ML18085A855

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Safety Evaluation Re Fracture Toughness Design of Steam Generator & Reactor Coolant Pump Supports
ML18085A855
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 01/21/1981
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML18085A854 List:
References
NUDOCS 8102230163
Download: ML18085A855 (1)


Text

... *.

1' SAFETY.EVALUATION REPORT"

. SALEM UNIT 1

. FRACTURE TOUGHNESS OF STEAM.. GENERATOR...

-~: " '.

l~O Introdtiction In a Jetter dateci December -30, 1977, Public *service, El:ecti'iC: and Gas.

Company' responded to the *NRC Is request for information concerning ttie '

fracture. toughness design' of the steam generator and reactor coolant '

pump S(.!pp*orts at Salem Unit 1.,. This information was initially

  • reviewed by Sandia Laboratories as part of generic technical activity*

,A-12.

Sandia's evaluation con~luded that the steam generator and.

reactor coolant pump supports at. Salem Unit 1 were considered to. be as good.as *careful, reasonable engineering practice. can produce.

This evaluation is contained in NUREG:..0577.. The.. informationcontained in the licensee's response was subsequently ~ransmitted to Franklin

. Research Center for an independent evaluation.. This eva,luation was based on the.criteria presented in the draf,t version,of.NUREG-0577.

    • ... 2.0 Evaluatian.
  • The enclosed Technical Evaluatio~ Reportwasprepar~dby the. Franklin**

Research Cen_ter as part.of NRC Contract* No.... NRC.. 03-79-" 118..,*.. **.

. The scope of Frankli~'s review was limited to those supports origin~lly reviewed by Sandia.which included the steam generator and reactor.

coolant pump supports"excluding the.upper steam generator snubber assemblies.. Subs*equent to the initial rev.iew by Sandia laboratories,*

the scope of Generic Technical Activity A-12 has been expanded to.*

include.other supports.. For thos.e supports 1dent1fi.ed by the final version of NUREG*0577 that are not included iil this review, the licensee should follow the implementation plan specified in NUREG-0577"."

. 3~0. Conclusion

  • Base.d onour review of:Franklin's Technical Evaluation Report~ we agree,

with_ their conclusion that the steam generator and 'reactor coolant pump '

supports at Salem Unit 1 possess adequate fracture toughness to merit

  • _:

Therefore, we consider the fracture*

toughness of _the steam generator and reactor coola.nt pump supports acce~table.