ML18153B383

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Suppl 1 to Rev 1-A to VEP-FRD-42, Reload Nuclear Design Methodology. Changes in Design Methodology Include Use of WRB-1 Critical Heat Flux Correlation for DNB Analysis & Application of Statistical DNB for Reactor Cores
ML18153B383
Person / Time
Site: Surry, North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 12/03/1993
From: Bowling M
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML18153B384 List:
References
93-723, NUDOCS 9312090068
Download: ML18153B383 (2)


Text

e e

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 December 3, 1993 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 SUPPLEMENT 1 TO VEP-FRD-42 REVISION 1-A Serial No.

NL&P/EJW Docket Nos.

License Nos.

RELOAD NUCLEAR DESIGN METHODOLOGY MODIFICATIONS93-723 50-280 50-281 50-338 50-339 DPR-32 DPR-37 NPF-4 NPF-7 In September 1985, Virginia Electric and Power Company submitted Topical Report VEP-FRD-42, Revision 1, "Reload Nuclear Design Methodology," which presented the methodology used to perform nuclear reload design analyses and safety evaluations for the Surry and North Anna Power Stations. That report described the analytical models and methods as well as the nuclear core design and safety analysis process used at the time of submittal. It also provided an overview of analyzed accidents and key parameter derivations performed for each reload.

Since the 1986 NRC approval of this topical report on nuclear core design and safety analysis, we have gained considerable experience and continued to improve and expand this analysis capability through development of in-house methods and incorporation of industry advancements. The most significant changes to our reload design methodology include:

1.

The use of the WRB-1 Critical Heat Flux (CHF) correlation for the Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB) analysis for Surry and North Anna,

2.

The application of Statistical Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB)

Methodology to Surry and North Anna reactor cores,

3.

The implementation of the Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for reporting cycle specific Technical Specifications parameter limits for North

Anna, 931209006Ef-931203 PDR ADOCK 05000280 p

'PDR.

4.

The use of the Westinghouse Owners' Group Dropped Rod Evaluation Methodology described in WCAP-11394-P-A for North Anna and Surry, and

5.

The application of improved core physics analytical models using the PDQ07 code.

Changes 1 through 3 have been reported to and accepted by the NRC on an individual basis. Changes 4 and 5 have been implemented for North Anna and Surry pursuant to the provisions of 1 OCFR50.59.

These changes have effectively superseded portions of VEP-FRD-42, Rev. 1-A. Supplement 1 to VEP-FRD-42, Rev. 1-A (enclosed) consolidates and summarizes these changes for your information.

Very truly yours, M. L. Bowling, Manager Nuclear Licensing and Programs Enclosure cc:

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N.W.

Suite 2900 Atlanta, GA 30323 Mr. M. W. Branch NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station Mr. R. D. Mcwhorter NRC Senior Resident Inspector North Anna Power Station