ML18151A898

Forwards Summary of 930324 Mgt Meeting in Atlanta,Ga Re self-assessment for Plant.List of Attendees & Handout Encl

ML18151A898
Person / Time
Site:	Surry
Issue date:	04/01/1993
From:	Merschoff E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Stewart W VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
References
NUDOCS 9304130117
Download: ML18151A898 (49)

Text

Docket Nos. 50-280, 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32, DPR-37 APR I 1993 Virginia Electric and Power Company ATTN:

Mr. W. L. Stewart Senior Vice President - Nuclear 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

MEETING

SUMMARY

- SELF-ASSESSMENT - SURRY UNITS 1 AND 2 This letter refers to the management meeting held at the NRC Region II office in Atlanta on March 24, 1993.

The meeting concerned~ Self-Assessment for the Surry facility.

A list of attendees and a copy of your handout are entlosed.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please let us know.

Enclosures:

1.

List of Attendees

2.

Presentation Summary cc w/encls:

M. L. Bowling, Jr., Manager Nuclear Licensing '

Virginia Electric & Power Company 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 cc w/encls cont'd:

(See page 2) 9304130117 930401 PDR ADOCK 05000280 P

PDR Sincerely,

/0/

Ellis W. Merschoff, Director Division of Reactor Projects

~I

/

IEVl I

Virginia Electric & Power Company cc w/encls cont'd:

M. R. Kansler Station Manager Surry Power Station P. 0. Box 315 Surry, VA 23883 Ray D. Peace, Chairman Surry County Board of Supervisors P. 0. Box 130 Dendron, VA 23839 Dr. W. T. Lough Virginia State Corporation Commission Division of Energy.Regulation P. 0. Box 1197 Richmo~d, VA 23209 Michael W. Maupin Hunton and Williams Riverfront Plaza, East Tower 951 E: Byrd Street Richmond, VA 23219 Robert B. Strobe, M.D., M.P.H.

State Health Commissioner Virginia Department of Health

• P. 0. Box 2448 Richmond, VA 23218 Attorney General Supreme Court Building 101 North 8th Street Richmond, VA 23219 bee w/encls:

G

• Bel i s l e, R II S. Vias, RII B. Buckley, NRR Document Control Desk NRC Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 1, Box 166 Sufry, VA.23883 RII:DRP ARuff 0 ~l- * /93

. -,,., - '...i>.. \\ **-.,

\\,;

RII:DRP GBe~K~1 e 0,v,, ( /93 It..

RII:DRP

>)J)1J MSinkule ot/t/93 2

APR I 1993

e ENCLOSURE I.

LIST OF ATTENDEES U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II, (RII)

L.A. Reyes, Deputy Regional Administrator, RII E. W. Merschoff, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), RII A. F. Gibson, Director, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS), RII B. S. Mallett, Deputy Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards, RII M. V. Sinkule, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 2, DRP, RII G. A. Belisle, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 2A, DRP, RII H. N. Berkow, Director, Project Directorate 11-2, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)

B. C. Buckley, Project Manager II-2, NRR J. W. York, Acting Senior Resident Inspector, Surry, DRP, RII M. W. Branch, Acting Chief,*Test Program Section, DRS, RII Virginia Electric & Power Company J. P. O'Hanlon, Vice President, Nuclear Operations M. L. Bowling, Manager, Nuclear Licensing M. R. Kansler, Station Manager, Surry E. R. Smith, Jr., Manager, Quality Assurance A. J. Price, Assistant Station Manager, Surry R. H. Blount, Superintendent, Engineering R. L. Gwaltney, Superintendent, Maintenance

VIRGINIA POWER Surry Power Stati<m.*

Self Assessment March 21, 1993 PT056.1

.. e

,1

(

I

L J. P. OHankm

• Vice President - Nuclear Operations PT056.2

-Introduction Surry -Performance Revie,¥ Surry Self Assessment

• J. P. O'Hanlon -

J. A. Price Summary by SALP Category

• _ J. A. Price R. L~ Gwaltney R.H. Blount Surry Quality Program -

E. R. Smith, Jr. *

• Summary Surry Performance,*summary M. R. Kansler Closing Remarks

• J. P. O'Hanlon PTOS6.3 I

I

. r

~*950ld

. gUJSUiJ:Jf7 puy £1<?{ VS a1lVoJ:JttN

-.1agvuvw 1101.1111-~~ 1-uv1-s1ssv

.. a:,µJy°f

Percent 100--r-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~----.

93.7 80

.so 40 20 1990 3 Year Average*

Bl Surry Unit 1

.80.7 79.1 70.8 1991 1992 3 Year Average 3 Year Average Ill Surry Unit 2 76.1.

1992 Actual 85.. 1 1993 Goal 1,Goodl PT056.5

Percent 100-.-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,----~-'--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--,

80-60-40-32 26 24

-J___.Li~~~Ll_~..Jfilisihl~UlL2lwl,2rdt--,-____f,::,,.. :s~:s:~,:[:.t2%2~&it1J---r____.[r-§**.~:s:~-=--:J_.1~0~--r...Jll 4

111111 4

1~!1.

1 1991 I

1992 I

1992

.I 1990 3 Year Average 111 Surry Unit 1 3 Year Average 3 Year Average Actual

• 1.111 Surry Unit 2 1993 Goal 1, Good I e

PT058.8.

Percent 100 r--~-'---~~~

98 PT058.7

I Scrams Per 7,000 Hours Critical.

2.5 -r-~~~------~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~-,--~~~~-----,

2 1.9 1.9 1.5 1

1

"~~',' ir~,

.. r.:_.::***:*::i:'.:_:l:_(:

_.::*:*-***:_._.:_._*******::**:t:::**:_,:

__ l:t**:_.:.,.::::_.::.::***:_ **

1~!1 1

• 1~:

0 O-+----i.:.=~~='---r-.....L,;;,..;-""'-'-'~;;..;..;.::..;..;..;;.i.__,.--..i..:.:.;=..=;...;.;;.;....;.:___,.._...=~.1..----r----

0.5 1990 1991 1992 1992 3 Year Average

• 3 Year Average 3 Year Average Actual Ill Surry Unit 1

. Ell Surry Unit 2 1

1 1993 Goal 1, Good I PT056.8 e

'I I

j

- r Man-Rem Per Unit.

600~-----~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~___;,~~~~~~~----.

500 494 1991 1992 3 Year Average 3 Year Average 1992 Actual 297.5 1993 Goal*

I ~Good' PTOS6.9

Curies 375-r-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~---,

340.9 300 225 207.3 150 75 1990 1991 3 Vear Average 3 Year Average 167.1.

1992 Actual 50 1993 Goal.

1, Good I PTOS6.10

ii Curies 200~---------------~------------------------~~---~~---~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-----.

170.3 150-100_-

50-4.1

2. 11 o:oa4 0.25 o*-+-~......._........................ ~

........ ~_.*.. -.....

,,....,,...... __,.~_..;;;,.~~................ __,.------~~------~......-~~~~~~

I 1991 I

1992 I

1992 I

1993 1990 3 Year Average 3 Year Average 3 Year Average Actual

• Goal

,, Good I PT056.11

Number of Events 350--~~~~--~-~~~~-~~~~~~~-~~-~~~--~~--,

300 300 250 200 170

<:<:*-.:*S~--~--

){/f }[)i}f ~?II

/Il1

I:itti*

-.:--.:--.:*-.:*-.:*<***S**>*>*>-:*

122

..,.... '**._....., ~,

_.:[:_::_.:_l::~:_;:_ *..

l:_:_::

1

_(::f:_::_.::*::[:_l:_~:_f::'.:_i:_ *.

• ':_):_:::*.:f:_::_l:_.::*j:_::_:_.:::_::_l:_ *.

~._i._

1

_.:::_::_[:_::_::_ *

}i:~@timI:\\:{ii:I i:/f tt:::ttl:t

• • • • • • • • • • j**:*****:*:*****:*:*****:*:********.:*****:*:*:***:*********:*:****1:*::::**:*:*:**:**:

150 100 50 145

~~:ii

• ._.:::_: *. :****:***:*_*:**.*::_.::.:.* ::_.::_.:::_.:.::_.::.:::**:::_:*:_:_:::_.::.* ::.. *:_._.:: __.:::.*::*:.*:::.::::_::_::::**:::**:::,:.:::'..1::_

• _

  :::::*:*::::_~::*.::_::*::.::_.:_::_:_::_::_i::::_i ** 1.:::_:.::::::_::_._::_::::.:::*-_:::::_::_::::::::.*:_i:_:_ ** _::~:._::_:::::.1:_:_::::::::*::_:_::::::::::

~ =

)I:::?\\\\\\::l:I:?}I:\\\\:::

0 4-_..t,;;;,;;;,;;;..;;;;;;,;;.;;..;:.;;.;;.i___,,----&....;;..;;.;;;.;;..;;..;;.;;;.;;.;;.;;.;;,:._-.-_~..:.;;.;.....;;..;.;u.___,;--.....L.;;.;;.;;.;;..;:.;:..;.;;..;;.;;.:..._-.-__

1990 1991 3 Year Average 3 Year Average 1992 3 Year Average 1.992

Actual, 115 1993 Goal 1,Goodl PT05e.12 i

I

Square Feet 16500-r-~~1-5-49_3~~~~~~~~----~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~--~-,

13200 11871

?((.*//\\?:}}~ 9900 15 6600 ~"I~ ~\\It~ ~,~ 3300 1424 1 .::****::******:.:_*:**,:_1_::\\*l.*_,_~'~_:.~,1.~.~.:,:_j '1.*.* :':::*-*:::*.l

i***:*:.;:.::.:.*.* :*:*:***:..

.:i******:;**-:

~ >" ~-;:

}i\\{}/}:t::~{\\{

0 -+--......_,""""""-........_ ___ --i.;..;,,,:,.;;.;=;..;.;;.;;i----.--.........,;;.;..;;.;,.~;;.;.i.__----'-........ ;.;...;;.;.;.;;..,.;,....._--.-- 1990 1991 3 Year Average 3 Year Average 1992 3 Year Average 1992* Actual 2000 1993

• Goal I

~Good I PT056.13

Number Of Incomplete Work Orders 500 438 433 400 l:::@t(f ?fit 300 200 100 1990 Actual 1991 Actual 1992 Actual dtl Number Of Incomplete Work Orders NumberOfDays 250

• Number Of Days.

500 400 300 200 100 0 1993 Goal ,, Good I PT056.14 e I

Strengths:

• Excellent Operator Performance

-. Plant Start-Ups - Response To Reactor Trips/Transients - Operator Requalification Performance - Pre-Evolution Training

• Management Involvement

- Backshift Assessments (Corporate am Station) .

• Staffing Levels and Experience.
• Operations Review Board
• Operator Rounds/Activities Monitoring e

PT056.16

, Challenges:

• Procedure Upgrade
• Enhancement of Human Performance
• Maintain Performance Level PT056.17 1

I II

• Strengths:
• Permanent Shielding/Source Term Reduction Program

- RCS Letdown Lines, IX Alley (Water Shields), Letdown Radiation Monitors ~ Charging Pumps - Reduction in PCEsand Contaminated Area

• Outage Radiological Work Pre-Planning *

- INPO Outage Performance Strength, RP Related Work Delays Rare

• Strong Station ALARA Program
• - Enthusiasm, Involvement, Accountability
• Strong Chemistry Program *

-.Makeup Water Production, Quality, and Monitoring . - Steam Generator Chemistry Performance and Integrity e e PT056.1B

Challenges:,

• Further Reduction in Source Term

- Permanent Shielding - Unit 2 RT.D Bypass Removal - Hot Spot Flushing * - Removal of High Source Abandoned Equipment - Replacement of Highly Contaminated Insulation

• Increase, Radiation Worker Performance and Accountabi I ity

- Advanced Radiation Worker Program - Radiological Controls in Craft Work Practices

• -Maintain Performance Level I 1 PT056.19

Strengths: ~ Annual Emergency Preparedness Exercise. . Demonstrated an Effective Capability to Protect the Public Health and Safety - Operations Shift Participation - After Hours Exercise - Challenging, Fast-Developing Scenario * - Previous EP Strengths. Maintained - Exercise Critique Process

• Interface with State and Local Authorities
• Prompt Resolution of Issues through Implementation of Periodic Drills
• PTOS6.20

. e Challenges:

• First Aid Team Command/Control
• *Protective Action Recommendations
• Conduct of Business From OSC
• Maintain Performance Level PT056.21

. I

Strengths:

• Innovative and Realistic Training
• Sustained High Level of Performance.

~ Experience and Maturity Level of Staff

• - Use of Motivational Programs for Staff
• Hardware Improvements.

- Protected Area Barrier Enhancements - Improved Badge Management System Challenge:* *

• Maintain Performance Level PT056.22

• ~

Strengths:

• Management Involvement

- Start-Up Assessments Effective -Thoroughness of MSRC.Meetings - LowThreshold for Reporting - Executive Participation in NRC Exit Meetings

• Root Cause Evaluation Process

- Independent Oversight, Multi-Discipline Approach

• • Safety System Readiness Assessment

.- Critical Parameters - At Power and Shutdown

• PT056.23

. Strengths (Continued):

• Integrated Trending Program *

- Station/Corporate/QA

• Independent Safety Review

-SNSOC -MSRC -CNS/IR

• UFSAR Operations Review.
• Licensing Submittal Improvements

- High Quality Submittals

• - Prioritization of Submittals

- No Missed Commitments

• PT056.24

Challenges:

• Enhancement of Human Performance
• Monitoring and l\\'laintenance of Corrective Action Program Effectiveness
• Continued lmprovement.ofTechnical Specifications and UFSAR e

0PT056.25

R r G* *w* .. a'tnP1, .JLro ' *~

f. " } *. llt Jr;f t7iY~ J.

Superinter1dent -Maintenance PT056.26 I I /. I

Strengths:

• Craft Personnel
• .. Ownership of Equipment

- Highly Skilled and Knowledgeable - Enthusiastic Pursuit of Excellence

• Engineering Support

-* Coordination Between System Engineering and Maintenance Engineering. - Hands-On Involvement in the Field

• Planning*and Scheduling

- Improved Inter-Departmental Coordination - Proactive Approach to Outage Scheduling - Craft Involvement.in ALARA Planning - System Windows and* Add/Delete Process. PT056.27 i I I

Strengths (Continued):

• Training

.. Use of Mock-Ups * - Supervisory Involvement - Contractor Orientation Training. *

• Quality Maintenance Team Approach
• - Self-Directed Team Goals

- Strong Craft Involvement in ALARA - Communication of Successes and Challenges

• Effective Programs

- Post Maintenance Testing - Reliability Centered Maintenance - Motor Operated Valves - l&C Module Repair - Foreign.Material Exclusion - Predictive Analysis * . PT056.28 i 'I' .. I ' I

Strengths (Continued):

• Reliable Plant Operation

- High Availability of Emergency Systems - Low Forced Outage Rate - Reduced Operator-Challenges {Work~Arounds)

• Improved Material Condition

..; Auxiliary Building Reclamation - Intake Facilities - Condensate Polishing Building

• Projects and Modifications.

- Unit 1 RTD Bypass Removal - EDG Fuel Oil Filters - Intake Screens * - SW Cleaning and Coating - RSHX Flow Element/Instrumentation - Control Room HVAC e PT056.29

. Challenges: .. e Human Performance - Control Over Contractor Maintenance Activities * - Some Improvements Needed in Work Practices.

• Material Condition Improvements.
• - Ground Water Intrusion *

- Roof Leakage

• Procedure Upgrade PT056.30
• e

Strengths:

• Engineering Support of Station Activities

- Procedure Upgrade Program - Scaffolding Program - Temporary/Permanent Shielding

• - Plan-of-the-Day
• Coordination.with Other Departments

- Resolution of Technical Issues - Active Involvement in Station Activities

• Experience and Knowledge Level of Staff
• _Proactive p*rograms

- ISi Program *improvements - Flow Assisted Corrosion -PMT

• - Equipme~t Abandoned-in-Place *.

' PT056.32 e 1 -*~/

Strengths (Continued):

• Review of Technical Specification Surveillance Requirements
• Use of Action Plans to Solve Long-Term Issues

- Water Intrusion - Waste Gas DecayTank* - AgastatTesting .

• Vendor Information Program
• Training Programs

- SRO/RO License Success Rate - Resolution of Previous Weaknesses in Licensing Examination Process - In-Plant Observation ByTraining Instructors - INPO Reaccreditation ofTraining Programs PT056.33 I

C~allenges:

• Resolution of Engineering Issues

- Design Basis Information - EDSFA

• Maintain Support of Station Activities

- Day-to-Day Plant Operational Needs. - Operational Expe,rience Reviews

• Maintain High Performance of Personnel Training Programs e

PT056.34

-- --------------~-----~ 'l}f 11 ~ E R. S "'ih* Ji

o. 11 -

-

• m1tt,

_- re Manage1/0 - {!JialitJ, Assitrance PT056.35

• Assess Performance
• Analyze Trends

- Provide Early Detection of Problems - Identify Where Existing Programs Need

• Improvement
• Monitor Corrective Actions

- Provide Feedback to Management - Determine Overall State of Quality PT056.36

• *Inspections
• -Audits

- Performance Based Versus Compliance Based - Use of Technical Specialists - Integrated Process*

• Performance Evaluations/Observations
• - Dynamic Scheduling

-*Safety Significant Issues - Integrated Process

• Performance Assessments

- Maintenance -~*Radiological Protection - Operations - Engineering \\, PT056.37

• Audits

.:. NuclearTraining - Design Control -Technical Specifications - Operations - Maintenance

• Observations and Assessments

- Post-Maintenance Testing - Quality Maintenance Teams - Sytitchyard Activities - Operations

• - Maintenance e

PT056.38 I I i

Unacceptable 4 -.--------------------------------*----, Unsatisfactory 3 Acceptable 2 Fully Acceptable 1 Operations Maintenance Radio_lo~lcal Protection 2.6 Industrial Safety PT056.39 i I

• Management Focus on Human Performance
• Low.Threshold for Reporting Deficiencies
• Strong Management Focus on Resolving Issues and Addressing Asse~sment Results
• Improving Condition of Equipment and Facilities.
• *Skilled and Knowledgeable Personnel.

PT056.40 I I I I

\\, PT056.41 J 'I

• Team Concept Entrenched and Growing
• Significant Reduction in Maintenance Back-Log and.

Reduced Age of Outstanding Work Orders

• Control of Personnel.Radiation Dose and Personnel Contamination Events

- Continued Reduction in Total Exposure* - Significant Reduction in Contaminated Area

• Safe and Reliable Reactor Operation, Including Strong Performance of Safety Systems
• Community Involvement
• - CASE Public Forum and Tour

-Open House PT056.42

• Successful "After Hours" Emergency Drill
• Implemented Capital. Improvements for Betterment Clf.
• Station
• Strong Engineering Support of Station Activities
• Facilities Improvements and Continued Strong Performance in Security Area
• Corporate Involvement and Support
• Record 1992 Generation - 11,650,269 MWh
• Strong QA Involvement e

PT056.43

(\\

• Single Point Failure Evaluation
• Procedure Adherence/Attention to Detail
• Integrated Trending
• Root Cause/Effectiveness of Corrective Actions
• Material Condition Improvements
• . Setpoints, EDSFA In-House Assessment PT056.44

Personnel Performance Equipment Performance . Program Performance Operation Net Generation/ Thermal Performance Operating Program Maintenance Emergency Preparedness Program _NSS Site Services Program Safety Assessment and Quality Program t--,----t"""....,..----t-~-.-----,--+---,r---.----- Planning & . Scheduling Program Procedure Program Business-Plan Performance . Red - - -Significant W~akness Yellow D - -Improvement Ne~ded White D - -Satisfactory Green - .:.. -Significant Strength Legend 10 I 20 I 30 I 4a 1992 Average 1992 Average S1tation Support System Materiel Condition PT056.45

Avoid The Vicious Cycle

• Keep It Green *

'i ~ "l! i if Success Leads To Complacency t._.!:?, ~*,~ '"' ;* =* ~* ~ .'> 1.. :. ~** t~ Failure Leads To Success*. LD722-PT056.46

-~ J.P. O'Hanlon

• Vice President - Nuclear operations

e.

PT056.47}}