ML18117A451

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
OEDO-18-00203 - Response Ltr to ACRS Safety Evaluation Report for Westinghouse WCAP-17938 Topical Report, Revision 2, AP1000 In-Containment Cables and Non-Metallic Insulation Debris Integrated Assessment
ML18117A451
Person / Time
Site: PROJ0811
Issue date: 06/07/2018
From: Mccree V
NRC/EDO
To: Michael Corradini
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
HABIB D/415-1035
Shared Package
ML18116A508 List:
References
OEDO-18-00203, WCAP-17938
Download: ML18117A451 (3)


Text

June 7, 2018 Dr. Michael L. Corradini, Chairman Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

SUBJECT:

SAFETY EVALUATION FOR WCAP-17938-P, REVISION 2, AP1000 IN-CONTAINMENT CABLES AND NON-METALLIC INSULATION DEBRIS INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT

Dear Dr. Corradini:

In its letter dated April 12, 2018, the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) reported on its review of the staffs draft safety evaluation for the Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC, Topical Report WCAP-17938-P, Revision 2, AP1000 In-Containment Cables and Non-Metallic Insulation Debris Integrated Assessment, dated June 2017 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML18102A074). The ACRS concluded the following:

  • The methodology described in the topical report to establish the loss-of-coolant accident break size for debris assessment is appropriate.
  • The requirement that non-metallic insulation be encapsulated in containers that are located beyond a specified distance from the origin of a loss-of-coolant accident jet is sufficient to avoid producing fibrous debris from this source.
  • Testing showed that unprotected cables could be damaged and produce fibrous debris when located within a distance from a loss-of-coolant accident jet that is determined by the break diameter.
  • The recommended distance of four break diameters from a loss-of-coolant accident jet, at which unprotected cables would not be damaged, has been shown by testing to be sufficiently conservative to bound plant conditions with high likelihood.
  • The added provisions that require separate qualification of cabling not covered by the testing performed are appropriate, and the staffs safety evaluation should be issued.

M. Corradini In accordance with the ACRSs review and recommendation on May 29, 2018, the staff issued the Final Topical Report Safety Evaluation (ADAMS Accession No. ML18128A156).

We look forward to working with the ACRS in the future.

Sincerely,

/RA Daniel Dorman Acting for/

Victor M. McCree Executive Director for Operations Project No. 0811 cc: Chairman Svinicki Commissioner Baran Commissioner Burns Commissioner Caputo Commissioner Wright SECY

ML18116A508 (pkg); ML18117A451 (ltr) *via e-mail EDO-002 OFFICE NRO:DNRL:LB4:PM NRO:DNRL:LB4:LA QTE NAME DHabib RButler* KAzariah-Kribbs DATE 5/4/18 5/1/18 5/3/18 OFFICE NRO:DNRL:LB4:BC NRO: DNRL: D NRO: D NAME JDixon-Herrity RTaylor (ABradford for) FBrown DATE 5/4/18 5/4/18 5/9/18 OFFICE EDO NAME VMcCree (DDorman for)

DATE 6/ 7 /18