ML18096A669

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Suppls 910515 & 0617 Responses to NRC Bulletin 88-011 Re Pressurizer Surge Line Thermal Stratification.Westinghouse Contracted to Perform More Detailed Structural Analysis of Pressurizer Surge Line.Final Rept Expected by Apr 1992
ML18096A669
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 04/29/1992
From: Miltenberger S
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
IEB-88-011, IEB-88-11, NLR-N92040, NUDOCS 9205050006
Download: ML18096A669 (2)


Text

.*

Public Service Electric and Gas Co_mpany Steven E. Miltenberger Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 609-339-1100 Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer APR 2 fl 1Q92 NLR-N92040 United States Nuclear Regulatory Cc;>mmission Document Control Desk Washington, *DC 20555 Gentlemen:

NRC BULLETIN 88-11 PRESSURIZER SURGE LINE THERMAL STRATIFICATION SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO.

  • 50-311 By letters dated May 15, 1991 and June 17, 1991 (ref: NLR-N91083 and NLR-N91100), Public Service Electric & Gas Company (PSE&G) committed to perform spring hanger modifications on the pressurizer surge line during the seventh refueling outage.*

Prior *to performing these modifications, PSE&G committed to perform walkdowns to detenuine the locations of temporary.

supports and shielding.

This letter is to inform you that PSE&G has completed the required walkdowns for Salem Unit No. 2 during the sixth refueling outage.

The results of these* wal*kdowns have been documented for use during the modifications to be performed during the seventh refueling outage.

In addition, PSE&G.has contracted Westinghouse to perform a more detailed structural an~lysis of the pressurizer surge line.

Configurations considered* in the more detailed analysis include

1) the qualification of. secondary stres-ses and fatigue usage with rigid stiffness assumed at the bottomed out spring locations and
2) the qualification of primary stress from assumed spring failure at the bottomed out spring locations.

Preliminary

-results of thi~ analysis indicate that both primary ~nd secondary stresses are qualified with fatigue usage factor le~s.than 1.0 for the surge line for both units.

Hence, the structural integrity of the pressurizer surge line is not compromised in light *of the bottomed out spring hangers. *PSE&G expects the final report. of the more detailed analysis by the end of April 1992.

Based. on the information contained in that report, PSE&G will revise it~ action plan to addres& Bulletin 88-11 concerns.

~205050066 920429 PDR ADOCK 05000311 G.

PDR.

  • t>.ocument Control Desk NLR-N92040 2

Should there be any questions with regard to-this submittal, pleas~ do not hesitate to contact us.

C Mr. J. C. Stonec Licensing Project Ma_nager Mr. T. Johnson Senior Resident Inspector Mr. T. Martin, Administrator Region I Mr. Kent Tosch, Chief New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Environmental Quality Bureau of Nuclear Engineering CN 415 Trenton, NJ 08625