|
|---|
Category:Letter
MONTHYEARML24023A0392024-01-22022 January 2024
NEI Comments on the Information Collection Renewal for Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material, Docket Id NRC-2023-0118
ML23355A1972023-12-14014 December 2023
NEI, Comments on NRC Draft Resolution of SFAQ 2022-02, SAE Program Requirements
ML23219A1672023-10-25025 October 2023
Response Letter to Fee Exemption Request for Pre-Submittal Activities, Review, and Endorsement of NEI 20-07
ML23270B9002023-09-27027 September 2023
NEI Letter Request for an Extension of Comment Period on Proposed Revision to Standard Review Plan Section 15.0, Introduction - Transient and Accident Analyses, Docket Id NRC 2023 0079
ML23268A0102023-09-22022 September 2023
NEI, Fee Exemption Request for Endorsement, Review and Meeting to Discuss Draft Nuclear Energy Institute Technical Report NEI 23-01, Operator Cold License Training Plan for Advanced Nuclear Reactors
ML23241A8612023-08-25025 August 2023
Consolidated Industry Comments to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-02, Scheduling Information for the Licensing of Accident Tolerant, Increased Enrichment, and Higher Burnup Fuels
ML23236A4992023-08-24024 August 2023
Industry Feedback on Region II Fuel Cycle Facility Construction Oversight Workshop Held August 15, 2023, and Suggested Topics for Additional Public Meetings in Fall 2023
ML23256A1622023-08-0101 August 2023
Incoming NEI Letter Dated August 1, 2023 Regarding Increase in Fees 2023-2025
ML23206A0292023-07-24024 July 2023
Incoming Fee Exemption Request for Pre-Submittal Activities, Review, and Endorsement of NEI 20-07
ML23143A1232023-06-22022 June 2023
NRC Fee Waiver Request for Draft NEI 23-01
ML23200A1662023-05-30030 May 2023
NEI Proposed Metrics for a Performance-Based Emergency Preparedness Program
ML23116A0732023-05-25025 May 2023
Letter to Hillary Lane in Response to a Request for a Fee Exemption for NEI 23-03
ML23135A7332023-05-0909 May 2023
NEI Comments on NRC Safety Culture Program Effectiveness Review
ML23110A6752023-04-18018 April 2023
04-18-23_NRC_Fee Waiver for NEI 23-03
ML23110A6782023-04-18018 April 2023
Request for Review and Endorsement of NEI 23-03, Supplemental Guidance for Application of 10 CFR 50.59 to Digital Modifications at Non-Power Production or Utilization Facilities
ML23110A6762023-04-18018 April 2023
04-18-23_NRC_NEI 23-03 Review + Endorse
ML23107A2302023-03-31031 March 2023
NEI Letter, to Andrea Veil, NRC, Regarding Industry Recommendations for a 10 CFR 50.46a/c Combined Rulemaking
ML23138A1662023-03-24024 March 2023
Transmittal of NEI 22-05 Revision a, Technology Inclusive Risk Informed Change Evaluation (Tirice) Guidance for the Evaluation of Changes to Facilities Utilizing NEI 18-04 and NEI 21-07
ML23083B4622023-03-24024 March 2023
Transmittal of NEI 22-05 Revision a, Technology Inclusive Risk Informed Change Evaluation (Tirice) Guidance for the Evaluation of Changes to Facilities Utilizing NEI 18-04 and NEI 21-07
ML23060A3272023-03-0101 March 2023
NEI, Wireless Cyber Security Guidance
ML23060A2142023-03-0101 March 2023
NEI, Request for NRC Endorsement of NEI White Paper, Enabling a Remote Response by Members of an Emergency Response Organization, Revision 0
ML23023A2752023-01-23023 January 2023
Request for Extension of Comment Period from the Nuclear Energy Institute on PRM-50-124 - Licensing Safety Analysis for Loss-of-Coolant Accidents
ML22348A1122023-01-17017 January 2023
Letter to Richard Mogavero Response to Fee Exemption NEI 08-09 Revision 7
ML22353A6082023-01-11011 January 2023
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report of the Regulatory Audit of the NEI-Proposed Aging Management Program Revision to Selective Leaching Program (XI.M33)
ML22349A1012022-12-12012 December 2022
LTR-22-0343 Ellen Ginsberg, Sr. Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Nuclear Energy Institute, Expresses Concerns Related to Issuance of Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-02; Operational Leakage
ML22336A0372022-11-16016 November 2022
Fee Exemption Request for NEI 08-09 Revision 7 - Changes to NEI 08-09 Cyber Security Plan for Nuclear Power Reactors
ML22321A3152022-11-16016 November 2022
NEI Letter with Comments on Significance Determination Process Timeliness Review
ML22298A2262022-10-25025 October 2022
Endorsement of NEI 15-09, Cyber Security Event Notifications, Revision 1, Dated October 2022
ML22298A2302022-10-17017 October 2022
Submittal of NEI 22-03, Draft Revision 0, Nuclear Generation Quality Assurance Program Description
ML22207B6512022-07-26026 July 2022
NEI, Full Fee Exemption Request for Industry Guidance Proposal - Weather Related Administrative Controls During Transient Outdoor Dry Cask Operations
ML22195A1662022-07-14014 July 2022
NEI, Draft G of NEI 99-01, Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors, Revision 7
ML22195A0202022-07-13013 July 2022
07-13-22 NRC Fee Exemption Request for NEI 21-05 Review
ML22195A0672022-07-13013 July 2022
Fee Exemption Request for Review and Meeting to Discuss Draft Nuclear Energy Institute Technical Report NEI 21-05, Reporting Guidance for Licensees with Risk-Informed Licensing Bases
ML22159A2772022-06-28028 June 2022
Response Letter to Richard Mogavero for Fee Exemption for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Review Ad Endorsement of NEI 15-09, Revision 1
ML22153A2782022-06-0202 June 2022
Nie, Fee Exemption Request for Endorsement of NEI 15-09, Cyber Security Event Notifications, Revision 1, Dated May 2022
ML22154A2962022-06-0202 June 2022
LTR from R. Mogavero to M. Sampson Dated Jun 2 2022 Endorsement of NEI 15-09 Cyber Security Event Notifications Rev 1 Dated May 2022
ML22152A2712022-06-0101 June 2022
Digital Instrumentation and Control Common Cause Failure Policy Considerations, Revision 1
ML22143A9362022-05-20020 May 2022
May 13, 2022, Public Meeting on Draft Regulatory Issue Summary Operational Leakage, 87 Fed. Reg. 2361 (Jan. 14, 2022) (Docket Id NRC-2021-0173)
ML22110A1752022-05-0303 May 2022
NRC Response to the Nuclear Energy Institute April 1, 2022, Letter, Regarding the Nrc'S CUI Implementation Plan
ML22109A2082022-04-0808 April 2022
April 8, 2022, NEI White Paper on Digital Instrumentation and Control Common Cause Policy Considerations Version 2.0
ML22110A1782022-04-0101 April 2022
April 1, 2022, Letter from NEI Regarding Nrc'S Controlled Unclassified Information Program Implementation
ML22048A5812022-02-16016 February 2022
NEI 22-02: Guidelines for Weather-Related Administrative Controls for Short Duration Outdoor Dry Cask Storage Operations
ML22019A2922022-01-12012 January 2022
NEI, Submittal of Proposed Revisions to Aging Management Programs XI.M33, Selective Leaching and XI.E3, Inaccessible Power Cables Not Subject to 10 CFR 50.49 Environmental Qualification Requirements
ML21343A2922021-12-0808 December 2021
NEI, Transmittal of NEI 21-07 Revision 0-B, Technology Inclusive Guidance for Non-Light Water Reactor Safety Analysis Report: for Applicants Utilizing NEI 18-04 Methodology
ML21337A3802021-12-0303 December 2021
NEI Technical Report NEI 17-06 - Guidance on Using Iec 61508 SIL Certification to Support the Acceptance of Commercial Grade Digital Equipment for Nuclear Safety Related Applications, Revision 1
ML21319A3522021-11-10010 November 2021
NRC NEI Fee Waiver Request Changes to NEI 10-04 and NEI 13-10, Dated November 10, 2021
ML21306A3652021-10-29029 October 2021
NEI Letter from D. Young to NRC S. Atack to Cease Work on Draft D of NEI 20-05, Methodological Approach and Considerations for a Technical Analysis to Demonstrate Compliance with the Eligibility Criteria of 10 CFR 73.55(a)(7)
ML21342A1682021-10-29029 October 2021
Letter from W. Gross to S. Atack, Endorsement of Nuclear Energy Institute 10-04, Identifying Systems and Assets Subject to the Cyber Security Rule, Revision 3, Dated October 29, 2021
ML21342A2032021-10-29029 October 2021
Letter from W. Gross to S. Atack, Endorsement of Nuclear Energy Institute 13-10, Cyber Security Control Assessments, Revision 7, Dated October 29, 2021
ML22081A2002021-10-29029 October 2021
NEI Backfitting Concerns with NRCs Developing Position on Protection of Dry Storage Systems from Natural Phenomena During Short Term Operations
2024-01-22
[Table view] |
Text
JERRY W. HIATT, CHP Senior Project Manager, Radiation Safety and Environmental Protection 1201 F Street, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004 P: 202.739.8171 jwh@nei.org nei.org September 20, 2018 Mr. Dave Garmon, Health Physicist Radiation Protection and Consequence Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Subject:
Industry Comments on NRC Draft Revision to the Public Radiation Safety Significant Determination Process Project Number: 689
Dear Mr. Garmon:
On behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institutes (NEI)1 members, we provide the attached comments on the NRC Draft Revision to the Public Radiation Safety Significant Determination Process provided to external stakeholders.
We thank you for the opportunity to provide the nuclear energy industrys comments on the Draft Revision.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely, Jerry W. Hiatt, CHP Attachment c: Dr. Kevin Hsueh, NRR/NRC 1
The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) is the organization responsible for establishing unified industry policy on matters affecting the nuclear energy industry, including the regulatory aspects of generic operational and technical issues. NEI's members include entities licensed to operate commercial nuclear power plants in the United States, nuclear plant designers, major architect/engineering firms, fuel cycle facilities, nuclear materials licensees, and other organizations and entities involved in the nuclear energy industry.
Summary of Industry Comments 09.20.2018 USNRC PUBLIC RADIATION SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION PROCESS DRAFT REVISION FOR EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS, Page-Location - Proposed Text in NRC Draft Industry Comment NRC Draft p.3, If the licensee has a substantial failure to Comment: Regarding the WHITE 1st full implement the radioactive effluent designation - Is there no consideration of paragraph release program, then the finding would the actual public dose resulting from the be WHITE failure? Should not a minimal dose consequence be considered GREEN?
p.3, If the licensee has a substantial failure to Recommendation: Insert the word 2nd paragraph implement the radioactive effluent radiological as shown below release program, then the finding would be WHITE. Failure to identify a release Failure to identify a radiological release event, or assess the dose consequences event and the impact to the environment in a timely manner, consistent with ODCM requirements, could be considered a substantial failure to implement the radioactive effluent release program.
Page 3, Examples of a substantial failure to The uses of the words significant and 3rd Paragraph implement the radioactive effluent gross inability are subjective and subject release program are: to inspector interpretation.
Recommendation:
- Significant deficiency in implementing
- Significant deficiency in implementing the effluent release program as defined the effluent release program as defined in the plants Technical Specifications, in the plant's Technical Specifications, resulting in the gross inability or gross resulting in the inability or inaccuracy inaccuracy in characterizing an effluent greater than a factor of 100 in release. characterizing an effluent release vs. an equivalent NRC. Calculation
- Significant deficiency in evaluating an
- Significant deficiency in evaluating a effluent release (either planned or radiological effluent release (either unplanned) where the resulting dose planned or unplanned) where the has been grossly underestimated. calculated dose has been underestimated by a factor of 100 vs. an equivalent NRC calculation
- Significant deficiency in calibrating
- Significant deficiency in calibrating effluent monitors used to assess effluent instrumentation or monitors used to P a g e l 1 of 3
releases, resulting in a gross inability or assess radiological effluent releases, gross inaccuracy in characterizing an resulting in an inability or inaccuracy effluent release. greater than a factor of 100 vs.
equivalent NRC calculation in characterizing an effluent release.
- Failure to have any data by which to
- Failure to collect and assemble data by assess the dose to a member of the which to assess the dose to a member of public from an effluent release (i.e., no the public from a radiological effluent monitor data, no independent sample release (e.g., no monitor data, no data, no actual release sample data, independent sample data, no actual etc.) release sample data, etc.)
Overall RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE Comment: The Effluent Release Program Section - PROGRAM section is silent on Solid Radwaste Effluent Reporting. It must be assumed that all General findings on Solid Radwaste Effluent Industry reporting would be Green.
Comment Since the last NRC Rad Effluent Report (2010, which is 7 years late) also excluded any Solid Radwaste Effluent information, this reporting must not be of safety significance. Commercial Solid Low Level Waste disposal data is obtained and stored in the National DOE Manifest Information Management System (MIMS).Therefore, NRR should follow up on its written promise dated June 18, 2015 to revise RG 1.21 with regard to solid radioactive waste shipped. That revision should eliminate the requirement to submit Solid Radwaste shipment quantities as part of the Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report (ARERR).
In addition, review of the ARERR for types and amounts of radioactive waste disposed should be deleted from Inspection Manual 71124.08-03 b.
pp. 6 & 7 C. SDP Determination Process Comment: Industry suggests that the definition of what constitutes 1 R/hr at 3 General a. Packaging meters be added asSection V C. b.
Industry Radiation Limits Exceeded. The draft Comment revision to this section already added clarification regarding averaging radiation levels over the area of a probe. Additional text should be added on averaging 3 meter dose rates from packages.
P a g e l 2 of 3
Such guidance is needed in this document at this time because NUREG 1608 is not slated for revision for at least 2 years.
- p. 9, 2 The loss of package contents means Comment/Question: what constitutes a footnote that radioactive material has been low background area? Is it intended to be released and can be detected and near the location of the potential release or distinguished in a low background area could the package be taken to another at a distance of 30 cm from the item location where the background could be with a micro-rem per hour-type lower? e.g., inside a separate building instrument, which typically uses a 1 inch by 1 inch scintillation detector.
- p. 12, It is also expected that the inspector Comment/Question: This statement 2nd paragraph follows previous guidance concerning indicates that only a single finding would be multiple findings on a single incident. issued. In other words only a Yellow and That is, a finding with a package breach not a Yellow for the breach and a which resulted in a YELLOW Green for the documentation associated determination and a CoC deficiency with the CoC. Is this correct?
which resulted in a GREEN determination would be considered to be a YELLOW finding. This is because the YELLOW signifies a more serious problem with the package breach aspect of the finding, than the CoC deficiency aspect of the finding.
P a g e l 3 of 3