ML18123A385
| ML18123A385 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07109294 |
| Issue date: | 05/03/2018 |
| From: | William Allen Spent Fuel Licensing Branch |
| To: | Global Nuclear Fuel |
| Allen W | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18123A383 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML18123A385 (2) | |
Text
NRC FORM 699 /"°"'<.'ii. U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE OF SIGNATURE (03-2013) f i
....... CONVERSATION RECORD 05/03/2018 NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT \MTH YOU DATE OF CONTACT TYPE OF CONVERSATION DE-MAIL 0
See below. 04/24/2018 TELEPHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER DINCOMING (888) 447-9153 0 OUTGOING ORGANIZATION DOCKET NUMBER(S)
Global Nuclear Fuels - America, LLC (GNF-A) 71-9294 LICENSE NUMBER(S) CONTROL NUMBER(S)
SUBJECT NPC Request for Additional Information (RAI) Discussion - Part II
SUMMARY
NRC participants: Chris Allen, Zhian Li, Christina Leggett, John McKirgan and Travis Tate GNF-A participants: Lon Paulson, Chritopher Kmiec, Jonathan Rohner and Scott Murray The discussion ofthe RAis, which can be found using ADAMS Accession No. ML18107A753, began at approximately 4 P.M. For RAI 1.1, the applicant began by explaining that safety analysis report (SAR) Table I.I summarized the contents listed in SAR Table 6.21. The NRC responded that the summary provided in SAR Table 1.1 appeared ambiguous and that it was necessary to clearly identify the contents being offered for transport. The NRC offered that the applicant could accomplish this by either replicating SAR Table 6.21 in SAR Chapter I, adding a statement in Chapter I which pointed to SAR Table 6.21 or another method chosen by the applicant. The NRC also expressed uncertainty that SAR Table 6.21 was an exhaustive list ofthe contents proposed for transport.
After explaining that they had sought to expand the previously approved contents and to broaden the definition ofapproved contents, the applicant affirmed their commitment to better define the contents proposed for transport in SAR Table 1.1. RAI 1.2 had been discussed on April 20, 2018 and no discussion ofRAI 6.1 occurred. In discussing RAI 6.2, the applicant pointed to previous analytical models which incorporated plastic and which demonstrated that the reactivity values generated by these models were Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY)
Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Chris Allen SIGNATURE_
tp" l.,
NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)
Page 1 of 2
NRC FORM 699 /"°"'<.'ii. U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE OF SIGNATURE (03-2013) f i
....... CONVERSATION RECORD 05/03/2018 NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT \MTH YOU DATE OF CONTACT TYPE OF CONVERSATION DE-MAIL 0
See below. 04/24/2018 TELEPHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER DINCOMING (888) 447-9153 0 OUTGOING ORGANIZATION DOCKET NUMBER(S)
Global Nuclear Fuels - America, LLC (GNF-A) 71-9294 LICENSE NUMBER(S) CONTROL NUMBER(S)
SUBJECT NPC Request for Additional Information (RAI) Discussion - Part II
SUMMARY
NRC participants: Chris Allen, Zhian Li, Christina Leggett, John McKirgan and Travis Tate GNF-A participants: Lon Paulson, Chritopher Kmiec, Jonathan Rohner and Scott Murray The discussion ofthe RAis, which can be found using ADAMS Accession No. ML18107A753, began at approximately 4 P.M. For RAI 1.1, the applicant began by explaining that safety analysis report (SAR) Table I.I summarized the contents listed in SAR Table 6.21. The NRC responded that the summary provided in SAR Table 1.1 appeared ambiguous and that it was necessary to clearly identify the contents being offered for transport. The NRC offered that the applicant could accomplish this by either replicating SAR Table 6.21 in SAR Chapter I, adding a statement in Chapter I which pointed to SAR Table 6.21 or another method chosen by the applicant. The NRC also expressed uncertainty that SAR Table 6.21 was an exhaustive list ofthe contents proposed for transport.
After explaining that they had sought to expand the previously approved contents and to broaden the definition ofapproved contents, the applicant affirmed their commitment to better define the contents proposed for transport in SAR Table 1.1. RAI 1.2 had been discussed on April 20, 2018 and no discussion ofRAI 6.1 occurred. In discussing RAI 6.2, the applicant pointed to previous analytical models which incorporated plastic and which demonstrated that the reactivity values generated by these models were Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY)
Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Chris Allen SIGNATURE_
tp" l.,
NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)
Page 1 of 2