ML18155A480

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
June 4 Email to NYSERDA Regarding Clarification Call on May 30 on the Nrc'S Technical Evaluation Report - Nyserda'S Radiological Survey and Dose Assessment
ML18155A480
Person / Time
Site: West Valley Demonstration Project
Issue date: 06/04/2018
From: Amy Snyder
NRC/NMSS/DDUWP/MDB
To: Mellon A
State of NY, Energy Research & Development Authority
AMSnyder NMSS/DUWP/MDB 415.6822 T5D48
References
Download: ML18155A480 (2)


Text

From: Snyder, Amy To: "Mellon, Andrea L (NYSERDA)"

Subject:

FW: RE: Clarification Question Regarding Date: Monday, June 04, 2018 6:25:42 AM Attachments: image004.png image009.png HI Andrea, NYSERDA requested a clarification call on our independent review of NYSERDAs Radiological Survey and Dose Assessment Report. The call was held on May 30, 2018. During the call, NYSERDA asked for specific examples with regard to what appeared to the staff as discrepancies in NYSERDAs model documentation and simulations - as documented in the staffs TER of NYSERDAs Radiological Survey and Dose Assessment Report. Please see clarification notes below that provide specific examples. A copy of this email will be place in ADAMS (publicly available) under the docket 50-201.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Thank you A

From: Barr, Cynthia Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 9:40 AM To: Snyder, Amy <Amy.Snyder@nrc.gov>

Cc: Chapman, Gregory <Gregory.Chapman@nrc.gov>

Subject:

FW: RE: Clarification Question Regarding Hi Amy:

We discussed discrepancies in model documentation and simulations documented in the staffs TER with NYSERDA and its contractors yesterday. I wanted to provide specific examples to clarify. For example, in Appendix H6, the consumption rates for fruits/nonleafy and leafy vegetables for Area 4 are listed as 165 kg/yr and 118 kg/yr, respectively (see screen shot below), which is consistent with Appendix D survey data from SNI (see page 17). The same statement applies for Appendix H7 for Area 5 as well. Appendix H6 and Appendix H7 document RESRAD OFFSITE input parameters which differ from RESRAD OFFSITE defaults. However, the actual RESRAD OFFSITE simulations for Areas 4 and 5 appear to use values of 82.6 (fruits/non-leafy) and 59 (leafy) kg/yr (see example screen shot below).

So the values used in the simulations do not appear to be consistent with Appendix D (page 17) survey data provided by SNI and the values listed in Appendix H6 and H7. It was unclear in the documentation if this was intentional (e.g., assumed that 50 percent of the fruits and vegetables came from non-contaminated sources).

Let me know if this clears the comments up, or if NYSERDA needs additional information.

Thanks, Cynthia From: Mellon, Andrea L (NYSERDA) [1]

Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 2:30 PM To: Barr, Cynthia <Cynthia.Barr@nrc.gov>

Cc: Snyder, Amy <Amy.Snyder@nrc.gov>; Bembia, Paul J (NYSERDA) <Paul.Bembia@nyserda.ny.gov>; Coble, Douglas W (NYSERDA) <Douglas.Coble@nyserda.ny.gov>; Mutty Sharfi (msharfi@mjwcorp.com) <msharfi@mjwcorp.com>; Louis Henry

<lhenry@mjwcorp.com>

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: Clarification Question Regarding Thank you, Cynthia for your assistance with our revision to the Radiological Survey and Dose Assessment Report. We appreciate your time and assistance in clarifying the consumption rates used in the report.

Thanks again, Andrea Andrea L. Mellon l Program Manager, SDA and Retained Premises New York State Energy Research and Development Authority 9030-B Route 219 l West Valley, NY 14171-9500 P: 716-942-9960 x4054 l F: 716-942-9961 l E: andrea.mellon@nyserda.ny.gov W: nyserda.ny.gov follow : friend : connect with NYSERDA