ML18080A010

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2018-02-DRAFT Outline Comments
ML18080A010
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear 
Issue date: 03/07/2018
From: Vincent Gaddy
Operations Branch IV
To:
Entergy Operations
References
Download: ML18080A010 (1)


Text

Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Rev 3 PROPOSED OUTLINE COMMENTS Facility:

ANO Unit 1 First Exam Date:

February 23, 2018 Written Exam Outline (Date)

Comment Resolution 1 No Comments Administrative JPM Outline (Date)

Comment Resolution 1

For JPM A1: Listed K/A is Ability to use plant computers to evaluate system or component status. Need to ensure that the actual JPM meets the K/A.

Ensured that a plant computer will be used in performance of the JPM.

Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (Date)

Comment Resolution 1 No Comments Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (Date)

Comment Resolution 1

Scenario 1, Event 2. This likely does not count as an instrument failure for the SRO. Just a TS.

Removed instrument failure from the bean count.

2 Scenario 1, Event 2. I would question whether the SRO MAY enter TS 3.8.1B.

I think TS 3.0.1 would mandate 3.8.1B ben entered.

Will replace this event with another failure and different tech spec call.

3 Scenario 2, event 10. This critical task is likely inadequate, since it (appears) to rely on an Aux building operator resetting the turbine driven pump. It would not be consistent between the crews. Could be salvageable if the control room fixes whatever problem happened.

After discussions with the Chief Examiner, the time between the aux operator being asked to reset the pump, and the time the applicants are told the pump is reset will be the same, independent of when they request the pump be reset.

4 Scenario 3, Event 2. This likely does not count as an instrument failure for the SRO. Just a TS.

Removed instrument failure from the bean count.