ML18069A006

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 385 Erai No. 9356 (09.02.07)
ML18069A006
Person / Time
Site: NuScale
Issue date: 03/10/2018
From:
NRC
To:
NRC/NRO/DNRL/LB1
References
Download: ML18069A006 (3)


Text

1 NuScaleDCRaisPEm Resource From:

Chowdhury, Prosanta Sent:

Saturday, March 10, 2018 10:49 PM To:

Request for Additional Information Cc:

Lee, Samuel; Cranston, Gregory; Markley, Anthony; Dias, Antonio; Le, Hien; NuScaleDCRaisPEm Resource

Subject:

Request for Additional Information No. 385 eRAI No. 9356 (09.02.07)

Attachments:

Request for Additional Information No. 385 (eRAI No. 9356).pdf Attached please find NRC staffs request for additional information (RAI) concerning review of the NuScale Design Certification Application.

Please submit your technically correct and complete response within 60 days of the date of this RAI to the NRC Document Control Desk.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Thank you.

Prosanta Chowdhury, Project Manager Licensing Branch 1 (NuScale)

Division of New Reactor Licensing Office of New Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1647

Hearing Identifier:

NuScale_SMR_DC_RAI_Public Email Number:

415 Mail Envelope Properties (BN7PR09MB2609BFF7E42EB0C3F13995749EDC0)

Subject:

Request for Additional Information No. 385 eRAI No. 9356 (09.02.07)

Sent Date:

3/10/2018 10:48:37 PM Received Date:

3/10/2018 10:48:42 PM From:

Chowdhury, Prosanta Created By:

Prosanta.Chowdhury@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Lee, Samuel" <Samuel.Lee@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Cranston, Gregory" <Gregory.Cranston@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Markley, Anthony" <Anthony.Markley@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Dias, Antonio" <Antonio.Dias@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Le, Hien" <Hien.Le@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "NuScaleDCRaisPEm Resource" <NuScaleDCRaisPEm.Resource@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Request for Additional Information" <RAI@nuscalepower.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

BN7PR09MB2609.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 556 3/10/2018 10:48:42 PM Request for Additional Information No. 385 (eRAI No. 9356).pdf 72783 Options Priority:

Standard Return Notification:

No Reply Requested:

No Sensitivity:

Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Request for Additional Information No. 385 (eRAI No. 9356)

Issue Date: 03/10/2018 Application

Title:

NuScale Standard Design Certification 048 Operating Company: NuScale Power, LLC Docket No.52-048 Review Section: 09.02.07 - Site Cooling Water System (NuScale SMR design)

Application Section:

QUESTIONS 09.02.07-6 10 CFR 52.47(a)(24) & (25) require a design certification application to contain a final safety analysis report (FSAR) that describes the facility and must include a representative conceptual design for those portions of the plant for which the application does not seek certification, to aid the NRC in its review of the FSAR and to permit assessment of the adequacy of the interface requirements, which must be sufficiently detailed to allow completion of the FSAR.

In RAI 9116, Question 09.02.07-4, the staff requested the applicant to clearly describe in FSAR Sections 1.2 and 9.2.7 which portions of the site cooling water system (SCWS) are parts of the design certification and which are considered site-specific or conceptual design information (CDI). In its response to the RAI dated November 13, 2017, the applicant stated that the entire SCWS is conceptual design and proposed changes to FSAR Section 1.2 to indicate the design of the SCWS as CDI by enclosing the information within double brackets (( )). The staff considered this response incomplete in that the applicant did not propose any conforming changes to FSAR Section 9.2.7 to specifically mark in the detailed description of the SCWS the applicable CDI including specifying all interface requirements to other plant systems that are in the scope of the certified design. Therefore, the applicant is requested to revise FSAR Section 9.2.7 to provide such markings or otherwise justify their omission.