ML18047A436

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Approves State of Mi & Local Plans Subj to Condition That Adequacy of Public Alerting & Notification Sys Must Be Verified by Fema/Nrc Joint Criteria in NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 Revision 1,App 3
ML18047A436
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/02/1982
From: Thomas L
Federal Emergency Management Agency
To: Dircks W
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
References
NUDOCS 8207160189
Download: ML18047A436 (27)


Text

.-

Kr. ~illi2~ J. Dire~~ - "~ . 13-:-**

E~eculive Director fc~ Op~r~tions U.S. t\uclear P.egul2loq Co:-1:;dssion

,, I'

.,._L W2shington, D.C. 20~5~

D~ 2i t*:r. Dircks:

lr1 ~:-cc:>*::fance ":ith the pr::p:;E~= reder2l [mergency Mc:'lEgE:ilent  ::.~~-r.~~ {r[:.*;. '!"=.:..:,*:~

.~!:. Cff: 3~0, the Stc,tc- of ;.~i:r1.i~a1 sw~*.~itled its Michiga~ [me:~~ .. ,=~ P:f;~:-::::*.;~.::

?Jc.r. a-.d*cssociated local pJc;:i~ rele:ted to the Palisad2s t\wcle=e:r r*o~:c-r Ste::i:r1 t~

  • t.he f.e95 onc:l qi:rec.lc:- of rEK~ P.e9ion V for f£MA revieio1 and 2;:>;:>:":)\*c1. 1r1t* ~r*;i::>:-.::.1 Dire=tcr for~ardeci his ~valu~tion of the Michigan State and local plE:J! t~ ~~ j~

sc-cc-r.:c:-i:-e \..*:it.h SE'dion 3,D.11 of the prop:ised Rule. tbs s:..rbiiis~.!~'!i .:-.:~:.r::~.: e:~

e~El~~lion of the Palisa~es exercise conducted Dece~ber 9 1 1980, ~n~ ~ r~~~Tt of the p:.f.:i)ic- mec:ting held on Dece:r.ber 10, 196:::l, to e).:plc.in the site-s;:-~i:if.i:- ::::~==ts of the St.;:,te c;11d locei: p~Ens. lne r.io:;t :recent P2lisa::5es ex-erc-ise c-o;i!:':.:ctt-d on febru;;r~* 2~, i982 1 de:a:ins*trc;t:d t1-i2t all oLJtstanding deficier.::ies ha\*r br~

correc!.e.d with the exci:pti.on of ~he proi:lpt s:lerting s:-d noti fic2tion s; sle:;.s.

Based en th.is evaluation end a review by the fE!*:A Heodquarters staff°,_ I find and deter-mine th2t, Eubject t~ the condition st~ted below, the plans and pre~

pare:;ness of the State cf Hichi92n c;:-id the applica~le local gove:rr~:ienls cdjc;ceill to the P 2J.5. sedes faci 1 it 'r ar-e a::lequ:;te to protect the real th Ll~ safr-tr of the ?i.i:*l.lC' li\'ing in tne vic::iriity of thc;t plant. lhere is r-ec:s::mr=!:ll~ 2ssurE:i:t>*

tha~ tne 2??ropri2te prole=tive ~~2sures can 2nd will be ta~en offsite i~ the e'.'cnt of a radiological e::ier9ency.. 1he condition fer the a'.:>ove c;-?r:l*'cl is**

ths~ the adeqi.!2=y of the pu~lic cl er ting a:id no ti f ic-Qtion s;.*ste:il :::.i~t be v~:ri fi ed ss call~d for in the FE~~/~u=le~r Regulatory Commission*(~RC) jci~t cr!te~i~

a:s stc t.~d ,i:1 f\UF:[G-065~ .'f£i'iA-REP-i, Re\*isi on 'l, A;:>pendix ~-

Acc6rd.:i.n?1~*, l ai';:irove the '11ichigan State and Joe-al pl;;n~ Te!Elive to i.he F;:.!5sE-ci-e:

!\::=le~:- ?:-.* ~er St2tio:-i s:.i:jec:t to the efo:rementioned co.*oi tion ...

i*

..Sinc-erelr,.

. r--....-*

' ::.. .*-*. \.. .----- - *.* ... *----..--. *-* *-

L~t" :~. lh6P12s

~~~~ci~te Dire:tor s*.. ot~ c:-ij Li:.cQl Fr.:igrc:11~ a.."'l.::i S.:;:~~rt l f.

U.S *

  • CLEAR REGUU*.TORY COfD1ISSIOHe REGION III R.eport No. 50-255/83-l2(DRHSP)

Docket No. 50-255 Lic~nse No. DPR-20 .

Licensee: Consumers Po~er Company 212 West Hichigan Avenue Jackson, HI 49201 Facility Name: Palisades Nuclear Generating Plant Saf~ty Evaluation Report Conducted: Harch 21 - Atigust 19, 1983

/~??/~~ g. FA£:£...

. Inspectors: Thomas J. l?ioski.

~;;J;&Palyst Approved By; H. Phill1p~g Chief,

. Emergencv Prepar~dness Section

/0 QR<-1'.i_Jt~

le~'§. Papf'riello, Chief, Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Safety Branch

  • ~

Safety Evaluation Report Summary Safetv Eva.luation Retiort - Harcb 21 - Au ust 19 1983 (Ret>ort No.* 50-255/83-12

.. DFJ-JSP Routine Sa f.ety Evaluation Report on Revision 3 to the Si t.e Emergency Plan, dated July 29, 1983. The inspection involved 135 inspector-hours by orie h"RC inspector.

Results: The Plan meets the planning standards of 10 CFR SD.47 (b) ~nd the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E.

lb if .

~*

!HERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT RELATED TO THE OPEAATION or PALISADES l-H.JCLEAR GENERATING PIJillT

. DOCKET NO. 50-255 RRC OPERA.TING LINCENSE NO. DPR-20

"<t CONSUH!RS POWER COtlPANY

~

U.S. h1JCLEAR REGULATORY COtfrfISSION AUGUST.1983 2

Introduction The s*taff revie<;.. ed Consumers Power Company's Palisades Plant Site Ece.rgency 1

'Plan, Revis ion o~ dated Ha rch r, 1981, and submitted comments in a letter

  • .cl.ated December 3, 1981, from Hr. James G. Keppler to Hr. R. B. DeWitt. The licensee responded to these comments by letter dated Harch 31, 1982 from Hr. Brain D. Johnson to Hr. James G. Keppler, and later submitted Revision l to the Plan, dated September 14, 1982. Several inadequacies in the Revision

\..'~.;:e discussed **:ith the licen.see in Hay 1983, at '1.'hich time the licensee c:O:ti..'ili tted to provide another Plan revision by August l, 1983. \.le have c:om-

~pleted onr reivew of Revision 3 to the Emergency Plan, dated July 29, 1983

  • and pertinent correspondence dated January 4, February 5, and .Harch 31, 1982, from the licensee to the h'RC. This Emergency Preparedness Safety Evaluation Report ~*ith the l\'RC *staff conclusions has been prepared incorpo.rating the fin.dings of the h"RC staff review *

..; t. .

A *. Assi nrnent of Resoons

  • anization Control) losed *2ss/Bl-19-07)
  • Planning Standard Primary responsibilities for emergency response hy the nuclear fa c:ili ty licensee, and by State and local organizations "ithin the .:E.merg_ency
  • Planning Zones have been assigned, the emergency responsibilities of the various.supporting organizations have been specifically established, and each principal response organization has staff to respond and to

~ugment its initial response on a continuous basis.

Emergency Plan The concept of operations !or emergency organizations and suborganiza-

. tions with oper~tional roles during an emertency, and the~~ relationships to the total effort, are described in the .Emergency Plan. The Plan also-'

contains block diagrams which depict the normal plant organization,

  • emergency onsi te and offsite organizations, .and the long-tem recovery organization. The plant. operating staff, including operations, heal th physics, and security pe.rsonnel, are on shift 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day and provide manning of the communications links *.

Federal, State, and local governmental organizations "',.hic:h are intend.ed to contribute to the overall emerge_ncy response effort .are identified in the Plan, as are non-govern,mental support organizations including the Institute for Nuclear Po~er Operations (Ih-rpo). Mutual assistance agreements bet~een the licensee and the Indiana and ttichigan Electric C~mpany and bet~een the licensee and the Toledo Edison Company and Detroit Edison Company ~re appended to the Plan. Contract/service.

  • *** ~greements' ~hicb address emergency assistance bet'l-.'een the licensee

~nd the nuclear steam supply system and nuclear fuels vendors~ are referenced *in the Plan.

The* Uriergency Plan Implementing Procedures (EPIPs) cont..ain information regarding bow the licensee ~ill be capable of continuous operation £or

    • .. a protracted period and ~ho, *by_title,,is responsbile for assuring con-tinuity of human and material resources. This indivicual should, :ho~

~ver, also be identified by title in the Emergency Plan.

The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness, as described in tbe Palisades Plant Site Emergency Plan, to be adequate *.

E. Onsite Emergency Organization (Closed, 255/81-19-08)

Planning Standard OD.shift fa cil:t°ty licensee rcsponsibili ties for emergency response are unambiguously defined, idequate staffing to provide initial facility accident response in key functional areas is maintained at.all times, timely 2U£mentation of response Capabilities is available, znd the intirfaces among various onsite response activities ~nd offsite support and zesponse activities are s~ecified.

Er;;ergency Plan The normal operating organization is described in the Emergency Plan and

  • is su:;:narized in Figure l. The duties and responsibilities of ~ey ~anage ment and supervisory personnel zre specified in the Plan for the nonnal operating organization.
  • The emergency organization is described by major functional areas and tasks for personnel with a specific position title or expertise *. The primary and alternate manning for the onsite ~mergency organization is illustrated in a block diagram (Figure 2) using normal plant titles.
  • The Shift Supervisor, on shift at all times, acts ~~ the Site Emergency Director (SED) until relieved by the Palisades Plant General Manager or de~ignated alternate. The line of su.C:cession for the SED is specified in the Plan: rhe S.ED.has overall responsibility for the plant's emer-

" gency activities, including assessment of the emergency, operational decisions involving personnel and plant safety, and making protective action recommendations to *off-site authorities. Other SED responsibili*

tie.s are. listed in the P~an. SE.D responsibilities which may not be delegated are decisions to reco~~end protective actions to offsite organizaticns, to evacuate the site, and to authorize emergency worker exposures that exceed 10 CFR Part 20 limits~ . . ...

The licensee has specified the positions, *titles and the major tasks to be performed by persons to be assigned to the major functional- areas of

  • emergency activity. Positions an9/or titles and qualifications of all shift staff and plant staff,.botb *onsite and offsite, ~ho are assigned oajor functional duties are listed. The Plan.lists t.h.e follo~ing nine
t>>erson.nel on-shift \.'ho provide expertise 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day: one Shift Supervisor-senior react or operator, t\..'O Control Room Op'erat.o"rs*, tii'O Auxiliary Operators, one Plant Technical Engineer or Auxiliary Operator for notification/communication, one Radiation Safety Technician, one Chemistry Technician, and one Shift Engineer.* By lett.er dated November 6, 1981 ~ responding to a h'RC Confimation of Action Letter dated Octobe~ 7, 1981, the licensee stated t.hat the follolo;ing personnel are _pre.sently provided on shift 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day (above cold shutdo\:n): one senior .;...:-: .._-*.

reactor operator, t\..'O Control Room Operators, four Au::iliary Operators, . **

  • one Shift Technical Advisor, and t~o Chemistry/Health Physics Technicians,

.for a total of ten personnel. This commitment meets t.he staffing re-quirer:ient of l\1.TREG-065.~, Table B-1. Figure 5-5 of the Plan lists the

  • number of people by p6.sition title or expertise ~:ho c:an respond in approximately 30 and 60 minutes for staff augmentation. This figure indicates that sufficient numbers of personnel \..'ith appropriate expertise to meet the guidance in hu'REG-0654 Table.B-1 can respond within the desired time intervals.

By letter fro~ Hr. Br~an D. Johrison to Hr. James G. Keppler dated ~

-November 6, 19~1, the licensee stated that a senior plant manager quali-fied to act as Emergency Operations facility (EOF) Djrector*and adequate EOF support staff kould not be able to meet the 30 to 60 minute staff

~ugrnentation time constraint and that qualified generzl office staff may

.. s ..

require up to six houAto reac:h the permanent EOF. aherefoie, ~ tempor-z.cy EOF, located at t!PGeneral Offic:e Control Cente'P"_and staffed by .

general office personnel, has been proposed to.fulfill the EOF functions until adequate general o"ffice staff can s:nan the permanent. EOF. The

  • licensee has fornally requested URC approval to u"se t.his concept of operations by letter dated January 4, 1982, '-'i th ad di t:iona"l information ttansmi t ted regarding the tempera ry .EOF by letter dat.ed Februa cy 5, 1982.

h"RC Region III responded by letter dated February 12 1 -1982, that the temporary EOF concept ~as adequate for interim use. Ho~ever, this concept of operations remains an Uh"R.ESDLVED ITEM as t.he long-term means of adequately meeting EDF requirements.

The interfaces bet\o.'een and .among the onsite functional area of emergency activity, Consumers Power Company General Office suppo.rt, local services support, and St.ate an*d local government response organizations are des-cribed in the Emergency Plan and the attached Figures 2 through 5.

    • rigure 2 illustrates the formal organizational structures for the Technical Support Center, Operational Support Center. and ~he Control Room; figure 3 illustrates the permanent *and ternporacy EOF organiza-tional structures; iiguie 4 depicts the licensee's Recovery Organization; and figure 5 summarizes the onsite and offsite licensee and governmental emergency response organizations.

Corporate management, 2dministrative and fechnical support, and public information personnel who ~ill augment the plant staff are specified in the plan. Ih1PO, Indiana and Michigan Electric: Company, _Toledo .Edison

  • Company, and Detroit Edison Company are listed among the *private .emer-gency support organizations \.:ith "'hem t.he licensee has r::rut.ual technical

~ssistance agreements. The services to be provided by local agencies to handle emergencies are identified for each organization and specified in letters of Agreement appended to the Plan. . . ** . * - **

Wit.h the exception of the 'UNRESOLVED ITEM regarding the interim EOF

- concept of operations, the staff finds this element of e.i:ne.rgenr:y pre-

.~ . paredness to be adequate *

    • -. f ::
  • C.

!mergen;:Y Response Support and Resources (Closed, 255/81-19-09)

  • Planning Standard . .

Arrangements for requesting and effectively using assistance resources

    • have been made, arrangements to ~ccomrnodate State and local staff at the licensee's near-site Emergency O;perations facility have been made, and other organizations capable of _augm~nting the planned response have been identified.

Emergency Plan The Si"te Emergency Director has the authority to request and .utilize

~ssistance from federal agencies, e.g., Department of Energy Regional Asd.stance Plan and Ioteragency Radiological Assis tact* Plan. The licensee will dispatch a representative to Lbe appropriate State ~nd

,' . .* 6

l,ocal Emergency Operations Centers. The licensee has identified the radiological laboratories ~hich can be used in ~n emergency, their genera 1 ca pa bili ties, and expected availability to provide radiol~gi cal conitoring and analyses services. Other facilities, organizations, and individuals who can be relied upon to provide erne*rgency assistance have been adequately identified in the Plan.

D. Emergency Classification System (Closed, 255/81-19-10)

Planning Standard A standard emergency classification and action level scheme, the bases of ~bich include facility system and effluent parameters, is in use by the_ nuclear facility licensee, and State and local response plans call for* relia.nce on inf orina ti on provided by :facility licensees :for detennina-tions of mini~um initial offsite response measures *

.Emergency Plan

Four standard emergency classes (Unusual Event, Alert, Site Emergency,

~nd General Emergency)- hav~ been established~ *ticensee responses, and

  • those.of State ~nd local offsite authorities, associated ""'ith each class

~re su.:n.~arized in the Plan. Emergency Action Levels (EAls) have been developed for ea ch class, based on guidance provided in Appendix 1 of

. -"-- KUREG-0654, Revision *-1. The method of detection for each EAL is speci-

... *. " fied in the.Plan. EALs are categorized as follows: Alarms/Annunciators; Communications loss; Containment Integrity; Engineered Safety Features; Control Room Evacuation; Fire; Fis"sion Product Barriers/fuel Damage; General Hazards; Personnel Injury; Meteorological Data-Loss; Miscellaneous; Natural Phenomenon; Plant Po~er-Electrical; Primary Cool.an~ System Integrity; Primary Coolant System-Temperature .or Pressure; Releases; Safety Injection System; Secondary Side; and Security. The Plan provides a Table relating the FSAR analyzed accident to appropriate I.AI. classifi-

. cations.

The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness, as described in the Palisades Plant Site Emergency Plan, to be adequate

  • E. Notification Methods and Procedures* (Closed, 255/81-19-11)

Procedures have been established for notification, by ~he licensee of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all response organiz~tions; the content of initial and*

fol!o~up messages to response organizations and the public bas been .

Lstablished; and means to provide early notification and clear instruc-tion to the populace- \.:ithin the plume exposure path\.:ay Emergency Planning Zone have been esta.blished.

--~

7 ..

Er.iergency Plan

!he licensee has e~tablished procedures for i~itial o.Otificatioo of State and local response organizations consistent ~ith the emergency classification and action level scheme set forth. in Appen~ix l of h'URl:G-.

0654. The plan provides for message verification. Procedures* for .*

alerting, notifying and mobilizing emergency response personnel have been established~ Figure 6 of this report depicts the notification

~chernes for plant and corporate personnel, and Federal, State, and local govern.i*riental agenc_ies.

The-~ontent of initial emergency messages to State *and local agencies to be sent from the plant includes:

  • Name and telephone number of caller
  • location of incident
  • Date and time of incident .
  • Emergency classification of the incident
  • ~"nether a release is taking or bas. taken plac"e
  • The affected or .potentially affected population
  • Recor..monded protective actions
  • ttessage verification
  • The contents of follovup ~essages to state and local ~gencies, consistent

~ith h1JPJ:G-0654 guidance, is also.prescribed in the PlaI:l

  • The licensee has established the physical and administrative means for

.providing timely notification and prompt instructions to the public vitbin the plume exposure path~ay Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ).

Consumers Po\..'er Company has installed 89 sirens **ithi.n t.he 10 .. cilc *plume.

exposure EPZ ~hieµ arc designed to alert 100% of the EPZ population

'dthin 15.. *minutes of the decision to activate t.he sirens. Offsite autbo.ritics \.'ho .are permitted to activate the siren sistem are identified in the plan. The siren.system is tested monthly. The successful opera-.

tional test "Was conducted prior to February l., 1982, deadline, thereby meeting the requirement . ... .** ...

of 10 CFR SD, Appendix E,Section IV.D.3 *

~.

_ ~~ *:. -~

The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness. as described in

-the Palisades Plant Site Emergency Plan, to be adequat..c.

  • F. * 'Emergency Commuriica tions (Closed, 255/81-10-12)

Planning Standard -*

Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations to emergency personnel-and to the public.

Emergency Plan The. licensee has made provisions *ror 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day com:nunications \.'$.th

~ppropriate Federal, State, local, and licensee org3nizations during emergency situations. With ~he exception of communications equipment

, 8

9.a t ion moni ~oring teams, pr.ir9-Y .!nd backttp 0

ut,il ize d by offs i te cor.~-::unications systems are adequately described in the Pl.an.* These cozr-~"!lunications systems are also swnmarized in Figure 7 of this r.eport.

There are also corrununications links bet~een the licensee and an ou:..bulance s~rvice and fixed med~cal support facilities. H~~ever, the P~an does Dot include a description of the co~'llunications link bet~een the licensee

~Dd mobile medical support facilities. This communications link, ~hich is through the medical service dispatcher, should be stated in the next revision of the Em~rgency Plan.

Periodic: testing of the emergency com.'llunications systems is conducted.

The link bet~een the KRC and the licensee is tested monthly. !he link bet~een the licensee ~nd State and local government agencies in the plume

  • .~xposure EPZ is tested quarterly, and annua-lly for tJ:tose agencies in the

The st2ff ~inds this element of emergency preparedness, ~s described in the Palisades Plant Site Emergency Plan,.*to be adequate.

G. Public Education and Information (Closed, 255/81-19-13)

Plannin~ Standard Information is made available to the public on a periodic.basis on how

  • t:hey will be notified and ...*bat their initial actions should be in an

. :*** emergency (e.g., listening to a local broadcast station* a:Qd remaining

  • *.indoors), the principal points of contact with the ne~s media for dis-semination of information during an emergency (including t.he physical
  • location or* locatio~s) are established in advance, and procedures for coordinated.dissemination of information to the public are established.

Emergenc.y Plan The licensee has provided for a coordinated annual dissemination of information regarding ho~ the public ~ill be notified, ~hat initial

  • !ctions should be taken in the event of an emergency, ~ducQtional information on radiati"on, locations from .,..*hich additional infomat.ion can be acquired, protective measures, and special needs for the handi-

~apped. The means used for disseminating the informa~ion is through

  • periodic direct rnail.ings, mailings of brochures in billing statewent.s,
  • posting in public places, and insertions in telephone books. Tb~

information is updated annually by the licensee and Stat.e and local governments and is ava_ibble to the permanent and transient adult population in the plume exposure pathway EPZ.

The license~ bas designated points of contact and a Joint Public Infor-

~ation Center (JPIC)* to be used by news media during an emergency. The Plant Public Affairs Director of Consumers Poi,..*cr Comp.:iny is the official

~pokesman for the Company and is responsible for establishing a rumor

  • , 9

control system. The ~en~ee has established arran9:.ents for exchange o"f information among designated spokespersons. ConsU&;iers Po\.:er Company has established an .annual program to acquant members of the media ~ith site and loca1 emergency plans 1 information concerning radiation; and the e~ergency classification scheme.

The staff finds this element of ernergency preparedness, as described in the Palisades Plant Site Emergency Plan, to be adequate.

H. Emergency Faciliti~s and Eguipment (Closed, 255/81-19-14)

Planning Standard Adeouate emergency facilities *and. equipment to support the emergency response *are provided and maintained *

. Emergency Plan The Emergency Plan*desc:tibes the onsite. emergency facilities needed to support an emergency response including a Technical S;::;pport Center (TSC) and an Operational Support Center (DSC). The Plan al.so descr~bes the offsite Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) concept of operations being employed by*Consumers Power Company. The ,Palisades Eilf is composed of t'Wo facilities, the temporary EOF located at the Gener.al Offices on Parnall Road at Jackson, Michigan and the permanent Efif' located at the .

0 Soutb Haven Conference Center approximately 10 miles from t.he plant. *_

The temporary EOF assumes the functions of the EOF until the permanent ..

EOF is activated. The licensee has requested the NRC "t.o approve .this

--.. concept of operations. The 1~C has found the temporary EOF concept of*

operations acceptable for interim use.* The adequacy c:f the licensee' .s *

. onsite and. offsite emergency response facilities \..'ill be revie'l.*ed. by * :*:

the _Nuclear Regulatory Commission, pursuant to Revisi.o_Il l to ~TLJ"REG-0737 ~

in* a &eparatc inspection.

The Plan contains descriptions of provisions for acti~ting.and staffing of emergenc:y response facilities. The TSC and DSC may be activated for an Unusual Event and "Will *be activated for an Alert, Site Emergency,* or

.General Emergency. The EOF 'is fully activated ~hen a Site Emergency or*

General Emergency is declared, and may be activated for ~n Unusual Event or .an Alert: The GOCC. "may be activated during an Ale.rt., and will be

~ctivated during a Sit~ or General Emergency.

  • Onsite monitoring systems have been identified and est.ablished that are.

to be used to initiate emergency measures in accordance ~ith Appendix 1 of hruREG-0654, as ~ell as those monitors used for conducting ~ssessment; e.g. 1 meteorological m.onitors, process and radiologiC2l monitors, .and fire and combustion monitors. Provisions have been tl.O<de to obtain off~

,ite monitorin~ and assessment data from radiological monitors 2nd fixed l.r:boratory facilities. Ho...,ever, .the Plan does not include a description of geophysical phenomena monitoring systems, nor does it describe pro-visions for acquiring such d~ta from offsite monitoring systems of other organizations or agencies. Sources of seismic monitoring data should be listed in th~ next Emergency

. Plan revision.

10

!he* Plan contains su.rr1ilacy 'descriptions of th~ licensee's mcteorologicai

  • oopi toring program, cAuteri:z.ed source of backup a:Asuppl eme_ntal

~eteorol6gical data,~ the manner by which the Co~ol Room*receives severe ~eather ~arnings. Additional details on these sources of meteoro-logical irifonnation are available in several referenced EPIPs a..ttd the Palis.a des Plant Heteorolog-ical Program document *.

E.me:rgency k_i ts containing radiological rnon:l to ring devices, protective *.

equipment, and supplies are described in the Emergency Plan and are located in each of the follo~ing areas: the Control P..oom, OSC, the Er:-iergency Vehicle, and the permanent EOF. The kits are inventoried and inspected quarterly to assure readiness. The Ch.ernistcy/Heal th Physics Superintendent is responsible for planning and scbetluling- the peri~dic.

inspection, operability checks, calibration, and inventory of emergency kits.

I. Accident* Assessment {Closed, 255/81-19-15)

Planning Standard Adequate methods, systems and equipment for assessing and monitoring

~ctual or potential offsite consequences of a radiological emergency c:ondi.tion are in use.-.

Emergency Plan The Plan contains plant system and radiological effluent. parameter. values

.. char.ac:teristic of a spectrum of abnormal conditions and a ccide:c.ts. These.

values .and other methods of detection are tabulated to cross reference initiating- conditi6ns for each of the four emergency c.lasses.

The onsite radiation monitoring system, ~s described in the Plan, .

measures, indicates, and records the presence and level of radiation and

.- ~lerts plant personnel to abnormal levels of radioactivity. Readouts and alarms are provided locally and in the Control Roei:c:t. The system * : _

_consists of permanently installed continuo1:1s area, liqc.id, and zirborne*"*

.radiation monitoring devices, together ~ith a program for spec~fic sasople collections and laboratory analyses.

  • The license~'s offsite radiological monitoring progra~ consists of a number of therrnoluminesc:ent dosimeter (TLD) and airborne particulate sampling stations. Station locations are identified in the Plan and EPlPs. During accident conditions, the licensee's ra<liological moni-toring tearns~are activated at the direction of the Si~c Emergency
  • Director (SED). Tearris are norm.ally: disp3tchcd from tlic OSC. If the*

OSC has not been activated, the SED contacts the plan:'s R~diation Protection Office. Honitoring teams generally consis~ of t~o Chemistry/

Radiation Protection Technicians. An emergency vehic;e is available for te:am use and is equipped ~ith a radio and instrur.:rnts for.monitoring 11

~n~/or sampling gaseo~r liquid releases. The es~ted deployment 0

time for an offsite monitoring team is 30 minutes. ~ Plan does not indicate, however, ;hat ~he licensee has the C?pabilit~ to detect and measure airborne radioiodine concentrations as*10~ as 10- 7 microcµries per cubic centimeter under field conditions. Th~ licensee's offsite oonitoring efforts can be augmented ~ithin about 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> by personnel

.c.nd equipment provided by the t1ichigan State Department of Public Health. A reciprocal agreement bet~cen the licensee and the Indiana

~nd Michigan Electric Company is appended to the Plan. This agreement cllo~s the licensee to utilize laboratory facilities and personnel at the Donald C. Cook *Nuclear Plant should the licensee lose use of Pal~sades Plant laboratory facilities cue to a nuclear related accident or natural disaster~

The Plan tefere-nces EPIPs regarding methods.for calculatiog radioactive release rates based on data from stack gas, steam line, high range

  • effluent, and containment air radiation monitors. Provisions have been made for determining the source tenn if instrumentation is offscale or inop~rable. Referenced.procedures also contain the licens~e's programm-able calculator and m~nual *techniques !or estimating cffsite dose based on source term and meteorological data, plus a method for comparing
  • offsite monitoring results to dose projecti6ns.
  • The staff. finds t.his element of emergency 'preparedness' as described in the Palisades Plant Site .Emergency Plan, to-be adequate *
J. Protective Response (Closed, 255/Bi-19-16)

Planning Standard

. ~

A range of protective actions hav~ been developed for* the P.lt..me exposure*

path~ay EPZ for emergency ~orkers and the public. Guidelines for the choice of protective actions during an emergency, consistent ~"ith Federal guidance, are developed and in place, and protective actions* for the ingestion exposure patb~ay EPZ appropriate to. the locale have been developed. * **

  • Emergency Plan The methods-and the time required to ~am and advise individuals ~it.bin.

areas controlled by the licensee are described in the Emergency Plan. A

  • public add~ess system and an alarm system are used for ~arning purposes onsite. Onsite assembly areas are identified in the EPIPs, as arc primary and alternate site evacuation routes. Radiological monitoring" I
  • of relocated persons is provided at onsite and offsite assembly areas.

I

  • Assecbly, accountability~ evacuation, and radiation monitoring procedures take into consideration all persons onsite. The Plcn provides for
  • accomplishing.accountability ~ithin 30 minutes. Individual respiratory protection and the uses of protective clothing and thyroid blocking drugs arc also addressed in the Plan. *

-~ .

I 12

!be r:::iecbanism for r9m.'D.e;ding protective actions e t..he appropriate State end local authorities bas been established. The bas~s for the choice of*

protective_ actions for the plume exposure path..,*ay during emergepcy con-dition. are provided in tabular form in the Emergency Plan. Evatuation time estimates for persons \.'ithin the plume expo.sure ~PZ are contained in. Appendix C of the Plan. ~aps and figures sho~ing evacuation routes, relocation ~enters, and population distribution are provided in this Appendix.

K. Radiological Exposure Control (Closed, 255/81-19-17)

Planning Standard YJeans for controlling radiological exposures, in an ~ergency, are established for emergency workers. The means for cont.rolling radiological exposures shall include exposure guidel.ines consistent \..'ith EPA Emergency

~orker and Lifesaving Activity Protective Action Guides.

Emergency Plan Onsite exposure guidelines consistent with EPA Imerg~cy ~orker and Life-s*aving Activity Prote.ctive ActioD:. Guides (EPA-520/1-75-001) have been estab1ished for search and rescue, and fer performiDt corrective and

    • "assessment actions. The Site Emergency Director, based on recoll".menda-

_._.. tions from the Chemistry/Radiation Protection Superintendent, ~ust author-ize emergency exposures. Conditions and methods for permitting on.site volunteers*to receive radiation e~-posures in the cour~e of carrying out

  • lifesaving and other emergency activities are described in "the implementing

_:proc_edures*.

-- Dosimetry (TLD) service is provided by the licensee~ a twenty-fourhour

  • :: . :_*-. . ~;*i,~ . -_ basis for all emergency personnel. Provisions have been made for distri-1: bµtion and use of self-reading TLDs. The .!dministrative ~ethods employed

. to 2ssure personnel do not exceed limits should be described.int.be Plan.

  • Action levels for det~rmining the need for decontami.?!2tion are specified in the Heal th Physics** Procedures. The means for decO!ltamina ti on, in-cluding supplies, instruments, equipment and means for t.:aste disposal are described in the EPIPs. Decontamination of relo~ated site personnel can be performed at onsite and offsite decontaminatio~ areas ~here

~upplics, spare cl~thing, and survey instrwnents are 2vailable.

Onsite contamination. control me2 sures have been ,proviced

  • including area

-2ccess and dr~nking ~ater controls. Criteria have been established for permitting return of areas and items to normal use.

The staff finds thfs clement of emergency prep a redness' as described in

_,. the Palisades Plarit Site Emergency Plant to be adequaLe.

13

L~ He.dical and Public h-~h Support (Closed, 255/81-9-*18)

  • Planning Standard Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated injured individuals.

Emergency Plan Hercy Hospital.is the primary hospital facility for treatment of serious medical emergencies* It is equipped to receive and treat all types of accident victims, including those ~ith radioactive contamination. The backup.medical facilities *are South Haven Community Hospital and Memorial Hospital. ttedical fi~st-aid training is given to the plant emergency organization. *This training includes the Red Cross Multimedia course combined ~ith the American Heart Association Cardiopul=onary Resuscitation

.course *. Arrangements have been made for transportation of potentially contaminated injured personnel to area hospitals,- utilizing t~o local

.ai:ipulance services". and company-o"-'Ded _vehicles.

The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness as described in.

the Palisades Plant Site Emergency Plan, to be adequate. *

" M. Recove!"V' and Reent Plannin and Postaccident erat.ioI!.S (Closed 255/81-19-19 Planning St2ndard Gene*ral plans for recovery and reentry .are developed.

Emergency Plan The licensee has developed general criteria, plans, and procedures for reentry and recovery actions. The Palisades Plant and Consumers Po~er Company staffs ~ill be reorganized at the dis*c:retion of the Site 'Emergeocy Director in* concurrence ~dth the !OF Director. Overall lon*g t.erm recovery

- operations ~ill be directed by the Vice President Nuclear. The !mergency Plan contains provisions for notifying the State ~hen ~enior licensee "staff deem it safe to begin the reentry phase of the offsite recovery .

operations. !he EP!Ps~provide for estimating the total offsite population exposure. "Ho~ever, this issue should also be described 'in the Dext.

revision of the Emergency Plan. --*

The st!f f finds this element of emergency preparedness as described in the Palisades Plant Site. Emergen_cy Plan, to be adequate

  • N. Exercises and Drills (Closed, 255/81-19-20)

Planning Standard Periodic exercises* are (~ill be) conducted to evaluate ~ajor portions of c~ergency response cap3bilities, periodic drills are (will be) conducted to develop ~nd maintain key skills, and deficiencies identified as a*

result of exercises or drills arc (~ill be) corrected.

Er::1e r~ency Plan

  • 7be plan states that Palisades ~ill conduct an annual emergency prepared-

~ess ex~rcise, and various drills, to meet the following objectiyes:

. . ensure that emergency respons.e personnel are fimiliar \.'ith their duties *

  • determine the adequacy-of the Plan and EPIPs
  • test communications systems verify the operability of emergency equipment check the adequacy of emergency sµpplies and equipment Exercise scenarios will be sufficiently varied such.that all portions of the emergency organizations will be tested at least once every five years *.

. Federal, State; and local government representatives "-'ill observe and *

  • evaluate the performances of those involved in the exercise. Observers

\..'ill be provided with exercise scenario information in accordance \.'ith Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEHA) Guidance Hemorandwn No. 17.

J.ri *exercise will be scheduled to begin bet~een 6:00 p.ri. and midnight 2nd another between midnight and 6:00 a.m. once every six years, and some exercises should be unannounced.

!he Plan also contains summary descriptions, including frequencies of :

occurrence, for the f ollo\..*ing types of drills: ttedica 1 Emergen_cy, !ire* * <

Emergency, Radiological Honitoring, Communications, and Radiatlon Safety/*

    • Chemistry. Off site agencies are a.dvised of the scheduled dates of drills.*.** .. *
  • ~nd exercises, although scenario details may be *kept confidential.**.:_. :.: :..... :,- ** .

.-_. The Hu_clea r Emergency Planning Coordinator and plant i:;:anagement. ar*e .. : *: .**

  • . responsible.for planning, scheduling, and coordina tin£;* emergency drills and exercises.. Recommendations for revisions to the Plan or its lmple-menting Procedures and/or upgrading of emergency equipment, resulting :

from *drill or exercise critiques, are fon.*arded to the Chemistry/Health Physi.cs Superintendent. After his revie**, recommendations are forwarded : :*

to the General Manager and the Plant Review Committee. Changes t.hat are_-::..:*:>

zpproved by the General nanager are then incorporated into the Plan and*.'.'.~-.'.*.***

~ppropriate procedures. Drill and exercise records arc: all maintained *.

  • at the Palisades Plant.

The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness, as described in the Palisades Plant Site Emergency Plan, to be adequate.

O*.. Radiological Emergency Response Training (Closed, 255!51-19-21)

Planning Stand3rd

~adiolotical emergency response training is provided to those '!.;ho may be called on to assist in an emergency.

15 .

  • Er..e rgency Pl an

~he e

General Superintendent for Training, Nuclear Operations, General Office, is responsible for training. Specialty training capabilities may be delegated to personnel qualified to perform such training. The Plan includes com~itments to provide site specific training for offsite e;ergency organizations who may be called upon to provide assistance in the event of an emergency. -Commitments extend to inviting 2nd providing training at appropriate intervals for offsite response organizations, including organizations ~ith ~hich the licensee has mutual aid agreements, such as: emergency_ preparedness offices, State Police, County Sheriff's Offices, fire and ambulance services, and doctors. .

B*esides classroom. training, members of t.be onsite emergency response organization participate in practical drills in ~hich the individuals demonstrate ability to perform assigned emergency functions. Each member.

of the first-Aid !eam(s) also receives the Red Cross tlulti.media First-Aid course *.

The Emergency Plan provides summary descriptions of the types of training given onsite personnel, iI;lcluding those having emergency response duties.

The initial training and annual retraining programs described in the Plan are applicable to the f ollo\dng personnel: licensed operators, personnel responsible for assessment of emergencies,,security force, fir~ brigade, damage control and repair teams, radiological monitoring personnel, .

first-aid teams, offsite support_ groups, and plant perso~l not having emergency response duties. *-: .

The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness, a~ described

'.*. in the Palisades Plant Site Emergency Plan, to be adequate.

P~. Res onsibilitv for the Plannin Effort: Develo ment, Periodic Revie~

Bnd Distribution of Emergency Plans Closed, 255/81-19-22 Planning Standard

~- *..*-~j~ :~;**:*,/ : -~-.;;. .. - ..

Responsibilities fo~ plan dev~lopment. ind *.review 2nd *for distribut..ion of emergency plans are established, and planners are properly trained.

!riergency Plan The Nuclear Emergency Planning Coordinator is responsible for updating the Palisades Plant Site Emergency Plan and for reviewing the CoUDty, State and other supporting emergency plans for compatibility. Be is

~lso responsible for conducting cffsite Agency training and coordinating Site Ecergency Plan revie~, drills, and exercises with the onsite coor-cHnator. The **chemistry/Health Ph)*sics Superintendent has been delegated responsibilities related to emergency planning ~hic:h includ~ being f~miliar with changes in the Federal Regulations and guidance which iopact emergency planning activities.

16

Ene rgency lrnplement.~ Proced~res (E!Ps), i-~cl udin-ppendcd. l_etters pnd plans of offsite orgJnizations and agencies, are to be revie...,ed on

  • it least an annual basis and updated as needed. The Nuclear .E.c:iergency Planning Coordinator and the Chemistry/Health Physics Superintendent

.ere respons:ible for a cornp-letc annual revie..., of .the Sit.e Emergency Plan

~nd the Implementing Procedures. Revisions to the Plan and I~plementing Procedures, ...,hich may result from exercises and drills, changes in key personnel, changes in organizational structure, changes in functions of supporting agencies, changes in State or Federal Regulations, ~edifica tions to the plant, and recorr-.,'llendations from -other organizations, are

~pproved by the General Manager. An independent Plan revie..., is also conducted annually b)' a competent organization that is no.t immediately responsible for*the emergency preparedness program. In practice, revised pages are da.ted and marked to sho\..' ""here they have been changed. !he

  • .Plan's tabl~ of conte6ts lists the supporting plans and their ~ource.

The Emergency Plan contains an appendix vhich lists t.he ElPs and the sections of the plan to be implemented by the EIPs. A cross reference for the .Plan sections to NUREG-0654 el~ent~ is also provided in the Plan.

Tb*e staff finds this element of emergency preparedness, as d~sc:ribed in t.he Pal1sades Plant Site .Emergency Plan,_ to be adequate.

Conclusion Based on our review of the licensee onsite emergency preparedness

  • .program, \r.'e conclt.ide that the Palisades Plant Site Emergency Plan Ineets .. * .*

the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E. The revie~ of the permanent Emergency Response facilities

\l'ill be documented in a separate report.

... 17

Annex A fIGUR!S

,, .. 18

LI ST OF FIGURES

  • 1; Normal Plant Organization.
  • 2.. Erne rgency On-Site Organization 3 *. Emergency Off-Site Organization
4. long-Term Recovery_ Organization 5....

.;;:.,'.' .. Emergency Facilities

6. Palisades Pl.ant Normal Notification Chain
7. Co~uncations Resources

.. 19

i t* GEHERAL MAH AGER e PALI SADES .

. . PLANT

~

. f

. . .I *

,I' Er..S. TI HG/

~I HTEHAHCE Cll Hl/llAO PROTECT! OH PUBLIC AfFAIRS TECHHICAL

  • TECHH I CAL ADHIH COHTROLLER ePER!

Pl SUPT *  :

EHGIHEER. SUPERVISOR SU PT .. SUPT DIRECTOn .' .. ** . DIR I

' I *,

. * **

  • 1 FI GU.RE I *

. NORMAL PLANT ORGAN I ZAT.l m~

~~~~~~~---;-~~~~~~~--;--------~--~--- -

... '~ * . '* l

~I rl*SQKft[l ACU>UnTAllllll

.. oo HCllO rT

1. r~rcor r~onc110~

' . surunso* i- - - - - -

l.PIOPllJT P~OICCTID*

... AOYUO*

J.S" surrar1ioa I

Ht.1* 1tAl $urM If I DFCllATIO*S Jllf'Nllf CC>llTlOl l tllll I I Willi

. l.Slllft JVr(IJIJ I

I I I J.lltl*JlD or111 J.11111t11*r O'C'

. ,,,,,,' llDIOllltll IJJl13MCIJ

  • .orc11110~1 sur

, 1.t"IJC. /"'

I. l(tN .. Ul ll,lllllll I rtai*ll*Dt*r Jur ll II ll llOU1 1*1 Hc1111UL J.r\.UI lllllfl f. lOC,llf*ttD*otl I I f~"' r"rJltlJf I 'UDIDllGICll .1 CJHHllllT rftDHCllON . JllrllYISO'

~'llflUI J.CllllAl lllAll*

l'llfllltlJU SUPlRYUO~

I I

I

    • llDIOIOUCIL Mlllll&l MJtlllO*llQ LU CO*l~Ol ~U,.

TUJIS *

  • I

. ~ *: .. l ,

'I. 1lC1t*IUl Ii Jll11motc , ..

sur11111UDCJJ suruumDUT .. *

,_~ ;_~_:::_u_*_ ; ~ ;)'~*{;: i 1j:'**.'

I. llJtlU lJflllll I, lJClllUI '-:_:_;_: :_;_! ...

'* Pll* f Cl'Ull UL l*Dllltl

  • *:;*ti.:

fltUllt'2

[Mt~~CHC1 DH lllC ORCAHIZAllOff

' I MUTUAL AID AGREEHEHT i-------- KUCLEAR ~PERAtl-OHS .*VI CE **PRES I DEHT i ..

r.1 I

  • . ;..~ :' ..
  • f\RC EOF DIRECTOR \ ' ~

GEHERAL OFFICE COHTHOL 1 HSP-ESD

' VJ..f< BUREM f---- r*

CEHTER DIRECTOR ALLEGJ..K*

BERRI EM COM. EHG~ .. . .,

,..----------~+-~~-------~

i ECHTEL ' *. ' .. 't '

.I X?O MED I A COORD I HAT.OR EHGlHEERIHG REACTOR PHYSIC HEALTtl PHYS S.W.REGIOHAL PUBLIC SUPPORT TEAH*

  • SUPPORT TEAH SUPPORT TEA AFFAIRS DIRECTOR*

LOGISTICS EHG IHEER IHQ REACTOR PJtYSICS I ' LA.I SOH . ,HEALTH PHYSICS.

  • COHMUH ICATI o~s

_ _ __...__ _IOllot .'*

I GiERGEHCY 0 I RECTOR 'OF CORPORATE DI RECTOR OF HUCLEAR

  • PLAPiHIHG* OPERATIHG HEALTH LI CEHS IHG CGORD.I K,\ TOR SERVI C£S ' PHYSICIST HUCLEAR ACTIVITIES ADHIHISTRATOR.

FIGURE 3 :*

EJAERGENCY OFF*SITE ORGANIZATIOH

... .I *  : ~1.: f I . I  ! . I

. 0 *

.

  • r

. ' I

. VICE ~RESIDEUT NUCLEAR -

. PUBLIC

  • ADMIHISTRATIOH

.. AFFAIRS DI. RECT9R '

RECOVERY HAHAGER AHO LOO*I STI CS . e.

I

. ADVISORY SUPPORT . SCH EDU LI HG

.e

. 4 , ...

I T£CHHICAL . PLANT .. II [A LTH

. ' DES I OH AHO OFf SITJ:

-COHSTRLICTIOH tHtP.G[llr.Y.

SUPPORT orEP.ATIOffS .. rllYSICS surronr COOP.O 1*111, rc11:

. I.

FI GUnE 4 .

LONG TERM RECOVERY ORGANIZATION

I .~. ,

I I

llllCLtAn .. . GEHCRliL OFF I CE *. * .*STATE Olf-SC(HE *i

.. f((GµLAlOnr " .* EllEltGEt<CY' :* : :

  • tf.fEnGE.HCY

.. .. COilTROL O[ffTtR *. . *o~ERATIOHS CENTER COHTROL Roon ,, '

tOl-U.t ISSI Ort

( UEllltSDA ,I-ID) *. (J/\CK50H) ( S*i\UGh TUCK)

I llUt;LEAR JO I llT ~UOLI C .. EHEREHGEtlCY 1 (ClllC I Chl

. n1:tj1Jl.URY I llFOrtl~i\ Tl OU OPERATIOHS surronr

.'

  • Ct11e.1l:iSIU:l CEllTER FACILITY C[llJ[ll

, * \ ,:11CfluO,1 ll} ( OF.111011 111\ROOR) (SOU 111 llA YEH -)

. I I t VArt.tJUREH COUHTY OPERl\TIOllS

  • HIERGEHCY SUPPORT
  • OPERATIOHS CEHTER (PAW PAW) .
  • CEHTER

. ' .. 1* ' .

I '

I ,

... I *'I t*

DERR IEH* COUHTY EHEROEHCY ;

OPEhATIOHS. crHTER (ST. JOSEPh)

I  : a*

I.I , *

  • r

. .* 1 OFF SITE . . OH SIT£ *

..' . ~

' ,* r *~ * ,* .*,

ALLEGAH COUHTY ..

tHEROEtlCY; orERhTIOHS ,CEllTER

.(AlltOAfl).:: =.'

I.

., . I*

, '*, I*

l '

TJ Gw.!.. G "Ied:iti:i cal Si:rriort Cn1tc.-r Com.*mm:i ca tc.r j ~-:::. 1t:c5 J:oti i i c~t:i or:~

Ir L J C'\..*f:r Cor.t.roller

.CovErt. Tire DcpartmenL

  • J ----+

..i

-:c;t~tr.a.1 Office

~

\'zD :Buren State

?.c:rl: SuJ"er:int.endent *

,?z.l:i~ades 'P~rk

  • S-:.ipe:riLt.eD dent. Alleran County Shc::rif!

i *-**"-** ..

redc~~J *Aviat.i.on
  • IA c::i: nist.r.?. t. i OD J:i chi~zn St~te l'o_li c:e iDep' rt.ment. o! S"utb  !:!.oven P~s~

i£De:rty.

I 1 . J

. };~ c:bi gz::c Sta t.e lle,Partt:i.1:..Dt "o:

C~z:rd"-.'.-

-~~*

1us Cozst.:

~rgenty *.sf::n.*ices .*

--*=- *-

1

. :;--. '-~  :**::

~~- - ;_

~ J *~* . *~

lsou~!~ P.z-~*~n '\....:ater l.Jcj*~ :-tt1.1e~t Ot.1c:r St.ate J.re:cd.c:!

~-*

~ l\c.t.i!:ic~tic:o per!o:nned upon .liCti'\*~tic:o o! ~.acil:it.)'

T! GI":.!. *. * ~*

  • 0 . . . .*. ...*., -
  • I a' ........ - . . . .. ' ,.. -'*\..!.

. . . . . . . . . . * ' * * *.*** J.& .....

..... ..r *

  • .c c I 1.

t.

J.

(:

' , o

!1. I.

G o

i

~:

s l .

II \' i-. r r ft ~ I CJ C  !  :. (I . C 0 l C C  : T C \" f C' C I

,~~~*~~~~~~~~~:---~~--:__.;..~~-:,-~;:;_~~~~~~~~-:-.,:--_;_~~~~;;;;._~--.!:

c, :-. t ;- ,,)

F.ocir..

1' 2

  • 7 2

.. -4 1

3 l

3 i

i 1

'3

~ ~

J I 6 l

s 1~-~--'~~~I~~.~'~,~~I~--~

7SC . ,! 2 7

'4 2

l 5

l 3

I 1

1 3 J.

f l 5

l 6

J 5*

1 I t

  • DSC 3 3 3 N/A )~/ J..

2 2 *s 5 l l l l J . l ..:*

3 3 5 .s-;* ._*._, .s

  • GOCC*- j 3

l

.3 .5 l

.3 ~-

l ' .* .3 j.s ' . -- ~. X/A I ~/A

!CS\.i' ..

s '.s

~ l _

~~*;1.*.

  • - *** ,. . *T

/\-: .

.°.~:*.:..:*,.i..

~. ~* . . .

.s -.

~/A l l "£./A 5 5 SEOC ...

6

\!Jlc-:wc II l l ~IA l ~JA N/A I

I l~/A f

5 ,.

l. DirccL 5

dcdicat~d 5

Lelephooe 5

JSC - 7ecbnic:~l Sup~ort I Center 6

2. Intr~~lan~ ~c1cpbooe OSC - Oper~~ioDal Suppo~~ Center t3. Comp2ny .radio I.OF - .I:o1ergeDc-y Dper~t.i c.ms :r" ci li ty
4. lnt.e:-rcom GOCC - Geotr.al O!U"Ce En;eq~eDC")' CoDtrol CeDtcr
5. Geoer~l 7e)cpboDe Co~p~DY i'CSt..' - To'""er CoDtroll er* Soutb*..:cd. Regi OD 5 .* S,t;ate* Police n1dio J\1\C - l\uclc~r Jfrr.ulatory Co=..*d!.:!:SoD

']. T~*Ct . t..o *.f ~ c:e* * ~!.OC -* Spstc On-Sc:cne I:r.w:r rcn~y Opcnt:ioos Center lpC-.I:OC - \'.iio Duren Cou:1ty I:nitl"fCDC)' Opcutl°oDs CeDt~r