ML18078A622
| ML18078A622 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 01/04/1979 |
| From: | Librizzi F Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7901090239 | |
| Download: ML18078A622 (4) | |
Text
(
PS~G Public Service Electric and Gas Company 80 Park Place Newark, N.J. 07101 Phone 201 /430-7000 January 4, 1979 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. c.
20555 Attention:
Mr. A. Schwencer, Chief Operating Reactors Branch 1 Division of Operating Reactors Gentlemen:
INCREASED CAPACITY SPENT FUEL RACKS NO. 1 UNIT SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO.
50-272 Public Service Electric and Gas Company hereby submits additional information in support of its application to increase the spent fuel storage capacity at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station.
This information is in response to discussions held with members of your staff.
This submittal consists of forty copies.
Should you have any questions regarding this application, please do~not hesitate to contact us.
Attachment Very truly yours, i
General Manager Electric Production REGULATORY DOC~\\ET FILE COPY 7 9 0] 0 9 0 ).3'7 The Energy People 95-2001 (400M) 9-77
I.
I
....... i.
'Maximum Drop Height of Empty Tool. over storage racks, ft.
Weight of Empty Tool, lbs.
Maximum Kinetic Energy at Impact, ft~ lbs.
M*aximum Drop Height of. Loaded* Tool over sto.rag.e racks, ft.
Maximum Weight of Loaded Tool,* lbs.
Maximum Kinetic Energy at Impact.ft. lbs *.
Unloaded Tool, Wire Rope Design F~ctor (based
.on bieaking strength) - Reeving Syst~m Loaded Tool, Wire Rope Design Factor (based on breaking strength) - Reeving System.*
Desi~n Factor of remaining portion&.of fuel handling crane with respect to its load rating of 5 tons Design Factor of T6ols including the* connection.
point (loaded condition)*
. Design Factor of Tools including the-connection*.
~oint. (unlo~ded condition)
Burnable Poison Fuel Assembly Rod Assembly Handling Fixture ~~~-T_o_o_l~~-
15 350 5250 1 1/4.
.1965 2456 350/56000 196'5/56000 5: 1..
- . 28: 1.
15
. _650 9750 1 1/4 2265.
2831 650/56000 2265/56000 5:1 5:1 17:1
- Note 1:
Fuel *Handling crane is load teste.d. per Chapter 2-2 of ANSI B30. 2.
P78 80 23
QUESTION NO. 27 Verify that the rack design is in accordance with the prov1s1ons of Paragraphs C.2, C.3 and C.4 of Regulatory Guide 1.124, "Design Limits and Load Combinations for Class 1 Linear Type Component Supports."
ANSWER The rack design is in accordance with the provisions of Paragraphs C.2, C.3 and C.4 of the Regulatory Guide.
Estimates of values of Su at temperatures in accordance with methods 1 or 2 of Paragraph C.2 were not required, since these values* are listed in Section III (Table 1.3.2) for Type 304 stainless steel.
Under all loading conditions for members in compression and/or sheer, the allowable stress is limited lo 2/3 of the critical buckling stress.
P78 78 59
QUESTION What will be the expected. man-rem exposure accumulated should an.underwater installation of the* spent fuel racks be required?
ANSWER The estimated-tota1 exposure-accumulated* during the-underwater-_
installation of the spent. fuel racks is 3. 64 man~rems *. -This is based on the use of a diver and assistant.during the entire modi~
fication.and also the use of personnel to dismantle and to_ crate_:--
the old spent fuel racks. for_ shipment to a __ burial site.
The additional cost *for underwater_ installation of the spent fuel racks~ is expected to be approximately. *$800,000..
P79 02 74
..-:*