ML18101A818
| ML18101A818 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1995 |
| From: | Heller R, Phillips R, Summers J Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9507190329 | |
| Download: ML18101A818 (8) | |
Text
/
PS~G Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Attn.: Document Control Desk MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT SALEMNO. 1 DOCKET NO: 50-272 July 14, 1995 In compliance with Section 6.9.1.6, Reporting Requirements for the Salem Technical Specifications, the original copy of the monthly operating reports for the month of June are being sent to you.
RH:vls Enclosures c
Mr. Thomas T. Martin
- John C. Summers General Manager -
Salem Operations Regional Administrator USNRC, Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19046 8-1-7.R4
- ~ r\\ n ~'. r-. :""'}
r~\\..,vv~:.::,J
---9-50-7-19-0329--950630-- ----- --~
PDR ADOCK 05000272 R
PDR The power is in your hands.
95-2168 REV. 6/94 J
AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL Completed by:
Robert Phillips Month JUNE 1995 Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) 1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
10 0
11 0
12 0
13 0
14 0
15 0
16 0
P. 8.1-7 R1 Day e
Docket No.:
56--272 Unit Name:
Date:
Telephone:
Average Daily (MWe-NET) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
-*salem #1 o 1 / 1QL-=9-=s __
339-i73_~--
Power Level 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
OPERATING DATA REPORT Docket No:
Date:
Completed by:
Robert Phillips Telephone:
Operating Status
- 1.
Unit Name Salem No. 1 Notes
- 2.
Reporting Period June 1995
- 3.
Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411
- 4.
Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170
- 5.
Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115
- 6.
Maximum Dependable Capacity(Gross MWe) 1149
- 7.
Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe}
1106
- 8.
If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7)
Report, Give Reason NA
- 9.
Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe}
- 10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any
- 12. Hours in Reporting Period
- 12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical
- 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs.
- 14. Hours Generator On-Line
- 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours
- 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH)
- 17. Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH)
- 18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH)
- 19. Unit Service Factor
- 20. Unit Availability Factor
- 21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net)
- 22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net)
- 23. Unit Forced outage Rate This Month 720 0
0 0
0 0
0
-8310 0
0 0
0 100 NA Year to Date 4343 2660.9 0
2632.09 0
8010326.4 2689850 2546120 60.6 60.6 53.0 52.6 39.4 50-272 07/10/95 339-2735 since Last N/A Cumulative 157800 104380.45 0
100388.27 0
318062229.2 105301000 100228284 63.6 63.6 57.4 57.0
- 21. 9
- 24. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type, date and duration of each)
To be determiend.
- 25. If shutdown at end of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup:
To be determined.
8-1-7.R2
UNIT SHUTDOYN AND POYER REDUCTIONS REPORT MONTH JUNE 1995 DOCKET NO.
50-272 UNIT NAME Salem #1 DATE 7-10-95 COMPLETED BY:
Robert Phi l l i [!S TELEPHONE:
609-339-2735 METHOD OF SHUTTING LICENSE DURATION DOYN EVENT SYSTEM COMPONENT CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION NO.
DATE TYPE1 (HOURS)
REASON 2 REACTOR REPORT #
CODE4 CODE5 TO PREVENT RECURRENCE 2671 6-1-95 F
720 D
1 SH CKTBRK TECH. SPEC. 3.0.3 1
2 3
4 5
F:
Forced Reason Method:
Exhibit G - Instructions Exhibit 1 - Same S:
Scheduled A-Equipment Failure (explain) 1-Manual for Preparation of Data Source B-Maintenance or Test 2-Manual Scram Entry Sheets for Licensee C-Refuel ing 3-Automatic Scram Event Report CLER) File e
D-Requlatory Restriction 4-Continuation of CNUREG-0161)
E-Operator Training & License Examination Previous Outage F-Administrative 5-Load Reduction G-Operational Error (Explain) 9-0ther H-Other (Explain)
UNIT SHUTDOYN AND POYER REDUCTIONS L______ __ -
10CFR50.59 EVALUATIONS MONTH: JUNE 1995 DOCKET NO:
UNIT NAME:
50-272 SALEM 1 07/10/95 R.HELLER 609-339-5162 DATE:
COMPLETED BY:
TELEPHONE:
The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59. The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations.
- 1. Design Change Packages {DCP)
The reporting ofDCP related 10CFR50.59 evaluations is being modified to address these items only after they have been implemented and turned over to Operations. For the next several months, during this transition phase, we anticipate few new DCPs to report.
- 2. Temporary Modifications (T-Mod)95-040 "Temporary Blank for 1 VHE838" Rev. 0 - 1 VHE838, 11 Switchgear Ventilation Supply Fan and Motor are to be removed for maintenance. To support this activity, the filter plenum 1VHE838 must be isolated. There is no isolation point on the upstream side of the fan. There is only one on the downstream side. Therefore, the upstream side of the fan is to be blanked off. This system contributes to the operability of the chilled water system, electrical equipment in the switchgear rooms and equipment in the electrical penetration by maintaining ambient room temperature within an acceptable range. This modification will enable the system to remain in service during maintenance of# 11 supply fan. This will allow for continued temperature control of the system served during this maintenance evolution with no loss of the current system capacity or structural integrity. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 95-058)
10CFR50.59 EVALUATIONS MONTH: JUNE 1995 (Cont'd)
- 3. Procedures DOCKET NO:
UNIT NAME:
DATE:
COMPLETED BY:
TELEPHONE:
50-272 SALEM 1 07/10/95 R.HELLER 609-339-5162 NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0006(Q) "Corrective Action Program" Rev. 9 - This revision is being made to include the requirements of procedure NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0058(Q). The Quality/Safety Concerns Reporting System is being shifted to Business Procedure NC-BP.ZZ-0008(Z) and will only be referenced in NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0006(Q). This administrative change does not affect the plant. The process being moved is not included or referenced in the Technical Specifications or definitions. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 95-057)
REFUELING INFORMATION MONTH: JUNE 1995 MONTH : JUNE 1995 DOCKET NO:
UNIT NAME:
DATE:
COMPLETED BY:
TELEPHONE:
50-272 SALEM 1 07/10/95 R. HELLER 609-339-5162 Refueling information has changed from last month: YES ____A_NO __ _
Scheduled date for next refueling: (to be determined)
Scheduled date for restart following refueling: (to be determined)
- a. Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required?
YES NO~-
NOT DETERMINED TO DATE ____A_
- b. Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee?
YES NO_X_
If no, when is it scheduled? (to be determined)
Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: ---~N~/_A ____ _
Important licensing considerations associated with refueling:
Number of Fuel Assemblies:
- a. Incore
- b. In Spent Fuel Storage Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity:
Future spent fuel storage capacity:
Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity:
8-l-7.R4 193 732 1632
_1632 __
September 2008
SALEM GENERATING STATION MONTHLY OPERATING
SUMMARY
- UNIT 1 JUNE 1995 SALEMUNITNO. 1 The Unit force outage continued for the entire period. According to commitments from PSE&G and a subsequent confirmatory action letter from the NRC, both Units will remain shutdown pending completion of the following actions:
Complete the Significant Event Response Team (SERT) review of the reactor trip Appropriately address long standing equipment reliability and operability issues After defining the work scope and approach to the outages, meet with the NRC to discuss these plans After the work is completed, conduct a restart readiness review to determine for ourselves the ability of each Unit to operate in a safe, event free manner After the*restart review, meet with the NRC and communicate the results of that review