire department works under a unified command structure assumes oontrol and is responsible for all fire fighting activities. The plant fire LBDCR-brigade, working with the plant's Emergency Operations Center, will coordinate offsite fire 1a-014 department activities to ensure moderator control and criticality safety.
The fire brigade is staffed so that there are a minimum of four (4) individuals, a Fire Brigade leader who acts as the team's Incident Commander, and three (3) incipient firefighters. The Fire Brigade consists of any qualified plant personnel. Building Operators that make up the minimum shift crew composition can also be assigned to the fire brigade. One qualified member of the Fire Brigade Emergency Response Organization/Fire Brigade will be assigned the function of Fire Brigade Safety Officer. The Fire Brigade Safety Officer is responsible to ensure that moderator concerns are considered for criticality safety during firefighting aotivities.
Periodic training is provided to offsite assistance organization personnel in the facility emergency planning procedures. Facility emergency response personnel meet at least annually with each offsite assistance group to accomplish training and review items of mutual interest including relevant changes to the program. This training includes facility tours, information concerning facility access control (normal and emergency), potential accident scenarios, emergency action levels, notification procedures, exposure guidelines, personnel monitoring devices, communications, contamination control, moderator control issues, and the offsite assistance organization role in responding to an emergency at the facility, as appropriate.
7.5.2.2 Off-Site Organizations LES will use the services of local, offsite fire departments to supplement the capability of the facility Fire Brigade. The two primary agencies that will be available for this response are the Safety Analysis Report Page-7.5-5 Rev44
7.5 Fire Protection and Emergency Response City of Eunice, New Mexico Fire and Rescue Agency and the City of Hobbs, New Mexico Fire Department. Both agencies are signatories to the Lea County, New Mexico Mutual Aid agreement and can request additional mutual aid from any of several county fire departments/fire districts.
A Memorandum of Understanding is in place between LES and these two local fire departments. The Memorandum of Understanding defines the fire protection and emergency response commitments between the organizations. The training and conduct of emergency drills and the Memoranda of Understanding are discussed in the NEF Emergency Plan.
LES has performed a baseline needs assessment evaluating the response to fires and related emergencies to confirm adequacy of the response considering both facility resources and response of the two primary response agencies. This assessment identified that with some supplemental resource and training development, adequate response is assured.
Eunice Fire and Rescue is the initial response agency and is comprised of volunteers.
Firefighters are trained to a minimum Firefighter Level I and ambulance personnel to a minimum of Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) - Basic per New Mexico standards.
The Hobbs Fire Department is the secondary response agency and is comprised of paid personnel. Firefighters are required to be a minimum Firefighter Level I and EMT - Basic per New Mexico standards. Shift assigned ambulance personnel are EMT - Paramedics per New Mexico standards.
The estimated response time to NEF for a basic life support ambulance is 11 minutes with a second ambulance available within an additional seven minutes. NEF personnel will be trained and equipped to provide first aid and circulatory/respiratory support in the interim (e.g., provide CPR,~ apply automatic external defibrillation, and administer oxygen).
The estimated response time to NEF for a structural fire engine and full structural crew from Eunice Fire and Rescue is between 11 and 15 minutes. In the event of a fire, the NEF fire brigade will respond and Eunice Fire and Rescue will be notified to respond. If the fire is incipient, the NEF fire brigade will fight the fire utilizing hand portable/wheeled fire extinguishers.
And/or 38mm (1 4h. in) hose lines. In the event that structural fire response is needed, the Hobbs Fire Department 1,.vill also be notified to respond and the 38 mm (1 % in) and/or 64 mm (2
% in) hose lines from NEF fire water supply system to the nearest points to the fire will be extended by the NEF fire brigade, where it can be done safely. The latter activity will minimize deployment time for the offsite responders upon their arrival. To ensure that application of water or other firefighting activities are consistent with moderator concerns for criticality safety, the NEF fEire e§_rigade s§.afety eOfficer is trained to provide direction to the and equipped to don structural firefighting gear and will accompany offsite responders to the firefighting location. In the event that offsite responders are needed in more than one facility location, the criticality safety role of the NEF fEire e§_rigade s.§afety eOfficer is fulfilled by appropriately trained NEF personnel (typically fire brigade members). NEF training personnel will provide training to offsite responders to ensure that firefighting efforts are consistent with moderator concerns for criticality safety. Offsite responders will be trained to ensure that sufficient precautions are taken when fighting fires in the following areas: UF6 Handling Areas, CRDB Cylinder Storage Areas, and UBC Pad. Furthermore, offsite responders will be trained to avoid the application of water for firefighting in the Ventilation Room, Decontamination Workshop, LECTS Room, Solid Waste Safety Analysis Report Page-7.5-6 Rev44 LBDCR-18-004 LBDCR-18-014
7.5 Fire Protection and Emergency Response Collection Room and the 2nd floor of the CRDB (no Provisions exist for keeping firefighting water on the 2nd floor). These NEF personnel are trained in oritioality safety and trained and equipped trained and equipped to don struotural firefighting gear to aooompany the offsite responders to required faoility looations.
Offsite response agencies will be the emergency response to uncontrolled hazardous substance releases. The emergenoy response to a hazardous release that results, or is like SAR Section 6.4.8, Emergency Planning describes hazardous release responses.
LES will ensure that the capability to respond to events such as confined space rescue, LBDCR-18-014 trench rescue. high angle rescue, and other technical emergencies is available as required. This may be provided through Through a combination of onsite capability, offsite responders, or through contract arrangements., LES \\Viii ensure that oapabilities are in plaoe to respond to other events suoh as oonfined spaoe resoue, trenoh resoue, high angle resoue, and other teohnioal emergenoies as required. The NEF fire brigade/emergency response team equipment will alse--be inventoried, inspected and tested in accordance with recognized standards. ~
needs for these response areas and response equipment will be reassessed after detailed faoility design to ensure adequate response oapabilities are in plaoe and training oompleted prior to any oonstruotion aotivities.
Safety Analysis Report Page-7.5-7 Rev44
10.0 Decommissioning 10.0 Decommissioning This chapter presents the National Enrichment Facility (NEF) Decommissioning Funding Plan.
The Decommissioning Funding Plan has been developed following the guidance provided in NUREG-1757. Louisiana Energy Services (LES) commits to decontaminate and decommission the enrichment facility and the site at the end of its operation so that the facility and grounds can be released for unrestricted use. After the first three years of initial plant production, the Decommissioning Funding Plan will be reviewed and updated annually on a forward-looking basis to reflect projections of depleted uranium byproduct generation. +Re Deoommissioning Funding Plan will be reviewed and updated as neoessary at least onoe every three years starting from the time of issuanoe of the lioense. Prior to facility decommissioning, a Decommissioning Plan will be prepared in accordance with 10 CFR 70.38 (CFR, 2003a) and submitted to the NRC for approval.
This chapter fulfills the applicable provisions of NUREG-1757 through submittal of information in tabular form as suggested by the NU REG. Therefore a matrix showing compliance requirements and commitments is not provided herein.
Safety Analysis Report Page-10.0-1 Rev44 LBDCR 013
I
- I :
1.6 Chapter 1 Figures CO, GASltNE 1 1 16 S
2 sf 11 E_ri 3,"
i --<9 C "'18 151 4
12 L.
7, 10
=-
I :
- EUNICE M
SIT STORM WATER DETENTION BASIN I :
I :
CO,ClAS LINE Safety Analysis Report I
GATE SITE BOUNDARY FENC NATURAL GAS LI ES
- : : : : : : :,: : : : : : : : : : : I : : :
ANDREWS TX BOUNDARY LEGEND
- 1)
UBC STORAGE PAD SITE 8-0 UNOARY CONTROLLED AREA
- 2)
CENTRIFUGE ASSEMBLY BLD
- 3)
- 4)
CENTRAL UTILITIES BUILDING
- 5)
CENTRIFUGE RECEIPT AND DISPATCH BLD
- 6)
SEPARATIONS BUILDING MODULE 1001
- 7)
SECURITY BLD
- 8)
EMPLOYEE PARKING
- 9)
TECHNICAL SERVICES BUILDING
- 10) TRANSFORMER AREA
- 11) METEOROLOGICAL TOWER
- 12) TREATED EFFLUENT EVAPORATIVE BASIN
- 14) SEPARATIONS BUILDING MODULE 1003
- 15) 4 8K WAREHOUSE
- 16) 30K 1/1/AREHOUSE
- 17) SEPARATIONS BUILDING MODULE 1005
- 18) UTILITY SERVICE MODULE Figure 1.1-3Plot Plan (1 Mile Radius)
Page-1.6-4 Rev44 LBDCR-18-022
I\\
I : Ii I :
I :
I :
I ~
1.6 Chapter 1 Figures
~
6019 52" CO,GAS LINE 1 1 1--------:---,.
I 1
I I
I s
2 I
---M*
I 3 i.i I
- 16 14 11 I
I I
7 J
t91 18'*.,;- -
/
IS 13 12 4
10 CO, GASLI E SITE BOUNDARY FENCE
('n'P)
NATURAL GAS LlhES BOUNDARY LEGEND SITE BOUNDARY CONTROLLED AAEA CONTROLLED ACCESS AREA BOUNDARY INTERIM CONTROLLED ACCESS AREA BOUNDARY
- 1)
- 2)
CENTRIFUGE ASSEMBLY BLD
- 3)
- 4)
CENTRAL UTILITIES BUILDING
- 5)
CENTRIFUGE RECEIPT AND DISPATCH BLD
- 6)
SEPARATIONS BUILDING MODULE 1001
- 7)
SECURITY BLD
- 8)
EMPLOYEE PARKING I
- 9)
TECHNICAL SERVICES BUILDING 1
- 10) TRANSFORMER AREA
- 11) METEOROLOGICAL TOWER
- 12) TREATED EFFLUENT EVAPORATIVE BASIN 1
- 14) SEPARATIONS BUILDING MODULE 1003 I
- 15) 4 SK WAREHOUSE
- 16) 30K WAREHOUSE
- 17) SEPARATIONS BUILDING MODULE 1005 1
- 18) UTILITY SERVICE MODULE le'
~ I SCALE IS APPROXIMATE
. : ; ; : ; : : : : :*:.: : ; : ~/fAa,; : : : : : : ;I ; : ; ;
ANDREWS TX LBDCR-18-022 Figure 1.1-4 Facility Layout (Site Plan) with Site Boundary and Controlled Access Area Boundary Safety Analysis Report Page-1.6-5 Rev44