Text

Comment (266) of Carl Schoepki Opposing Holtec Internationals HI-STORE Spent Fuel Waste Facility
	ML18219A714
Person / Time
Site:	HI-STORE
Issue date:	07/17/2018
From:	Schoepke C; - No Known Affiliation
To:	May Ma; Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
	83FR13802 00266, NRC-2018-0052
	Download: ML18219A714 (39)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:,. SUNSI Review Complete May Ma Template= ADM-013 Office of Administration E-RIDS=ADM-03 COMMENT {266) PUBLICATION DATE: 3/30/2018 CITATION# 83 FR 13802 Mail Stop: TWFN-7-A60M ADD= Antoinette Walker-Smith, Jill U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Caverly (JSCl) Washington, DC 20555-0001 RE: Docket IO NRC-2018-0052; Holtec Intemational's ID-STORE Spent Fuel Waste Facility Nuclear Regulatory Commission: I am extremely concerned about the Consolidated Interim Storage (CIS) facility proposed by Holtec International to store up to 100,000 metric tons of high-level radioactive waste in southeast New Mexico. I respectfully submit the following comments regarding the proposal itself and the scope of the Environmental Review and analysis for the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). I am submitting these comments because I do not consent to New Mexico becoming a national dumping ground for "speJ?.t fuel" from every nuclear reactor in the country. I do not consent to transporting up to I 0,000 canisters of highly radioactive waste through communities nationwide. I do not consent to the ri~k of contamination of our lands, aquifers, air, or the health of our people, plants, wildlife, and livestock*. I do not cons~nt to endangering present and fu~e generations. I formally request additional Public Scoping Meetjngs for other communities throughout the United States (U.S.) that will be impacted by the transport of these waste canisters. This Holtec Propos=,tl Is Contrary To -Current Law Current law only allows the U.S. *Department of Energy to take title to commercial spent fuel "following commencement of operation of a repository" or ~t ~ DOE-owned and operated'&oirltored retrievable storag~ facility. The Holtec site m~ts neither requirement, as it is a private facility. Holtec Mus.t ~emove Copyrights_ Apd All Re4actions In The Envir.onmental_ Report (ER) NRC must require Holtec* to produ~ an ER th;,it has no such copyright restrictions and has. no redactions. It is impossible to make recommendations on the.scope of analyses ofthes~ r~ted areas of the ER for the EIS-.

Tile Impa~ts Of Perman~JJ.~.Sto.-a.g~.1"l~t :Q~ An~lyzed Toe ijR is ~comple.te-b~us~_jt does -~ot_-~alyze the impacts. of ~e spent.fuel peing left at
--the H;oltec.~tte in4efinitely. TheE~S q~ tq inclu~ an analysis of.the itp.pacts of

. p~r,manent storage should th~ CJS.faciljty. hecom~ a d,e faqto perm~ent waste site. Mo.re Alternatives Must Be Analyzed The high-level *radioactive waste is too danger:ous to inove and can remain on site for many more years. It should* not be moved until all alternatives are analyzed, including keeping the waste where it is in some form of Hardened On Site Storage (HOSS) on the reactor sites or at suitable locations as close to. the reactors as possible to minimize transport *risks. The alternative of consolidated storage at an existing. licensed Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility (ISFSI) must also be analyzed. All Transportation Routes And Risks Must Be Analyzed The EIS must include all possible transportation routes and study the potential impacts from accidents, terrorism. incidents, and how new rail lines or roads for waste shipments will impact public health, environment, water sources, flora, fauna ( especially any endangered species), and occupational safety along these routes;

The Consequences To An Acciden{.-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Terms like.. collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during

transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transp9rting or Working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool_or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister~ will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from_ WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the local oil *and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in t4e EIS.

Seigmic !mpa~bi On. Sto:-ed Casks *Must Be Stated Although the ER gives a $tatement on r~nt seismic-activity in the area, there is no analysis of what frackitig-indu~ earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the :EIS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Analy7:ed Impacts: from new electrical lines, surface and sµbsurface projects must'be included in EIS. _.. ~ ,t

Jkonomic I111pacts M~t Be ~a.l~d For*The Differ-ent Pl_lases Of 'f.~e froj ~ct....

The economi,c.im,p~1'$.mll$t be studied and ciearly state any posi~ve*_or negatiye.. unp~ts

from this site: initially, after construction IS complete, and throughout the whole 12"0 years.
How m~y jobs will 'be 'treated? How many are only 'temporary and how many are

-pemiarient? How may will go to-local reside~ts? =- _ A Thorough Environment~l Justice cii>Anai;.~~~M~~ Be I~~l~deci-fu T~~: Eis

Impacts tp EJ cominunities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied, inch1ding but not limited to ecowmk an4health impasts.that 8fe ;speei.fio te:-Iew:er-:ineem-e----

. and people of colon:ommtri:tl"1es. F.or:indigenous popW.atioii$1ocated neat the site er along transport routes; thls.EJ *analyijS.fu1J$tinc1ude impacts to :cultfu:aily i.riiportani battiral . resources, such*-as: sacred.'plitces, 1riuiitlonal "foodi.sources, artd traditional medical plants. Date ~- ~ W1rt~,otcc1~ \\e5%~ 1117})&

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed

Terms like "collective dose risk" and person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual.

All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during transport iuid at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasio_n lilld workers who are transp9rting or working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed c The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister~ ~ll be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed

The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts of"a radiologic release *from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site..
The impacts from WIPP and~ossible impacts from and to the lo~al oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in t4e EIS.. -

Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *Must Be Stated Although the ER gives a ${:atement on recent seismic-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what frackiri.g-indu~ earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the EIS; Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other ln!"rastructu:re Must Be Ana~ed .

Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and*$µbsurface projects must be included in EIS.

,~,. Economic Impacts Must Be Analyzed For 1The Different Phases Of The Proje_ct 11 The economic impacts must be studied and clearly state any positive* or negative impfiCts from this site: initially, after construction is complete, and throughout the whole 120 "years.

How many jobs wilt be'created? How many are only temporary andhowmany are permanent? How may will go to local :i'e~id~~ts?

A Tho;~;gh E;vi~~~.;_~;t~iJusti;; (EJfA~;ly;~-M~tiJ.e In;l~d~d hi -Th~-EIS. - ~mpac~ to EJ co~~ties near the _site.and alon~ tr~port routes m~t be studied,_ -~---~* .. ~m=c=lu=d=m=-g.but-notlIImtedto econonucand.,health unnacts.that are specdic to-:lower m@.m.e~* ___ _ and people of color communities. For indigenous populations located 1:1ear the site er along transport routes, this EJ analy~ -must include impacts to culturally iiliportant natural resources, such as: sacred places, _traditional food ~ources, and traditional medical plants. Sincerely, Signature~'.~-***\\i.=......; __ ---'-':*~_.....i'."_..__. 1 {......... J:. ).___ *~--=- __ '-=-* .* - - - Date_7-4'-.£_{ ~----=-1-,--, J a-__ _

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Q Terms iike "collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual.

All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during
transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasi~n and Workers who are transp9rting or Working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed 0 The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at *the si~e. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister~ will be handled onsite and during transport and analyz.e possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed

The ER mentions the Waste Is.olation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site.
The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~ oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in f4e EIS.
Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *Must Be Stat~d
Although the ER gives a statement on recent seismic-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what fraclcing-induced earthquakes will have on tli.e buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the ~IS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Ana~ed .

Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS.

&conomic Impacts Must Be Analyzed For ;The Diff~ent Phases Of The Proj~ct 8 The ecqm;nnic impacts mll$1: be studied and clearly state any positive or nega,tive imp~cts from this site: initially, after construction is complete, and thrt>ugho_ut the whole 120 years. How many jobs will be *created? How inatiy are only temporary and how many are permanent? How may will go to local resid~~ts? A Thorough Environmental Justice (El) Analysis**Must Be Included In Tbe*EIS

Impacts to EJ communities near the site and along transport routes must be studied,

. including but not limited to economic and"health.impacts that ate.specific to.lower:* incow,..,.e<--~-'--- and people of color communities; For indigenous populations loca,ted :,;tear the site or along transport routes, this EJ analyfjs m~ include impacts to culturally important natural resources, ~ch ~= sacred places, traditional food.sour~s~ ~ti traditional medical plants.

' -~-- -*---

Sincerely, '" /i Signature.. - _!\\{4_ .. _.*._t_L _______ _._ ______________ Date ',--_-z_. -_._r _8.__,...,-,-'_i_*,,,---=- Name (Print) _i_1-r:~o_.,_f1-'--__ {_*,..._*.r_)..(_,_* t-(;1...------------,- City & Strite __ 7...;;,,c;*-4-f_* ____,_N---'-'* r",___ ______________ _

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed fodividnal Must Be Analyzed Terms like "coUective dose risk and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transp9rting or working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed c The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked arid leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister.s will be* handled onsite and during transport ahd analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste.Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts of"a radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~ oil *and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in t4e EIS.

Seismic Impact8 On Stnred Casks :Must Be Stat.ed Although the ER gives a $tatement on recent seismic-activity in the area, there is no analysis of what fracking-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. Toes~ µnpacts need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Anal~ed Impacts:from new electrical*.lines, surface and s¥bswface projects must be included in EIS. Economic.ID1pacts _M:mt Be Analk~d For!Th*e.Diff~hmt Phases Of The froj~ct... .. The econ9:rnic im.pl;lGts. must be s~died and clearly state any positfve..or n~gatiye.jmpf1Cts from tlri,s site: initially, after construction fa complete, and t;b,roughout the whole 120 years. How many jobs will *oo* created? How mky are only teniPQrary and how many *are

pemiarient? How inay will ~o to*local resid~~ts?

A~Th~;~ughinvironmen~;tl J~tice{EJ)A;~;~~ --M~~ B~ l~c*l~de~-I~ i;e: EI;. Impacts tp EJ communities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied, ine1ncling but not-limited to econoh'iJc and-hal~~4~~ed@er income ahd people of eolon~omtlitmitie& Fotfadigenous populations located neat the site or along transport :fomes, *thl-s*:EJ *a:naJ.yfjs,m.t~tinclude impacts t0: :C?uJ.turaily important natural resources, such*,as: sacred.placeS;traditioilal*food* ~ources: and traditional-medical plari~. -:*.:-::-:-:-*:-;;--:--:-:'..:-* =-=-----. __ :_-**--_ -..:.. _--

-.... *--***.--***. ":-:-~-*.. =--=..:.:.*:...:.=.:--:..:.-* *.* ***-. -.- _*_

.. ~-.' *--~--- __ _.:__ -=-----~::*..::-:~.. --::-*:........ ~- -* Sincerely; ./} Signarure{/~~. ~~ Name (Print) A /et.)'at1dt~ : t?Jpe 2--" Date ]-16; 18

City & State <3Gvirh ~ Ii) * ((}'

The Consequences To An Accideni-Expo:sed Individual Must Be Analyzed Terms like "coilective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potentiai impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during - transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for in~ividuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transp9rting or working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool_ or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canisters will be* handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts of"a radiologic release from_ WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~ oil anci gas industries need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.* lli;l.. i.,mi.-. Tm'"' 0 ""+., o... Sto,;....1,-,... sh-.,.*11....-,..,t Be *s* tct~... L..,..,aa,~&-.&.&a..,.u,,.,i.lJI 'IV"a.l. I. IP.l'\\A '-A. ~" J..TJ..~.... A ~ Although the ER gives a ~tatement on recent seismic-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what frackiri.g-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. Toes~ µnpacts need to be analyzed and included in the EIS. Future Electrical.Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be_Ana~ed Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS. ~onom~c-lm,pacts,Must BeAnal~~d For 1The Different Phases Of T~e froj~.. ct.... I) The ecom;>tni,c impacts mll$1: be s~died and clearly state any positiv.e:.ornegativeimp~cts from this site: initially, after construction IS complete, and,throughout the whole 120 years.

Now many jobs will "be *created? How many are only tem:porary and how many' ate
pemiarient? How inay will go to -local residents?

-*ATh~;;~;i~~~o~me;t~IJ;~tice(EJ)-A;~;~~-:-M~t B-e* I~~~u~ed i~.. T~~: ~i;..... Impacts to EJ communities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied, in,*>J..uding*but Irut lhTJted *to* eco~41~..1$~at-are ;speei-fici to.lq;,v*p,erl=-'ffll-l=. WC>AQIAffl*C.__ __ _ . ab.d:people of"color co.m:munities; F.odndigenous populations located: Ii.eat the site or along ttansport:routes, thls-EJ Imaly~ inustfaclude impacts to :culturally iri:iportani natifral resoutces, stich*.. as: sactedpla:ces,*traaitional*food* _sources; anci traditioruil*medical plants.

-***-*....:..:._:._*:;::.:.*_:_.:;-_* ___ ___:_: ~:...:.:~..... :.:....:.:..:..:..:=----7':..:.---*-.!.-:_..:....._.:..~.:.::-.------::.:.-......... --...:.--*----'--------. ~---------'-~*-*--.*:*.* *. __ ::~-:=====-=:--**

Sincerely," Name (Print) --=-"-"----=~--"-'-.L-..:=-"---r----'.S=--'..__Cf-er City & State S@-:7/J~ --r-D Ai ll:}_

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Q Terms like "collective dose risk" and "person.;.rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and acddental radioactive releases during

transport ;:ind at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasio_n and workers who are transporting or Working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed = The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool_or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister~ will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts of"a radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed*.CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~l oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in the EIS. Seismic Impactfii On sto.. ed *Casks *Mu.st Be Stated Although the ER gives a $tatement on recent seismic. activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what frackirig-indu_ced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the ;EIS. Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Anal~ed

Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS.

Economic Impacts Must Be Analyzed Fo/The Different Phases Of The Project .i The economi,c llllpaGts must be s~died and clearly state any positive* or negative imp~cts from this site: initially, after cons~ctiort fa complete, and througho.ut the whole 12u *years. How many jobs will be *created? How m~y are only temporaiy and how many ate permanent? How may will go to local re~idt?~ts? A Thorough Environmental Justice (EJ) Analysis*Must Be Included In The*EIS

Impacts tp EJ communities near the site and along transport routes must be studied,

* ____ jncluding but-not limited-to economic and health __ impacts that are-sp_~ific.Jo-l.0.w.r::.iuc.11rn-.. =e __ _

and people of color coinmunities. For indigenous populations located ~ear the site er along transport routes, this EJ analy~ in.list include impacts to culturally important natural resources, ~uch as: sacred places, traditional food ~ources, and traditional medical plants. Sincerely,

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Terms iike "collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during

transport ~d at the site 11:1ust _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasio_n and workers who are transp9rting or Working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed = The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister~ will be handled onsite and during transport and analyz.e possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the local oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.

Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *Mu.st B.e Stat.ed Although the ER gives a ~tatement on re~nt seismic-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what :frackirig-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the EIS..

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Anal~ed Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS. Economic Impacts Must Be Analyzed For :The Differ-ent Phases Of The Project The ecom;mric impacts m.µst be s~died ~d clearly state any positive* or negative fmp1:1-cts

from this site: initially, after construction fa complete, and tJ;rroughout the whole 120. years.

How many jobs will be *created? How iri~y_ are only temporary arrd how many are permanent? How may will go to local re~id~~ts? A Thor~.;gh E~~~o~;;.t~iJ:;sti~~ (EJ)*~;1y;is*M~tB;-I~~l;d;dI~ Th~: EIS Impacts to EJ communities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied, ___ -------* inclu~11,g bqt.npt.lirn:iteyj to economic and.h~th impacts tl1!:1t !'Ire-specific to.Jower in~-0.me ______ _ and people of color comm.unities. For indigenous populations located near the site or along transport routes, this EJanaly~ mll$1: include impacts to.culturally important natural resources, such as: sacred places, traditional food sources,. and traditional medical plants. Sincerely, Signature cR ~ G~: Date J ~ ff(~ r\\ Name (Print) L D f Q. F+s ~ #y City&State 3d ~+d\\ f ~ ~ ~\\(: M,

The Consequences To An Accident.-Exposed !ndividua! Must Be Analyzed Terms iike "collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in* plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transp9rting or working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed = The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister~ will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if le~s or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts of *a radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the local oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in ~e EIS.. Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *l"..1:u.st Be Sfat.erl Although the ER. gives a $tatement on recent seismic-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what fra,ck;irig-indu_ced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the ~IS. Future Eledrical_Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Anal~ed

Impacts from new electrical lines, sw.face and subsurface projects must be included in EIS.

Economjc.Imp~cts Must BeAnai;~d Fo/Th~Different Phases OfT.lw froj~ct _.* The econc;>mic

imp~~-ri:t~ be $died and clearly state any positive _or negative -impacts from~ site: initially, after construction IS complete, and througho:ut the whole 120 years.

How many jobs will *be *created? How many ate only tem~rary and how many *are

permanent? How inay will go to*local residents?

A Thorough *Environmen~al Justice (EJ) Ana~s~~M~-~ B-e I~~hi°~ed-~n ~~:-~i;.. ~pac~ tp EJ co~~ties near the_site.and:alon-'? tr~port route~ m~t, ~e studied,_

=======- ~nc!ud.mg,hut-r10U~~s-a:1t~-rn*ma~;_'i~,-.ar~~~1:fie4'0iJ.Q,ver~meom.e-____ _ ahd peopie of colon}bimnunities; F:ot;ittclig~nous populatiohs Iocated,~eat the site er along transport *"tdUtes; tbk*EJ *analy~,mustmc1ude impacts to ;culturally important natural . resources, such,as: sac.red* places, *traditional Joocf ~ources, and traditibiial medical plan~. --"7"-**---.-***----,.: ______ :.__:.::.._ __ :..:.*::.....* __ :_*.:__:... :.:.::...:.=._:_-::.; ___ .. _._....... _................. __ ~*_* _* __ -._._." **... __,_. ____....... ___ ---: __.. _:.*-.... ::-:::-..:..-=----..-::=.~---=-===----- Sincerely, Signatur~~ )00-0-([') o !e:t CK. Date . _,i"'-. - I\\ Name (Print) ~v- ~ b'Y' A:-. 1) e..-\\_[) IC 8 City&State ~On+/-l:t "fe._ Y\\Jc:10 (~..,...~~~~-~.)~*---

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individ!!al Must Be Am!.!y:rnd Terms iike ~Lcoilective dose risk" and Hperson-rem" are used to ignore the poieniial impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during - transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for in~ividuals near waste on occasion and workers who are tran,spqrting or Working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed = The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister_s will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environme~tal impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts of a radiologic release from_ \\VIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impac~ from and to the local oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in ~e EIS. *

Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks }I.lust Be Stated Although the ER gives a ~tatement on recent seismic-activity in the are~ there is no analysis of what fracki.tig-indu_ced ~quakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be _Anal~ed

Impacts=from new electrical*.lines, surface and subsurface projects*must be included. in EIS.

t*

)konomjc Jiµp~cts Must Be Anal~~d For The* Diffe,rent Phases Of The :froj~~t... *.

The econ9mi,c imp~ts. must be studied and clearly state any positiv.e or.negativ:e.imp~ts from~ site: initially, after construction IS complet~, ~d throughout the whole 120 years.

How man.y jobs will *be *created? ~ow nian.Y are only teni~rary a.lid ho~ many *are

pemianent? How inay will go to-local residents?

-...:.:.=::.**:..:::=.-=-::..:... _. -.-.:.:.:::::::.. -=-*;==::.:==.::=.; *-==*:::::::..::::.---::-*--*:*--*-**.~*-- ****-.*.---:--.. -......... -*** -*-*--*****----:.:.-:-.. *..::.. :...:=... -. -::::.=-*-----*-*-* A Thorough Environmental Justice (E.J) Analysis*Must Be Included In The*EJS Impacts t_o EJ communities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied, . eluding but not lim!ted to econo~-health:i:mp~..ts.iliat are ;@eei.fio to-lewer-meo""m'l4'e.__--- and*people of color'coin:m.unities; Fotfadigenous populations loca.teth;ieat the site er along ttanSport-"toutes; t1ns*,EJ imalyljS --m.ustiric1ude impacts to *culturally im:portant itatural . resources, such *as: sacre,f places, traditional "food° ~:ources, and traditiomil =medical *plan~. Date '7-}7-- JB

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Ind!vichrnl Must Be Analyzed Terms like coilective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. " All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during

transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are tran.sp9rting or working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister.s will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts of'a radiologic release from WIPP on the proposed CIS site, The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the local oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in tq.e EIS.

Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *Mu.st 8e Stated Although the ER gives a $tatement on recent seismic-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what frackiri.g-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the ~IS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be.Anal~ed Impacts:from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS. Economj~*Iiµpacts Must Be Anal~~d For:Th~Different.Phases OfT4e ~roJ~t... 5 The econ~m.rlc impa~ts must be $died and clearly state any positiv.~: or negative llllp/iCts from this site: initially, after construction IS complete, an~ tbrougho~t the whole 120 years. How riianyjobs will be 'created? How many are only tein~rary and how many *are

pemiarient? How may will go to*local resid~~ts?

-A Th~ro~;:E~~;;,-~;~~tal J~~ti~~ ~A;afys~-~M~~-B:e I~cl~~ed-j~ i;~:*;I;... Im.pacts t9 EJ comnnn:iities near the site.and along transport routes.must be studied, mr:h1ding* but not limited to economic and~th-1~ that a:re'speeifio to'-lower--inoom*----- a.fia*people of colonrofuliiunities; FotfadigenbUS popw.atiobs loca.ted'~eat the site er along ttaiispofttotites; tln-s* EJ analyifs inustili.clude hnpacts to ;culturally irtiportani natural resources, such as: Sacred places~ traditioilaJ:food'.sources, and traditional -medical plan~. --.-:---***----H*-**-----***--- **-- *-, -**- **-

--'--.l.-----'-***-*....,*---------*--~*.. * -

The Consequenc.es To An Accident-Exposed Individual Mnst Be Analyzed Terms like ~~collective dose risk"' and "person-rem~' are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. " All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transp9rting or Working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed = The.ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking c~ster would be handled, since there is no wet pool_or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister!3 will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from_ WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the local oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.* Seismic Imp:acts On Stored Casks *Mu.st Be Stat.ed Although the ER gives a $tatement on recent seismic-activity in the area, there is no analysis of what fra,d,<lng-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. Toes~ tmpacts need to be analyzed and included in the ~rs. Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be.Anal~ed* Impacts-from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS. Ecm1omi~-lm,pa,~ts.Must Be An~lYZ~d For:Th~.Different.PI,.ases Of 'f.~e Project. The ecqn9n;tic im,pacts. must be studied and clearly state any positive or ne_gatiye.i;mp;:icts from thi,s site: initially, after construction 1s complete, and tbrougho~t the whole 120 years. Ffow many jobs Mii 'be. created? How iri~y are only temporary and how many ate '.

pemiarient? How may will go to*local residents?

-*-----:*.*--:--**--*-*---:-:*-:-*---*-- --- ---**-* --*--. :_:_ __ *:-------*-*-- *:~---.. -- ~-:.:_* __ -*- . -*-.... :~...... A Thorough Environmental Justice (EJ) Analysis*Must B.e Included In Tbe*EIS

Impacts to EJ communities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied,

. 1. b r

~

'§ Mew.

lll?.J1chng*AI.t-not-imuted--to*econo~c.h~aG:ts:::that a.rasp~1 e t~er moom.c aiid*pebple of color ooilmi.unities; *Fodndigenous popula:tiohs localed ~ear the site er along ttanspaft toutes; thiirEJ analy~,must*irtclude impacts to *culturally iriipoiiailt b.atural resources, Stich *as: sacred* pllices, traditional foo*d.sources, and traditioiial medical plants..

--:-:-:-:--.:-:-:-:-:-..=*:=:---:::-::-:-:.:-. *.. .... **-**-***-... :~*. *.*.-*****.. ** **-*.*****.-**=--*---._ *.*...... **_ ---.. --*----- ___...... *~---*'- Sincerely; Signature-jref,n-J l_) ~ Name (Print) () S, '"h1 h/ f1.v' o( City & State /;' eJMMILa'--1--/(!_1--M.L....L.._ ______ _

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individm!l Must Be Analyzed Terms like 4~coilective dose risk and "person-rem" are used io ignore the potential impacis to *a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during

transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transp9rting or working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed e The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister~ will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possibl1;;: environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER nie1?,tions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the local oil and gas industries n{)ed to be analyzed and included in the EIS. Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *Must Be Stated Although the ER gives* a $tatement on recent seismic-activity in the area, there is no analysis of what fra,ckiri.g-indu~ed earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the ~IS. Future Electrical_ Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Analy~ed Impacts :fi:om new electrical lines, surface and s_ubsurface projects must be included in EIS. Economjc.Impact~ _Must Be.A~;l;~(?d For!Th~ Different Phases Of T~e Project. Ii The econc:nnk. itupa.Gts m~t be ~died and clearly state any positiv~:.or negative.imp~ts from this site: initially, after construction lS complete, and througho~t the Whole 120 years.

How many jobs wili'-be 'cteated? How many are.only temporary and how many "are
pemiarient? How may will go to focal residents? *

.. A.Th~ro~-;"Ji~~~o~~~;t~I Justice (El) An~~~-~M~~~-e -,~~-lu~e~-i~ T;e. i1; Impacts tp EJ communities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied, includingJJut.notJi.mit~tlHm~*4hat-are~sp~fiu.:!;ftim¥.e..cinoome-- - ---- and peopie of color coimhunities; F.or-'indigenoris populations located ~ear the site or along trahsporf totites; tlnifEJ analy~,mll$t iric1ude impacts to culturally important natiiral resolli'Ces, such as: sacred.'plitces, 'triiditiofut!*food* ~ources; and traditional medicitl plan~. .... - -- ------- *-* -* ~ =--==.=..:-:--..:.::..:....:.-: :_*__:.__:=-~--*--:-:.-:.:...::-= -*=*.::-=----~~:-*_....:..-::-.== _ _:_ __

. _-:::_: __ -:_:-_-=-==----=...:...:.*:: ___ :.--.::..~~._._-: __ -_*:~.:._::_* _-_:-.:..:... -*---

Sincerely, Signa~e ~0-----"' Name (Print) M a ct-i u ~ h *lc_e, h~ City & State rJ a. n f 4 ~

l The C_onsequences Tu An Accident-Exposed Individ,rnl Must Be Analyzed ~ Terms like <<coUective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potentiai impacts to a single individual. All possible hum~ exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for in~ividuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transp9rting or working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked :And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed = The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool_ or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister_s will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possibl~ environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot P~ant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impa~ts of a radiologic release from_ WIPP on the proposed CIS site. Tue impacts from WIPP and possible impac~ from and to the local oil *and gas industries need to be analyzed and include~ in ~e EIS.

Seismic Impacts On Stored Cm;ks °l'-,1:ust Be Stat.ed Although the ER gives a $fatement on recent seismic-activity in the area, there is no analysis of what frackiri.g"'.indu_ced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be_A.nal~ed I~pacts:from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be inclli.ded m EIS. ~on~~~~-Imp~cts Must Be Anai~~d For:The Different Phases Of The Proj~~t e The econoµtic impac;ts must be s1:lldied and ciearly state any positive*.or negative.i;mp~cts from tb.i,s site: initially, after construction IS complete, and througho:ut the whole 120 years. How many jobs will *be.created? How many are only tempdrary and how niany'ate

perii:J.arient? How inay will go to-local residents?
A Thorou~ E~vironment~I Justice (EJ) Analys~-:M~~ B~ I~~.~~e~-i~ ~;;:_~i; :*..

Impacts to EJ communities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied, including blit not limited-to-~Jiealth iinpar~at a.n:fspeeifio lo-fower income and people of C9lonx,iririlunities; *Fot:indigenous popWatiohs located-~ear the site er along ttanspotttoutes, thif,*-EJ analyfi.S inustitic1ilde hiipacts to :culturally irii.t,ortani tiariiral . resoutces, such-as: sacred* plii.ces, traditioilal'food* ~ources, and traditioruil *niedical plants. -*----:---:::-*:=:::-::::*.* _--:

... _. *****- **~--.. -::-*_**:.**.,.*-, --------.:...:*.=~---~::_~--** ---~*::._:_-.:.:~~-=-~-:~~-:..:::_*_:-~*-::.-:.::=.:..::.-.::_-_~--

Sincerely,'

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Re Analyzed Terms like "collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the poiential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during

transport ~d at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transp9rting or Working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed ~ The.ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool_ or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister~ will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possibl~ environ.mental impacts if l~ or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed

The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site.
The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the Io~ oil *anci gas industries need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.

Seismfo Impacts On Stored Casks *1vfo.st Be 8fat.ed Although the ER gives a $tatement on recent seismic-activity.in the ar~ there is no analysis of what frackiri.g-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These µnpacts need to be analyzed and included in the ;ms. Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be _AnalY7:ed lmpacts:from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects*inust be included in EIS. E-cm:iomj~* I~pac.ts Mmt Be Anai~~d ~or :Th~ Di!:ferent Phases Of T~e P..roj~!,!t......

The econ~~c iln.p~ts rn~ be s~died and clearly state any positive*.or negative Jmp~ts from this site: initially, after construction IS complete, and througho_ut the whole 120 year:s.
How many jobs wiU--be*created? How many are only temporary and how manj,aie
penrianent? How may will go to -local residents?

.. AThorou~*EnvironmentalJustice (EJ) Ana:lys~--M~~ B.e I~~l~ded-:in T;~:;I;.. *. Impacts tp EJ communities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied, -including-but notlimited:.to tiCOOODiiG..fil!4-.health 5-.;q~t are *spesifie tO-ffl:\\:Yer--moom""'e---- ahd peopie of color* communities; -F.ot:indigenous populations located neat the site er along tfahspoft totites~*fhis:EJ analy~'l'riust itic1llde impacts to.:cultutally im:portimtiiaft.fral . resoutces, such -as: sacred* places, traditional *food* _sources, and traditional medical plants.

-**** --* - -- ----*****---*---*-***.:.._:~_

.. _*:_:..._*=*-:..:_:_-=.*:=.-::=.. ~*.=:.-_*:.==..:::.:*:.. ::..--:::.==-------_--_--.:-:.*.=:.... -:..:::.::...-:... ~--==--: __ -_:_*:-.:.::..--:--_-:------~-=~---: _ _: ____. -~--:*.-------=------------------- --* Sincerely," Signature~~ /J/J V '. Name (Print) ~ 1 0- <\\ -{' (} City & State So-.V'"'\\~ ~~ (--l]-./63

The Consequences To Ao Accident-Exposed Individ.,.rnl M!.!st Be Analyzed Terms iike coiiective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacis to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during transport and at the site must.be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transp9rting or working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed = The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister,s will be h~dled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if lea.ks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumu,ative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from_ WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacU! from and to the lo~ oil *and gas industries need to be analyzed and incJuded in the EIS.

Seismic Impacts On Stofed C~sks *Mu.st Be St~ted Although the ER gives a $tatement on recent seismic-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what fracking-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be _AnalY7:ed Impacts-from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS. Economi~'Impacts Must Be An~l~~d For1Th*~ Different Phases Of T4e ~roj ~ct.. *.. " The ecqnomjc im,papts must be studied and clearly state any positiv.e* or n~gative;imp~ts from 1rn:s site: initially, after construction IS compl~te, anc,i tlu:oughout the whole 120 "years. How many Jobs will he'created? How many ate ottly teinporacy and how niany*are

perniarient? How inay will go to*local residents?

. A Thorou~ Environmental Justice (EJ}-~i.;;s::.*M~~ B~ 1-~~l~-ded-in T;~: Ei; Impacts t.o EJ commw:iities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied,

including bu.. _..,...,..

.. ' ~* ~ :J.itklth imp~$-$'6:spedi;fio 'tWQWeNfieORfflW'C----- ahd people of color ooi:ntriunities; *Forfadigenbus populatlohs locateff:tieat the site or along ttansport 'toutes; this*-EJ analyiJs,riiust itic1ude impacts ~b :culturally irliportant natural . resources, such as: sacted.pl~ces,'traili.tional."foocf~urces, and traditional medical *plants. Sincerely,' Signature t~~ ~> N arne (Print) l-eo (I\\ Tl, *a ~ () 5 Dvl I City & State Mr V1 "1 ed.f d /,*) H N Date 'J't.t{f J ]., ;JO[E[

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individ.uai Must Be Analyzed Terms iike coiiective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potentiai impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during

transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transporting or working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed = The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool_or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister~ will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if le~ or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~ oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.: Sei&mic Impacts On Sfo:-e_d Casks *J\\.1:ust Be Stated Although the ER gives a statement on recent seismic-activity in the area, there is no analysis of what frackiri.g-indu~ earthquakes will have on the buried casks. Toes~ impacts need to be analyzed and included-in the ;EIS. Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be_Anal~ed Impacts:from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects*must b~ included m EIS. )r.conom:j~*Im,p~cts.M~t Be Anal~~d Fo/The Different Phases Of Th~ Proj~5t... The econ9m.ic

imp~u; ni~t be ~died and clearly state any positfve*.o~.n~gative.im.p~ts from th.i,s site: initially, after construction IS C01J:"lplete, and througho_ut the whole 120 years.
How*many jobs win**be*created? How many are.only teinporruy and how many*are

'pemianent? How i:nay will go to *local residf?nts? .. __.:, ---*.--*--:-:*-----*---* --------.. -* -----~- - -----*.- ---' ----~..... -. _. **-.:.. *... *. :*.:.. :*.:...*.*.. -:...-~----* ~-:.. :.::.. :~*:*:* ::* '.~-:~_:=...:-=.:-~. A Thorough Environmental Justice (EJ) Analysis*Must_Be Included In The*EI.S Impacts to BJ corrui:nuiities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied, -inch1ding bui* not-lm-~omic.a.lld-.:h~th-i.mpast&:th$MS-:speoilie "tcdewermoom,P.e---- afla 'people of celor:comriiunities; Fodndigenous popWatiohs located, ~eat the site or along ttansport "toutes; this** EI analy~ m.U$t faciude impacts to :culturally irtiportani hatural resources, suoh as: sacred* places, *traditional food* _sourtes, anti traditioruil :medical plants. Sincerely,* d4 Signature Md_ Date 7;_1_7/_1/. Name (Print) flvtY: Sck'UiJr City & State l Lfli r-{ ~ d 11. I-,. 7 lA

The Consequences To Ao Accichmt-Exposed Individual Must Be.Analyzed Terms iike.. 'collective dose risk,' and Hperson-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during

transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasi~n and workers who are transp9rting or working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool_ or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister_s will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts of a radiologic release from_ WIPP on the proposed CIS site. ~ The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the local oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in the EIS._. Seismic Impacts On Stored Caslcs *Must Be Stated Although the ER gives a statement on recent seismic-activity in the area, there is no analysis of what fracJ:dtig-indu_ced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the ~IS. Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Analy7:ed Impacts from new electrical* lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included m EIS. ~conomi~-Im,pacts Must UeAnal~~d For 1The.Difforent Phases Of The :froject. The ecQn9:m.fo. im,paGts. rit~t be ~died and clearly state any positive: _or negative imp~cts from th.i,s site: initially, after construction IS complet~, andthrougµout the whole 120 years.

How many jobs wiU--oe*created? How many ate only teinp~rary and how m~y"are
perniarient? How may will go to-local residents?.

A-Th~;ou~-Environmen~~I Ju~ti~~ (EJ)-~:~~~---iv.1~~ B.~ i~~luded-ln T~e:E~; *-* -- Impacts t.o EJ communities near the site and along tran.~port routes must be studied, including but not -limited to*econoi:PJ-e-mi~aGt.~t a:re.*speoifie lo.lmver:-inooin----- ab.d *people of color communities; F.edndigenous pop'u.la,tiohs located* ~eat the site or along transporfi'otites; thl~rEJ *an.aly~,n1ust4Ii.clude impacts to *culturally ioiportant natural rei:iou.tces, such*as: sacred places; triiditional"food _sources, and traditional* medical plants.

- - - - --***-- --* --*--:-*-*::: --*-.--.. ::::::.:..::--...::-:.*.. _.. ::..:-* ****-*- *-*-.. *..... *. _.... *_- -~* _*** -.. *****. -*_-.*.- *_ --.

Sincerely, Signature -V-f-!---Y-~=:;l,Jl-!-l-4Cid,L-14if--1---.-,,------ Date ~[ K

Name (Print) _.J.,£_--'-'-(\\-'l.cc+-+-+---:.,rhf-'=:::...l<'.C"-<.l.O,Ll,L.l.--------

City & State ~ \\~ct\\02 \\rs, tf\\N

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individm!I Must Be Analyzed w Temis like "collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the poiential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during transport ;md at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasi~n and workers who are transporting or Working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed c The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister.s wjll be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possibl~ impacts from and to the loqal oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in ~e EIS.* Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *Must Be Stated Although the ER gives a statement on recent seismic-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what frackiri.g-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the EIS. Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure -Must Be Analy~ed

Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS.

Economic Impacts Must Be Analyzed For ;The Different Phases Of The Project

. The economic impacts mll$t be ~tudied ~d cle;rrly state any positive* or negative impf1cts. *
from this site: initially, aft.er construction 1s complete, and throughout the whole 120 years.

How many jobs will be"created? How many are only te~porary and how many are pernianent? How may will go to local residents? A Tho;~-ugh E;.~-;~~~e~t~iJ;sti~~-(EJ)~~1y;~-M~t-B_;i~~l~d;d I~ The*EIS Impacts to EJ communities near the site and along transport routes must be studied, including but.not limited to economic and-healJh impaci.tsfe..aL~cmecific to_lo...w..Grfoc_om~------ and people of color coi:nrilunities. For indigenous populations located near the site or along transport routes, tbis-EJ analyij.S must include impacts to culturally importailt natural resources, such as: sacred places, traditional food ~ources, and traditioiial medical plants. r 7-~

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Terms like "collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used io ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during. transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasiqn and workers who are transp9rting or working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed e The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canisters will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative ~pacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP. on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~al oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in ~e EIS.

Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *Must Be Stated Although the ER gives a statement on recent seismic* activity in the area, there is no analysis of what frackiri.g-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Analyz,ed Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS. Economic Impacts Must Be Analyzed For'The Different Phases Of The Project 5 The economic imp~9.~ must be studied and clearly state a,ny positive or negative i'mp~cts from this site: initially, after construction IS complete, anq throughout the whole 120 years. How many jobs will be *created? How niany are only temporary and how many ate permanent? How may will go to local residents? A Th~~o-~gh E;vi~;~~-~~i~i'i;sti~;*(EJ) A~;lys~ *Mu~t-B;*j~~I~~-Th;*Eis'. -... Impacts tp EJ communities near the site and along transport routes must be studied, __ --C including.but notlimited to. economic and health imp.a~ts.:...t1l.at ari:t.s~ific_to~fowcr.. inco_m,,._e ___ _ and people of color comri:mnities. For indigenous populations located ~ear the site or along transport routes, this EJ analysis must include impacts to culturally important natural resources, such as: sacred places, traditional food.sources, and traditional medical plants.

The Consequences To An Accident~Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Terms like "collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore ihe potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during

transport ~d at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasi~n and workers who are transp9rting or working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed " The.ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be !landled, since there is no wet pool or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canisters will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possibl~ environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER nientions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts of"a radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~al oil anci gas industries neeci to be analyzed and included in the EIS..- Seismic Impacts On Stored CasJ5:s *Must Be Stat~d Altliough the ER gives a $tatement on recent seismic-activity in the area, there is no analysis of w~t frackiri.g-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts

need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Anal~ed Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS. Economk Impacts Must Be Analyzed For'The Diff~r.~.mt Phases Of The Project Ii The econo:mjc impacts must be studied and clearly_ state ;my positive or negative imp~ts from 1:b.i:s site: initially, after construction 1s compl~te, and tbrougho_ut the whole 120 years. How many jobs will be *created? How IDMY are only tefuportuy and how many are permanent? How may will go to local residents?*. A Thorough Environmental Justice (EJ) Analysis *Must Be Included In The* EIS* Impacts to EJ communities near the site and along transport routes must be studied,

-----~-~in=c=l=udin=*==-g.but not.limited to economic and,health impacts that are-specific to.. lowerJm:mm.e and people of color cotnmunities. For indigenous populations located near the site or along transport routes, this EJ analy~s must include impacts to culturally important natural resources, such as: sacred places, traditional food.sources, and traditional medical plants.

Sincerely, ~* Signature ~V/Y'\\ J:2D (i~ Date~- rtz- [3 '/, \\ I"'- \\/ .Name (Print) .-):::::), I (yJ 'lQf \\e ~ )O CGf---.- City & State,~)J\\t0l \\~, f\\j )Ll}J (\\(\\ Q__'f-( CD ) 1

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Tenns like "collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual.

All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during
transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in ph,tin language, for individuals near waste on occasio.n and workers who are tran,sp9rting or Working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be. Addressed The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at ~e site. The EIS must include how cracked andleaking caniste~ will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impac~ from and to the lo~al oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.

Seismic lmpacb On Stored Casks *Must Be Stated Although the BR gives a $tatement on recent s~isrriic-activity.in the area, there ts no analysis of whatfrackiti.g-induced earthquakes "".ill have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and.included in the ;EIS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Anal~ed .

Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS.

Economic Impacts Must Be Analyzed For 'The Different Phases Of T~e Project 11 The economic imp~cts must be s~died and clearly state any positive* or negative i'mp~cts from this site: initially, after construction 1s complete, and tb.rQughout the whole 12'0 *years. How many jobs will be *created? How m.Ju(y are only temporary and how many are permanent? How may will go to local residents?

A Thorough Environmental Justice (EJ) Analysis* Must B.e ~il.cJu.ded In The* EIS Impacts to EJ communities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied, including-but-not. limited to economic and,hf".--alth.jmpactL-tliata.. !'e~pecifi.c to~lnwerJ...T1.come~-___ _

and people of color communities. For indigenous populations located near the site or along transport routes, this EJ analysis must inciude impacts to culturally important natural resources, such as: sacred places, traditional food ~urces, and traditional medical plants. Sincerely, .;;,.~J,,. f.

t.

!; r.. ~. Signature ~E-=-ic:~;~C~_j:.-_* ~,,-_c:-fl~~* t!--+0-------- Date ___ f___:;.J_: -"'-i_. ff~;* _*i'-; _ 1 )_** _.-\\'--*;:. Name (Print) __________________ _ City & State_**~*:._:._:~ ... ¥~'.-~~},_. -~\\ ___ 1;_.,..,,_.,: ~,_;~* ~i ___ --,.-fti_.. ~}_)~°I_.;._\\ __ ~

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed. Individual Must Be Analyzed Terms like "collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine *and accidental radioactive releases during

transport ~d at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasi~n and workers who are transporting or Working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed = The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canisters ~11 be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed

The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site.

The_ impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~ oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in ~e EIS.

Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *Mu.st Be Stated Although the ER gives a statement on recent sei~mic-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what frackiri.g-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in thews.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Ana~ed

Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS.

Economic Impacts Must Be Analyzed For ;Th*e* Different Phases Of The Project

The econc;nnic impa~ts must be s~died and clearly state any positive* or negative fmp/lcts from this site: initially, after constructio~ is complet~, and thr<?ughout the whole 120 years.
How many jobs will be *created? How many are only* temporary and how many are
permanent? How may will go to local residents?

A Tho;~~gh E~~~o;~~~t~l-J;sti~~ (EJ)~~.y~is*M~~t"i1e"i~~l~d;i1~ Th~*-Eis- -.

Impacts tp EJ communities near the site and along transport routes must be studied,

___________ *----. including but not limited to economic and,he&lth_impa~JS _that ar~t~p.ekific t9Jower.inc.omtL _ _ *-*-- ___ _ and peopie of color cointnunities. For indigenous populations l_ocated i;iear the site or along trail.sport routes, this EJ analyljS must include impacts to culturally important natural resources, such as: sacred places, traditional food sources,* and traditional medical plants. - .***-**- ~ -- - Sincerely, G' I\\~,----- Signature ' \\IV Date ---lc-t---=----------------,c-,--- Name (Print) -AJ-p-,-..,.,C.HAJY_.ft.~ h*~cCG_t ~---&-.-J~f}-u_§\\~, - City & State L)~ V t' \\/'\\JJ V &- 7--17-lrf

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Terms like "collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual.

All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during transport ~d at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transpc>rting or working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at the site. Toe EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister_s will be* handled onsite and during transport and analyze* possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts of*a radiologic release from.WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impac~ from and to the local oil and gas industries need to be analyz.ed and included in t4e EIS.

Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *Must Be Stated Although the ER gives a ~tement on recent seismic-activity in the area, there is no analysis of what t;racking-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be AnalY7:ed Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS. Economic Impacts Must Be Analyzed For 0The D~erent Phases Of The Project The ece>n9ipic impacts must be studied and clearly state any positive* or negative imp~cts from this site: ipi_tially, after construction IS complete, and throughout the Whole 120 years. How many jobs will be*created? How ini3.I1Y are only terhporary and how many are permanent? How may will go to local residents? * ---A-Th~;~~g11 E;~~;;~i;i-.i;sti~e-*(EJ) k~*1ysi1rM~tB;*1~~1~d;i i~-Tiie~iis -- *- - Impacts t_o EJ communities ne~ the site and along transport routes must be studied, ______ ___ -inclJJdmg.but not limited to economic and h~lthc..impacts.th.at ar~.:.SP.~~ific.to-fower_iru1o"""m""'e"----- ahd people of colotcoinmunities. For indigenous populations located J;Lear the site or along transport routes, this EJ analy!JS must include impacts to culturally important natural resources, such as: sacred places, traditional food.sources, and traditional-medical plants. Sincerely, Signature ____ */]_~1::::=======~---- Date _7~/~/~7~l~/EJ~-- Name (Print) Ju\\,c:\\:\\EClLE /V\\fii2J, ti\\./ City & State QE.fs.R ( LLOS NM. f37o (0

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Tenns like "coliective dose risk"* and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during

transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are tran,sp9rting 0:r Working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed e The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister~ will be handled onsite and during transport and

analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters.

More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts of'a radiologic* release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the local oil anci gas industries need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.

Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *Must Be Stated Although the ER gives a $tatement on recent seismic-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what frackiri.g-induced earthq~es will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the ;EIS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Anal~ed Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS. Economic* Impac.ts Mu.lit Be Ana,lyzed For 1The Different Phases Of The Project The ecom;,m.ic impac::ts must be s~died ~d clearly state any positive* or negative fmp~cts from this site: initially, after construction 1s complete, and throughout the whole 120 years. How many jobs will be *created? How mariy are only te~porary and how many are permanent? How inay will go to local re~id~~ts? A Tho~~;gh E;~~~~;;~t~l-Justi~e-(EJ)-~Jy;~-M~~tBe-1~-~l;d;di;-Th~: Eis* Impacts t~ EJ communities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied,

~*

=in~c~lu~d=ing:hPtJlOt limited to economic and.. ~ealthimpacts that are-specific.tQJID¥er in=c-O=* !D=**=e __ and people of color communities. For indigenoµs populations loca~d :i;iear the site or along transport routes, this EJ analy¥5 must include impacts to culturally important natural resources, such as: sacred places, traditional food ~ources, and traditional medical plants. Sincerely, ~ Signature,fu,1n.u:.J. "'. Name (Print) /11\\o:r ~ ~ City & State ~ta te " N 'M_ 7 Date 7. \\], lf:, 87665

Th.e Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Tenns like "collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible _human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transp9rting o~ working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed e The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister_s will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from_ WIPP on the proposed CIS site.

The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~al oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.
Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *Must R.e Stated Although the ER gives a $tatement on recent syism:jc-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what frackiri.g.:.induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the ~IS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Analyzed Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS. Economic Impacts Mmt Be Analyzed For'The Different Phases Of The Project The economic impa~ts. must be s~djed ~d cl~ly state any positive or negative imp~ts from this site: initially, after construction 1s complete, and tbrougho_ut the whole 120 years. How many jobs will be *created? How many are only temporary and how many are ~~~~~~~~~-°.:1~!-~1 ~~ ~~-~o_:al_~:~i~:~~?. _______ --~--______________. A Thorough Environmental Justice (El) Analysis *Must B.e Included In The* EIS Impacts to EJ communities near the site and along transport routes must be studied, _ _ ______ including but not.!imited-to..:..e_conomic and-health. imP-acts.that ar..e..::.sp~j.fic,toJoYL.~r_i11_c_ome and people of color communities; For indigenous populations loca:ted near the site or along transport routes, this EJ analyfiS must include impacts to culturally important natural resources, such as: sacred places, traditional food.sources, and traditional medical plants. Sincerely, Signature____,,_~~~-~~--------- Date ___,_J-'-{ l_,_L2_0_\\ ~-*-- Name (Ppnt) _G'-'----0(-W\\..-\\;..\\~_f ~_....;- '--"-.'.......,.(--""21-+0-=--0..-=-* vv_* _t_* C,i.A. __ **_* ~_v.._. \\~~---- q City & State_-=8-"'-ru=-~~--"-\\ f"--1--_,_\\t\\J_\\'j+-________ _

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be A.nalyzed. Tenns like "collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during* transport ;md at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasiqn and workers who are transp<;>rting or Working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed c The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canisten, will be handled onsite and during transport and analyz.e possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More C~uiative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~al oil and gas industries need to be analyz.ed and included in ~e EIS.* Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *Must He Stat.ed Although the ER gives a $tatement on recent seismic-activity in the area, there is no analysis of what fracking-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the ;EIS. Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Anal~ed Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS. E.conomic.Impac.ts Must Be Analyzed For;Th~Different Phases Of The Project The econ.o:mic imp~~ts m~ be s~died ;md clearly state any*positive* or negative imp~ts from this site: initially, after construction IS complete, a,nd.thro,ughout the whole 120 "years. How many jobs will be *created? How m~y are only temporary and how many are perm.anent? How may will go to local residents? A Tho;~~gh E;~~;~~ent~i-j~sti~~ -(i2n-k;"iy*~;-M~~tB; i~~l~ded I~ The~ Eis -- *-.. Impacts tp EJ com.in.unities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied, --~in=cl=u~dm=*. g.but..notlimited to economic and health.imp~s th~pecificJo.JQw.etin.c=*O=m=e __ _ and people of color communities. For indigenous populations located near the site or along transport routes, this* EJ analy!jS must include impacts to culturally important natural . resources, such as: sacred places, traditional food,sources, and traditional medical plants. Sincerely, Signature {,-./.~----* Name (Print) l- \\JD~D *hJ ~ /,,,.,... \\jl\\A City & State v{Sl\\K(-J\\ (]>., (. ; v \\ I

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individu~l Must Be Analyzed Terms like "collective dose risk" and <<person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during. - transport ~d at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transp<;>rting or working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed = The.ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool_or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canisters will be handled onsite and during transport and

malyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters.

More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP_ on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~l oil and gas indushies need to be analyzed and included in the EIS. : Seismic Impact~ On Stored Casks *Must Be Stated Altllough the ER gives a ~tatement on recent s~isrriic-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what frackirig-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the EIS. Future Electrical_ Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be AnalY7ied .

Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS.

Economic Impacts _Must Be Analyzed For :The* Different Phases Of The Project.

The econ9.mic irn,pa~ts must be studied and clearly state any positive* or negative imp;:icts from this site: initially, after construction is complete, and throughout the whole 120 years.

How many jobs will be *created? }low many are ~nly temporary an:d how many are permanent? Hbw may will go to local i:eside~ts?: A Thorough Environmental Justice (EJ) An~ilysis -M~t-B~"in~i;d~,i i~-Th*e*-Eis**_ Impacts tp EJ communities near the site and along transport routes must b~ studied, ______ including-but-not limited to econo1PJc and health hnP-~~-ts that are sp_t,g_ific tolower.inc.om=e __ and people of color communities. For mdigenous:j:mpulations located near the site or along transport routes, this BJ analy8's m~ include i.inpacts to culturally important natural resources, such as: sacred places, traditional food ~ources, and traditional me(ii.cal plants. Sincerely, L Signature v-7/ Date ? ~ 7 L~ * ---.'---------.e---------- --~-'-T,"---'---'----- ~- l=~=~~&~~~~~~- City & State~..cc-5-=CP'!,~~-'---"-G_._-......,,1--+-/J_' f-_Lf.._---'87=-..c..-.sZ;.,_* _-;; 7 __ 7

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Terms like "collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during

transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for in~ividuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transp9rting or working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed 0 The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and lea.king canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool_or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister.s will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts of a radiologic release from_ WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~al oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in ~e EIS.

Seismic Impacts On Stored Caslcs *Must Be Stat.ed Although the BR gives a statement on recent seis~c-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what frackiri.g-induced earthquakes vvill have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the ~IS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be_Ana~ed Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS. Economic Impacts Mtrnt Be Analyzed For;TheDifferent Phases Of The Project The economic impacts must be s~died and clearly state any positive* or negative impFlcts from this site: initially, after construction IS complete, and throughout the whole 120 years. How many jobs will be"created? How many are oniy.teinporary and how many ate permanent? How may will go to local resid~~ts? --ATho~o~gh*E~~~o~~e~i~iiusti~e-(EJ)-~~1y;1s -M~;t-B_e-1~~i~-ded. fu-Th~: i:cs** Impacts tp EJ communities near the site and along transport routes must be studied,

~-*-"'in=c=lu=d=i=ng but not limited to econo.mlc ~d:h~l.th imp_a&..ts.. thata..re-SP-ecific toJow~rjn.come~---

and people of color communities. For indigenous populations located near the site or along transport routes, this EJ analysis must include impacts td culturally important natural resources, such as: sacred places, traditional food ~ources, and traditional medical plants. Sincerely, Name (Print) _L_. ~_:;.- A_~-~-~,____o_tJ __ fA_o_* -----,-- City & State -1" 0-W--~...c-.vLQ-_* __ pl/V\\_*--~--~-:...-__,__ .-*- _f_ f

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Tenns iike "collective dose risk" and <<person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during. transport and at the site must be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transp<;>rting or working at the CIS site long-tenn. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed " The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister.s will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More C.umulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site.

The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~al oil anci gas industries need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.*

Seismic Impact!! On Stored Cas.ks *Must Be Stated Although the ER gives a ~tement on recent seismic, activity in the area, there is no analysis of what fracking-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the EIS. Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Ana~ed .

Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS.

Economic Impacts Mmd Be Analyzed For 'The Different Phases Of The Project The economic impacts must be stl,ldied and cl~ly state any positive* or negative fmpfi.Cts from this site: initially, after construction lS complete, and tbrougho~t the Whole 120 *years. Bow many jobs will be*created? How numy are only temporary and how many are permanent? How may will go to local resid~~ts? .. -*-A-Th-o~~~gh E~~~~n;~~~I J~sti~;*(EJ). A~;iy;ffi *M~;t.Be-i~~.~-d~cii.;Th~--EIS. 11 Impacts to EJ communities near the site and along transport routes must be studied,

*---~-*~in=c=lu=dh}..gbut not limited to-economic and.healthimp::ict'-:.fua.t are sp.edfic to lower_im::om__e ____, ___ -**-*-

ahd people of color coinri:mnities, For indigenotlS populations located near the site er along transport toute.s, this EJ analysis must include impacts to culturally important natural resources, such as: sacred places, traditional food sources, and traditional medical plants. Sincerely, ~/ ai -A Signabrre ~~ Name (Print) Oi'tz ~/c/f[ J City & State dd#ci ve. /{)If! ~ Date *'f-, /~ /~

The Coo.sequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Terms like "collective dose risk" and "person-rem are used io ignore the potential impacts to a single individual.

All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during. transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are tran,sp9rting or Working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed = The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister~ will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possibl~ environmental impacts ifleaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts of a radiologic release from. \\VIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the local oil *and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in t4e EIS. Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *,Must Be Stated Although the ER gives a ~tatement on recent seismic-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what fracking-ind11;ced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the :ers. Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Mu.st BeA,nal~ed Impacts:from new electrical.lines, surl'ace and subsurface projects must be included in EIS.

. ~

~.. l?,conomic llllpac.ts Mmit Be.Analy~~d For*The Di,fferent Pllases Of The froject _. G The ecom;mnc unpacts must be $died and clearly state any positive _Qr negative)mp~ts from thi,s site: initially, a.fter.constructiOI11S (?Omple~e, an~,~O~{?;hOUt the Whole 12-0 years. How niany jobs will *be *created? How mmiy are only temporary and how many ate

permarient?*How may will *go tofoeal residents?

-.... :. :::::.. :_.*..:::. __ :*~..:....=-***--:::.:._. A Thorough Environmental Justice (EJ) Analysis.*Must Be Included In The* EIS Impacts t_o EJ communities near the site and along transport routes must be studied, inclu.dir~ * * ~. * *

- - *~-uwaGts:th:at-fil'8 *speeifiri twew:ecin-eo-mFlA

.. -e---- ail.d*people of colonx>iriiiiunities; F.odndigenous populations located ~eat the site or along transport *foutes; tlns*:EJ analy~,huist mcluqe impacts to :culturally important natural res"olli"Ces, such as: sacrecfplaces, *trii.ditlonai 'food _sources, and traditional medical plants. .. _-:.. ::.:.::..::..:.:::..--.-*: ** -***:-:.:...=..... *-..*. --~ -

_*_-. **:..-* -..* *"-- ------- *- ~-*- ***-******--*-

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Temis iilce.. collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during. transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasi~n and workers who are transp9rting or working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed 0 The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since th.ere-is no wet pool.or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister~ will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from crack~ canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts of*a radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the local oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in t4e EIS.

Seismic Impact, On Stored Casks *Must Be Stated Although the ER gives a statement OQ. recent seismic-activity in the area, there is no anaiysis of what frackiri.g-indu_ced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the ~IS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be AnalY7:ed Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be in.chided in EIS. Eco~omic* Impacts Must Be Analyzed For :The '.Different Phases Of The Proj~ct The econplllic impact& must be $dj,ed and clearly state any positive* or negative imp~cts from this site: initially, after construction IS complete, and throughout the whole 120 years. How many jobs will be *created? How many are only temporary and how many are permanent? Htiw may will go to local residents? A Thorough Environmental Justice (EJ) Analysis *Must Be Included In The' EIS Impacts t9 EJ communities near the site and along transport routes must be studied, . including.but.not limited to economic and.health imp_a.~.:.!11-.at are s~cific to-lo.}Y~J'=..io.c_ome __ _ and people of color communities. For indigenous populations located ~ear the site or along transport routes, this EJ analyiJS must include impacts to culturally important natural resources, such as: sacred places, traditional food.sources, and traditional medical plants. Sincerely, /', Signature ~t ;:f,,,,J:7.C ~ . ~- Name (Print) ;.J. ' l--yn i:. ft: bi / {c.. 1j L City & State c, f ~j- ~. N ll.\\l\\ f;; 5-30 I Date ().

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Terms like "collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual.. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during transport ;md at the site must _be clearly defined in plain langwige, for in~viduals near waste on occasi~n and workers who are tran,sp9rting o~ Working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed The ER does not analyze exactly how r~oactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking caniste~ will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~al oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in t4e EIS. : Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *Must Be Stated Although the ER gives a $1:atemen~ on recent seismic* activity.in the area, ther~ is no analysis of what frackiti.g-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the :ms. Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be Analy~ed Impacts from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS. Economic.Impacts Mu.st Be Analy~ed For;The Different Phases Of Tile Project The economic impacts must be' S~died and clearly state any positive OI' negative lIIlp/lCtS from this site: initially, after construction fs complete~ *a:nd throughout the whole 120 years. How many jobs will be*created? How many are only temporary and how many are permanent? How may will go to local resid~~ts? A Thorough Environmental J.ustice (E.J) Analysis*Must Be Inciuded In The*EIS Impacts tQ EJ communities near the* site and along transport routes must be studied, including but not limited to economic and health impacts that are specific to lower income and people of color communities. For in4i_genous populations located near the site or along transport routes, this EJ analy~ must include impacts to culturally important natural resources, such as: sacred places, traditional food _sources, and traditional medical plants. Sincerely, Signature-~~=----;,'-"'~=-~~,:__ ___ Date p 7/; f'. Name (Print) _ _!=:::=.,<.~~~---=~~~~,..*:...~*.1..4L--'-..~~;1-------- City & State ___ ~=....,,f~* --'-fj~J}j-1-------- )

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Terms like '-~coliective dose risk" and 0 person-remn are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasiqn and workers who are transp9rting or Working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed e The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canisters will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environrriental impacts ff leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impac~ from and to the lo~al oil *anci gas industries need to be analyzed and included in t4e EIS.

Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *Must :Be Stated Although the ER gives a $tat~ment on recent seismic-activity in the area, there is no analysis of what frackiri.g-indu.ced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the ;EIS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Mu.st Be Anal~ed Impacts.from new electrical.lines, sin.face an:d.'subsurface projects must be included m EIS.

\\,

Economic.lnlpacts _Must Be Anaiy~~d *For!The D~eieent Phases Of T~e Project... The econ9m.jc impaGts. must be s~clied and clearly state any* positive*.or negative *llliPliCts

from this site: initially, after construction fa complete, and throughout tp.e whole 120 years.

Hovi many jobs will 'be 'created? How many are only temporary, ~d how many are

permanent? How i:nay will go to *local reside~ts?

A 'fh~;;~~i;~;;;;~~{;i~~ti~~(EJ)-~~;~~--M~*i.~~ i~~l~~ed-in ~;~:~I; -- -- Impacts tp EJ cominw:iities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied, iDclHdin,g bnt not limited to economic *mid healthJm:f;}~at are *specific tedewerinfP.eAOfflR':.!Pe,----- ahd people of color communities; F.ot'i:ndigenous poptilatio.ns located neat tlie site or along transport t9tites;. tmif EJ analy~ inustinclilde impacts to '.culturally iri:iportant natriral reiources, such -as: sacrecf places, -triiditiomtl *foocf :8o'llrces, and traditional medical plan~.

-:-:~~*::-.::.-=:.:*-:::=-::.:-:::-...:**._ *--~-:--.:-_-:-. -:.:* -.. *--* *-*- *.-= *_* *.-.. **:...... **.-.:.**...:__:_. -_ --... *.. *** ___...

__ ---'... ___ ' -:::_:-_--* '-* --.

Sincerely; Signature ~\\(A-~~~~- __ ___,_,£&'-'~~~~---- Date Name (Print) _:._V ~_-_t'--'-(l_*{_~-'--~.-----.!C..)-=-F-=--ct &it_........ ___ City & State __ 7__:_hJ~--=-7/--'-(l_._*1 _.._r&_.,,~:;;..___* _____ _

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed " Terms like "coliective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during

transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transpprting or Working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed = The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool_ or _hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister_s will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possibl~ environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must B~ Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts of"a radiologic release from. \\"VIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~ oil anci gas industries need to be analyzed and included in the EIS. Seismic Impaets On Stored Casks *Must Be Stated Although the ER gives a ~tatement on recent seismic-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what frack.iri.g-induced earthquakes will have on the buried ca.sics. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the EIS. Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be_Anal~ed Impacts:from new electrical lines, surface 8:IlA 5i~b,surface projects must be included in EIS. E,con~~.!!-iDlp~cbi _Must Be.An~l~~d For;Th~ '.Diffe-r.ent Phases Of T~e froJ~tct.. **.

The econ9.mi;c
imp~cts ~ust be studied and dearly state any positiv~:.or,negative :iinp11cts
from this site: initially, after construction fa complete, and throughout the whole 120 years.
How~y jobs wiU*be"created? How many ate_only tein~raiy@d hov./m:any"are
pemianent? How inay will go to-local reside~ts?

. A-Th~~~;-E;;-.i;~~m;;~al J;~ti;~ -(EJ) -A~~~s~:M~~ B-e i~~lri.ded-j~ T;~: ii;... ~ Impacts tp EJ communities near the site.and along transport routes must be shldied, inch1ding but not* limited to economiG--mld-llea1th jmp2,$truit are:speeifre:ffldt>wer-inoQ!ne ahd peopie of co lot* coinihunities; *For indigenous popUlations 1ticated* :f:ieat the site er along transport:totites, tlni(RT analy~,mll$1:irtc1ude impacts to *cwturally i.ti:iporuuitnafural re~outces, stich*as: sacted.places, traditioiJ.al*food._sources, arid traditioiia.l,niedicill plan~. .... -;:-;--;---:-::-::~_..===---**---. *--~--- _:_:__:...:::..:.. :.:.:~---....... *. -***.-***.. ****** ___ -__ ------~---*.. -* _______ --*==:_--::..::::..-::.::....**:- ~-- *---- -- --*-"*----*****---------*-*- ---* Sincerely; ~ signature. ~'JfJ~vef"'~Lr Name (Pnnt) . 'a J\\.,

rJ/,n Q

/ Date IZ -ZL>I. e- , I I CJ. I City & State __ ~~---* _:._F_c;e __ ---'-',-,l---~-L-__._..~..;...-,-=-...;;.,1 )

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analy:rnd Terms like "collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacis to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during

transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transp9rting or working at the CIS site long-term.

Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool_ or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canisters will be handled onsite and during transport and apai.yze possible environmental impacts if le~ or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed

The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plarit (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site.
The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~ oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in t4e EIS.
Seismic !mpad8 On Stored Casks *Must Be Stat.ed Although the ER gives a $tatement on recent seismic-activity in the area, there is no analysis of what fracking-indu_ced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be _Anal~ed Impacts:from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included m EIS. Economi¢)m,pacts.~ust Be Anal~~d For!Th~ Different Phases Of The :froj~~L..

The economic "hn,paq~_ must be $.died and clearly state any positiv.~* or n~gati\\.~e fmp~ts from~ site: initially, after construction 1s complete, and througho_ut the whole 120 ye~s.

How many Jbbs will *be *created? How iri~y are only temporary and how many ate

pemiarient? How may will go to*local reside~ts?
.A.ih~;;u~*Environmen~~l Justice (El) An~lys~*Must*B~ I~~l~-~e~-~~ ~~~:~I;.::.. ~.

Impacts to EJ communities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied, mrJ.HdinglrutJlot:J.imited:..to.:ec-..,oo.g~-hga}fu iln})ar.A&,ffi.at~ei:fie--tW6WCf inoome ahd people of colon:ommunities; For-indigenous populations -located ~eat the site or along ttansporrfoutes; tbls,EJ tmalyliS,m:ustiiiclude impacts to *culturally iriiportani ilafilral reiiioutces, stich *as: sacred* pl~ces, traditioila.l "food ~ources, and traditional,medical JHants.

*-._** ~~.- *.-~.

-=-**.. ----* ----*=... *. -**.*-.- *_.. ***-.-**.. *:.*.=..:.. _* ***--=:* *-. -*

. ---.. i. *.* :. ** Sincerely; Signature --"'-Q-~--=-...,~-* -'-".b__::C're..h.5W;___*~7.~---- Date 7 / /,.ff-'-}___,.i __ Name (Print) _D=--=0-'--N_R~l-=-D__,_,0'---"a=-'"'E=-1R__._._g.._._E..._.I~~--_____ City & State_5_~__.:__...,_--==-__,f~*'*-"'---"'-'-N~ri~t-~ __ 1~5~0~S: ____ _ )

The Consequences To An Acciderrt.-Exposed !ndividual Must Be Analyzed Terms iike "coilective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for in~ividuals near waste on occasio_n and workers who are trans.p9rting or working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed = The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canisters will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possibl~ environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does riot analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the local oil *anci gas industries need to be analyzed and included in t4e EIS. Seismic Impacts On Store.d Cask.s 1\\1:ust Be Stat.ed Although the ER gives a ~tatement on recent seismic-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what fracking-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These µnpacts need to be analyzed and included in the ~IS. ~uture Electrical Transmission Lines And Othet Infrastructure Must BeAna~ed Impacts-from new el~ctrical.lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS. Economjc*I~pac.ts _Must BeAnal~d For:The Ditl'er.ent Phases Of The ~roJ~ct _... *

The ec<>n9uiic.im.pacts. m~ be studied and clearly state any positiv.e:.or n,~g~tive im.p~cts from thi,s site: initially, after construction 1s complete, and ili.foug];iout _the whole 120 years.

How IIlfilly jobs will '*oe 'created? How m~y are only temporary an:d how Di~y 'are

perniarient? How may will go to-local reside~ts?

. *A -Th~~~~;:E;~;;*;me;~~. J~ti~; (EJ)-~~s~-:M~~ B.e I~~.~~ed. In T;;: Eis* Impacts tp EJ cominwiities riear the site.and along transport routes must be studied, -incl.11ding but not limited to eccmomic ruid--!walte+/-..!!:lFaG-tstlfat are;sper~todawer income . ahcl'peopfo of color=com:rl:iunities; *Fodndigenous populatiohs located*J;ieai' the site or along ttahspoft tdtites; this:EJ analy~ -must include in:ipacts to culturally iriiportani natural reiources, such*as: sacred.'pl~es, :traditional *food.sources, and traditional medical plan~. --:--:--:..-:.-:*-: *=-*':".:::::::::::=-:-;:.-*. ::::::---:..........:... :..:::.: .:_:_::...:.:..~--* *-:--* :.-=-.. _. *. -.... *- -. -. -..... -~. 7'. *.** *- -~- --- -* -*---**-- Sincerely,' /) Signature ~ ~ '\\ j 11 Date __ v_L "-! --1)_lo_ij-=---- Name (Print) ___,f......,,,e-~"'~ter-"'-"----().-fVW;__;..*

-=-_. _t.;.._rJ _______

City & State_~_AA1\\A vc_~-+-J _N_* _'M _______ _

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Irrdivid!.!al Must Be Analyzed Terms iike coilective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potentiai impacts to a single individual. All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transp9rting or working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed = The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at the site; The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister~ will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possible environmental impacts_ if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts ofa radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~l oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.

Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks *Must Be Stated Although the ER gives a $tat~ment on recent seismic-activity.in the area, there is no analysis of what frackiri.g-induceq. earthquakes will have on the buried casks. These impacts need to be analyzed and included in the EIS.

Future Electrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be_Anal~ed Impacts-from new electricaHines, surface and sµb~urface projects must be included in EIS. E.conomjc Impacts MU.Bt Be Anal~~d *For'Th*e Different Phases Of T4e froject. 'fhe econc;nnjc inlpac~ ID.U$t be S~U<fied and clearly state ariy positive::or*negatiye.imp~cts from this site: initially, after construction fa complete, and*througho:ut the whole 120 years.

How many jobs will be *created? How imuiy ar~ only tem~rary and how manyate
pernianeilt? How may will go to -local :residents?

-ATho;~~~:E~'ri~~~;e~tal J~~ti;e (EJ)A;-ai;,~~-i1~*~-~:e* I~~lri.de~-;n ~e: ~i; Impacts tp EJ corn.munities near the site.and _along ~port routes must be studied, . 1 cl' b ~+ 1:-:+-..:1 + -~*--=--=- -......:! i....:.-*n.1- *.. ..,,. *.,~=~~.r;.... 1 rncJLmgut ~:o.:ec~'\\,!,~ tlnpaGts.w.at ar~e4mawer-moomc and peopie of color COinniunities; Fodndigeno~ poptilations located* i;ieat the site er along transport routes; tlns*-E:T *analyiivs inustiliclude impacts to :culturally iriiportani natural . resources, Stich as: sacted.places, traditiotfill"foocf_sources, and* traditiortal medical plan~. Sincerely; ~ Signature~, ~'I&- Date 08- (.i - :Z*Q f 6 Name(Pnnt) t11weuv ci f).T(<1,Gfl LL(} City & State-5_/l (V7 /I f' ~I /lld!J ~l"j~'LfJ7- /

The Consequen,ces To An Acdderrt-Expused Ind!vidua! Must Be Analyzed Terms iike "coliective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potentiai impacts to a single individual. ~ All possible human exposures from routine and accidental radioactive releases during transport and at the site must _be clearly defined in plain language, for individuals near waste on occasion and workers who are transpc;>rting or Working at the CIS site long-term. Cracked And Leaking Canisters Must Be Addressed The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool.or hot cell at the site. The EIS must include how cracked and leaking canister~ will be handled onsite and during transport and analyze possibl~ environmental impacts if leaks or spills occur from cracked canisters. More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions the Waste Is_olation Pilot Plant (WIPP) but does not analyze the impacts of*a radiologic release from. WIPP on the proposed CIS site. The impacts from WIPP and possible impacts from and to the lo~ oil and gas industries need to be analyzed and included in the EIS._* Sehimic Impacts On Stored Casks *Must Be Stat.ed Although the ER gives a ~tement on recent seismic-activity in the area, there is no analysis of what frackirig-indu_ced earthquakes will have on the buried casks. Toes~ impacts need to be analyzed and included in the ;EIS. Future Eleetrical Transmission Lines And Other Infrastructure Must Be_AnalY7:ed Impacts::from new electrical lines, surface and subsurface projects must be included in EIS. Jkon~~t~lm,p~cts Must Be Anal~~d For:Tb.e :O~erent P.hases Of T~e f_roJ~Ct.... Q The econ<;>ntic imp~ts must be s~died and clearly state any positive..or negative Jmp)icts.

from thi,s site: initially, after construction fo complete, and througho~t the whole 120 *years.
How many jobs will"be *created? How irimiy ate only tem~rary and how nnmj(are
perrriarient? How inay will go to-local residents?

A Thorou~ Environment~l Justice (EJ) -A~~:~~~*:M~~ Be 1-~~l~de~-~ ~~~: ~i; *-... Impacts tp EJ communities near the site.and along transport routes must be studied, -incl1J.ding*but oot limited to *ec~db.~th-i..mt>ast&t!latanfspeoi-:fio "to-loWOf income ahd'people of colot'cotmiiunities; Fot'indigenous popwatiohs fo~ted* neat the site er along ttansport "totites, thls** EJ "tinalyijS -must-include impacts to :culturally i.ri:iporumt hatural res"outces, stieh,as: sacred places, traditional *roocl ~ources, and traditional. medical plan~. .*.*.*,.. -- *.-.L-----*--*..U--*-.. - Sincerely; Signature,J v-0----- Name (Print) s1e 311(6-City & State )a VI.bx te, t tJ tA-1. _}}

ML18219A714

Text

Navigation menu

Search