ML18227C734
| ML18227C734 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 09/27/1976 |
| From: | Goller K Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Robert E. Uhrig Florida Power & Light Co |
| References | |
| Download: ML18227C734 (4) | |
Text
Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 Florida Power 8 Light Company ATTN:
Dr. Robert E.'hrig Vice President P. 0.
Box 013100 Miami, Flor ida 33101 Gentlemen:
RE:
TURKEY POINT UNITS NOS.
3-AND 4 In our letter dated Hay ll, 1976, we requested that you conduct an examination of your facility to compare its existing fire protection provisions with the guidelines in the Standard Review Plan 9.5.1, "Fire Protection,"
dated ltay 1, 1976, which included Br anch Technical Position APCSB 9.5-1.
We are enclosing a copy of Appendix-A to Branch Technical Position APCSB 9.5-1, "Guidelines for Fire Protection For, Nuclear Power P'lants Docketed Prior to July', 1976" (Enclosure 1).
This document presents certain acceptable alternatives for operating plants to the positions given in APCSS 9. 5-1.
We are sending this to you for your information because we will be using Appendix A in our evaluation of your plant.
After reviewin'g the licensee submittals made to date in response to our letter, we believe your initial response may not adequate'ly present the results of your fire hazards analysis.
Me stress that in order to begin a re-evaluation of the fire protection program of your facility, you must perform a fire hazards analysis with the assistance and technical d)rection of a qualified fire protection engineer.
In order for us to evaluate your fire hazards analysis we require that you submit the, results in sufficient detail.
To provide further guidance, we are enclosing a copy of "Supplementary Guidance on Information tfeeded For Fire Protection ProgramI Evaluation" (Enclosure 2).
This document indicates the type of information that will enable us to evaluate the total fire hazards analysis for your facility.
This type of information may or may not be included in the detailed point-by-point comparisorr with Standard Review Plan 9.5.1 depending upon how you present'that information.
~6 4-/8 e/
.OPPICE~
SURNAME&
DATE~
PorID hEC-318 (Rev. 9.33) hKCM 0240 4 U 4 OOVERHMENT PRINTIHO OPPICEI IST4 444
~ 44
0 I4 k'
J' 1f
't 4
4 F
e IP l q 1
L k
Jt l
il I
S
e
~4 Florida Power 5 Light Company In addition, we request at this time that you propose Technical Specifications for your present fire protection systems and inform us of the date you intend to meet Section B of Appendix A NAdministrative Procedures, Controls and Fire Brigade".
Your presently scheduled submittal should include the information indicated by Enclosure 2
and proposed Technical Specifications for the fire protection systems of your facility.
Sincerely, Orig>na nai signed 4 Karl R. Goller, Assistant Director for Operating Reactors Divisjon of Operating Reactors
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A to.Branch Technical Position APCSB 9.5-1 2.
Supplementary Guidance cc w/encl:
Hr. Jack R.
- Nesrman, Esquire Lowenstein, Newman, Reis 5 Axelr ad 1025 Connecticut
- Avenue, N. W.
Suite 1214 Washington, D.
C.
20036 Environmental 8 Urban Affairs Library Florida International University Miami, Florida 33199 1.
DISTRIBUTION:
NRC PDR Local
- PDR, ORB¹3 gdg VSte)lo KRGoller TJCarter GL,ear CParrish DE]liott TWambach OELD Or8E g) llButler VBenaroya DEise'nhut TBAbernathy JRBuchanan ACRS (16)
File OPPICS~
bURNAMSW ORB¹l THambach:a'cr ORB¹3 DElliot ORB¹3 GLear AD/DOR KRGol1er ~
9/ 2 Ir
/76 CATS 9P Form hFC-318 (Rev. 9.53) hZCM 0240 9/ ~
/76 9/ ~
/76 9/ gp
/76 4 V 4, CDYSRNMSNT PRINTINO DPPICSr I474 bbb !44
'I J
g P'
tI I
M II I
JAC>>
""ir l
i I'