ML18094A500
| ML18094A500 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1988 |
| From: | Miltenberger S Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NLR-N89108, NUDOCS 8906070069 | |
| Download: ML18094A500 (20) | |
Text
(
Public Service Electric and Gas Company Steven E. Miltenberger Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 609-339-4199 Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Document Control Desk May 31, 1989 NLR-N89108 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Gentlemen:
1989 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT SALEM GENERATING STATION FACILITY O~ERATING LICENSE NOS. DPR-70 AND DPR-75 DOCKET NOS. 50-272 AND 50-311 The attached Annual Environmental Operating Report is hereby submitted pursuant to Subsection 5.4.1 of Salem Generating Station, Unit No. 2, Environmental Technical Specifications, Part II (Nonradiological), (Appendix B to Facility Operating License DPR-75, Docket No. 50-311).
Included are the results of nonradiological environmental monitoring studies required by Section 3.1.2 of the Salem Generating Station, Unit No. 1, Environmental Technical Specifications, (Appendix B to Facility Operating License DPR-70, Docket No. 50-272).
Should you or your staff require any additional information, please contact Mr. Bruce A. Preston, Manager - Licensing and Regulation at (609) 339-5129.
Attachment 8906070069 881231 PDR ADOCK 05000272 R
PDC Sincerely,
Document Control Desk NLR-N89108 C
Mr. J. c. Stone Licensing Project Manager Ms. K. Halvey-Gibson Senior Resident Inspector 2 -
Mr. W. T. Russell, Administrator Region I Mr. Kent Tosch, Chief New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Environmental Quality Bureau of Nuclear Engineering CN 415 Trenton, NJ 08625 05-31-89
,e
\\
1988 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NON-RADIOLOGICAL)
January 1 through December 31, 1988 SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311 Operating License Nos. DPR-70 and DPR-75 PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 May 26, 1989
Section 1.0 1.1 1.2
- 1. 3 2.0 2.1 2.1.1 2.1. 2 2.1. 3 2.1. 4 2.2 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.3 1988 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NON-RADIOLOGICAL)
SALEM GENERATING STATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Title GEllERAL * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * '!I * * * * * * * * * * *
- INTRODUCTION ****************************
SUMMARY
CON CL US I ON ******************************
1 1
1 3
ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEILLANCE:
BIOTIC.....
4 DIAMONDBACK TERRAPIN NESTING STUDY......
4 Study Area..............................
5 Materials and Methods...................
5 Data Reduction..........................
5 Results and Discussion..................
6 OSPREY AND BALD EAGLE SURVEY............
7 Study Area..............................
8 Materials and Methods...................
8 Results and Discussion..................
9 LITERATURE CITED. * *.. * * *. * * *... * *. *. * * * * *
- 10 i
Figure 2.1-1 1988 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NON-RADIOLOGICAL)
SALEM GENERATING STATION LIST OF.FIGURES Title Locations of diamondback terrapin study beaches, osprey nests, and bald eagle sightings in 1988.................
- ii -
11
Table 2.1-1 2.1-2 2.2-1 1988 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NON-RADIOLOGICAL)
SALEM GENERATING STATION LIST OF TABLES Title Summary of nesting, depredation, and hatching data for diamondback terrapin on Sunken Ship Cove Beach, New Jersey in 1988....................
Summary of nesting, depredation, and hatching data for diamondback terrapin on Liston Point Beach, Delaware in 1988...
Summary of osprey nesting activity near Artificial Island in 1988................
- iii -
12 13 14
1.1 INTRODUCTION
SECTION 1.0 GENERAL This report is submitted in accordance with Section 5.4.1 of the Salem Generating
- Station, Unit No.
2, Environmental Technical Specifications, Part II-Non-Radiological, (Appendix B to Facility Operating License DPR-75, Docket No. 50-311).
Included are the results of non-radiological environmental monitoring programs required by Section 3.1.2 of the Salem Generating Station, Unit No. 1, Environmental Technical Specifications, (Appendix B to Facility Operating License DPR-70, Docket No. 50-272).
Much of the equipment and resources utilized by Salem Unit No. 1 are shared by Salem Unit No. 2.
Although differences in Environmental Technical Specifications (ETS) reporting requirements for both units exist, no distinction is made for the purpose of assessing environmental impacts. This report covers Salem Unit No.
1 and Salem Unit No. 2 for the period from January 1 through December 31, 1988.
1.2
SUMMARY
During 1988, Salem Unit No.
1 generated 7,409,906 megawatt-hours of net electrical energy, while Salem Unit No.2 generated 5 1 955,927 megawatt-hours.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 5.3 of the Salem Unit No. 2 ETS, all design changes for Salem Generating Station Unit Nos.
1 and 2 proposed during 1988 were reviewed for potential environmental impact.
None would involve a change in the applicable ETS if implemented, or pose an unreviewed environmental question.
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) issued a revised final New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NJPDES)/Dischar~e to Surface Water (DSW) Permit Number NJ005622 for Salem Generating Station on December 1, 1985.
The final NJPDES/DSW permit imposed several additional monitoring requirements and contained items that Public Service Electric and Gas Company believed were excessively restrictive.
1 -
Accordingly, pursuant to N.J.A.C. 7:14A-8.6, a request was filed with the NJDEP, Division of water Resources, for an adjudicatory hearing.
No response was received through 1987.
On February 10, 1988, PSE&G met with the NJDEP and resolved all adjudicated issues and requested modifications with the exception of the thermal issues, which are being addressed independently.
The permit modification was subsequently issued and became effective April 1, 1989.
The NJPDES/DSW permit modification will be forwarded to the NRC in accordance with Section 5.4.1 of the Salem Unit No.
2 ETS.
Copies of monthly NJPDES Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's) were submitted to the NRC for the year 1988 in accordance with Section 5.4.2.d of the Salem Unit No. 2 ETS.
No major changes to the other Salem Generating Station environmental permits occurred in 1988.
Four ( 4) environmentally-related non-routine reports were submitted to the NRC during 1988.
All of these reports involved the impingement of sea turtles on the circulating water intake trash bars.
Eight (8)
Loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) were recovered from the trash bars on July 5, 9, 12, and 15, 1988.
Two specimens were in good condition when recovered and were transported to the Marine Mammal Standing Center (MMSC) in Absecon, New Jersey for observation and release.
The other six Loggerhead sea turtles where necropsied in an at~empt to determine the cause of death.
However,' 'the necropsy results were inconclusive for most of the specimens.
Two Kemp's ridley (Lepidochelys kempi) sea turtles* were recovered from the intake trash bars on July 5 and 27, 1988.
These specimens were also transported to the MMSC for observation and release.
One turtle was dead upon recovery and *the other ridley turtle was subsequently released offshore of Brigantine, New Jersey.
The proper authorities were notified by telephone of each event and written reports followed.
Meteorological monitoring data for 1988, as requfred by Section 3.1.1.6 of the Salem Generating Station, Unit No.
1
- ETS, was submitted to the NRC as part of the Radiological Environmental Operating Report, in April 1989.
2 -
, I
1.2 CONCLUSION
No significant environmental impacts attributable to the operation of Salem Generating Station Unit Nos. 1 and 2 were observed during 1988.
~he required biotic monitoring (i.e.,
for diamondback terrapin and osprey/eagle) was conducted in accordance with the Salem Generating Station, Unit No. 1 ETS.
No apparent changes in terrestrial ecology in the vicinity of the Salem Generating Station were observed.
Section 2.0 of this report contains the details of the terrestrial ecology studies and results.
3 -
SECTION 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEILLANCE:
BIOTIC
- 2. 1 DIAMONDBACK TERRAPIN NESTING STUDY ( ETS Section 3.1. 2.1)
The study objective is to monitor nesting by diamondback terrapin at typical beaches in the vicinity of Artificial Island.
Northern diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin terrapin) inhabit brackish water along the Atlantic Coast from Cape Cod to Cape Hatteras.
Nesting usually begins by early to mid-June and. continues through July~
Hatching usually begins in mid-to late August and may continue through November.
With the onset of cold weather, hatchlings which have not emerged from the nest will hibernate and emerge the following spring (Carr, 1952; Lawler and Musick, 1972).
In 1988, diamondback terrapin nesting activity was monitored at two beaches *on the Delaware River within 4.8 km of Salem during the period May 22 through November
- 14.
Nesting, as determined by the first discovery of adult tracks, was recorded initially on June 16 and ended in late Jul~.
Data suggests that the time of greatest activity was during mid to late June.
The number of females estimated to utilize each beach was 512 at Liston Point beach and 196 at Sunken Ship Cove beach.
These numbers are higher than in the previous year, but within the range recorded annually since 1975.
Three females were marked at Liston Point beach and one was marked at Sunken Ship Cove beach.
Age of the turtles averaged approximately 12 years.
None of the turtles found on the beach had been tagged previously.
Tracks of hatchlings from 1988 nesting activity were noted in August, September, and through to mid-October.
The occurrence of hatchling tracks at both beaches in May and June is evidence of eggs and/or hatchlings
~hich overwintered from 1988 nesting activity.
Track evidence indicated a
similar assemblage of predators as recorded in previous years, with raccoon, red and/or gray fox accounting for most nest depredation.
4 -
2.1.1 Study Area 2.1.2 2.1.3 Observations were made from 22 May through 14 November 1988 at Sunken Ship Cove beach, New Jersey, and Liston Point beach, Delaware (Fig. 2.1-1).
For a description of these locations see Volume II of the 1977 Annual Environmental Operating Report (PSE&G, 1978).
Materials and Methods Searches for evidence of nesting were conducted during daylight hours weekly from late May through August, bi-weekly in September and October and once in November.
Ef fart was made to minimize site disturbance and to allow females to finish nesting before being examined.
Nesting females were caught by hand, and the length and width of the carapace and plastron were measured. Each turtle was marked with an individual binary-code which consisted of holes drilled in one or more of the 10 post-dorsal marginal laminae.
These plates are situated so that they can be easily drilled with little or no injury to the turtle. The marking program provides information on nesting-beach fidelity, growth, and movements.
For further description of the study methods see Vol~me II of the 1977 Annual Environmental Operating Report (PSE&G, 1978).
Data Reduction The following formula was developed to provide a relative estimate of the number of nesting females (N) utilizing each site:
R-S N=
(S + 2
) D 3V where S is the number of turtles sighted, R is the number of pairs of tracks counted, D is the estimated number of days of nesting activity, 3 is the estimated mean number of nests laid per female during the nesting season (based on Hildebrarid, 1932), and Vis the number of times the beach was visited over the nesting period.
5 -
2.1.4 Results and Discussion Nesting, as inf erred from the presence of adult tracks, in 1988, at Sunken Ship Cove beach was first noted on 16 June and last recorded on 20 July (Table 2.1-1).
At Liston Point beach, adult tracks were first noted on 16 June and last recorded on 20 July (Table 2.1-2).
Nesting activity, also inferred from the number of adult tracks, varied over time but generally was highest in late June and early July.
Daily and seasonal nesting activity remained within the range recorded in previous years.
The annual estimate of nesting terrapins was, as in previous years, higher at Liston Point beach, with 512.
At Sunken Ship Cove beach, the estimated number was 196.
These estimates are, by nature of the program, conservative (low).
An indication of egg production at each site can be inf erred from egg shell counts from depredated nests and counts of eggs from viable nests.
A total of 411 nests were recorded; these contained approximately 5,360 eggs and/or remnants.
Liston Point beach had the higher egg counts, with 5354 from 405 nest~, while Sunken Ship Cove beach had 70 from seven nests. Depredated nests accounted for 99.0 percent of the observed nests at Liston Point beach, while at Sunken Ship cove beach depredated nests accounted for only 28.6 percent of observed nests.
These data suggest greater predator pressure at Liston Point than has been observed in previous years.
Track evidence at Liston Point beach indicated that raccoon (Procyon lotor), red fox (Vulpes fulva) and/or gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) were common.
Track evidence at Sunken Ship Cove beach indicated that the heaviest predation was probably by gulls (Larus spp.).
Tracks belonging to feral cats (Felix catus) were abundant at Sunken Ship Cove beach.
Since cats typically do not dig for food, it is not probably that the cats were a predator for eggs.
- However, it is possible that cats did prey on emerging hatchlings.
Four terrapins were marked with a binary code in 1988.
Three were captured at Liston Point beach, 6 -
L and the fourth was captured at Sunken Ship Cove beach. All turtles were female and shell dimensions are given below (cm):
CARAPACE PLASTRON LOCATION Sunken Ship Cove Liston Point Liston Point Liston Point LENGTH WIDTH 16.2 19.7 18.0 17.7 14.4 16.0 14.2 14.4 LENGTH WIDTH 15.2 17.0 16.2 16.2 9.4 10.4 9.4 9.2 AGE 11 The average approximate age of captured turtles was 12 years.
15 12 10 A total of 51 sets of hatchling tracks were noted from 22 May to 14 November; 26 at Liston Point beach and 25 at Sunken Ship Cove beach.
The hatchling tracks noted in late May and June at both beaches.
came from hatchlings which overwintered in nests laid during the 1987 nesting season (Table 2.1-1).
Tracks of terrapin hatched from 1988 nesting activity were first noted on 24 August and last recorded on 17 October.
2.2 OSPREY AND BALD EAGLE SURVEY (ETS Section 3.1.2.1)
As required by the Salem Environmental Technical Specifications, PSE&G continued the osprey and bald eagle surveys during 1988.
The study objectives were to record the occurrence of osprey and bald eagle and to monitor nesting of osprey in the vicinity of Artificial Island.
The North American osprey (Pandion haliaetus carolensis) had been federally classified as "status undetermined" (USDI, 1973), but has since been deleted from the list.
It was historically listed as endangered by the State of,,
New Jersey but was down-listed to threatened in 1985 (NJAC 7:25-4.17 as amended May 6, 1985).
The State of Delaware does not include osprey on its Endangered and Threatened species list (DE DNREC 1981). The southern bald eagle, Haliaeetus leucocephalus leucocephalus, is federally classified as "endangered" (USDI, 1979~.
Osprey surveys were conducted in the study area from April 21 through August 4, 1988.
Thirteen nests were occupied and appeared active, eight of which fledged a total of 17 young.
7 -
area, no special study program was established. In 1988, no bald eagles were observed in the study area.
2.4.1 Study Area 2.4.2 Observations were made at and in the vicinity of actual and potential osprey nesting sites in the general area shown in Figure 2. 3-1.
The region extends roughly 16 km north, 13 km south, and 8 km east and west from Salem Generating Station.
The area features bay, riverine, marsh, upland field and wooded habitats.
Duck blinds, pilings, navigation range markers and powerline towers are common features.
Materials and Methods During 1988, PSE&G cooperated closely with the New Jersey Division of Fish, Game and Wildlife (NJDEP) on an intensive study of the osprey population in the Delaware Bay region.
Productivity of the Delaware Bay population has been consistently lower than osprey nesting along the Atlantic Coast of New Jersey and the NJDEP requested that PSE&G cooperate in a more intensive study to determine the re~son for this lower productivity.
Consequently, the use of aerial surveys as in previous years was discontinued in favor of nest visits to obtain the necessary data.
After an initial helicopter survey in April 1988 to locate areas with nesting activity, active nests were visited weekly to determine nest status.
Except for nests in which the young were near fledging and may have been frightened off prematurely, nest contents during the weekly surveys were determined by climbing the nesting structure and recording the nest contents.
For those nests on transmission towers, nest contents could usually be.determined by climbing the tower to a point above the nest and observing the contents with binoculars.
The number of adults at or in the vicinity of each nest was recorded as was the number of eggs or young in each nest.
The bald eagle survey was conducted in conjunction with the osprey nest monitoring.
Had any bald eagles been sighted, they would have been recorded as to time, location, and stage of maturity.
All 8 -
I,
field crews conducting Artificial Island ecological studies were also instructed to note incidental sightings of bald eagles during the course of other work.
2.4.3 Results and Discussion The results of the NJDEP study to determine the reason for the lower productivity among Delaware Bay osprey are not available as of the date of this summary document.
However, the Delaware Bay osprey population studied by PSE&G had an above average year during 1988.
During
- 1988, fourteen nests were located and surveyed during the nesting period. Thirteen nests were occupied by osprey and appeared active.
The remaining nest was occupied by great horned owls, which begin nesting before osprey return from migration, and fledged one young (Table 2.4-1).
Of the total number of nests, 12 were in electrical transmission line towers, one was in a navigational rangelight tower, and one was in a dead cedar tree (Fig. 2.3.1).
Of the 13 active nests, it is estimated that eight were successful and fledged a total of 17 young.
This compares with 15 fledged in 1987, nine in 1986, and is well within the range (4 to
- 23) and substantially above the mean (10.2) for the previous 14 years of study (1974 through 1987).
1 Osprey nesting activity on the Salem-Deans Transmission line, completed in 1984, remained at the same level as in 1987.
Construction of this transmission line increased the number of available nesting sites for osprey and PSE&G had hoped that it would facilitate an increase in the number of osprey nests in the study area.
During 1988, weekly nest visits allowed PSE~G to determine that several nests containing young osprey were lost to an unknown predator in the first week after hatching. It is hoped that the ~ore detailed data collected by the NJDEP will help determine the source of this predation and lead to management practices that can benefit osprey in the Delaware Bay region.
- I 9 -
2.3 LITERATURE CITED Carr, A. 1952.
Handbook of turtles.
Assoc., Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY Comstock Publishing 542 p.
DEDNREC (Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control).
1981.
List of endangered and threatened species (potentially found) in Delaware 1 p.
Hildebrand, S. F. 1932. Growth of diamondback terrapins, size attained, sex ratios and longevity.
Zoologica 9(15):551-563.
Lawler, A. R. and J. A. Musick.
1972.
Sand beach hibernation by a northern diamondback terrapin, Malaclemys terrapin terrapin (Schoepff).
Copeia 1972(3):389-390.
NJAC.
1984.
New Jersey Administrative Code 7:25-4.17 as amended May 6, 1985.
PSE&G (Public Service Electric and Gas Co.).
1978.
Biotic environmental surveillance. Vol. 2 of 3, Annual environmental operating report
( nonradiological).
SNGS Unit No.
1, January 1 through December 31, 1977.
679 p.
USDI (U.S.
Department of Interior).
1973.
Threatened wildlife of the U.S. Bureau Sport Fish and Wildlife Resource Publ. 114.
289 p.
1979.
List of endangered and threatened wildlife and plants.
Federal Register 44(12).
- ~ I j I
' I, I...
J:...
Ii
- , 1*.
\\
- I I*
I,*
10 -
I.
j
N
.,.... E.E."E.~
~-*
illconool:
~
'{~*-** * *** :: *
- eaciow ~:*r;*
3-'"'~
\\:*.
- . *.A*. rrorial f"
nnonqron 1**:/
J'ea
~"" ~**
(-Wildlife
~
~~Zland ~.~:~~.,;~.,
- * :'~:
p;:~?_:* *.. **
~
~~-~
~.. ::::lf.,~:f:.:.:_...,
... ****--**-."~>*.:.
~. o_~
Oelawar~* cii;* ~"'*......
- ' ~~j.;:,,
-~ ::.
0 l*'::
.~= ki:er.
km 3
)
i:.... ::::,:.* "(
Locations of JERSEY
\\
- "Ei'!RAPIN BEACH I diamondback terrapin PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPA..'iY beaches and osprey nests, 1988.
Figure 2:r::..1
- study
[\\J I
11.-i O<t of Obca-rvali on Table 2.i-1 Summary of nesting, depredation, and hatching data for diamondback terrapin on Sunken Ship Cove Beach, New Jersey in 1988.
HES TS EGGS/CllHTCllLI HGS>
Turli vs llo. of Hon-D*pr*dal*d Dopr*dal*d Hon-D*predal*d D*pr*dal1>d i"
Vi si l" Parli*l Tolal Tur-llv rrack!I Ob5vr-vvd Arie a Adull llalchlin9 tl*lin9 reriod Hay lG-30 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 IG J.....
I - 1'5 2
0 0
0 0
0 II n
II 1r.-:m
- J
'1 0
0 52 I
II 1:11
- r.
July 1-15 2
l 0
0 12 0
E.'5 0
IG-:Jl 2
0 0
0 0
0
")
0 5btol41 II
'5 0
0 6'1 2
205 22 116< hluq r., &od lbqu.,l I-I'S 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
15-3 l
- J 0
0 2
0 5
0 0
0 Svplonbor l-15 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 lG-:JO 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 lf:lob*r 1-17 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 18-:J l 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Hovvttbor l-15 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Suh lo la) lO 0
0 2
0 5
0 0
3 r.tal 21 5
0 2
G-1
- r.
2 205 25
'... ~
I I-'
w I
P*ri od of Ob!lorvnli on.
Table 2.1-::i Summary of nesting, depredation, and hatchiµg data for diamondback terrapin on Liston Point Beach, Delaware in 1988.
Ho. of Vi :!Ii ls HES TS Hon-Dopr*dal*d leprodal*d P4rlial Total EGGS/ CllATCHLI HOS>
furl lqs in Ar~
Tur ll v lracks Ob!"'ervod fldul l llalchl in tl*sli n9 *rvrtod n.. y lf>-30 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
Jun*
1-15 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
lf>-30 3
2 1
151 0
3013 1
263 1
July 1-15 2
2 0
1'57 21 15~6 I
t-15 0
lf>-31 2
0 1
11 113 0
'~
0 Sublol"l 11 1
2 352 21 5082 2
110 3
llelchln9 Period Au9usl 1-1'5 2
0 0
13 0
71 0
0 0
15-:H 3
0 0
25 0
113 0
0 8
S*pl*'1h*r 1--15 I
0 0
8 0
1'5 I
0
£,
lf>-30 l
0 0
2 0
13 0
0
'5 Oclobvr 1-17 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 18-31 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Hovet1bor 1-15 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 SublolDI 10 0
0 10 0
272 0
23 Jo lei 21 1
2 100 21 5351 3
1"10 26 9 '.
('"'"'
1'
Table 2.. 2.:..1 SUmrnary of osprey nesting activity near Artificial Island in 1988.
Numbers in:ticate young fledged; N=Nest present, may have been aCti ve or constructed as housekeeping nests; A=Acti ve nest, eggs obsel:ved or adults appeared to be incubating eggs arrl defeOOing nest.
OWl~t horned owl nesting in fo:r:ner osprey nest.
Number in parenthesis J.n:4cate number of ow1s fledged.
NFS!' LOCATION NEW JERSEY Transmission-Line Towers Salem Keeney:
Tower #12/1 9/3 4/3 4/2 3/4 Hope creek-New Freedan1:
Tower #6/1 3/4 3/3 Salem-Deans2 :
Tower #4/1 2/3 Salem-New Freedan3:
Tower #5/1 2/3 Raccoon Ditch/Stow creek:
J:ead Cedar Tree DEI.AWARE Delaware River:
Texa.co-Ranqelight Tower
SUMMARY
Total Osprey Nests Active Nests success:ful (i.e., young fledged) nests Fledglings Fledglings/active nest SUccess:ful/active nest 1Fornally referred to as New Freedcm:North.
- New transmission line, completed in 1984.
Fornally referred to as New Freedan:South. Activity 2
2 OWl (1)
- 2 A
2 3
A 1
A A
3 A
2 14 13 8
17 1.31
- 0.62