ML18116A334
| ML18116A334 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 06/29/1979 |
| From: | Stallings C VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18116A333 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7908150247 | |
| Download: ML18116A334 (2) | |
Text
,I, n
e e
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND PowER CoMPANY RICHMOND,VIBOINIA 23261 June 29, 1979 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Serial No.
PO/FHT:baw Docket No.:
License *No. :
We have reviewed your letter of June 5, 1979, in reference tion conducted at Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 on May and reported in IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-280/79-23 and Our response to the specific deficiency is attached.
-~.:
476 Co 50-230**
50-28£;
DPR-32 DPR-37 to the inspec-9-11, 1979, 50-281/79-35.
We have determined that no proprietary information is contained in the report.
Accordingly, the Virginia Electric and Power Company has no objection to this inspection report being made_a matter of public dis-closure.
Attachment cc:
Mr. Albert Schwencer Very truly yours,
!f/t.:6f Vice President-Power Supply and Production Operations 1 9 o s 1 s o-;,. 41
- -IC:
.-~
>Z 2:::V
-iO
- J
\\
\\.
A.
NRC COMMENT
~ttachment page 1 of 1 RESPONSE TO DEFICIENCY LISTED IN IE INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-280/79-23 and 50-281/79-35 As required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, "Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures or drawings".
The accepted Quality Assurance Program, Section 17. 2. 5.
states in part, "Section 5 in the Nuclear Power Station Quality Assurance Manual (NPSQAM.) describes the sequence of actions and the requirements for developing, reviewing, approving and controlling procedures *** ".
NPSQAM., Section 5, paragraph 5 states in part:
"Each nuclear power plant shall be operated and maintained in accordance with written procedures *** ".
- 1.
Project Operating Procedure (POP) 2.8.5 requires that, as individual_ portions of the working copy of the Engineering Task Assignments (ETA) are signed off and completed they will be reproduced in hard copy form (master ETA copy).
Contrary to the above, the master copy (ETA 10061) was not being reproduced as required ~y POP 2.8.5 for a period of about two months prior to the inspection.
- 2.
Project Operating Procedure 2.8.7 requires that revised drawings be controlled and distributed to controlled files.
Contrary to the above, nine out of ten drawings reviewed by Daniel QC ETA 40025, were not of the latest revision.
lbis is a deficiency.
RESPONSE
The deficiency is correct as stated.
~
- 1.
Corrective steps taken and results achieved:
- a.
The Master Copy of ETA 10061 was retrieved and re-processed in accordance with POP 2.8.5.
- b.
The drawings found to be not of the latest revision were reissued and that set decontrolled.
- 2.
Corrective Steps taken to avoid further non-compliance:
- a.
All master copies of ETA's are now processed in accordance with POP 2.8.5.
- b.
Controlled sets of drawings were reduced in number June 8, 1979.
All controlled sets of drawings are now handled in accordance with POP 2.8.7.
- 3.
The date when full complaince will be achieved:
~~~-~~~~~F~nu1~1~c~ommoliance has been achieved.