ML18153A374
| ML18153A374 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 02/26/1998 |
| From: | Kuo P NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Ohanlon J VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9803040434 | |
| Download: ML18153A374 (4) | |
Text
' \\,
Mr. J. P. O'Hanlon.:e February 26,* 1998 -
.
- Senior vice President - Nuclear
~--
Virginia Electric and power Company
" 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060
SUBJECT:
SURRY NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1 -SCHEDULE EXTENSION FOR CAPSULE X ANALYSIS RES UL TS
Dear Mr. O'Hanlon:
The purpose of this letter is to grant your request for a 3-month extension to provide a surveillance capsule analysis report for Surry, Unit No. 1, Capsule X.
In your letter dated February 5, 1998, you indicated a 3-month extension was needed to provide a surveillance capsule analysis report because of accumulated delays_ in transporting the capsule to the test vendor, testing the capsule specimens, analyzing the data, and preparing a report. The staff notes that Surry's operational pressure/temperature (PIT) limits, as reflected in Technical Specifications figures 3.1-1 and 3: 1-2, are valid to the end-of-license (28.8 and 29.4 effective full-power years (EFPY) fo_r Unit Nos. 1 and 2, respectively), and that currently only about 16 EFPY have been experienced. Also, two previous surveillance capsules from. high neutron fluence areas have provided data which encompass the current fluence level of the reactor vessel. Therefore, there is sufficient margin in the current PIT limits that a 3-month delay in any revision of the limits will not be significant for the safety of the plant. Your plan to provide the report by June 19, 1998, is acceptable.
Docket No. 50-280 cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION:
Docket File PUBLIC PDll-1 R/F J. Zwolinski (A)
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\SURRY\\EXT P. T. Kuo (A)
G. Edison Sincerely, Original Signed by:
P. T. Kuo, Acting Director Project Directorate 11-1 Division of Reactor Projects - 1/11 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation OGG ACRS E. Dunnington E. Sullivan (A) r i)
\\
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosur "N" = No copy OFFICE PM:PDII-1 E
LA:PDII-1 C
BC:EMCBCA)
C.
NAM~E~---t~;.;.......""'-'--'--~~~---r-;;.....;.;;.;;;..;.;.;.;;~..;.__,..:....<.1'--~+'E~S.;;;,;ul;-;,l"'::-iv..:;;.;an..;..._.:;....,1"':"-~--+;;...;;.;.;.~~-+--+-~~-+---,-~~~~~--1I DA==TE::::::::::==:::!====.i"/;,t:::/:.:::::::::::============::::!::::::=::!:!!!::::::::::::::============::!:::0:::::2::::::/')../5',:::!::::::::/::::::98==============::::!::::::::::::::!=!i!::::::::::==l==========::::!::::02==/=====/9:::::8=============:!I Official Record Copy 9803040434 980226---~ --------
PDR ADOCK 05000280 1
P PDR
- ! I IIIIII IIIII IIIII IIIIII IIII IIIII IIII IIII.
- &&5E17*1
Mr. J. P. O'Hanlon.e February 26, 1998 Set'1ior vice President - Nuclear Virginia Electric and power Company 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060
SUBJECT:
SURRY NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1 -SCHEDULE EXTENSION FOR CAPSULE X ANALYSIS RESULTS
Dear Mr. O'Hanlon:
The purpose of this letter is to grant your request for a 3-month extension to provide a surveillance capsule analysis report for Surry, Unit No. 1, Capsule X.
In your letter dated February 5, 1998, you indicated a 3-month extension was.needed to provide a surveillance capsule analysis report because of.accumulated delays in transporting the capsule to the test vendor, testing the capsule specimens, analyzing the data, and preparing a report. The staff notes that Surry's operational pressure/temperature (PIT) limits, as reflected in Te~hnical Specifications figures 3.1-1 and 3.1-2, are valid to the end-of-license (28.8 and 29.4 effective full-power years (EFPY) for Unit Nos. 1 and 2, respectively), and that currently only about 16 EFPY have been experienced. Also, two previous surveillance capsules from high neutron fluence areas have provided data which encompass the current fluence level of the reactor vessel. Therefore, there is sufficient margin in the current PIT limits that a 3-month delay in any revision of the limits will not be significant for the safety of the plant. Your plan to provide the report by June 19, 1998, is acceptable.
Docket No. 50-280 cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION:
Docket File PUBLIC PDll-1 R/F J. Zwolinski (A)
P. T. Kuo (A)
G. Edison Sincerely, Original Signed by:
P. T. Kuo, Acting Director Project Directorate 11-1 Division of Reactor Projects - 1/11 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation OGC ACRS E. Dunnington E. Sullivan (A)
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\SURRY\\EXT To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosur "N" = No copy OFFICE PM:PDII-1 E LA:PDII-1 C
BC:EMCB(A)
NAME ESul L ivan DATE 02f).. /:,/98 02/
/98 Official Record Copy
e UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Mr. J. P. O'Hanlon Se.nior vice President -:- Nuclear Virginia Electric and power Company 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 February 26, 1998
SUBJECT:
SURRY NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1 - SCHEDULE EXTENSION FOR CAPSULE X ANALYSIS RESULTS
Dear Mr. O'Hanlon:
The purpose of this letter is to grant your request for a 3-month extension to provide a surveillance capsule analysis report for Surry, Unit No. 1; Capsule X.
In your letter dated February 5, 1998, you indicated a 3-month extension was needed to provide a surveillance capsule analysis report because of accumulated delays in transporting the capsule to the test vendor, testing the capsule specimens, analyzing the data, and preparing a report. The staff notes that Surry's operational pressure/temperature (PIT) limits, as reflected in Technical Specifications figures 3.1-1 and 3.1-2, are valid to the end-of-license (28.8 and 29.4 effective full-power years (EFPY) for Unit Nos. 1 and 2, respectively), and that currently only about 16 EFPY have been experienced. Also, two previous surveillance capsules from high neutron fluence areas have provided data which encompass the current fluence level of the reactor vessel. Therefore, there is sufficient margin in the current PIT limits that a 3-month delay in any revision of the limits will not be significant for the safety of the plant. Your plan to provide the report by June 19, 1998, is acceptable.
Docket No. 50-280 cc: See next page Sincerely, 4q~-
.J'. T. Kuo, Acting Director Project Directorate 11-1 Division of Reactor Projects - 1/11 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
~ Mr. J. P. O'Hanlon Virginia Electric and Power Company cc:
Mr. Michael W. Maupin, Esq.
Hunton and Williams Riverfront Plaza, East Tower 951 E. Byrd Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Mr. David Christian, Manager Surry Power Station Virginia Electric and Power Company 5570 Hog Island Road Surry, Virginia 23883 Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 5850 Hog Island Road Surry, Virginia 23883 Chairman Board of Supervisors of Surry County Surry County Courthouse Surry, Virginia 23683 Dr. W. T. Lough Virginia State Corporation Commission Division of Energy Regulation P. 0. Box 1197 Richmond, Virginia 23209 Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Robert 8. Strobe, M.D., M.P.H.
State Health Commissioner Office of the Commissioner Virginia Department of Health P.O. Box 2448 Richmond, Virgini~, 23218 e
Surry Power Station Office of the Attorney General Commonwealth of Virginia 900 East Main Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Mr. J. H. McCarthy, Manager Nuclear Licensing & Operations Support innsbrook Technical Center Virginia Electric and Power Company 5000 Dominion Blvd.
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 Mr. R. C. Haag U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth St., SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Mr. W. R. Matthews, Manager North Anna Power Station P. 0. Box 402 Mineral, Virginia 23117