ML18093A296
| ML18093A296 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 01/14/1977 |
| From: | Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18093A287 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8708110537 | |
| Download: ML18093A296 (5) | |
Text
I ".
~-- a*
--as Ht mner*** N'OP' a* t u er& b
'tfatyp* 'Ct i'* 'M:,.,fr!St' ttWM'
- H==eiL C!L!I
&!!! 9l1!!1!J--......
c*
PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION c
P,O, BOX 168r HANCOCKS BRIDGE, NEW JERSEY 08038 r)
NO PERSONNEL & MAN-MREM BY JOB FUNCTION REPORT u,9!'
REPORT PERIOD 1/ 1/76 TO 1/14/77
- 1.
c TOTAL PERSONNEL NUMBER OF MAN*-MREM
')
EXCEEDING 100 MREM
\\'
')
STATION UTILITY CONTRCT STATION UTILITY CONTRCT REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURVEILLANCE c~
MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0
0 0
13 0
25
~'>
OPERATING PERSONNEL 0
0 0
172 0
0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL
- o.
0 0
45 0
225 I
("
CHEMISTRY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
369 0
5 r')
SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
119 o*
25 i
ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0
.I & C PERSONNEL 0
0 0
31 0
0
~
("
SECURITY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
13
) 1 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE 1
("
MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0
0 0
70 0
61 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0
0 0
1 0
0 CHEMISTRY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
6 0
3
'I
('
SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
23 0
32
)
i
.1 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0 J
I
("
I & C PERSONNEL 0
0 0
102 0
0
- l SECURITY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0 I
INSEf(VICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0
('
OPERATING PERSONNEL 0
0 0
75 0
0
) 1 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0
0 0
70 0
0 c
CHEMISTRY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0
) i SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
110 0
0
-~
ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0
.l C*
I & C PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0
')
- 1 SECURITY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
20
\\
SPECIAL MAINTENANCE l
(';
MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0
0 0
138 0
183
' ) I OPERATING PERSONNEL 0
0 0
2 0
0 HEALTfl PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0
- 1
(:
CHEMISTRY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
9 0
22 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
I & C PERSONNEL 0
0 0
36 0
0
')
SECURITY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
9 0
9 WASTE PROCESSING 0
MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0 c
CHEMISTRY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0
)
SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0 G
I & C PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0
. )
SECURITY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0 REFUEqNG 0
MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0
)
OPERATING PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0 HEAL TH PflYSICS PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0 CHEMISTRY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
()
0 0
SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0 I & C PERSONNEL
()
()
0 0
0 0
~.
SECURITY PERSONNEL 0
0 0
0 0
0
...)
8708110537 870803 PDR A DOCK 05000272
__ *fl!....,--.~ --
- ---- -- --- ~ - ---
j,,
(
il
.1
-~.J ('
I
~
('
- ~ (
-1
- I
~
(
~ 1 ('
~
. '/!I
~ (*
~,
,j C'
('
1 ('
li c fl (
il.. C*
I
('
c I
c
- 1~1 c
- i
~l c ii
- ., c*
(J
- ~
PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION P,O, BOX 168r HANCOCKS BRJ[IGE, NEW JERSEY 08038 NO PERSONNEL & MAN-MREM BY JOB FUNCTION REPORT REPORT PERIOD 1/ 1/76 TO 1/14/77 TOTAL MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL OPERATING PERSONNEL llEALTll PHYSICS PERSONNEL CflEMISTRY PERSONNEL SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL ENGINEERING PERSONNEL I & C PERSONNEL SECURITY PERSONNEL GRAND TOTAL TOTAL PERSONNEL EXCEEDING 100 MREM STATION UTILITY CONTRCT 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
)
')
')
~)
NUMBER OF MAN-MREM
')
STATION UTILITY CONTRCT 221 0
269 249 0
0 116 0
225 375 0
8
- ')
261 o:
79 0
0 0
169 0
0
)
9 0
42 1400 0
623
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
- )
.:)
0
...)
ATTACHMENT 4 SALEM GENERATING STATION POSTOPERATIONAL ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS STUDIES As indicated in Section 6.2 of the Final Environmental Statement related to operation of Salem Generating Station, PSE&G agreed to maintain ecological effects studies for several years after the startup of Salem Station.
This commitment was reinforced through the inclusion of specific monitoring requirements in Section 3.0 of Appendix B to Facility Operating License Nos.
DPR-70 and DPR-75, the Environmental Technical Specifications (ETS).
After several years of postoperational monitoring and following a shift in governmental agency responsibilities for water quality-related requirements to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and then to the New Jersey Department of Environ-mental Protection, most postoperational monitoring requirements were deleted from the Salem Units 1 and 2 ETS (LCR 83-03, Technical Specification Amendment Nos. 59 and 28).
The New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (NJ0005622) now regulates facility operation to assure protection of the aquatic environment.
The postoperational ecological effects studies indicated that Salem Generating Station is not having any significant environmental impacts and are summarized as follows.
Postoperational monitoring to determine the effect of station operations on primary productivity of the aquatic system was conducted during 1977 and 1978 and is summarized in the Annual Environmental Operating Report (Nonradiological) for these years.
Objectives of the two year monitoring effort were to determine the seasonal trends in size, photosynthetic rate, and composition of the standing crop of phytoplankton.
Measurements of chlorophyll a and phaeo-pigment concentrations showed that the seasonal levels of phytoplankton standing crop and surface net productivity are similar to preoperational (1974-1976) norms.
Additionally, there has been no discernible impact on community structure.
Quantitative zooplankton collections were taken in the Delaware River in the region of the thermal plume, and in regions to the north and south, throughout 1977 and 1978 for comparison to preoperational data (1973-1976).
This postoperational monitor-ing was done in conjunction with a zooplankton entrainment sampling program.
In addition, river monitoring and entrainment sampling for two representative important species" of macroinvertebrates, Neomysis americana and Gammarus spp., continued through 1980.
These data indicate that species composition and distribution during the postoperational period remain similar to that occurring during the preoperational period.
The postoperational microin-vertebrate data are summarized in the 1977 and 1978 Annual Environ-mental Operating Reports (Nonradiological).
The macroinvertebrate data for Neomysis americana and Gammus spp. are completely sum-marized in the Salem Generating Station 316(b) Demonstration, Appendix II and IV.
1 -
ATTACHMENT 4 (CONT'D)
- Impingement and entrainment monitoring at Salem Station was initiated in April 1977 in accordance with Section 3.1.2.2 of the ETS which was then in effect.
The ETS monitoring was further supplemented with more intensive impingement and entrainment sampling under the Salem 316(b) Demonstration Plan-Of-Study (POS) beginning in 1979.
Currently, although the 316(b) POS expired in 1982 and the ETS requirement was deleted in 1983, impingement and entrainment monitoring at Salem is an ongoing program under the responsibility of the NJPDES permit system.
The postoperational impingement and entrainment data is sum-marized in the Salem Generating Station 316(b) Demonstration which was submitted to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection in February 1984 as required by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) Amendments of 1972.
The Demonstration is a comprehensive effort utilizing impact assessment models to relate cooling system fish mortality to ecosystem population effects and indicated that Salem is not having any significant environmental impact on the Delaware Bay fisheries.
Operational effects of the Salem heated effluent and thermal plume were evaluated in the Salem Generating Station 316(a)
Demonstration (dated September 1974 with supplements in November 1975, January 1976, and February 1978).
This document was prepared in response to section 316(a) of the FWPCA Amendments of 1972 and requested a variance from the regulatory mandated thermal plume limitations on the basis that the thermal discharge effects are localized and have little or no regional consequences.
Although the NJDEP has not yet i~sued a decision on the Salem 316(a) Demonstration, the thermal discharge is regulated under the NJPDES permit program.
The 316(a) Demonstration summarized a variety of studies under-taken to determine the susceptibility of local biota to temper-ature or thermal impacts, including:
cold shock experimental studies, temperature avoidance studies, secondary entrainment of ichthyoplankton and macrozooplankton experiments, investiga-tions on the effect of the plume on migration of anadromous fishes, and studies on the potential spawning and nursery area effects of the thermal plume.
These investigations indicated that the Salem thermal plume has little potential for affecting the fisheries of the Delaware Bay.
In support of the 316(a) Demonstration and its conclusions, PSE&G conducted a thermal monitoring program beginning in April 1976 and continuing through September 1978.
The program con-sisted of periodic and continuous collections of temperature, salinity, and current velocity at different depths during four tide stages at numerous locations.
This extensive monitoring program verified that the effects of the thermal discharge are quite localized on the eastern side of the channel and are gener-ally confined to a narrow band extending up or down the estuary from the discharge.
2 -
ATTACHMENT 4 (CONT'D)
- To define the extent of the full-power two unit thermal plume,
_PSE&G also conducted a thermal plume survey in June 1982, in-cluding an infrared aerial mapping.
This data supported the earlier thermal plume survey efforts and indicated rapid dissipation of the heated effluent with a narrow, shallow band extending in the direction of tidal flow.
As shown by the extensive postoperational ecological effects studies conducted by PSE&G, Salem Generating Station has had no significant environmental impacts and all water quality-related issues of concern for future operations will be adequately regulated by the NJDEP through the NJPDES permit program.
KAS 7/6/87 3 -