ML18092B142
| ML18092B142 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 04/21/1986 |
| From: | Preston B Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | Ronald Bellamy NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| References | |
| NLR-M86029, NUDOCS 8605130057 | |
| Download: ML18092B142 (2) | |
Text
PS~G Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Nuclear Department April 21, 1986 NLR-M86029 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 ATTENTION:
R. R. Bellamy, Chief Radiological Protection Branch
Dear Dr. Bellamy:
NRC COMBINED INSPECTION 50-272/86-05 AND 50-311/86-05 SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT NOS. l AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-272 AND 50-311 Per your discussion with Mr. J. N. Leech, enclosed please find a list of Items for Discussion for our meeting on April 24, 1986, concerning the subject inspection.
JNL:slc ay26 Enclosure C
File 18.4.3 8605130057 860421 PDR ADOCK 05000272 G
PDR The Energy People
- ~1~nf-21t, Manager -
Licensing & Regulation
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION CONTENTION:
The use of the 8-120 casks during the period of interest was performed in strict accordance with the law (10CFR71) and by following approved procedures.
The approved procedures meet the purpose and intent as well as the specific requirements of the law (10CFR71).
Therefore, the licensee does not believe that the alleged violation is indeed a violation.
The licensee believes that a narrow interpretation of relatively vague quality assurance requirements are at issue.
The topics of discussion should include:
The responsiblity of licensee Quality Assurance programs as defined in Appendix E and Appendix H of 10CFR71.
(See Statements of Consideration, Part 71, 42FR39364, Published 8/4/77)
The validity of determinations by Quality Assurance of such programs.
The history and original purpose of the Quality Assurance certification (12 month) letter.
The promulgation of additional data collection and documentation requirements unreviewed by the OMB as stated in 10CFR71-6.
The lack of specific regulatory clarification on special types of documentation.
The specific statements on routine determinations in 10CFR71.
The consistency of interpretation of docu.mentation requirements both within and outside of NRC Region 1.
The nature of the concern (as articulated to the licensee) as expressed during the inspection.
The actual level of C of C compliance in force at the time of the inspection.
The statement of consideration regarding the Foster Wheeler PRM71-8 which takes specific credit for paperwork reduction.
Interpretation of the use and maintenance of, and actions to be taken prior to shipment *