ML18123A385
| ML18123A385 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07109294 |
| Issue date: | 05/03/2018 |
| From: | William Allen Spent Fuel Licensing Branch |
| To: | Global Nuclear Fuel |
| Allen W | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18123A383 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML18123A385 (2) | |
Text
/"°"'<.'ii.
(03-2013) f i U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
CONVERSATION RECORD NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT \\MTH YOU See below.
E-MAIL ADDRESS ORGANIZATION Global Nuclear Fuels - America, LLC (GNF-A)
LICENSE NUMBER(S)
SUBJECT NPC Request for Additional Information (RAI) Discussion - Part II
SUMMARY
DOCKET NUMBER(S) 71-9294 CONTROL NUMBER(S)
DATE OF CONTACT 04/24/2018 TELEPHONE NUMBER (888) 447-9153 NRC participants: Chris Allen, Zhian Li, Christina Leggett, John McKirgan and Travis Tate GNF-A participants: Lon Paulson, Chritopher Kmiec, Jonathan Rohner and Scott Murray DATE OF SIGNATURE 05/03/2018 TYPE OF CONVERSATION DE-MAIL 0 TELEPHONE D INCOMING 0 OUTGOING The discussion of the RAis, which can be found using ADAMS Accession No. ML18107A753, began at approximately 4 P.M. For RAI 1.1, the applicant began by explaining that safety analysis report (SAR) Table I.I summarized the contents listed in SAR Table 6.21. The NRC responded that the summary provided in SAR Table 1.1 appeared ambiguous and that it was necessary to clearly identify the contents being offered for transport. The NRC offered that the applicant could accomplish this by either replicating SAR Table 6.21 in SAR Chapter I, adding a statement in Chapter I which pointed to SAR Table 6.21 or another method chosen by the applicant. The NRC also expressed uncertainty that SAR Table 6.21 was an exhaustive list of the contents proposed for transport.
After explaining that they had sought to expand the previously approved contents and to broaden the definition of approved contents, the applicant affirmed their commitment to better define the contents proposed for transport in SAR Table 1.1. RAI 1.2 had been discussed on April 20, 2018 and no discussion ofRAI 6.1 occurred. In discussing RAI 6.2, the applicant pointed to previous analytical models which incorporated plastic and which demonstrated that the reactivity values generated by these models were Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY)
Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Chris Allen SIGNATURE_
N tp" l.,
NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)
Page 1 of 2
/"°"'<.'ii.
(03-2013) f i U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
CONVERSATION RECORD NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT \\MTH YOU See below.
E-MAIL ADDRESS ORGANIZATION Global Nuclear Fuels - America, LLC (GNF-A)
LICENSE NUMBER(S)
SUBJECT NPC Request for Additional Information (RAI) Discussion - Part II
SUMMARY
DOCKET NUMBER(S) 71-9294 CONTROL NUMBER(S)
DATE OF CONTACT 04/24/2018 TELEPHONE NUMBER (888) 447-9153 NRC participants: Chris Allen, Zhian Li, Christina Leggett, John McKirgan and Travis Tate GNF-A participants: Lon Paulson, Chritopher Kmiec, Jonathan Rohner and Scott Murray DATE OF SIGNATURE 05/03/2018 TYPE OF CONVERSATION DE-MAIL 0 TELEPHONE D INCOMING 0 OUTGOING The discussion of the RAis, which can be found using ADAMS Accession No. ML18107A753, began at approximately 4 P.M. For RAI 1.1, the applicant began by explaining that safety analysis report (SAR) Table I.I summarized the contents listed in SAR Table 6.21. The NRC responded that the summary provided in SAR Table 1.1 appeared ambiguous and that it was necessary to clearly identify the contents being offered for transport. The NRC offered that the applicant could accomplish this by either replicating SAR Table 6.21 in SAR Chapter I, adding a statement in Chapter I which pointed to SAR Table 6.21 or another method chosen by the applicant. The NRC also expressed uncertainty that SAR Table 6.21 was an exhaustive list of the contents proposed for transport.
After explaining that they had sought to expand the previously approved contents and to broaden the definition of approved contents, the applicant affirmed their commitment to better define the contents proposed for transport in SAR Table 1.1. RAI 1.2 had been discussed on April 20, 2018 and no discussion ofRAI 6.1 occurred. In discussing RAI 6.2, the applicant pointed to previous analytical models which incorporated plastic and which demonstrated that the reactivity values generated by these models were Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY)
Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Chris Allen SIGNATURE_
N tp" l.,
NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)
Page 1 of 2