ML18139B154

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards LERs 81-014/03L-0 & 81-019/03L-0 & Updated Ler. 80-063/01X-1
ML18139B154
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 03/09/1981
From: Joshua Wilson
Virginia Power (Virginia Electric & Power Co)
To: O'Reilly J
NRC Office of Inspection & Enforcement (IE Region II)
Shared Package
ML18139B155 List:
References
81-014, 81-14, NUDOCS 8103130470
Download: ML18139B154 (3)


Text

.. _.. _____

Vepco-VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY Surry Power Station P.O. Box-315 Surry,. Virginia 23883

  • MAR 9* 1981 Serial No: 81-014 Docket Nos: 50-280 50-281 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cormnission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 License Nos: DPR-32 37

~

n~CEWEo~\\

MIi,\\ l 2 7097

. I

},.... *;,,,
  • \\_}, U,S, P~IClf~tl!EGfAA
  • i*

S \\

COMA11ssaoH TOIY

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

\\'<\\.

/~ I.

Pursuant to Surry Power Station Technical~: the Virginia Electric and Power Company hereby submits the following Licensee Event Reports for Surry Unit l & 2.

Report Number 81-014/03L-0 8l-019/03L-0 80;...063/01.X-l Applicable Technical Specification T. S. 6.6.2.b (4)

T. S. 6.6:2.B (2)

T. S. 6.6.2.a (9)

These-reports have been reviewed by the Station-Nuclear Safety and Operating Committee, and.will be placed on the* agenda for the next qu~-i:terly meeting of *the System Nuclear Safety&. Operat~ng Committee.

Very trulyrrours,

~:s~

  • L. -W:ilson ENCLOSURES cc:

Mr. Victor Stello, Director (3)

Office of Inspection and Enforcement Mr. Norman Haller, Director (3)

Office of Management and Program Analysis s10111.0L\\1D

  • 3 \\ 3 i)

~,oi'.\\

fl 1:7, I

~ ----*--*-------******--* --------* '*-*- --------. **-** _______________ ;.-_.. ___ *--** ____

  • ___,

NAC FQRM 366" 1..~UC1..EAR REGUL..ATORV COMMISSION

'7-771

-~

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT C0NiR01.S1.0CK; ~I ~l-:................ _...~---1l(I) 1 6

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE AU. RECUIREC INFORMATION!

IV I A I s I p I s I 2 i'01 0 I O l _, 0 I 01 *01 01. 01...., 010 l(Dl 4 j l 11 1111_ 10t l I© 9

I.ICENSEE ccce

)"'

1$

UC!:NSi NUMBER

z5.
25 1.ICENSE TYPE
JO

"' CAT SS CON"'T

[ITIJ s

  • /
~~ 1!:.J© I o I s I o I o I o I 21 s 1 1 101 o 1 2 1 1 I 2: I s I 1 I© I o I 3 Io I 9 J a 11 I© SO*

S1 COCXiT NUMBER S8 69 EVENT CATS 7"'

7S REPORT CA, E 80

VENT DESCRIPTION-ANO PROSASI.E CONSEQUENCES@

I On February 12,1981, the alarm setpoint for RM-CC-106 was found to be in error (greater than twice background).

This condition had existed since February 6,1981.

((J7J This is contrary to T.S. 3. 7, Table 3. 7-5 and is reportable per T.S. 6.6.2.b(4).

Since RM-CC-106 remained functional and the activity in the component cooling system L...;:.d,;:i;:.d.... n;;;o;.t.:...:e:::x::;c;,;e;,;e:;:;d:....:tw~i;.;c;;e;...:b::a;;c;.:k::1g.:r;,;;o;;.;;u:.:;n::d::.izi.....:;t~h:.:.e;..:.:hi.::e;;;:a.;:;l.:.t.:;.:h....:.:;an,:;,:,:;:;d...:.:.s*::.a.:..f.:.:.e.:::;.t;v...,.A?i.:.f~t.:..h~e;;;;.*..:P11:.:u~b,:,,;ll;;,,;11o,l*ca...1Yl~e...

  • r..ie......it1.:.9""t.._~.... ----'I-.

[§]!J i affected.

L III!J '---------_.;..------------------------~

8 9

  • so*

!Im 7

ii SYSTEM cooE IM!c I@

9 10 CAUSE CAUSE COMP.

VALVE CODE SUIICOCE COMl'ONENT CODE SUBCOOE SUBCODE LU L.LI@ Ir IN Is IT IR lu,e W w@

11 1:Z 1:1 18 19

ZO S!QUENTIAI.

OCC\\JAREN~

REPORT t.:::"\\

I.ER/AO. CEVENT Y!AR*

REPORT NO.

COD&

T'VPE

~

REPORT

!s I 1 j.

1-1

!o h !4 I I,...I lo I 3 t W

l::i NUMSEFI 21

z:z.

23 2<1 26 27.

28 29 lO

11 ACTION P\\m.JAE.

Ef'!=!c:T S>IUTDOWN t.::\\

AT'T'ACHMENT NIIRD PRIME COMP.

REVISION NO.

IQ.J 32 COMPONENT MANUFACT\\JRER TAKEN ACTION ON PLANT METHOD MOURS ~ SUSMITTm FORM SUB.

SU,.,.UER L.!l@LLl@)

l2..l@ L.!1 I* 0 I 01 01 01 L!J@), L!.I W@)

33

14 35
I&*

37 40 42 43

  • -1v 11 11 1s I CAUSE CESCAIPTION ANO CORRECTIVE ACTIONS @

"'4

<17

[II[] I The cause was personnel error-in *that the' setpoint calculatfon's were not yerifjed as cr:IJJ I required.

The alarm setpoints were reset to comply with Teen. Specs.

o:m 7

B 9

FACIUT'I'

~

STATUS

% POW&PI OTHER STA'T\\15 v:::/

80 METHOD OF t,;:;\\

,TITJJ.!J@_ J 11 0 I O l@I.___N __ / __

A ___

OISCOVERY Ol~ERY O!SCJIIIIITION ~

LI.J@i..l _R;;;;o;;;.u.t:;.;i:.:*n;;;;e....:;T~e~s~t.... -------------L~-

8 9

10 1:Z 13 4'

ACTIVIT'V CONT&NT t.::\\

REI.EASiC

  • OF RELEASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY ~.

IIIE. LLl @)_ WI N/ A I

a e 10 11 7

4 4

-~

  • _I.OCAT1_9N 01' REl.iASE
  • N/A so PERSONNEi. EXJIOSURES t.::\\

NUMBER A

T'VIIE I,;;\\ OESCRIPTION ~

[!JI] JO I O j O l~l!J~.._ _______

N/......;.;A......... _________________ __

1 a

9 12 1:i so PERSONNEL. INJURIES

~

NUMBER OESCRl"10N~

OTI IO IO IO I@.... --------~N/.:.:A:........-----------------""""'

a g 11 12 80 L.CSS OF OR OAMAGE TO FACIUTY 12, TYPE

  • CESCRIPTION

\\::::,,

TTITL.l.Ll@i...._. _________

N:.:.,:!.:,:A:,.._ _________________ __.

a 9

10 so PUl!LICli'Y

~

NRC USE ONI.Y ISSVEtlt,;::\\ OESCRl'T!ON ~

r:mJ ll!.Je., ____________

N_/_A ____________..,._..:

I I I I,, I I I I I l I !_ ____ _

7 B

9 10 SB 69 J. L. Wilson 80 ;

0

""'ON::....... <_ao_4_)_3s_1_-_3_1_a4 ___ _

.J.* ---- -*-

. -~-*------.---

ATTACHMENT 1

  • --------* ---*--** *-1 SURRY POWER STATION, UNIT 2 DOCKET NO:.

50-281 REPORT NO:

81-014/0JL-O EVENT-DATE:

2-12-81 TITLE OF EVENT:

IMPROPER.SETPOINT* FOR RM-CC-106...

1.

DESCRIPTION OF EVENT:

On February 6,1981, as a result of data obtained frmn.:_f.'.f-.~-14~..il.Jt..Eml.iaJ:_iQJl. __ _

Monitor Surv~illance), the alarm setpoints for RM-CC~l06 were reset.

On February 12,1981, as required by Unit 1 rag:(~tJ..on__mQ.tiit..Ql:.S..._+efuel.inz_..:... __ ~-.. --~-.

calibration procedure, the setpoints for RM-C~~106 were recalculated. It was discovered that the February 6th' s

  • calculations. wel!e....in errar_and._..t:b:e....alaJ:m:__ ______ _

setpoint had. been set at greater than twice ba.ckground.

This. is contrary to Tech. Spec.JP~. and ~epo_rtable per Tech. Spec~.6. 6-2..h.(4.>--.----------*-~-.,--.-----*-----..

2.. PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES and STATUS of REDUNDAN~.EQUIPMENT~-.. --- *-----*---. _.. _. __.. ____,. --- ----*

A review of component cooling activity levels., for the perj.od of concern, indicated that the activity in. this system lia<L'not exceeded-tw.i.ce backgi-:ound.

Since RM-CC-106 remained functional,. although the alarm s~_tpoint. was slightly higher (factor of 1.5) the. health and safety of the public were not affected.

3.

CAUSE:

The* cause of the event was personnel error.

Specifically, the setpoint..

calculations on.February 6,1981 were not verified as required by Health Physic's procedure.

4.

IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION:

Radiation monitor, RM-CC-106, alarm setpoin.ts--were--Fe-Se-t-t-e-eempl,y-w~~h...,..---,-

Specs.

5.

SUBSEQUENT' CORRECTIVE ACTION:

None required *.

6.

ACTIONS TAKEN TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:

The personnel involved have been re-instrumctto insure compliance with established procedures.

7.

GENERIC Il1PLICATIONS :

None.


**--....----*-*-**----*-.. -*-------