ML18136A378

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Supplements Re SHOCK-II Computer Calculations Performed on Piping of Six Inches or Less.Surry & Me Yankee re-examined as Part of Show Cause Reanalysis Effort.One Piping Problem Remains at Fitzpatrick
ML18136A378
Person / Time
Site: Surry, Maine Yankee, FitzPatrick  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 01/08/1980
From: Kennedy W L
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP.
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8001150535
Download: ML18136A378 (1)


Text

.,,.

STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 245 SUMMER STREET, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS i

ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO P.O. BOX 2325, BOSTON, MASS. 02107

/

NEW YORK BOSTON CHICAGO HOUSTON LOS ANGELES DENVER CHERRY HILL, N.J.

PORTLAND, OREGON Mr. Harold Denton Director DESIGN CONSTRUCTION REPORTS EXAMINATIONS CONSULTING ENGINEERING January 8, 1980 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555

Dear Sir:

This letter supplements the information which was provided to you by our January 3, 1980 letter regarding the status of Shock 2 computer calculations which were performed for 6 inch and under piping for the Surry 1 and 2, Maine Yankee and J, A. FitzPatrick Projects.

The information contained herein addresses only 6 inch and under piping configurations that were not analyzed as branch piping (branches from piping greater than 6 inch in diameter) as a part of the Show-Cause Reanalysis effort.

Surry 1 and 2 Maine Yankee J.A.FitzPatrick The review of all available pre-1979 records disclosed no evidence that any Shock 2 computer calculations exist other than those which were reanalyzed as a part of the Show Cause reanalysis effort.

As previously reported, there are a number of Shock 2 computer calculations that were made for 6 inch and under piping.

All of these were reanalyzed as a part of the Show Cause reanalysis.

All of the 2~ to 6 inch piping identified in compliance with IE Bulletin 79-14 is being re-evaluated and/or reanalyzed with only one piping problem remaining to be completed.

We have verified that none of this piping was previously analyzed using the Shock 2 computer program.

Based on this information, we conclude that there are no outstanding Shock 2 computer program related questions for the piping discussed above.

1/dd*.

fool/

S I 0 H. tJe,,+ovi