ML18108A120
| ML18108A120 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | HI-STORE |
| Issue date: | 04/15/2018 |
| From: | Giese M - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| 83FR13802 00023, NRC-2018-0052 | |
| Download: ML18108A120 (2) | |
Text
iUNSI Review Complete femplate = ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03
!\\DD= Antoinette Walker Smith rILL Caverly (jscl}
COMMENT#23 PUBLICATION DATE:
4/6/2018 CITATION# 83 FR 13802 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Docket: NRC-2018-0052 Holtec International HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Project Comment On: NRC-2018-0052-0001 Holtec International HI-STORE Con~olidated Interim Storage Facility Project Document: NRC-2018-0052-DRAFT-0023 Comment on FR Doc# 2018-06398 Name: Mark M Giese Address:
1520 Bryn Mawr Ave Racine, WI, 53403 Email: m.mk@juno.com Submitter Information General Comment Southeast New Mexico, near the Texas border, has the dubious distinction that every single train car load ofhigh-level radioactive waste will pass through on its way into (and, if it ever leaves, out of) Holtec International/Ed dy-Lea [Counties] Energy Alliance (ELEA). But transport impacts, to eventually import more irradiated nuclear fuel than currently exists in the U.S. into s.e.. NM will be felt nation.
-wide.
As of: 4/17/18 9:22 AM Received: April 15, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. lk2-92ml-czt Comments Due: May 29, 21 18 Submission Type: Web Transporting 100,000 metric tons, or more, of irradiated nuclear fuel to NM makes this proposal even bigger than the highly *controversial, unacceptable Yucca Mountain, Nevada permanent burial dump scheme, in terms of transport impacts (limited to 70,000 metric tons under current law).
In that sense, when it comes to radio active waste transportation
risks, we all live in New Mexico.
Stop these plans, please.
Thank you.