ML18227D395

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Letter Response to Request for Agreement to Perform Rod Bank Worth Testing During Startup of Unit 4 Cycle 5
ML18227D395
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/23/1978
From: Robert E. Uhrig
Florida Power & Light Co
To: Schwencer A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML18227D395 (4)


Text

g7 7y REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

DISTRIBUTION FOR INCOMING MATERIAL 50-251 REC:

SCHWENCER A

ORO:

UHRIG R F DOCDATE: 09/23/78 NRC FL PWR 8( LIGHT DATE RCVD: 09/26/78 DOCTYPE:

LETTER NOTARIZED:

NO COPIES RECEIVED

SUBJECT:

LTR 3 ENCL 0

RESPONSE

TO NRC LTR OF 09/19/78... FURNISHING INFO AND ADVISING THAT APPLICANT HAS AGREEDl95 TO PERFORM THE ROD WORTl.l TESTING DURING THE STARTUP OF UNIT CYCLE 5.

PLANT NAME: TURKEY PT 84 GENERAL DISTRIBUTION FOR AFTER ISSUANCE OF OPERATING LICENSE.

(DISTRIBUTION CODE A001)

REVIEWER INITIAL:

XJM

'ISTIIIBUTOR INITIAL:g)jj

++~444444+444~++4 DISTRIBUTION OF THIS MATERIAL,IS AS FOLLOWS FQR ACTION:

INTERNAL:

BR CHIEF ORB))1 BC++LTR ONLY(7>

REG FILE+>LTR ONLY(i)

L <2 HANAUERu~LTR ONLY(i>

AD FQR SYS 8( PROJ~4LTR ONLY< 1)

REACTOR SAFETY BR+<LTR ONLY(i>

EEB~>LTR ONLY<i)

J MCGOUGH><LTR ONLY(1>

NRC PDR4+LTR ONLY(i)

OELD~~I TR ONLY(1)

CORE PERFORMANCE BR~~LTR ONLY( 1 ENGINEERING BR+4LTR ONLY< 1)

PLANT SYSTEMS BR>>LTR ONLY(i>

EFFLUENT TREAT SYS<4LTR ONLY< 1)

EXTERNAL:

LPDR 8 MIAMI. FL<%LTR ONLY(1)

TERA44LTR ONLY(i>

NSIC4~LTR ONLY(1)

ACRS CAT Bw+LTR ONLY(16>

DISTRIBUTION:

LTR 40 ENCL 0 SIZE:

1P THE END CONTROL NBR:

781980215

~-

il I<<

P. O. BOX 013100, MIAMI, FL 33101

<<<d4Lti I III~I LIOI;,(PI Pf H'ABE'l

~-'4 eric 4>i) x+

FLORIDAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY Office of Nuclear Reactor Regul'ation Attention:

Mr. A. Schwencer, Chief Operating Reactors Branch Il Division of Operating Rea'ctors U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nashington, D. C.

20555 September 23, 1978 L-78-308

Dear Mr. Schwencer:

Re:

Turkey Point Unit 4 Docket No. 50-251 Startup Testing This letter is in response to your letter of September 19, 1978.

In accordance with your request we agree to perform the rod bank worth testing during the startup of Unit 4 Cycle 5 as in-dicated below:

If any one bank differs from the predicted value by more than 15%; or if the sum of the measured worths of the regulating banks differs from the predicted>

value by more than 10%, the first shutdown bank will also be measured.

If the sum of measured worDs of the regulating banks and the first shutdown',bynk differs from the predicted value by more than 10%;

the worth of additional shutdown banks will;.be m a-sured to verify the existence of the shutdown mar-.~

gin specified in the Technical Specifications.

If

.the sum of the worths of all measured rod banks still differs by more than 10% from the predicted

value, we will notify the Division of Operating Reactors of tnis fact before taking the plant to power.

Such noti icatio.. i<ill include the basis on which we conclude that operation with more than a

10% difference from predicted performance is safe.

M 'F

~ )

~C't is our understanding tnat the above commitment is accep-table to you.

Very truly yours,,

Rober" E. Uhrig t

Vice President Advanced Systems 6 Technology REU/GDN/npb cc:

Robert Iowenstein, Esquire J.

P. O'Reilly, Region II Ij 781980215 PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE

,k t