ML18155A605

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Letter to M. Mckinley Scheduling Letter for Kentucky 2018 Periodic Meeting
ML18155A605
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/04/2018
From: Monica Ford
NRC Region 1
To: Mckinley M
State of KY, Cabinet for Health and Family Services
References
Download: ML18155A605 (4)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 2100 RENAISSANCE BLVD., SUITE 100 KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-2713 June 4, 2018 Matthew McKinley, Administrator Radiation Health Program Cabinet for Health and Family Services 275 East Main Street, HS1C-A Frankfort, KY 40621-0001

Dear Mr. McKinley:

In order to help the Agreement States and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) remain knowledgeable of each others program, the NRC conducts one-day periodic meetings with Agreement States between IMPEP reviews. This letter confirms that, the previously schedule periodic meeting that was to be held on June 28, 2018, has been moved to August 23, 2018. The meeting will be conducted in accordance with Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Procedure SA-116, Periodic Meetings Between IMPEP Reviews. The NRC will be represented by John Miller, Regional State Agreements Officer, Region I; Joseph Nick, Deputy Director, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region I; and me.

The likely topics for discussion at this meeting are listed in the enclosed agenda. If there are any additional specific topics you would like to cover, or if you would like to focus on a specific area, please let me know. If you have any questions, please contact me at (610) 337-5214 or via e-mail at Monica.Ford@nrc.gov.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Monica Lynn Ford Regional State Agreements Officer Division of Nuclear Materials Safety U.S. NRC Region I

Enclosure:

Agenda for August 23, 2018 Periodic Meeting with Kentucky

June 4, 2018 Matthew McKinley, Administrator Radiation Health Program Cabinet for Health and Family Services 275 East Main Street, HS1C-A Frankfort, KY 40621-0001

Dear Mr. McKinley:

In order to help the Agreement States and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) remain knowledgeable of each others program, the NRC conducts one-day periodic meetings with Agreement States between IMPEP reviews. This letter confirms that, the previously schedule periodic meeting that was to be held on June 28, 2018, has been moved to August 23, 2018. The meeting will be conducted in accordance with Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Procedure SA-116, Periodic Meetings Between IMPEP Reviews. The NRC will be represented by John Miller, Regional State Agreements Officer, Region I; Joseph Nick, Deputy Director, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region I; and me.

The likely topics for discussion at this meeting are listed in the enclosed agenda. If there are any additional specific topics you would like to cover, or if you would like to focus on a specific area, please let me know. If you have any questions, please contact me at (610) 337-5214 or via e-mail at Monica.Ford@nrc.gov.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Monica Lynn Ford Regional State Agreements Officer Division of Nuclear Materials Safety U.S. NRC Region I

Enclosure:

Agenda for August 23, 2018 Periodic Meeting with Kentucky Distribution:

L. Rakovan, NMSS K. Williams, NMSS P. Michalak, NMSS J. Nick, RI DNMS M. Ford, RI DNMS J. Miller, RI DNMS J. Trapp, RI DNMS L. Roldan-Otero, NMSS SUNSI Review Complete: MF (Reviewers Initials)

S:\State Agreement Files\Kentucky\KY August 2018 Periodic Meeting DRAFT Letter and Agenda.docx After declaring this document An Official Agency Record it will be released to the Public.

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy ML18155A605 OFFICE RI/DNMS E NAME MFord/mlf DATE 06/04/18 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Agenda for Periodic Meeting with Kentucky Topic areas for discussion during the meeting may include:

1. Program reorganizations:

Discuss any changes in program organization, including program/staff relocations and new appointments.

2. Changes in program budget/funding.
3. Feedback on the NRCs program as identified by the State, including identification of any action that should be considered by the NRC.
4. Status of the States program, including:
a. Technical Staffing and Training (2016 IMPEP: Satisfactory) i) Number of staff in the program and status of their training and qualifications; ii) Program vacancies; iii) Staff turnover; and, iv) Adequacy of FTEs for the materials program.
b. Status of the Materials Inspection Program (2016 IMPEP: Satisfactory) i) Number of inspection performed overdue since the last IMPEP review ii) Number of inspection currently overdue iii) Number of initial inspections completed on time and overdue since the last IMPEP iv) Percentage of reciprocity inspections completed per calendar year since the last IMPEP
c. Technical Quality of Inspections (2016 IMPEP: Satisfactory)
d. Technical Quality of Licensing Actions (2016 IMPEP: Satisfactory)
e. Technical Quality of Incident and Allegation Activities (2016 IMPEP:

Satisfactory) i) Status of allegations and concerns referred by the NRC for action; ii) Significant events and generic implications.

iii) Event reporting, including follow-up and closure information in NMED

2

f. Compatibility Requirements (2016 IMPEP: Unsatisfactory) i) Regulations: Discuss status of States regulations and actions to keep regulations up to date, including the use of legally binding requirements.

ii) Legislative changes

g. SS&D Evaluation Program (2016 IMPEP: Satisfactory)
h. Low-level Radioactive Waste Program (2016 IMPEP: Satisfactory)

Recommendation: To ensure openness and transparency regarding the Branchs monitoring and oversight of the Maxey Flats Disposal Site (MFDS), the review team recommends that the Branch ensure timely and consistent issuance of licensing actions and inspection results for the MFDS.

5. Information exchange and discussion:
a. Current State initiatives;
b. Emerging technologies;
c. Large, complicated, or unusual authorizations for use of radioactive materials;
d. States mechanisms to evaluate performance; and,
e. NRC current initiatives.
6. Additional topics
7. Next IMPEP review