ML18227C674
| ML18227C674 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 08/31/1978 |
| From: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML18227C674 (6) | |
Text
AUGUST 3 1'1978 Docket Nos.
and 50-251 tKFNRNDUH FOR:
Darrel1 G. Eisenhut, Assistant Director for Systems and Prgects, DOR E
A. Schwencer, Chief Operating Reactors Branch N, DOR TURKEY POINT STEAN GENERATOR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE FROM:
SUBJECT:
gggIHALSMKD The original date to begin steam generator tube replacement on Unit 4 was October 15, 1978.
One reason for that early date (early in,view of the steam generator.
delivery) was a contingency in case the steam generator tubes became seriously worse.
Since the next refueling for'nit 4 has begun the likelihood for replacement beginning October 15, 1978 is essentially zero.
Current plans are to refuel for six months and reeva'quate the steam generator tubes again on about April 1, 1979.
At that time the new steam generators are expected to be on site and the likelihood of starting the replace-ment is much greater, although still dependent on the condition of the steam generator tubes and steam generator delivery.
'Further, the final FPL submittal dated August,4, 1978 was received August 7, 1978.
This submittal affects PSB only and therefore the PSB safety evaluation will not be available until mid-Sppteaher.
The SE should be completed by the end of September.
On the 'basis of the above considerations I have concluded that the Turkey Point review should follow the Surry review and the individual reviewers have been so informed; The primary urgency is the environ-mental review.
This is currently scheduled to be in first draft form hy September 1, 1978.
Although the basic impact appraisals for each plant do not differ greatly, I have requested of each reviewer that is involved with both plants, that Surry be completed first because it is nearer to replacerrent than Turkey Point.
Surry is stil'I scheduled to begin the steam generator replacement in late 1978, depending upon steam generator delivery.
SEE PREVIOUS YELLOW FOR CON A. Schwencer, Chief Operating Reactors Branch B, DOR lJ OURNAMCW OATC%
DOR:ORB1*
DNei qhbors: j F
8/31./78 DOR:ORBl*
NGrotenhuis 8/31/78 c
neer
/78 782480262 NRC PORN 318 (976) NRCM 0240 4 V 2 OOVCRNMC T PRINTINO OFRICCI IOTO 620 224
JE J
6<64 Z 8
)QUOUA
\\
~,
v I
'14
~v 4)
I
- ~
r
~
't 4
~v I'
~ I
)
I I
v ltv lt>>
~ ',$ ~
I J>>'
ll'
~
4I J,
~
r I
v ~
r i
v)',>>,
~ J 4
I I v
J vf I lt l
4 I~ J J
'I
~
I Jt I
I I r
J Jv 4'it
~
4 I ~
J 4
~
J
.c Jv v.. E' J
~)'C <<
~.
1 ~
f I
v
'1 v
1>>
4 4t
~I t
Vl I
~
~
'J I
vr v vv)
I
'Jv
~ (
~
I
~
~ I 14I
~
vl 4
1>>
~ J
-EV'-
)
I ~
J VVBaQZXQXSq 4 J I
4 l
\\
'I J
'v v
~
I r
v
Docket Hos. 50-250 and 50=gal f~iBIORNDUll FOR:
Darrell G. Eisenhut, Assistant Director for Systems and Projects, DOR FRON:
A. Schwencer, Chief Operating Reactors Branch 81, DOR SUMECT; 'RKEY POINT STEAN GENERATOR REPLACEKHT SG-IEDtJLE The original date to begin steam generator tube replacem nt on Unit 4 was'ctober 15, 1978.
One reason for that early date
{early in view of the s earn generator delivery) was a contingency in case the steam genera or tubes became seriously worse.
Sihce the next, refueling for Unit 4 as begun the likelihood for replacement beginning October 15, 1978 's essentially zero.-
Current plans are to refuel for six months an reevaluate the steam generato~
tubes again on about April 1, 1978.
At that time the new steam generators are expected to be on site and he lik lihood of starting the replace-ment" is much greater, although s ill dependent on the condition of the steam generator tubes arid steam q nerator delivery.
Further, the final FPL submittal dated August 4, 1978
~as received August 7, 1978.
This submittal effects PSB only and the fore the PSB safety evaluation will not be available until mid-Septenber.
The SE should be completed by the end'of September.
On the basis of the above, considerations I have conclu1led that the Turkey Point review should follow the Sur review and the individual "reviewers have been so informed.
The prim y urgency is the environmental review.
This is currently sch duled to be in firSi Graf&
form by September 1, 1978.
Although the basi impact appraisals for each plant do not differ greatly, I have requested each reviewer that is involved with both plants, that Surry be complet d first because it is nearer to replacement than Turkey Point.
Sur is still scheduled to'begin the steam generator replacer." nt in 'late 1
8, depending upon steam generator delivery.
A. Schwencer, Chief Operating Reactors Branch 8
DOR ORPICC~
0URNAMC~
OATC~
M.:0881......,
t.18rotenb.u.is.
.<..g..)78........
...D
..DMe.i hb.ok'..:.
.....ASchwencer-
-"---/-- -C78--
NRC FORM 318 (9.76) NRCM 0240
- V 0 OOVCRNMCNT PRINTINO OFFICCI 1070 020 024
n t
J
D.
G. Eisenhut DISTRIBUTION Docket Files 50-250 and 50-251 ORB 1 Reading File A.
C.
N.
D.
S.
R.
G.
R.
S.
S.
R.
.J.
J.
J.
J.
S.
G.
B.
W.
R.
G.
G.
P.
Schwencer'arrish Grotenhuis Neighbors Kirs 1 i s Emch Cwalina Colmar McKay Rhow LaGrange Giannelli Roberts Cutchin Scinto Goldberg Lear Youngblood Kreger
'allard Knighton Lainas Check iOPPICC~
SURHAMR~
DATC~
NRC FORM 318 (9.16)
NRCM 0240 4 U, 8 OOVCRHMRNT PRINTIHO OPPICKI IOTII II2IIII24
r
'll 4 ~
p I ar 1
JI p11