ML18092A649

Forwards Response to Generic Ltr 85-07 Re Implementation of Integrated Schedules for Plant Mods.Integrated Living Schedule Being Implemented for Internal Use

ML18092A649
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek, 05000000
Issue date:	06/27/1985
From:	Corbin McNeil Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	Thompson H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
GL-85-07, GL-85-7, NUDOCS 8507110601
Download: ML18092A649 (3)

Text

Public Service Electric and Gas Company Corbin A. McNeil!, Jr. Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236, Han cocks Bridge, NJ 08038 609 339-4800 Vice President -

Nuclear June 27, 1985 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

u. s. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, MD 20014 Attention: Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., Director Division of Licensing Gentlemen:

IMPLEMENTATION OF INTEGRATED SCHEDULES FOR PLANT MODIFICATIONS (GENERIC LETTER 85-07)

SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-272, 50-311 AND 50-354 This letter provides the response pursuant to your request in Generic Letter 85-07, dated May 2, 1985. The attached form provides our response in the format requested.

We are currently in the process of developing an ILS for internal use. After an initial period of trial use, it is our intent to evaluate the ILS process and the overall benefits to be derived from its use, and discuss the results with the NRC staff during the first quarter of 1986.

Sincerely, C Mr. Donald C. Fischer Licensing Project Manager Mr. Thomas Kenny Senior Resident Inspector

RfSPO~SE FORMAT - GENERIC LETTER 85-07 PLANT NAME: Salem Unit Nos. 1 & 2/Hope Creek UTILITY: Public Service Electric and Gas I. INTENTIONS A. Intend to work with the staff to develop an ILS x B. Have reservations that must be resolved before developing ILS C. Do not presently intend to negotiat~ an

!LS with the staff D. Plan to implement an infonnal ILS only I I. STATUS A. If you answered I.A above:

1. Have you settled on a method for prioritizing the ~ork at your plant(s)?

Circle One: No If yes, select best description:

Engineering judgement x Analytic Hiearchy process x Risk based analysis Cost-benefit analysis Other (please describe)

If no, provide estimated date for selecting a methodology:

Date or If not presently available, provide estimated date for scheduling the*selection of a methodo~ogy:

2. What is your estimated date for making a submittal to the NRC-or If not presently available, planned date for First Quarter scheduling a submittal to the NRC 1986

B. If you answered I.B above:

l. Please explain your reservations on separate sheet(s) or prC1vidEfyo'ur schedule for supplying an explanation .!

See separate sheet(s) or Separatp submittal scheduled for (Date)

2. If available to meet with the staff to discuss your concerns, propose a time frame for such a meeting and provide a contact that can ~~~e arrangements Contact/Time Frame

• ---~------~---------------

Phone Number

---

~~~----~--~--------~

C. If you answered I.C

1. Would you he willing to meet with the staff to discuss the development of an ILS for your facility(s)?

Circle One: Yes No If yes, propose a tiMe frame for such a meeting and provide a contact that can mMke arrangements.

Contact

---

~--~--~------------------------

Time Frame

---~----~-------------------------

Phone Number

---

~

If no, any constructive comments you have would be appreciated.

III. ADDITIONAL ITEMS Please make any suggestions you May have as to how a utility sponsored availability/reliability project might be credited for plant safety enhancement. Provide additional constructive conments as appropriate.