ML18145A040

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (41) Regs.Gov Regarding Holtec-CISF EIS Scoping
ML18145A040
Person / Time
Site: HI-STORE
Issue date: 05/25/2018
From: Public Commenter
Public Commenter
To:
Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, Safeguards, and Environmental Review
NRC/NMSS/DFCSE
References
83FR13802
Download: ML18145A040 (3)


Text

1 ADMRegs-Holtec-CISFEISCEm Resource From:

ADMRegs-Holtec-CISFEIS Resource Sent:

Friday, May 25, 2018 7:59 AM To:

ADMRegs-Holtec-CISFEISCEm Resource

Subject:

COMMENT 108 Attachments:

NRC-2018-0052-DRAFT-0112 #108.pdf Holtec CISF FDMS Comment Number:

DOCKET ID: NRC-2018-0052 83-FR-13802

PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 5/25/18 7:55 AM Received: May 24, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 1k2-93by-ns4q Comments Due: May 29, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2018-0052 Holtec International HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Project Comment On: NRC-2018-0052-0001 Holtec International HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Project Document: NRC-2018-0052-DRAFT-0112 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-06398 Submitter Information Name: Lara Derasary General Comment RE: Docket ID NRC-2018-0052 I respectfully submit these scoping comments on the Holtec Environmental Report (ER) to bring up to 100,000 metric tons of spent fuel, high-level radioactive waste, from nuclear reactors around the country to southeast New Mexico. I am submitting the following comments because I do not support making New Mexico a national radioactive waste dumping ground. I do not consent to transporting up to 10,000 canisters of high-level radioactive waste through thousands of communities across the United States. I do not consent to the nationwide transportation risks of contamination of lands, aquifers, air, or the health of plants, wildlife, and livestock. I do not consent to endangering present and future generations.

This Holtec Proposal Is Contrary to Current Law Current law only allows the U.S. Department of Energy to take title to commercial spent fuel "following commencement of operation of a repository" or at a DOE-owned and operated monitored retrievable storage facility. The Holtec site meets neither requirement, as it is a private facility.

Holtec Must Remove Copyrights And All Redactions in the Environmental Report NRC must require Holtec to produce an ER that has no such copyright restriction and has no redactions.

The Impacts Of Permanent Storage Must Be Analyzed The Environmental Report (ER) is inadequate and incomplete because it does not analyze the impacts of the spent fuel being left at the Holtec site indefinitely.

More Alternatives Must Be Analyzed Page 1 of 2 05/25/2018 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=09000064832e13ec&format=xml&showorig=false 46/4*3FWJFX$PNQMFUF 5FNQMBUF"%.

&3*%4"%.

"%%"OOUPJOFUUF8BMLFS

4NJUI +JMM$BWFSMZ +4$

$0..&/5 

16#-*$"5*0/%"5&



$*5"5*0/'3

Keeping the spent fuel casks in some form of Hardened On Site Storage (HOSS) on the reactor sites must be analyzed.

The alternative of consolidated storage being done at an existing licensed Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility (ISFSI) must be analyzed.

The Environmental Report inadequately discusses the transportation Risks This ER must include all transportation routes and the potential impacts of accidents or terrorism incidents on public health and safety along all the routes.

The ER is inadequate and incomplete because it does not discuss how rail shipments from reactors without rail access would be accomplished and the risks and impacts of such shipments.

The Consequences To An Accident-Exposed Individual Must Be Analyzed Terms like "collective dose risk" and "person-rem" are used to ignore the potential impacts to a single individual.

Cracked And Leaking Casks Must Be Addressed The ER does not analyze exactly how radioactive waste from a cracked and leaking canister would be handled, since there is no wet pool or hot cell at the site.

More Cumulative Impacts Must Be Analyzed The ER mentions WIPP but does not analyze the impacts of a radiologic release from WIPP on the proposed CIS site.

Impacts Of Future Railroads And Electric Lines Must Be Analyzed The railroads and electric lines are not in place, but must be analyzed.

How many of the estimated 135 jobs will go to locals?

The total number of annual workers at the site could total as many as 135 when construction jobs are combined with the operating workforce.

Seismic Impacts On Stored Casks Must Be Stated Although the ER gives a statement on recent seismic activity in the area, there is no analysis of what many 3.0

- 4.0 fracking-induced earthquakes will have on the buried casks.

Page 2 of 2 05/25/2018 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=09000064832e13ec&format=xml&showorig=false