ML18092A468

Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-70 & DPR-75,revising Item 3 in Amends 59 & 28,respectively,to Extend Implementation Date to 850120

ML18092A468
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	01/18/1985
From:	Liden E Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LCR-85-01, LCR-85-1, NUDOCS 8501250409
Download: ML18092A468 (4)

Text

,.

Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Nuclear Department Ref: LCR-85-01 January 18, 1985 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

u. s. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention: Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Operations Reactors Branch 1 Division of Licensing Gentlemen:

REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT FACILITY OPERATING LICENSES DPR-70 AND DPR-75 UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-272 AND 50-311 In accordance with the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended and the regulations thereunder, we hereby transmit copies of our request for amendment and our analyses of the changes to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-70 and DPR-75 for Salem Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2.

This amendment request consists of a revision to Amendment

• No. 59 to Facility Operating License DPR-70 and Amendment No.

28 to Facility Operating License DPR-75 that extends the implementation dates for those amendments and formalizes our previous agreement that the time prescribed for implementation of the subject amendments, considering the complexity involved and the need for additional clarification, should have been more than 45 days from issuance. The proposed amendment would extend the effective date an additional 60 days, which corresponds to March 20, 1985. . /7 /j ~

850T-:>50409- -- - -

PDR ADDCK 850fjg*--

A

'I

/)~ f !5'{)

~- ..oft~

P osooo~£H Ltpp{ :tf ()J'!l'I--,

The Energy People f l 'f 1 95-2168 (25M) 6-84

Mr. Steven A. Varga 1/18/85 The subject amendments have not yet been implemented, nor have they been incorporated into the Salem Technical Specifications. Therefore, as we are currently operating under the existing Technical Specifications, such an extension will not cause confusion among station operations staff.

In accordance with the fee requirements of 10CFR170.21, a check in the amount of $150.00 is enclosed.

Pursuant to the requirements of 10CFR50.91, a copy of this request for amendment has been sent to the State of New Jersey as indicated below.

This submittal includes three (3) signed originals and forty (40) copies.

Sincerely, E. A. Liden Manager - Nuclear Licensing and Regulation Enclosure C Mr. Donald C. Fischer Licensing Project Manager Mr. James Linville Senior Resident Inspector Mr. Samuel J. Collins, Chief Projects Branch No. 2, DPRP Region 1 Mr. Frank Cosolito, Acting Chief Bureau of Radiation Protection Department of Environmental Protection 380 Scotch Road Trenton, New Jersey 08628 Honorable Charles M. Oberly, III Attorney General of the State of Delaware Department of Justice 820 North French Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801

• Ref: LCR-85-01 STATE OF NEW JERSEY ss: COUNTY OF SALEM COUNTY OF SALEM RICHARD A. UDERITZ, being duly sworn according to law deposes and says~

I am a Vice President of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, and as such, I find the matters set forth in our Request for Amendment dated January 18, 1985, are true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.

Subscribed and sworn to before me this P?/-'1P day of ~ , 1985 Notary Public of New Jersey DONr~A IJ. r-HTC!iNEfl NOTARY PUB UC OF MEW .JERSEY My Commission expires on MvCcmm!ssicnF.:n~i'f'S~ii;or~i;?4 1w17

~~~=--~~~~=-~~~~~~~~

LCR 85;...0l PROPOSED AMENDMENT SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE Revise Amendment No. 59 to Facility Operating License DPR-70 and Amendment No. 28 to Facility Operating License DPR-75 to provide an additional 60 days for implementation such that Item 3 of these amendments is changed to read as follows:

3. This license amendment is effective on issuance and shall be implemented no later than 105 days after issuance.

REASON FOR CHANGE The reason for this change request is to provide a more realistic period of time in which to implement Amendments 59/28 (for Units 1/2 respectiv~ly). The presently specified implementation date did not allow sufficient time to complete the significant techni~al, administrative and training effort~ involved. in the change-over of.the large number of procedures related to 10CFR50, Appendix I re qui remen_ts.

Signiticant Hazards Evaluation The 10CFR50, Appendix I rulemaking specifically addressed the definition of a criterion of "As Low As Reasonably Achievable" (ALARA) and set effluent limits based on doses to the population surrounding nuclear power plants. Since our existing radiological technical specifications are at least as, or more conservative than the Appendix I specifications contained in Amendment 59 to Facility Operating License DPR-70 and Amendment 28 to Facility Operating License DPR-75, deferral of the implementation of these amendments will pose no hazard to the health and safety of the public during. the deferral period.

There are no procedural or physical plant changes involved in this proposed amendment; therefore, no increase in the*

probability or consequences of any previously evaluated accident, no possibility of any new accident not previously evaluated, and no decrease in any margin of safety is generated by operation of our facility under the existing Technical Specifications. Based on the above, we have determined that this change involves no significant hazards consideration.