ML18153C415
| ML18153C415 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 10/26/1990 |
| From: | Stewart W VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| 90-329A, NUDOCS 9011060215 | |
| Download: ML18153C415 (2) | |
Text
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 October 26, 1990 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 & 2 CLARIFICATION OF COMMITMENT Serial No.
NOiRJS Docket Nos.
License Nos.
90-329A 50-280 50-281 DPR-32 DPR-37 NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-280/90-07 AND
- 50-281 /90-07 It has been called to our attention that a discrepancy exists between a written
_response provided to your inspection team and the documentation of that response in Inspection Report Nos. 50-280/90-07 and 50-281/90-07 dated May 22, 1990. The discrepancy concerns temporary *action taken to correct a weakness identified by your
- inspection team in our electrical equipment post-maintenance testing program. Our response, dated March 30, 1990, read "The process will be formalized by a revision to SUADM-M-27 which will require system engineering review of, electrical post-maintenance testing for concurrence and to specify any additions if required." System engineering review of the assigned testing was deemed necessary due to the limited guidance provided by SUADM-M-27 for specifying electrical post-maintenance testing for safety-related components. Inspection Report 90-07, however, further identifies that "qualified electrical system engineers" will specify post-maintenance testing in these areas.
In accordance with our March 30, 1990 response, a procedure change to SUADM-M-27 was approved and implemented to satisfy this commitment. The procedure change did not require ".qualified electrical system engineers" specify post-maintenance testing* as stated in the referenced inspection report. The procedure change only required that system engineering review the specified testing and make additions as required.
9011060215 901026 PDR ADOCK 05000280 G!
i I.
We have subsequently determined that a more efficient and consistent temporary method for specifying post-maintenance test requirements could be implemented. A matrix has been developed which provides guidance for specifying safety-related electrical post-maintenance testing. The matrix has beer:i incorporated into SUADM-.
M-27 for use by the Planning Department and the Electrical Maintenance Group.
Implementation of the test matrix to determine post-maintenance test requirements supersedes our March 30, 1990 commitment for system engineering review.
If you have any further questions, please contact us.
Very trul
~
W. L. Stewart Senior Vice President - Nuclear cc:
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W.
Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. W. E. Holland*
NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station