ML18085A714
| ML18085A714 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 01/21/1981 |
| From: | Uderitz R Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8101270616 | |
| Download: ML18085A714 (1) | |
Text
...... -- -..,;., -
f
,Ps~cf Public Service Electric and Gas Company 80 Park Place Newark, N.J. 07101 Phone 201 /430:,.(_QpQ **
January 21, 1981 Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Nuclear Reactor R.egulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Mrc Eisenhut:
EMERGENCY PLAN EVACUABILITY STUDY SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-272 AND 50-311
'.":i:*:*T *:-
On January 6, 1981 we received your letter which outlined what apparently was a recent review o;f; the evacuation time estimates submitted to the NRC by :Public Service for our Salerri Generating Station.
However, upon review of the enclosures to t'.he lette~ it was obvious to us that the review was based upon material sub-mitted to you almost a year ago and prior to NUREG-0654.
In the spring of 1980 we commissioned a new evacuation study which was included in our Salem Generating Station Emergency Plan, submittal of July 12,.1980.
As a iesult of your letter we promptly contacted Mr. R. Priebe, the NRC's emergency plan reviewer for our plan, to determine what ma,teria.1 has been used for the NRC staff study.
Mli* l?riebe stated that he had neither seen the letter nor had he made any input.
We subsequently contacted the consultant that performed our evacuability studies to determine if any of thei,"r other clients had received an overall poor rating.
The consultant stated that another client received an overall rating of excellent using the same format and methodology as is used in our Salerri Generating Station Emergency Plan.
- It appears to us that there *may ha;ve been a lack of coordination of the various divisions of the NRC in respect to reviewing or issuing this letter on emergency p;i:;"eparedness.
We hereby request a revised letter providing an evaluation of our evq,cuation time estimate~ as currently submitted.
1879 1979 8 1012 '1 () '11,.
Very truly yours, ft:lillir General Manager -
Nuclear Pro~uction 95-2001 (300M) 1-79