Similar Documents at Salem |
---|
Category:NON-RECURRING TECHNICAL REPORT (ENVIRONMENTAL)
MONTHYEARML18096A9111992-06-0303 June 1992 Analytical Data Rept, for 920603 ML18094A5731989-06-30030 June 1989 Assessment of Impacts of Salem & Hope Creek Generating Stations on Kemp Ridley (Lepidochelys Kempi) & Loggerhead (Caretta Caretta) Sea Turtles. ML18093A2791987-07-31031 July 1987 Ro:On 870714,16 & 20,respectively,loggerhead Sea Turtles Impinged on Circulating Water Sys (CWS) Intake Trash Bars. Caused by Large Seasonal Influx of Turtles in Vicinity of CWS Intake Approach Velocity.Trash Bars Cleaned & Monitored ML18092A3371984-05-31031 May 1984 App XIII to Salem Generating Station 316(b) Demonstration, Intake Technologies & Practices. ML18092A3361984-05-31031 May 1984 Vols 1 & 2 to App XII to Salem Generating Station 316(b) Demonstration, Bay Anchovy (Anchoa Mitchilli): Synthesis of Info of Natural History,W/Ref to Occurrence in Delaware River.... ML18092A3351984-05-31031 May 1984 App XI to Salem Generating Station 316(b) Demonstration, Weakfish (Cynoscion Regalis): Synthesis of Info of Natural History,W/Ref to Occurrence in Delaware River & Estuary & Involvement W/Salem Generating Station. ML20081C5041984-02-29029 February 1984 316(b) Demonstration ML20085M5351984-02-28028 February 1984 316(b) Demonstration ML18089A3411983-08-31031 August 1983 Models,Study Area & Methods,Salem Nuclear Generating Station, App I,Draft Section 4 & 5.W/830906 Ltr ML18086B0461981-11-0303 November 1981 Neomysis Americana:Synthesis of Info on Natural History W/ Ref to Occurrence in DE River & Estuary & Involvement W/ Salem Nuclear Generating Station. ML18086B0131981-10-0909 October 1981 Evaluation of Methods for Analysis of Sr-89 & Sr-90 in Environ Samples. ML18085A3021980-12-0101 December 1980 Nonproprietary Version,Revision 1,Vol 2, Environ Qualification Review Rept. ML18085A3011980-12-0101 December 1980 Nonproprietary Version,Revision 1,Vol 1, Environ Qualification Review Rept. ML18082A3031980-02-15015 February 1980 Ecological Study of DE River Near Artificial Island,1968- 1976:Summary. ML18081A9981980-01-21021 January 1980 Review of Aquatic Sampling Programs in DE River Estuary from 1958-1979,w/Special Ref to Capture of Shortnose Sturgeon. ML18081A7181979-12-31031 December 1979 Offsite Dose Calculational Manual 1992-06-03
[Table view] Category:TEXT-ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS
MONTHYEARML18107A5441999-08-31031 August 1999 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for Aug 1999 for Salem Generating Station. ML18107A4891999-07-31031 July 1999 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept, for Salem Generating Station for Jul 1999 ML18107A5251999-06-30030 June 1999 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Jan-June 1999. ML18107A4571999-06-30030 June 1999 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for June 1999 for Salem Generating Station. ML18107A4111999-05-31031 May 1999 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept, for Salem Generating Station for May 1999 ML18107A3391999-04-30030 April 1999 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for Salem Generating Station for Apr 1999. ML18107A2571999-04-29029 April 1999 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 990331,shortnose Sturgeon Was Removed from Circulating Water Sys (CWS) Intake Trash Racks at Salem Generating Station.Environ Licensing Responded & Confirmed Identification of Sturgeon ML18107A2291999-03-31031 March 1999 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Repts for Mar 1999 for Salem Generating Station. ML18106B1401999-02-28028 February 1999 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept, for Salem Generating Station for Feb 1999 ML18106B0851999-01-31031 January 1999 Discharge Monitoring Rept for Salem Generating Station, for Jan 1999 ML18107A2581998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Environ Operating Rept (Non-Radiological) for Salem Generating Station,Units 1 & 2. with 990429 Ltr ML18107A2531998-12-31031 December 1998 Radiological Environ Monitoring Program for Salem & Hope Creek Generating Station for 1998. ML18106B0891998-12-31031 December 1998 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Jul-Dec 1998. ML18106B0311998-12-31031 December 1998 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept, for Dec 1998 ML18106A9881998-11-30030 November 1998 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for Nov 1998 ML18106A9711998-10-31031 October 1998 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for Oct 1998 for Salem Generating Station,Units 1 & 2. ML18106A9401998-09-30030 September 1998 Discharge Monitoring Rept for Sgs for Sept 1998. ML20154B2281998-08-31031 August 1998 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for Aug 1998 for Salem Generating Station ML18106A8231998-07-31031 July 1998 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for July 1998 for Salem Generating Station. ML18106A7811998-07-23023 July 1998 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 980727,dead Sea Turtle Was Removed from Circulating Water Sys Intake Trash Racks. Based on Turtle Being Badly Decomposed,Licensee Disposed of Turtle in Trash Dumpster ML18106A7891998-06-30030 June 1998 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for June 1998 for Sgs. ML18106A6761998-05-31031 May 1998 Discharge Monitoring Rept for Salem Generating Station for May 1998. ML18106A6211998-04-30030 April 1998 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for Apr 1998 for Salem Generating Station. ML18106A5651998-03-31031 March 1998 New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination Sys Discharge Monitoring Rept, for Salem Generating Station ML18106A4101998-02-28028 February 1998 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for Salem Generating Station for Month of Feb 1998. ML18106A3461998-01-31031 January 1998 NPDES Monitoring Rept for Salem Generating Station, for Jan 1998 ML18106A3611997-12-31031 December 1997 Station,Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Period Jul-Dec 1997. ML18106A2771997-12-31031 December 1997 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Repts for Dec 1997 for Salem Generating Station. ML18106A3521997-12-31031 December 1997 Std Format for Reporting Number of Personnel & Man-Rem by Work & Job Function for Period from 970101-1231. ML18106A5801997-12-31031 December 1997 1997 Annual Environ Operating Rept (Non-Radiological) for 970101-1231, for Salem Generating Station,Units 1 & 2. W/980428 Ltr ML18106A5891997-12-31031 December 1997 1997 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for Salem & Hope Creek Generating Stations. ML18106A2301997-11-30030 November 1997 New Jersey NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for Salem Generating Station for Month of Nov,1997. ML20216F5301997-11-30030 November 1997 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for Nov 1997 for Salem Generating Station ML18106A1751997-10-31031 October 1997 New Jersey NPDES Discharge Monitoring Repts, for Oct 1997 for Salem Generating Station ML20216F5231997-10-31031 October 1997 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for Oct 1997 for Salem Generating Station ML18102B6241997-09-30030 September 1997 New Jersey NPDES Discharge Monitoring Repts for Salem Generating Station for Sept 1997. ML18102B5861997-08-31031 August 1997 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for Salem Generating Station for Aug 1997. W/970925 Ltr ML18102B5261997-07-31031 July 1997 Discharge Monitoring Rept for Salem Nuclear Generating Station for July. ML18102B5541997-06-30030 June 1997 Semi-Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept. ML18102B4601997-06-30030 June 1997 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for June 1997 for Salem Generating Station. W/970723 Ltr ML18102B4041997-05-31031 May 1997 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for May 1997. ML18102B3371997-04-30030 April 1997 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Repts for Apr 1997 for Salem Generating Station. W/970523 Ltr ML18102B2691997-04-29029 April 1997 Supplemental Discharge Confirmation Rept #2 Re Discharge of Fuel Oil to Delaware River.Maintenance Svcs Now Inspects & Documents All vendor-supplied Tanks Used for Fuel & Master List of Tanks & Locations Is Kept by Maintenance Svcs ML18102B2501997-03-31031 March 1997 New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination Sys Discharge Monitoring Repts for March 1997. W/970423 Ltr ML18102B3601997-02-28028 February 1997 Corrected Discharge Monitoring Rept for Feb 1997 for Salem Generating Station. ML18102A9421997-02-28028 February 1997 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for Salem Generating Station Units 1 & 2 for Feb 1997. W/970324 Ltr ML18102A8891997-02-27027 February 1997 NPDES Noncompliance Notification,Submitting Suppl Rept on Corrective Measures to Be Taken to Reduce Potential of Future Occurrences Re Discharge of Fuel Oil Into Delaware River ML18102B3581997-01-31031 January 1997 Corrected Discharge Monitoring Rept for Jan 1997 for Salem Generating Station. ML18102A8771997-01-31031 January 1997 Discharge Monitoring Rept for Jan 1997 for Salem Generating Station. W/970220 Ltr ML18102A7591997-01-13013 January 1997 NPDES Noncompliance Notification,Confirming Discharge of Less than One Gallon of No 2 Fuel Oil to Delaware River at Plant.Measures Are Being Developed to Reduce Potential for Future Occurrences 1999-08-31
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217A9931999-09-30030 September 1999 NRC Regulatory Assessment & Oversight Pilot Program, Performance Indicator Data ML18107A5581999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Salem,Unit 2.With 991014 Ltr ML18107A5571999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Salem,Unit 1.With 991014 Ltr ML18107A5301999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Salem,Unit 2.With 990913 Ltr ML18107A5311999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Salem,Unit 1.With 990913 ML18107A5031999-08-26026 August 1999 LER 99-006-00:on 990729,determined That SG Blowdown RMs Setpoint Was non-conservative.Caused by Inadequate ACs for Incorporating Original Plant Licensing Data Into Plant Procedures.Blowdown Will Be Restricted.With 990826 Ltr ML18107A5201999-08-12012 August 1999 Rev 0 to Sgs Unit 2 ISI RFO Exam Results (S2RFO#9) Second Interval,Second Period, First Outage (96RF). ML18107A4811999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Salem,Unit 1.With 990813 Ltr ML18107A4821999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Salem,Unit 2.With 990813 Ltr ML18107A4691999-07-28028 July 1999 LER 99-008-00:on 990714,determined That Limit Switch Cables Were Subject to Multiple Hot Shorts in Same Fire Area.Caused by Inadequate Original Post Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis.All Limit Switch Cables for MOVs Were Reviewed.With 990728 Ltr ML18107A4441999-07-0606 July 1999 LER 99-007-00:on 990605,surveillance for Quadrant Power Tilt Ratio (QPTR) Was Missed.Caused by Human Error.Qptr Calculation Was Performed & Personnel Involved Have Been Held Accountable IAW Pse&G Policies.With 990706 Ltr ML18107A4211999-07-0202 July 1999 LER 99-005-00:on 990605,11 Containment Declared Inoperable. Caused by Valves 11SW72 & 11SW223 Both Leaking.Procedure S1.OP-ST.SW-0010(Q) Was Enhanced to Provide Specific Instructions to Ensure Proper Sequencing.With 990702 Ltr ML18107A4331999-07-0101 July 1999 LER 99-002-01:on 990405,determined That 2SA118 Failed as Found Leakrate Test.Caused by Foreign Matl Found in 2SA118 valve.2SA118 Valve Was Cycled Several Times & Seat Area Was Air Blown in Order to Displace Foreign Matl.With 990701 Ltr ML18107A4321999-07-0101 July 1999 LER 99-006-01:on 990501,determined That There Was No Flow in One of Four Injection Legs.Caused by Sticking of Valve in Safety Injection Discharge Line to 21 Cold Leg.Valve Was Cut Out of Sys & Replaced.With 990701 Ltr ML18107A5211999-07-0101 July 1999 Rev 0 to Sgs Unit 2 ISI RFO Exam Results (S2RFO#10) Second Interval,Second Period,Second Outage (99RF). ML18107A4351999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Salem,Unit 1.With 990713 Ltr ML18107A4341999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Salem,Unit 2.With 990713 Ltr ML20196H8621999-06-30030 June 1999 NRC Regulatory Assessment & Oversight Pilot Program, Performance Indicator Data, June 1999 Rept ML18107A3951999-06-17017 June 1999 LER 99-004-00:on 990520,reactor Tripped from 100% Power,Due to Negative Flux Trip Signal from Nuclear Instrumentation. Cause Has Not Been Determined.Discoloration Was Identified on One of Penetrations.With 990617 Ltr ML18107A3661999-06-0909 June 1999 LER 99-003-00:on 990513,unplanned Entry Into TS 3.0.3 Was Made.Caused by Human error.Re-positioned Creacs Supply Fan Selector Switches & Revised Procedures S1 & S2.OP-ST.SSP-0001(Q).With 990609 Ltr ML18107A3551999-06-0202 June 1999 LER 99-005-00:on 990504,failure to Meet TS Action Statement Requirements for High Oxygen Concentration in Waste Gas Holdup Sys Occurred.Caused by Inability of Operators. Existing Procedures Will Be Evaluated.With 990602 Ltr ML18107A3441999-06-0101 June 1999 Interim Part 21 Rept Re Premature Over Voltage Protection Actuation in Circuit Specific Application in Dc Power Supply.Testing & Evaluation Activities Will Be Completed on 990716 ML18107A3541999-06-0101 June 1999 LER 99-006-00:on 990501,HHSI Flow Balance Discrepancy Was Noted During Surveillance.Caused by Sticking of Check Valve in SI Discharge Line to 21 Cold Leg.Valve 21SJ17,was Cut Out of Sys & Replaced.With 990601 Ltr ML18107A3681999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Salem Generating Station,Unit 1.With 990611 Ltr ML18107A3721999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Salem Generating Station,Unit 2.With 990611 Ltr ML18107A2931999-05-12012 May 1999 LER 99-002-00:on 990413,determined That Number 12 Auxiliary Bldg Exhaust Fan Was Rotating Backwards.Caused by mis-wiring of Motor Due to Human Error by Maint technician.Mis-wiring Was Corrected & Fan Was Returned to Svc.With 990512 Ltr ML18107A2781999-05-10010 May 1999 LER 99-004-00:on 990411,automatic Actuation of ESF Occurred During Reactor Vessel Head Removal in Support of Refueling Operations.Caused by High Radiation Condition.Containment Atmosphere Was Monitored.With 990505 Ltr ML18107A2791999-05-0404 May 1999 LER 99-003-00:on 990406,all Salem Unit 2 Chillers Rendered Inoperable.Caused by Human Error.Lessons Learned from Event Were Communicated to All Operators by Including Them in Night Orders.With 990504 Ltr ML18107A2741999-05-0303 May 1999 LER 99-002-00:on 990405,determined That Containment Isolation Valve Failed as Found Leakrate Test.Caused by Foreign Matl Blocking Valves from Closing.Check Valve Mechanically Agitated.With 990504 Ltr ML18107A3711999-04-30030 April 1999 Corrected Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Salem Generating Station,Unit 1 ML18107A3151999-04-30030 April 1999 Submittal-Only Screening Review of Salem Generating Station Individual Plant Exam for External Events (Seismic Portion), Rev 1 ML18107A2991999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Salem Unit 1.With 990514 Ltr ML18107A2971999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Salem Unit 2.With 990514 Ltr ML18107A2351999-04-23023 April 1999 LER 99-001-00:on 990330,MSSV Failed Lift Set Test.Caused by Setpoint Variance Which Is Result of Aging.Valves Were Adjusted & Retested to Ensure TS Tolerance.With 990423 Ltr ML18107A2881999-04-0707 April 1999 Rev 0 to NFS-0174, COLR for Salem Unit 2 Cycle 11. ML18107A1821999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Salem,Unit 1.With 990414 Ltr ML18107A1831999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Salem,Unit 2.With 990414 Ltr ML18106B1471999-03-29029 March 1999 LER 99-001-00:on 990228,reactor Scram Was Noted as Result of Turbine Trip.Caused by Operator Error.Lesson Plans Revised to Explicitly Demonstrate Manner in Which Valve Functions. with 990329 Ltr ML18106B1021999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Salem Unit 2.With 990315 Ltr ML18106B1011999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Salem Unit 1.With 990315 Ltr ML18106B0931999-02-25025 February 1999 Part 21 Rept Re Possible Defect in Swagelok Pipe Fitting Tee,Part Number SS-6-T.Caused by Crack Due to Improper Location of Heated Bar.Only One Part Out of 7396 Pieces in Forging Lot Was Found to Be Cracked.Affected Util,Notified ML18106B0701999-02-16016 February 1999 LER 98-015-00:on 981208,inadvertent Discharge Through RHR Relief Valve During Startup Was Noted.Caused by Operator Performing Too Many Tasks Simultaneously.Appropriate Actions Have Been Taken IAW Policies & Procedures.With 990216 Ltr ML18106B0551999-02-0101 February 1999 Part 21 Rept Re Possible Matl Defect in Swagelok Pipe Fitting Tee,Part Number SS-6-T.Defect Is Crack in Center of Forging.Analysis of Part Is Continuing & Further Details Will Be Provided IAW Ncr Timetables.Drawing of Part,Encl ML18106B0561999-01-31031 January 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1999 for Salem Generating Station,Unit 2.With 990212 Ltr ML18106B0571999-01-31031 January 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1999 for Salem Generating Station,Unit 1.With 990212 Ltr ML20205P1671999-01-31031 January 1999 a POST-PLUME Phase, Federal Participation Exercise ML18106B0441999-01-29029 January 1999 Part 21 Rept Re Possible Defect in Swagelok Pipe Fitting Tee Part Number SS-6-T.Caused by Crack in Center of Forging. Continuing Analysis of Part & Will Provide Details in Acoordance with NRC Timetables ML18106B0491999-01-28028 January 1999 LER 98-007-01:on 980730,reactor Coolant Instrument Line through-wall Leak Was Noted.Caused by Transgranular Stress Corrosion Cracking.Replaced Affected Tubing.With 990128 Ltr ML18106B0401999-01-18018 January 1999 LER 98-016-00:on 981219,ECCS Leakage Was Outside of Design Value.Caused by Leakage Past Seat of 21RH34 Manual Drain. Valve 21RH34 Was Reseated.With 990118 Ltr ML18106B0251998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Salem Unit 2.With 990115 Ltr 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
)
I EVALUATION OF METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF Sr-89 AND Sr-90 IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES Prepared by Radiation Management Corporation 3508 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19104 r1s3:1i:1il1li11/oirol:;7;c;5~
8-o-8 -:;-1 -;-11~0~~:--------\
- PDR ADOCK 05000272 j
, G PDR
.--*---*-*--.... ---~.*:-.*.* ....... :...;. .. _ .---:;__ -** - --. --- --* --*-*---*----*--.- *-
EVALUATION OF METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF Sr-89 AND Sr-90 IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES I. INTRODUCTION As a continuing effort to improve its services, Radiation Management Corporation has evaluated its procedure for Sr-89 and -90 on environmental samples. Three areas have been looked into specifically. These areas are: *
- 1. Methods to increase the sensitivity of the analysis for certain sample types *
. 1. Methods to better-differentiate, di~crete Sr-89 and Sr-90 contributions to the total radio-strontium activity, and
- 3. Methods to improve the chemical yields for preserved milk samples.
A new analytical method is proposed to achieve the above objectives.
II. EVALUATION OF EXISTING PROCEDURE Radi~tion Management Corporation's methodology for Sr-89/90 determination in environmental samples utilizes classic wet chemistry means to purify strontium from competing elements. A final strontium carbonate precipitate is prepared for beta counting. A second count of the prepared samples is done 7-14 days later. The Sr.89 and -90 activities are calculated from equations using Sr-89 decay and Y-90 ingrowth terms in a solution of 2 simultaneous equations with two unknowns. Ari evaluation was initiated to review the various aspects of the analytical method for Sr-89/90. The chemistry procedures used for Sr-89/90 analysis for various ~edia were internally reviewed .. In addition, an independent evaluation was conducted by our radiochemistry consultant, Dr. K.K.S. Pillay. As a result of these reviews, it was concluded that the radiochemistry methods w~re scientifically sound in chemical theory. Dr; Pillay was *then.requested to observe and evaluate the RMC technician in performance of the analyses, and also present a training seminar on the radiochemistry of strontium.
From his technological review, Dr. Pillay found no outstandin9 technique problems~ but he was able to provide some sup~estions to handle certain specific conditions.
II I. RESULTS OF QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE TE~llNG In order to evaluate some of the proposed improvements to the analytical method, testing was performed to accomplish this goal.
TEST 1 The first testing to be performed was to make a more accurate determination I of the chemical yield by means of a radioactive tracer Sr-85. A standard solution of Sr-85 was obtained to perform this test. Radioactive Sr-85, which is not a B- emitter would be added alona with stable strontium carrier so that the Sr.BS would act as a tracer for the chemical yield of I
a the prepared samples. By knowing the a~ount of Sr-85 added, the chemical yield could be determined from a gamma count of each prenared sample to ouantitate the Sr-85 remaining in the sample. The ratio of measured and
~ctual Sr-85 amounts would be the chemical yield of the analysis. The chemical yield could thus be determined almost imriediately for a prepared
- -* ___ ._..,_,___ ,. ..... __ -*-*-.a.-*... _. ____ .., __ ~' ___ _.... .. --... **
sample. Befor~ per.forming any actual tests for use of Sr~85 as a radioactive tracer, an aliq0ot of the Sr-85 standard was counted on the gas-flow proportional counter to detennine the counting efficiency of the Sr-85 photons in the proportional counter. Since Sr-85 was going to be added to both samples and blanks, the Sr-85 should not be efficiently counted in the gas-flow proportional counter since the blank is used in the LLD calculation. One additional important concern for this initial test was an evaluation of the potential for the Sr-85 to become a contamination problem and thus have an adverse affect on other samples being prepared and counted. An activity of approximately 50 nCi was used and resulted in a beta counting efficiency of approximately 0.84~{ (890 cpm/
105700 dpm). Since a quantity of about 10 nCi was to be added to each sample and blank to provide a suitable quick determination on the finished planchet, the activity of the sample would be masked and a hi9her LLD result. Approximately 100 cpm additional would result from the use of this .amount of activity if a yield of approximately 60~~ was achieved. The use of Sr-85 was thus not feasible as a determination of yield for low-level detennination of Sr-89 and -90. The more convential gravimetric or atomic absorption spectrophotometric methods will be utilized for chemical yield determinations for the strontium procedures.
TEST 2 The next test performed was an evaluation of the Sr-90 results for some previously analyzed samples by means of a separate detennination for the Y-90 daughter activities of these samples. Since a condition of secular equilibrium exists in these samples, the Sr-90 activity can be inferred from the Y-90 detennination. This test was- not intended to make auantitative comparisons to the initial Sr-90 measurement, but was done to confirm the Sr-90 results. The following data in Table 1 show results from previous Sr-90 analyses (with some duplicates) and the Y-90 results.
TABLE 1 Sr-90 CONFIRMATION BY Y-90 COUNTING SAMPLE # Sr-90 RESULT(s) Y-90 RESULT 1 <2.36 x 10_4 -4 <2.17 x 10- 44 2 <2.75 x lQ4 <2.20 x 10-3 . <3.8 x 10_4 3.5 ~
4 <4. l x 10 <3.54 x 10-*
5 14.9 10. 7 6 <.572/<.53 <.449 7 <.62 <. 51 8 <.51/<.43 <.46 9 <. 50/<.43 <.52 10 <.67 <.58 11 2.06 2. 34 12 4.2 <l .32 The testing showed that the initial Sr-90 results were in general agreement with the Y-90 result. The Sr-90 results was not verified in a few of the tests, but the method of analysis of Sr-90 by Y-90 {which R~~c has not previously been doing} shows promise. To further test this the Y-90 analysis, a series of Y-90 known spikes were analyzed. Results of this testing appear in Table 2. Results show that the spike recoveries were in decent agreement with the known activities. We expect improved agree~ent
with future refinements in the technique.
TABLE 2 Y-90 SPIKE RECOVERIES SP I KE ACTIVITY RECOVERED ACTIVITY SAMPLE # pCi/1 pCi/l % DIFFERENCE 1 lb.2 l 0. 9 + 6.9 2 l 0. 2 12.0 + 17. 7 3 10.2 12. 7 + 24.5 4 10.2 l l. 1 + 8.8 5 20.4 j 23.2 + 13. 7 6 20.4 22.6 + 10.8 7 20.4 22.8 + 11.8 8 20.4 22.8 + 11. 8 AVERAGE + 13.3%
TEST 3 One additional series of tests that was conducted was detennination of anv upward or downward trends of a repeated second count on prepared samples.'.
A recount of the second count was done on approximately 57 samples. The count was done after Sr-90/Y-90 e(!uil ibrium was: reached, but before any significant Sr-89 decay. A review of this data showed that the ori~inal second count and the repeat second count were not significantly different.
This test was thus inconclusive to further improve the analysis or identify any particular problems in the present analysis.
TEST A Tests of a method to improve the chemical yield for preserved milk samples is currently being conducted. This test involves denaturation of a fluid milk sample with Trichloroacetic Acid {TCA) prior to per'forrning the remainder of the analysis rather than performing the analysis directly on an ashed milk sample.* Results of this test will be presented upon its completion.
- IV. PROPOSED NEW METHOD FOR ANALYSIS OF Sr-89 AND -Sr-90 Radiation Management Corporation's present procedure for analyzin~ Sr-89 and Sr-90 has been previously discussed in section II of this report. One major advantage of this method was to eliminate the need for a.second che~ical separation for Yttrium. One apparent disadvantage is that the method yields higher calculated LLD values than a two separation method since the LLDs are calculated from the two sequential counts rather than individually from single counts performed f~r each isotope.
- Radiation Management Corporation thus investigated alternative calculational methods for the detennination of Sr-89 and -90 usinq a more classic two separation chemical method rather than the simultaneous equation method currently in use. Two principle methods for detennining the quantitative Sr-89 and -90 contributions to the total radiostrontium activity in a sa~ple are in popular use. The Sr-89 activity can be determined by counting a freshly prepared strontium sample through an absorber to shield the Sr-90 soft beta and then determing the Sr-90 by Y-90 separation. A second Method is to determine the Sr-89 activity by subtraction from the total radiostrontium
- ..------~- ;;-=-~-----=-----
'--~ -
activity by first measuring the Sr-90 (by Y-90). The prepared method for the Sr-89/90 analyses will utilize a technique based upon the absorbance of the soft Sr-90 beta to detennine Sr-89 activity and a separate Y-90 detennination to infer Sr-90 activity.
The Beckmen Wide Beta fI gas-flow proportional counters can be equioped with absorbers of different thicknesses for beta counting. An absorber of 90.6 mg/cm2 thickness was chosen since it reduced the Sr-90 counting efficiency to <1% (44 cpm/4575 dpm) and allowed a Sr-89 counting efficiency of approximately 12.1% (201 cpm/1665 dpm). The use of an absorber should thus be suitable for the measurements to be done.
V. ACHIEVABLE SENSITIVITIES FOR SELECTED SAMPLE TYPES Typical sensitivities achievable by thi~ method have been calculated for selected sample types. The equation for LLD as described in Regulatory hUide 4.8 has been used with suitable additional terms to correct for Y-90 ingrowth and the second chemical* separation required from the Sr-90 analysis.
The sample media addressed include water, ~ilk and air particulates. Real data has been used for the variables such as chemical vield and backaround count rates. Prepared Y-90 samples will be counted within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> to minimize its decay tenn. Prepared strontium samples will also be counted within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> to minimize Y-90 ingrowth.
Where: 8 = Background counts = 1 cpm x 200 min = 200 t = Counting time = 200 min V =*sample volume= 1.5 liters Ys = Strontium chemical yield = .33 Yy = Yttrium chemical yield= .85 Ey = Counter efficiency for Y-90 = .45 2.22* = dpm/pCi (constant)
IF = Y-90 in~ro~th fact~rt{time from iRitial Sr separation to Y separation) = 1 -e}.. *= .974 for 14 days DF = Y-90tdecay factor (time from Y separation to countin~) =
e -}. = .878 for 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> ;_
LLD90 = 4. 66 v' 200 (200) (l.5) (.33) (.85) (.45) (2.22) (.974) (.878)
- = 0.92 pCi/liter Sr-89 Achievable Sensitivity (LLD): 5 pCi/l
- 4. 66 v' B t . Es
~- ..:......--
Where: B = Background counts = 1 cpm x 200 min = 200 t = Counting time = 200 minutes Ys = Strontium chemical yield = .33 2.22 = Constant V =Volume= 1.5 liters Es= Counter efficiency for Sr-89 = .121 DF = Sr-89 decay factor (assumes aR~roximately 30 days between collection and counting) = e- = .674 4.66/ 200 (200) ( .121) ( .33) (1.5} (2.22) ( .674)
- 3.7 pCi/liter Water Sr-90 Achievable Sensitivity -'(LLD): l pCi/l LLD 90 = 4. 66/ B t
- OF Where: B = Background counts = 1 cpm x 100 min = 100 counts t = Counting time = 100 minutes V =Sample volume= 2 liters Vs = Strontium chemical yield = .80 .
and all other terms are same as in the Sr-90 milk determination.
LLD 90 = 4.66/ 100 (100) (2.0) (.80) (.85) {.45) (2.22) (.974) (.878)
- 0.40 pCi/liter Sr-89 Achievable Sensitivity (LLD): l pCi/liter
- 4. 66 v7 B t
- OF Where: Vs = Strontium chemical yield= .80 V =Sample volume= 2.0 liters _
DF = Sr-89 decay factor for 14 days = .832 and all other terms are the same as in the Sr-89 in milk determination
- 4. 661200 (200) (.121) (.80) (2.0) (2.22) (.832)
- 0.92 pCi/l "Air Particulates Sr-90 Achievable Sensitivity (LLD): l x 10- 4 pCi/m3 LLD 90 = 4. 66 I B t
~
6 *.
.., ~* ,..
r-Where: B*
t
= (.7
= 750 cpm) (750 min) = 525 ~cunts minutes V = 2500 m3 and all other terms are the same as Sr-90 analysis in water
- Low Background Counter Used
- 4. 66 y' 525 (750) (2500) (.8) (.85) (.45) (2.22) (.974) (.878)
- 0.98 x 10- 4 pCi/m 3 .
Activity calculations for Sr-89 and -90 would be as follows:
Sr-90 (pCi/unit volume) = G- B Activity V
- OF Where.: !he terms are identi_cal ,to those in the Sr-90 LLD equations and G = Gross count rate B = Background count rate Sr-89 (pCi/unit volume) =
G - B - Bs - Bv V
- DF Where: the terms are identical to those in the Sr-89 LLD equations and G = Gross count rate B = Background count rate (instrument)
Bs = Additional backaround count rate from fractional Sr-90 countin9 By= Additional background count rate.from Y-90 ingrowth VI.. CONCLUSIONS
- 1. RMC has eva 1 uated its current chemistry procedures and have determined them to be scientifically sound.
- 2. RMC proposes to chan9e the analytical method in the following manner:
- a. A two separation chemical procedure will be performed in lieu of the current single separation method.
- b. An absorber will be utilized in the determination of Sr-89
- c. A Y-90 separation will be performed for the determination of Sr-90
- 3. Achievable sensitivities will meet client requirements.
Sr-90 Sr-89 Milk 0.92 pCi/l 3.7 pCi/l Water N 0.57 pCi/1 0.92 pCi/l Air Particulates 0.98 x lo-4 pCi/m3 I
- 4. Although the proposed methods will achieve the above sensitivities, more testing (e.g. TCA usage in the milk procedure to improve the chemical yield) is currently being conducted and will be reported upon completion.
I t
p Radiation Management Corporation will conduct some additional testing as necessary to make further refinements .in its analytical procedures.
033 DI 7 Der 19 I s2 PM ~ B/
..:J.-*~l-.~ \...