ML18038B980

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Responds to Licensee 970604 Requests for Relief from Specified Requirements of Asme,Section Xi.Concludes That TVA Provides Acceptable Level of Quality & Safety.W/Se & Technical Ltr Rept
ML18038B980
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 10/16/1997
From: Hebdon F
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Kingsley O
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Shared Package
ML18038B981 List:
References
TAC-M99004, NUDOCS 9711050015
Download: ML18038B980 (7)


Text

'PRR600 f(4

b

'o Cy 0O UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 2055&0001 October 16, 1997

'+*<<+

Mr. Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.

President, TVA Nuclear and Chief Nuclear Officer Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801

SUBJECT:

RELIEF REQUESTS -

BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 (TAC NO. M99004)

Dear Mr. Kingsley:

By letter dated June 4, 1997. the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) submitted requests for relief from specified requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)Section XI inservice inspection (ISI) and system pressure test (SPT) programs for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN) Unit 2.

On August 11.

1997, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff requested additional information regarding these relief requests.

TVA responded to this request on September 9,

1997.

The NRC staff, with the assistance of its contractor, the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, has reviewed the information provided by TVA.

The results of this review are summarized below.

Additional details are provided in the enclosed Safety Evaluation and Technical Letter Report.

With regard to TVA's request for relief 2-SPT-10 to use Code Case N-546 in lieu of ASME Code requirements tor inservice inspector qualifications, the NRC staff concludes that TVA's proposed alternative.

including additional commitments made and described in TVA's letter of September 9,

1997, provides an acceptable level of quality and safety.

Therefore, TVA's request to implement Code Case N-546 is authorized pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i).

Use of Code Case N-546 is authorized for the current interval or until such time as the Code Case is published in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1. 147.

From that time, if TVA intends to continue to implement this Code Case, TVA is to follow all provisions in Code Case N-546. with limitations issued in RG 1.147, if any.

With regard to TVA's request 2-ISI-7 for relief from ASME Code requi rements for volumetric or surface examination of integrally welded attachments, the NRC staff has concluded that for supper ts 2-478415S009, 2-478415S023, and 2-478415S025.

TVA has demonstrated that the specific Section X1 requirement is impractical'herefore, the NRC staff concluded that pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(i ) relief is authorized.

Furthermore, authorizing relief will not endanger life. property, or the common defense and security and is otherwise in the public'.interest, giving due consideration to the burdenupon

/

I TVA that could result if the requirement were imposed on the facility.

r" aGK 97ii0500i5 97ioih PDR ADQCK 05OO0260 P

PDR lliiiiiiiiIiiiiiliIiiiiiiiillllllllll

')

J i~

~

~

Mr. 0.

D. Kingsley For supports 2-47815H0002, 2-47815H0004, 2-47815H0006, 2-47815H0008, 2-47815H0010, and 2-47815H0012, as listed in request for relief 2-ISI-7. the NRC staff has concluded that relief is denied, because TVA did not demonstrate that the specific Section XI requirements were impractical.

The factors cited by TVA for these components, such as personnel

dose, constitute hardship, so relief under 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) appears to be more'ppropriate.

The staff finds that TVA did not provide sufficient information to support relief under 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(i),

as requested.

It is the staff's understanding, based on telephone conversations with TVA personnel, that TVA has inspected other components instead of these 6 supports in order to ensure Code requirements are fulfilled.

Relief requests 2-SPT-9, 2-SPT-11, and 2-SPT-12 were withdrawn by TVA in its letter of September 9,

1997.

Please call Joe Williams at (301)415-1470 if you have any questions regarding this topic.

Sincerely, Frederick J.

Hebdon, Director Project Directorate II-3 Division of Reactor Projects

- I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulatio Docket No. 50-260

Enclosures:

1.

Safety Evaluation 2.

Technical Letter Report cc:

See next page Distribution Docket File PUBLIC

\\

BFN Reading I

BBoger JZwolinski T. Harris (e-mail SE TLH3)

OGC o'CRS J.

Johnson, RII t

DOCUMENT NAME:

G:~BFNlM99004.LTR

  • see previous concurrence To receive a copy of'his document, indicate in the box:

"C" = Copy without attachment t/enclosure "E" = Co y with attachment/enclosure "N" = No co y'FFICE PDII-3/PH PDII-3/LA OGC>>

PDII-3/D RARE Jwilliams BClayton RBachmann FRebdon DATE 10/

/97 10/

+97 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 10/14/97 10/ I'Q97

I lt

Mr. 0.

D. Kingsley For supports 2-47815H0002, 2-47815H0004, 2-47815H0006, 2-47815H0008, 2-47815H0010, and 2-47815H0012, as listed in request for relief 2-ISI-7, the NRC staff has concluded that relief is denied, because TVA did not demonstrate that the specific Section XI requirements were impractical.

The factors cited by TVA for these components.

such as personnel dose. constitute hardship, so relief under 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) appears to be more appropriate.

The staff finds that TVA did not provide sufficient information to support relief under 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(i),

as requested.

It is the staff's understanding, based on telephone conversations with TVA personnel, that TVA has inspected other components instead of these 6 supports in order to ensure Code requirements are fulfilled.

Relief requests 2-SPT-9, 2-SPT-11.

and 2-SPT-12 were withdrawn by TVA in its letter of September 9,

1997.

Please call Joe Williams at (301)415-1470 if you have any questions regarding this topic.

Sincerely.

Frederick J.

Hebdon, Director Project Directorate II-3 Division of Reactor Projects

- I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-260

Enclosures:

1.

Safety Evaluation 2.

Technical Letter Report cc:

See next page

Hr. Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.

Tennessee Valley Authority BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT CC:

Hr. 0. J. Zeringue, Sr. Vice President Nuclear Operations Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Hr. Jack A. Bailey, Vice President Engineering

& Technical Services Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101,Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Hr'.

C.

H. Crane, Site Vice President Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O.

Box 2000

Decatur, AL 35609 General Counsel Tennessee Valley Authority ET'0H 400 West Summit Hill Drive Knoxville, TN 37902 Hr. Raul R. Baron, General Manager Nuclear Assurance Tennessee Valley Authority 4J Blue Ridge 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Hr. Karl W. Singer, Plant Manager Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O.

Box 2000

Decatur, AL 35609 Mr. Hark J. Burzynski, Hanagar Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority 4J Blue Ridge 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Mr. Timothy E. Abney, Manager Licensing and Industry Affairs Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O.

Box 2000

Decatur, AL 37402-2801 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Suite 23T85
Atlanta, GA 30303-3415 Hr. Leonard D. Wert Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 10833 Shaw Road
Athens, AL 35611 State Health Officer Alabama Dept. of Public Health 43'4 Monroe Street Montgomery, AL 35130-1701 Chairman Limestone County Commission 310 West Washington Street
Athens, AL 35611

~ I