ML18143A442
| ML18143A442 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 08/02/1978 |
| From: | White L Rochester Gas & Electric Corp |
| To: | Ziemann D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML18143A442 (13) | |
Text
REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
< RIDS)
DISTRIBUTION FOR INCOMING MATERIAL 50-244 REC:
ZIEMANN D L ORG:
WHITE L, D NRC ROCHESTER GA S
ELEC DOCDATE: 08/02/78 DATE RCVD:~ 08/09/78 DOCTYPE:
LETTER NOTARIZFD:
NO COPIES RECEIVED
SUBJECT:
LTR i ENCL i FORWARDING FIGURES CONSISTING OF INFO RE FLUX 'MAP TAKEN DURING THE STARTUP OF CYCLE 8.
PLANT NAME: RE GINNA UNIT i N
4 REVIEWER INITIAL:
XJM DISTRIBUTOR INITIAL:~
DISTRIBUTION OF THIS MAT-RIAL I AS;OLLOWS ++<++>>>+>+>>>>>>>
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION FOR AFTER I SUANCE OF OPERATING LICENSE.
<DISTRIBUTION CODE AOOi)
FOR ACTION:
INTERNAL:
EXTERNAL:
BR CHIEF QRBN2 BC<4W/7 ENCL REG FILE( ~W/ENCL 4
. '0/2 ENCL HANAUER~4W/ENCL AD FOR SYS
- 8. PROJ+4IW/ENCL REACTOR SAFETY BR>4W/J:-NCL EEB++W/ENCL J.
MCGOUGH%+W/ENCL LPDR S
ROCHESTER'Y+<W/ENCL TERA+%W/ENCL NSIC++W/ENCL ACRS CAT B<4W/16 ENCL NRC PDR44W/ENCL OELD~+LTR ONLY CORE PERFORMANCE BR~~W/ENCL ENGINEERING BR+<W/ENCL PLANT SYSTEMS BR++W/ENCL EFFLUENT TREAT SYS>+W/ENCL DISTRIBUTION:
LTR 40 ENCL 39 SIZE:
iP+5P 0 %%%%%%%%%%%%0& %%0M%%%%%0t+%4% 0k%%%%%
THE END CONTROL NBR:
782220ii7
0 H
1 '
1 1'
P ~
i
/SIXIE IP/ Ill'i/8
/
iiiN/lgEitii'ISI'iiiii
~
/87/I/ià ZIIIIOI ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION t
pc I'
r
',)
Terr
>II Ssrrc 0
S9 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y. 14649 LEON D. WHITE, JR.
VICE PRESIDENT August 2, 1978 frI C'0
~I
" I C >I~
IiT~
O ~40 C.. M CD TELEPHONE
- Rc*cooc Tie ~6.2700 I
CXt C
C C~5 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
Mr. D. L. Ziemann, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No.
2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Mr. Ziemann:
During conversations with members of the NRC staff, a
request was made for additional detail on the flux maps taken during the startup of Cycle 8.
Attached are five figures which illustrate measured assembly powers and a com-parison between measured assembly power and the predicted assembly power for the following conditions:
a.
Hot Zero Power, All Rods Out b.
Hot Zero Power, D bank in c.
25% Power d.
50% Power e.
80% Power (Figure 1)
(Figure 2)
(Figure 3)
(Figure 4)
(Figure 5)
Very truly yours, gJ Q pter~
C~~
~stf'~
~gA~
782220ig7 Yg,
Cycle 8 Flux Map VIII 1 Hot zero power, bank 6 209 steps ROCHESTER GAS ANO ELECTRIC CORPORATION CORE MAP N
Measured F;-aH 270o 5
6 7
2 3
4 I
I I
I i
I 9
10 11 12 13 I
I i
I I
. 652
-l. 0.81
-1. 0.65
-0.'632
-1.9
. 935
-1. 9
.15 1
1.06
-1.
'1. 17,2
-0,.'0
.959 0.649
-0.6 -0.8
.723 0.8
. 082 0.8
- 012
-0.3
.13 1
' 3 1.18
-1.8 3.. 144
-0'.
.034, 1.081 0.710 19 07
-10
- 0. 631"
. 083
-2.3'.8 0.932 0.992 2 ~ 3 2%3
- 1. 052 0.8 1.219 0.8
.220 1.052 0.9 0.1 1.011 1.061 1.3 1.3
- 0. 971 1. 04
-1. 8
-0.
1.072 1.05 0.4 0.6
.206 1.035 1.055 0.0
-0.9 -1.73 0.990. 1.173 0.983
-0.8
-2.9
-3.2
- 0. 639
-0.9 0'21
-3.5
- 0. 64 2 ~
- 1. 145 1. 128
-2.3
-1.8
- 1. 041
-1.2 1.061 0.985 1.2 2.3
- 1. 166 0. 98 2.3 2.4
- 1. 057 1. 050, 1. 132 0.8
-0.3
-1.5 1.136
-3.0 0.64
-3.5
- 0. 78
-4 1.049 1.175
-2.7 "-2.0 0.975 1 ~ 3 1.076 1.161 0.8 2.7
- 1. 028 1. 16 3.2 3.0 1.090 1.004 3.206 2.1 1.6 0.7
- 1. 058
-1.8
- 0. 79
-3 00
- 0. 62
-6.
1.129 1.129
-3.7
-1.9 0.926 1.006
-3.1
-1.2
- 1. 053
-0.1 1.225 1.1 1.070 0.989 2.3 2.6 1.042 1.078 4.1 2.5 1.169 1.00 2.9 4.2 1.090 1.08 1.7 3.5 1.081 1.078 1.177 3.3 2.2 2.4 1.037 1.239 1.045 3.7 2.3 2.7
- 1. 177 0.4
- 0. 96 1.4
- 0. 64
-3 H
0.643 1.074
-0.5
-0.3
- 1. 063 1.5 1.250 1.080 3.2 2.1
- 1. 011 1.09 2.3 3.9
- 1. 248 1. 064 1. 092 3.1 1.7 1.4 0.64
-0
- 0. 722 0.4
- 1. 090 1.3 '.029 1.171 1.0 1.5 1.227 1.18 1.8 2.3 1.036 1.085 0.722 1.7 0.9 0.5 0."646
-0. 1 0.961 1.181 0.5 0.5 1.085 1.17 0.5 0.3
- 0. 956 0. 646
.0.0 0.0 I
I 1
2
- 0. 662
-0. 5 I
I I
I 3
4 0.819 0.66
-0.5
-0.
I 7
90'Measured N
~% Difference between measured and predicted I
I I
9 10 11 12 13 Measured Predicted Predicted x
FIGURE 1 47 ~ 1V
e
Cycle 8 Flux Map VIII Hot Zero Power, D bank inserted ROCHESTER GAS ANO ELECTRIC CORPORATION CORE MAP N
Measured F.,
1 2
3 4
270d 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 13 I
I I
I I
I i
I I
t I
i I
0.561 0.68
-6.9'6.2
- 0. 56
-5.8 A
0.817 0.5 0.678 1.199
-3.4 0.5
- 0. 652 6.9 1.196 0.5 l.167 0.5 0.892 0.966 0.820
-6. 9
-6. 9
-5. 0 1.022 0.969 0.644
-2.4
-2.8
-2. 0 1.305 1.041 0.894 0.4 0.2 0.1
- 1. 00 0. 932 0. 683
-3.0 -2.7
-2.4 0.98 1.032 1.162 0.788
.1.1 -1.6
-2.4
-3.1
- 1. 03 1: 300 1. 164 1. 188
-0.7 0.0 0.3
-0.4 0.68 3.1 0.928 1.107
-3.4 5.2 1.341 2.8 1.125 1.160 1.175 1.8 0.3 0.5
- 1. 17
- 1. 13 1'. 353 1. 046 1.3 3.0 3.7
-0.6
. 892 7.2
- 0. 58
-3.4
- 0. 68
-5.8 1.005 0.973
-3.4
-2.6 0.830 0.636
-4.0
-3.2 1.062 1.8
- 0. 884
-1.3 1.199 1.134 1.345 3.6 1.6 0.7 1.183 1.332 1.195 1.1 0.4 0.6 1.13 1.180 1.045 0.957 1.8 2.0 0.1
-4.1 1.34 1.183 0.888 0.621 1.1 1.1
-0.9
-5, 5
.975 6.3
. 828 4.2
.584 3.1 0.729 0.0 G
0'.
558
-7. 6 0.986 0.960
-5.3 -4.0'.
024
-2. 0 1.155 1.138 1.364 0.0 2.0 2.3 1.12 1.170 1.061 0.989 0.9 1.3 1.5
-1.1
- 1. 023 1.7
- 0. 610 0.9 0.912 1.014
-5.3
-3.8
- 1. 285
-1.7 1.120 1.201 1.231 1.1 3.6 4.9 1.18 1.122 1.327 1.056 2.3 1.3 1.5 0.2 0.94 1.4 0.681 1.160
-3.3
-3.1 l.146
-1. 6 1.305 1.068 0.909
-0.0 2.0 1.8 1.05 1.320 1.182 1.193 1.02 1.1 1.5
-0.4
- 0. 68 2.6
- 0. 804
-1. 3 l. 179 1 ~ 3 1.052 0.989 0.653
-0.1
-1.1
-0.9 1.00 1.080 1.228 0.810 0.9 2.5 2.7
-0.6
- 0. 715 1.8 0.969 1.032 0.856 0.8
-0.8
-0.8 1.05 1.004 0.734 1.4 4.3 4.3 I
I I
2 0.600 0.724
-0.6
-0.6
. 611 1.4 3
4 5
6 7
8 90' I
)
I I
I s
Measured F,N kH e Difference measured and I
I measured-redicted 9
10
.11 predicted between predicted I
12 13 x 100%
Figure 2
47 ~ I 7
r lr
Cycle 8
Flux Map VXIZ 25% Power, D hank 6 175 steps ROCHESTER GAS ANO ELECTRIC CORPORATION CORE MAP Measured F,,N 5>H 270o 5
6 7
8 2
3 4
10 11 12 13 I
I I
I I
i I
I I
I I
0.682 0.812 1.2
-2.0
- 0. 64
-4. 1 0.677 1.2
- 0. 980 1.2 1.175 1.051 1.2
-0.6 1.14 0.959
-1.3 -1.0 0.654 2 ~ 2 0.756 1.111 1.2 1.2
- 1. 032 1.2 1.123 1.113
-0. 0
-0. 9 1.12 1.021 0.0 0.2
- 1. 073 2 ~ 3 0.712
-4.7 0.673
~ 4 1-113 1.071
.2 1.2 1.227 1.5
- 1. 047 0. 946 0.8
-2,0 1.02 1.211
-0.9 0.2
- l. 045
-l.3 1 069 0 640
-2.8 4.6 0.972 1.029 1.223 0.4 0.8 1.0
- 1. 023 2.1 1.078 1.074 3.0 1.1 1.05 1.012 0.3 '.0 1 ~211 0.0 1.012 0.947
-0.9
-2.2
.676
-0.4
. 816 1.5 1.164 1.116 1.039 0.4
-0.6
-0.3
- 1. 054 1. 111 0. 954
-0. 1 0.8
-1.3
- 1. 059 1.0
- 1. 067 0.3 0.989 1.173 2 '
2.6 1.148 1.022 1.1 2.0 0.99 1.070 2.5. 2.1
- 1. 16 l. 094 2.7 2.8 1.042
-0. 0
- 0. 967 O.l 1.099 1.13
-2.1
-2.6
- 1. 085 1. 01 323%3
.651 3 ~ 3
.795 4.1 G
0' 654 3.0 1.144 1.117 1.043
-1.5
-0.6 0.0
- 0. 947 1. 009 1. 222
-2.4
-1.4 0 ~ 8 0.662 1.088 1.059
-1.4
-1.3
-0.2
- 1. 056 0.9
- 1. 026 2.2
- l. 226 1.1 0.984 1.162 1.6 2.0 1.072 1.088 2.0 1.9 1.051 0.969 0.5 0.3 0.99 1.068 2.6 2.1 1.07 1.025 2.1 2.1 1.05 1.244 1.3 2.6
- 1. 048 0.5
- 1. 230 1.4
- 1. 094 3.1 1.115 1.133
-0.8
-2.5
- 1. 027 0. 964 0.4
-0.6 1.110 0.663 0.7
-1.3
.645 4.4
H 0;741 1.093
-1.1
-0.8
- 1. 016
-0. 7 1.101 1.107
-2.4
-1.8
- 1. 12 1. 038
-0.3 1.5 1.124 2.1 0.756 0.9
- 0. 666
-1. 0
- 0. 963
-0.7 l,il49 1.042
-l. 3 -l.2
- 1. 15 0. 970
-0.7 -0.0 0.672
-0. 1 I
I 1
2 0.674 0.829
-0. 2
-0. 1 I
7 904 I
I I
I 3
4 5
6
. 674
-0. 1 ~ Measured F,.-N
% Difference between measured and predicted I
I I
9 10 11 12 13 Figure 3
'measured-redicted pp~
x 00%
predicted 47 17
Cycle 8 Flux Map VIII -".4 50't power, D bank 8 18 eps ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION CORE MAP N
Measured FhH 1
2 3
I i
I 2700 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12 13 I
I I
I I
I I
I
. 671 0.0 0.822 0.671
-0.1 '0.1
. 667
.0
.960 0.0
.152 0.0
.052 1.148
-0. 2
-0. 3 0.956.670
-0.3
.5
- 0. 739
. 082
-0.4 0.4
. 012 0.3
.119 0.5 1.130" 1.118
-0. 9
-'0. 6 1.011 '.092
-0.4
.5
- 0. 752 1.3
'662 0.9 1.084
.048
-0.4 0.4
. 201 0.4
. 040 0.6 0.968 1.038
-1.0 "0.7 1.196
.047
-0.8
- 0. 5
- 1. 090 0.1
- 0. 677 1.4
.951 0.9 1.007 1.203 1.004
-0.9 0.4 0.3
';.054 0.2 1.071 1.057
-0.2 0.0 0.998 1.18
-0.8 1.8 0.999
-1.7
- 0. 946
-1.4
- 0. 664
. 140
-0.9 0.9 l.112
. 037
-1.04 1.1
. 055 0.2
. 982
.2 1.161 0.988 0.5 0.8
- 1. 060
. 040
- 0. 2 0.8
- 1. 107
-l. 5 1.136 0.688
-1.2
-0.3 0.813
.039
-1.1 1.2 0.662
.132
-1.3 1.7
. 119 1.8
. 097 2.5
. 964 1.3
. 038 1.1
. 070 0.3
. 060
.5
. 154 0.6
- 0. 989
.0 l.028 3,. 163 1.1 1.4 1.171 1.000 1.5 2.1 1.083
.973 0.9 0.5
- 1. 063
. 041 0.7 0.8 1.118
-1.8 1.116
-0. 9 1.044 0.827
-0.7 0.6 1.149 0.676
-0.2 0.8 G
0'945 1.7
. 999 1.9
. 205 0.4
. 023
.6
. 076
.6 1.088 1.070
- 1. 0 1.0 1.010 1.20 0.3 0.3
- 1. 019 0.1
- 0. 972 1.1
.661 1.0
. 081
. 055 0.9
-0. 0
.222
.0
. 059 0.6
.975
-0.3 l. 050
-0. 2
.1.211
.058 0.9
.2 1.100 0.8
- 0. 682 2.0
.744
.091 0.1 0.1
. 024
.6
.124
-0. 5 1.136 1.129
-0.8
- 0. 0 1.024
.097 0.6
.6 0.754 1.2
- 0. 676
.1
. 971
.9
.165
.0 1.063 1.166 1.0 1.1 0 ~ 974
.676 1.2 1.1 L
I 1
1 2
- 0. 687 2.4 I
I I
3 4
N o.s44 o.ss4 4 "sssrrrs
~SH 2.4 2.0 ~ 4 Difference between measured and predicted' I
I l
I I
l 7
8 9
10 11 12 13 904 measured-redicted x 100%
predicted Figure 4
t
'I
( ji-
0