ML18038B784

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 960901-1012.Violation Noted:Iicensee Did Not Maintain in Effect All Provisions of Commission-approved PSP
ML18038B784
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 11/07/1996
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML18038B783 List:
References
50-259-96-10, 50-260-96-10, 50-296-96-10, NUDOCS 9611180026
Download: ML18038B784 (4)


Text

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Tennessee Valley Authority Browns Ferry Units 1, 2, and 3 Docket Nos.

50-259, 50-260 and 50-296 License Nos.

DPR-33, DPR-52 and DPR-68 During an NRC inspection conducted from September

1. through October 12,
1996, two violations of NRC requirements were identified.

In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"

NUREG-1600, the violations are listed below:

A.

Unit 1, Unit 2, and Unit 3 Facility Operating License Conditions 2.C.(11), 2.C.(11),

and 2.C.(6), respectively, state that the licensee shall fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the Commission-approved Physical Security Plan.

Contrary to the above, on September 18, 1996, the licensee did not maintain in effect all provisions of the Commission-approved Physical Security Plan.

Two vehicles within the protected area were identified unlocked with the ignition keys inside of the vehicle.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement III).

0 B.

Technical Specification 6.8.1.1.a requires that written procedures shall be established, implemented, and maintained covering the applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.

Paragraph 9 of Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33 recommends procedures for.performing maintenance that can affect safety related equipment.

Site Standard Practice (SSP)

SSP-6.1, Conduct of Haintenance, Revision 5, Section 3.1.1.C.5 addresses management oversight of work erformed by non-plant personnel and contractors to ensure that work is eing performed in a quality manner.

Contrary to the above, between August 26, 1996 and September 12,

1996, management oversight of work performed by non-plant personnel and contractors was not adequate enough to ensure that work was being performed in a quality manner while painting was being conducted on the emergency diesel generators.

This was illustrated by three examples of painting problems which affected the diesel generators.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I), applicable to Unit 2 and 3.

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Tennessee Valley Authority is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:

Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.

20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the Enclosure 1

9611180026 961107 PDR ADOCK 05000259 G

PDR

0 0

NOV NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of'his Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).

This reply should be clearly marked "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should'nclude for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results

achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for. Information may be issued as to. why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

.Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction.

However, if you find it necessary to include such information, you should clearly indicate the specific information that you desire not to be placed in the

PDR, and provide the legal'asis to support your request for withholding the information from the public.

t Dated ag Atlanta, Georgia this ~+

day of November 1996

ili 0