ML18227C708

Letter Request to Amend Appendix a of Facility Operating Licenses

ML18227C708
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	10/21/1976
From:	Robert E. Uhrig Florida Power & Light Co
To:	Stello V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML18227C708 (11)

Text

~ '

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

)

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

P~ I I ~$R

~R W

WQ

~

~

I

~

000Q R

Q I

~

I ~ I

~

~

~ I S

~ I R

me

~ ~

o

~

~

a

~ ~

~ t 0 6 4X ~

l,~

I' c ~

~ q

ll go

~c+~yO 3

+cS~ ~d ulation U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555

Dear Mr. Stello:

Re:

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4

Docket Nos.

50-250 and 50-251 Proposed Amendment to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-31 and DPR-41 4dMQIRgacto g

Attention:

Mr. Victor Ste

~

3, c

Division of Opera '- eactors t

P. O. BOX 013100, MIAMI, FL 33101

~pe lb 6

FLORIDAPOWER 8( LIGHTCOMPANY October 21, 1976 L-7 8

~o

,. A@6

,S,16I~~iSSe+

co~1 ~44 C

Xn accordance with 10 CFR 50.30, Florida Power 6 Light Company submits herewith three (3) signed originals and forty (40) copies of a request to amend Appendix A of Facility Operating Licenses DPR-31 and DPR-41.

The proposed amendment is described below and shown on the accompanying Technical Specification page bearing the date of this letter in the lower right hand corner.

Pa e 6-15 The Specification 6.8.3.c time limit for Plant Nuclear Safety Committee (PNSC) review and Plant Superintendent-Nuclear approval of temporary changes to procedures is extended from 7 days to 14 days.

The proposed amendment is based on the Standard Technical Specifications for Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactors.

It has been reviewed and the conclusion reached that, it, does not involve a significant hazards consideration, therefore, pre-noticing pursuant to 10 CFR 2.105 should not be required.

A safety evaluation is attached.

Very trul

yours, obert E. Uhrig Vice President REU/MAS/cpc Attachments cc:

Mr. Norman C. Moseley Jack R.

Newman, Esc(uire PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE

'J U

ih 5, p k

J P*

J J

H d

IL

\\

SAFETY EVALUATION Introduction This safety evaluation supports a proposed revision to Technical Specification 6.8.3.c which would extend the time limit for Plant Nuclear Safety Committee (PNSC) review and Plant Superintendent-Nuclear approval of temporary changes to pro-cedures from 7 days to 14 days.

Discussion Plant activities are conducted in accordance with preplanned methods which are described in approved procedures.

Periodically these procedures need to be revised.

There are two methods by which this can be done.

First, procedures can be changed by PNSC review and Plant Superintendent review and approval prior to the change taking effect.

This is the method used for almost all procedure changes.

Second, procedures can be changed more quickly, if necessary, by using the temporary change option permitted by Technical Specification 6.8.3.

This method is provided in case, a relatively rapid procedure change is needed to allow for handling conditions beyond the scope of the original procedure, to prevent anunnecessary delay'in operation or maintenance, or to handle conditions encountered in imple-menting a procedure which were'not anticipated when'he procedure was first written.

Both of the procedure change methods des-cribed above are authorized by approved plant procedures which have been reviewed by NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement compliance inspectors.

A temporary change is made only if it, does not change the intent of the procedure, does not conflict with other facility require-

ments, does not adversely affect nuclear safety, and is approved by at least two authorized members of the plant management staff.

The Plant Nuclear Safety Committee (PNSC) then reviews the temporary change at a later date.

The PNSC can then cancel the temporary change, modify it, or establish it as a permanent change.

The Plant Superintendent-Nuclear then acts upon the,Committee's recommendations regarding the temporary change.

Since it is implicitly understood that performance of an approved procedure does not involve an unreviewed safety question, then any temporary change to that. procedure which does not change the intent of the procedure also does not involve an unreviewed safety question.

Therefore, a written safety evaluation is not required prior to on-the-spot approval of a temporary change and the PNSC is not required to act immediately to review it.

Under the current Turkey Point Technical Specifications, the PNSC is allowed 7 days to review temporary changes.

However, the Standard Technical

t"

Safety Evaluation (Cont'd)

Page Specifications (STS) for Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactors, dated October 1, 1975, permit as much as 14 days for review of temporary changes.

The difference between a

PNSC review 7 days after a temporay change is not significant.

Florida Power Light Company requests authorization to utilize the longer time frame permitted by the STS in order to establish greater flexi-bility in scheduling PNSC meetings.

CONCLUSXONS The requested change is administrative in nature and does not involve any physical change to the facility, nor does it repre-sent a significant. deviation from present operating philosophy.

Based on the above considerations, (1) the proposed change does not increase the'probability, or consequences of accidents or malfunctions of equipment important. to safety and does not reduce the margin of safety as defined: in the basis for any technical specification,'herefore, the change does. not "involve a significant hazards consideration; and (2)'here is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner; and (3) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission '

regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.

'k

6.8.2 Each procedure and administrative policy of 6.8.1 above, and changes thereto, sh..ll be revicued by the PNSC and approved by the Nuclear Plant Superintendent prior to implementation and periodically as provided by procedure.

6.8.3 Temporary changes to procedures of 6.8.1 above may be made.

provided:

a.

The intent of the original procedure's not altered.

b.

The change is approved by tvo menbers of. the plant management staff, at least one. of whom holds a Senior Operator License on the unit affected.

c.

The change is documented, revieved by the PNSC and approved by the Plant Superintendent - Nuclear ~vithin fourteen days of implementation.

~ 6-15

STATE OF FLORIDA

)

)

COUNTY OF DADE

)

SS

~

E. A. Adomat being first duly sworn, deposes and says:

That he is Executive Vice President Light Company, the Licensee herein; of Florida Power That he has executed the foregoing document; that the state-ments made in this said document are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief, and that he is authorized to execute the document on behalf of said Licensee.

E. A. Adomat Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of

=. K~O'x~ PUBLIC, in an f

" Sta"e of Florida

'My commission expires:

the County of Dade,

<>< b<>>C v< fiud"p!~ 4t v ag MYIMMISSIONEXPIRES NOY. 30 1979 IIot40E0 IHRV CfAEI4L QS. QHIEtl/gII5

I I

../g I

I

~

'I

~

JIA/Sly~

I,

~