ML18033A270
| ML18033A270 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry  |
| Issue date: | 06/13/1988 |
| From: | Czubakowski T, Martin J, Mclemore J TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18033A268 | List: |
| References | |
| SDSP-12.7, NUDOCS 8807140065 | |
| Download: ML18033A270 (29) | |
Text
Ienllessee vailey Authority Browns Ferry Huclear Plant Site Director Standard PracCVFe
~ '1\\
I DEC i 0 l987.
Form Page 1 of 1
Form SOSP-1 SOSP-2.11 FORPI SOSP-1 PROCEDURE AHO IHSTRUCTIOH REVIEM AHD APPROVAL COVER SHEET
{for SPS use onl nit roce ure MSP.{.z.7 lgl Tracking Ho.
o
(
e SllaiOW PvR,- O~vok ilia e ~( LIN evlslon Ho.
CHECK AS APPROPRIATE:
[ )
Permanent Change f i Cancellation
~
Her procedure
]
Terrporary change (Expiration date if less than 120 days after approval
)
Originator list affected pages 4 forms:
C
~
R SPS list pages affected after laird processing:
O O
I
~
ORIGIRllIOR:
I I C
'loiikOORR O
O
~
sponsl ection Technical Revier Required?
Initials of Responsible 5 c making determination:
Il
Date ~~g Section
-i l-g5 (Sig gnatu Phone ~5~
5-'iz-88 "l97e 5g uperv 1 sor te TER any required Technical Review)
H; i
)zI
~/Z ~
annlng u lng I e ervl s
anager nager o
e cen g
sl s an o
I e Iree or l.~ c ra lons up e
or nua Ina or a e y upervlsor lre ro ec lon nglneer rogec nagBlRn nager'perv1 sor es i 3 Ho i
'Z c
nglneer E-I o
~,'.:.,;
I 1catlons nager er1 a s rocuremen vcs gr
-:-ii'~
Inancla ervlces nager C'8' L
nager:
C.
Cl'h Revi ui
?
ecurl y R
Upe sor rvls I
ec ion:
ec 'Ion:
ec ion
'I e a
'I ager 1 e ce ures a
S ~QGr~
u ervlsor or ns ruc sons a
rove a
ctlon u ervlsor mar e
o olIIn a
rova s pORC R
ui IR Yes 5
3 Ho or es o.
2100p eO srlv'i ~ +Aelr I an ger or Inu Ret tion Period.
t,ifeti lr cor s ny Responsibil ity:
DocIxnent Control 8807}40065 880706 PDR ADOCK 05000260 P
PNU
~,
SDSP12.?
Page 1 of 1
HISTORY OF REVISION/REVIEW REV.
NO.
DATE REVISED PAGES REASON FOR CURRENT REVISION 0
06/13/88 ALL'hisis a new procedure defining a process for recommending system operability.
0999v SS
~ ~
~
~
Tennessee Valley Autho y
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Site Director Standard Practice Page 1
SDSP-12. 7 RKV 0000 SYSTEM PRE-OPERABILITY CHECKLIST (SPOC) 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to provide a systematic method to ensure that all open work items and outstanding programmatic items affecting system operability are completed or dispositioned prior to recommending that a system be declared operable to support Browns Ferry Unit 2 Cycle 5
Restart.
2.0 SCOPE I
This procedure applies to any system identified by the Return to Service Manager as requiring a System Pre-Operability Checklist (SPOC) for system operability.
3.0 REFERENCES
NQAM Part II, Section 3.2, Paragraph 6.4.7 3.2 Interface Documents BF-12.18, Unit PrestartUp Review SDSP-3.1, Corrective Action Program SDSP-3.7, Corrective Action SDSP-6.3, Preventative Maintenance Scheduling and Tracking SDSP-7.5, Outage
- Schedule, Schedule Control, and Outage Reports SDSP-7.6, Maintenance Request and Tracking SDSP-8.8, Conversion of Temporary Alteration to Permanent Plant Modification SDSP-9.1, Processing Drawing Discrepancies SDSP-12.1, Restart Test Program SDSP-12.3, Plant Component Identification PMI-12.12, Conduct of Operations SDSP-15.2, Handling of Engineering Reports fr'om the Office of Engineering SDSP-17.2, Post-Modification Test Pxogram PMI-8.1, Temporary Alterations BFEP-PI-88-04, Change Document Closure and System Plant Acceptance SDSP-12.4, Return to Service and Closure of Modifications 0759p sr
Tennessee Ualley Author Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Site Director Standard Practice t
Page 2
SDSP-12.7 4.0 DEFINITIONS
~
RK'<
0000 infers
.."operable in accordance with Technical Specifications definitions".
If no Tech.
Spec. is applicable to a particular system, operability means capable of performing its required function in support of safe and efficient plant operation.
S stem Pre-0 erabilit Checklist (SPOC) - A systematic method for verifying that all activities that affect system operability have been evaluated and dispositioned in accordance with approved plant procedures to support a recommendation for declaring a system operable.
5.0 BACKGROUND
Due to the length of the Cycle 5 outage currently in progress on Unit 2 and the large amount of work and outstanding issues that remain, a
systematic method must be established to ensure that all items required for system operability have been addressed and dispositioned.
The SPOC vill establish-the systematic process necessary for establishing confidence in returning a system to an operable status.
The SPOC will be used to assist in the completion of BF-12.18.
6.0 INSTRUCTIONS 6.1 Initiatin the S stem Pre-0 erabilit Checklist The System Pre-Operability Checklist (SPOC) has been developed to provide a systematic method for recording the completion status of items affecting a system in the following areas:
Testing Modifications Maintenance Licensing Procedures Programmatic Issues Design Open Documentation System Configuration 0759p
Tennessee Valley Author~
Browns Ferry Nuclear Pl~
Site Director Standard Practice 6.1 (Cantinued)
The SPOC shall be completed Retur'n to Service Manager.
the SPOC.
t Page 3
SDSP-12.7 RI:v oooo for each system as determined by the This section describes the initiation of 6.1.1'he Return to Service Manager shall:
Recommend a list of systems necessary to'support the various restart milestones.
Set overall system priorities to support restart milestones For each SPOC section, identify the Responsible Section
- Manager, from the organization designated for the SPOC
- section, who will countersign with the System Engineer on each section of the SPOC
&.1.2 The System Engineering Supervisor shall:
Identify responsible System Engineers for systems requiring a SPOC as determined by the Return to Service Manager.
6.1.3 The System Engineer shall:
Initiate the SPOC for the system.
Identify uncompleted work affecting system operability required to be completed to support the SPOC.
6.1.4 The Responsible Section Manager should:
Designate a responsible Cognizant Individual to countersign with the System Engineer on the SPOC.
6.1.5 The Responsible Cognizant Individual shall:
Assist and advise the System Engineer in verifying completion of the required items pertaining to the completion of the SPOC section.
0759p
Tennessee Valley Author~
Browns Ferry Nuclear Pl~
Site Director Standard Practice t
Page 4
SDSP-12-7 6.2
. Execution of the SPOC REV 0000 The System Engineer is responsible for completion of the SPOC to suppo'rt a system operability recommendation.
Each specified Site Organization is responsible for completion of those items identified as restraints for completing a
SPOC section.
This section describes the process for executing the SPOC.
6.2.1 The System Engineer shall:
Monitor the completion of open items affecting system operability.
Sign and date sections of the SPOC when the requirement of the SPOC section has been satisfied.
Obtain the responsible Cognizant Individual's countersignature on the SPOC for the completed portions.
Provide, or request assistance to obtain, timely resolution of technical issues pertaining to the completion of open items.
Utilize the Return to Service Manager to meet scheduled completion of required open items.
6.2.2 The Responsible Cognizant Individual shall:
Assist, the System Engineer in determination of status of items in the area under his cognizance.
Countersign with the System Engineer upon completion of the SPOC section indicating that, the requirement of the SPOC section has been satisfied.
6.2.3
.The Return to Service Manager shall:
Monitor critical activity completion.
Initiate actions through existing organizations to complete activities affecting restart milestones.
I Monitor SPOC completion to support restart milestones.
0759p
Tennessee Valley Auth ty Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Site Director Standard Practice Page 5
SDSP-12.7 RE:V 0000 6.3 Deferral of SPOC Items During the completion of the
- SPOC, the System Engineer may determine t'e need for deferral of.an item, identified as required for system operability, to after system operability.
The Return to Service Manager shall determine the criteria for allowing deferral of an item.
This section describes the process for deferring an item.
6.3.1 If an item is requested to be deferred, the System Engineer shall:
Complete Attachment B, Operability Item Deferral Form, for the particular item.
Submit the completed form to the System Engineering Supervisor for review.
6.3.2 The System Engineering Supervisor shall:
Review and sign the Operability Item Deferral Form, Attachment B, if the deferral is justified.
Forward the signed Operability Item Deferral Form, Attachment B, to the Return to Service Manager for review and approval.
6.3.3 The Return to Service Manager shall:
Review. the Item Deferral Form for schedule and restart milestone impacts
~
If the Item Deferral The Return to Service Manager shall Is Approve'd Sign and Date Attachment B and forward the Form to the System Engineer for processing of a schedule change request in accordance with SDSP-7.5.
Is Not Approved Return the Attachment B to the System Engineer with reason for re'ection.
6.4 Com letion of the SPOC 0759p The completion of the SPOC constitutes a recommendation by the System Engineer for system operability.
Upon completion, operations will review the SPOC and make a determination and declaration of system operability in accordance with Technical Specifications, if applicable, or in accordance with approved plant procedures if Technical Specifications do not apply.
This section describes the completion of the SPOC.
Tennessee Valley Author Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Site Director Standard Practice 6;4 (Continued) t Page 6
SDSP-12.7 R KV 0000 6.4.l'he System Engineer shall:
Complete Parts I through VII of the SPOC in accordance with Section 6.2 of this procedure.
After Parts I through VII of the SPOC have been signed off as
- complete, complete Part VIII of the SPOC (Open Documentation) based upon the determination that all work required for system operability is complete or dispositioned.
After completion of Part VIII of the
Assist Operations
- Section, as needed, to complete Part IX of the SPOC.
6.4.2 The Operations Superintendent shall:
Direct a Licensed Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) to complete Part IX of the SPOC.
6.4.3 The Licensed Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) shall:
Complete Part IX of the SPOC and the SPOC cover sheet.
Forward the SPOC to the Responsible System Engineer for completion.
6,4,4 The System Engineer shall:
Review the SPOC for completeness.
If acceptable, sign and date the SPOC cover sheet indicating a recommendation for system operability.
Note any outstanding Special Operating Conditions for system operability on the SPOC Special Operating Conditions Form SDSP-270.
Forward the SPOC and Form SDSP-270 to the Technical Support Services Superintendent.
0759p
Tennessee Valley Author~
Browns Ferry Nuclear PlalF Site Director Standard Practice Page 7
SDSP-12.7 6.4 'Continued) 8 l".7 0000 6.4.5 The Technical Support Services Superintendent shall:
Review the completed SPOC for adequacy and completeness.
Review the associated Special Operating Conditions relative to system operability.
(Form SDSP-270)
Sign and date the SPOC cover sheet and Form SDSP-270 indicating concurrence with the System Engineer recommendations.
Forward the completed SPOC and Form SDSP-270 to the Operations Superintendent.
6.4.6 The Operations Superintendent shall:
Review the SPOC and the recommendations for operability on Form SDSP-270.
Upon concurrence with the system operability recommendations, sign and date the SPOC cover sheet and Form SDSP-270.
Forward Form SDSP-270 to the Shift Operations Supervisor.
6.5 Recommendation of S stem 0 erabilit Upon completion of the SPOC cover sheet, the Operations Superintendent shall communicate to the Licensed Shift Operation Supervisor (SOS} the recommendationd for declaring the system operable.
The Licensed SOS is then ultimately responsible for declaring system operability in accordance with PMI-12.12, Plant Operating Instructions, and Technical Specifications.
The original SPOC shall be returned to System Engineer to be maintained in the system file.
7.0 RESPONSIBILITIES System Engineer Supervisor Assign Responsible System Engineer for SPOC completion.
Responsible System Engineer Complete the SPOC for the assigned system in accordance with this procedure.
Make recommendation for system operability based upon completion of the SPOC and review of open items against the system.
Responsible Cognizant Organizations 0759p Complete outstanding items identified as restraints for satisfying a SPOC section.
Countersign upon completion of a SPOC section indicating that the requirement of the SPOC section has been completed.
Tennessee Valley Authori Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Site Director Standard Practice 4
7.0 RESPONSIBILITIES (Continued) t Page 8
SDSP-12.7 RKV Ot) 00 Operation's Superintendent Licensed SRO or RO Technical Support Services Superintendent Identify Licensed SRO or RO to complete Section IX of the SPOC.
Review completed SPOC for concurrence with recommendations for operability.
Complete Part IX of the SPOC Review the completed SPOC for completeness and adequacy and make recommendation for system operability.
Return to Service Manager Recommend a list of systems necessary to support the various restart milestones.
Identify Responsible Cognizant Section Managers required to cosign for the SPOC sections.
Set overall system priorities to support restart milestones.
Monitor critical activities and initiate actions for their completion.
Review and approve requests for schedule deferrals of items originally required for system operability.
8.0 ATTACHMENTS AND FORMS Attachment A, System Pre-Operability Checklist (SPOC)
Attachment B, Operability Item Deferral Form Form SDSP-270, SPOC Special Operating Conditions Form 9.0 RECORD RETENTION The System Pre-Operability Checklist (Attachment A) is not considered a
quality Assurance document
- however, the SPOC's shall be retained by System Engineering as non-permanent Non-gA 'records for a minimum of 2 years.
The Operability Item Deferral Form (Attachment B) is not considered a guality Assurance document and has no retention period.
Form SDSP-270 shall be maintained by the SOS until such time that the Operations Superintendent determines that the Special Operating Conditions no longer apply or for a minimum of one year.
0759p
~
Tennessee Valley Autho~
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Site Director Standard Practice t
Page 9
Att. Page 1 of 11 SDSP-12.7 1L r: V o i) o o ATTACHMENT A SYSTEM PRE-OPERABILITY CHECKLIST SYSTEM NO.
SYSTEM NAME PARTS I THROUGH VIII COMPLETE SYSTEM ENGINEER DATE PART IX COMPLETE LICENSED SRO or RO DATE RECOMMENDATION FOR SYSTEM OPERABILITY TSS SUPERINTENDENT DATE CONCURRENCE WITH RECOMMENDATION FOR SYSTEM OPERABILITY OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT DATE 0759p
~
Tennessee Valley Authori~
Browns Ferry Nuclear Pla~
Site Director Standard Practice t
Page 10 Att. Page 2 of ll SDSP-12.7 SYSTEM NO.
ATTACHMENT A (Cont'd)
SYSTEM NAME R EV 0(]00 I.
TESTING SYS.
ENGR.
COG.
INDV.
1.
The Restart Test results and/or the System Checklist for this system have been approved by the Joint Test Group.
RESTART TEST 2.
Any exceptions generated by the Restart Test are being txacked relative to the required completion milestones.
RESTART TEST 3.
Outstanding test exceptions against the Restart Test do not affect system operability.
4.
All outstanding Post-Modification Testing (PMT) and PMT test exceptions affecting system operability have been closed out.
s 5.
All ASME Section Xl testing and A~endix J testing required for system operability has been completed.
POST-MOD TEST MECH TEST 0759p
Tennessee Valley Autho y
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Site Director Standard Practice ATTACHMENT A (Cont'd). t Page ll Att. Page 3 of 11 SDSP-12.7
>t >V 0nno SYSTEM NO.
'I.
MODIFICATIONS 1.. All ECN/DCNs affecting system operability that can be closed out, have been closed out in accordance with SDSP-12.4 (attach a listing of those modifications that affect system operability and have been closed out).
SYSTEM NAME SYS.
ENGR.
COG.
INDV.
MODIFICATIONS MAINTENANCE 2.
All ECN/DCNs affecting system operability that cannot be closed
- out, have been evaluated in accordance with Reference 3.1.
MODIFICATIONS MAINTENANCE 3.
All outstanding modifications affecting this system, that do not directly affect system operability have an appropriate milestone identified for required completion.
4.
Temporary Alteration Control Forms (TACF's)
MODIFICATIONS MAINTENANCE PLAN E
SCHED a.
All Temporary Alteration Control Forms (TACF's) that affect system operability have been removed in accordance with SDSP-8.8 or PMI-8.1.
TECH SUP SVCS OPERATIONS b.
Any TACF's that are requ'ired to remain on the system after system operability are tracked by the System Engineer.
TECH SUP SVCS OPERATIONS 0759p
Tennessee Valley Autho ty Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Site Director Standard Practice
$f V:7 t)t)UO Page 12 Att. Page 4 of 11 SDSP-12.7 SYSTEM NO.
ATTACHMENT A (Contend)-
SYSTEM NAME 1 II.
MAINTENANCE 1.
All Preventative Maintenance affecting system operability has been completed.
SYS.
ENGR.
COG.
INDV.
MAINTENANCE 2.
All required Preventative Maintenance affecting this system has been scheduled in accordance with SDSP-6.3.
MAINTENANCE 3.
All Maintenance. Requests required for system operability have been closed out in accordance with SDSP-7.6 (including proper post-maintenance testing).
4.
All outstanding Maintenance Requests identifying non-routine and/or significant maintenance activities that do not affect system operability are identified and tracked relative to the applicable completion milestone.
MAINTENANCE MODIFICATIONS MAINTENANCE MODIFICATIONS 5.
All NOI's that affect system operability have been dispositioned.
MECH TECH 0? 59p
'I Tennessee Valley Author Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Site Director Standard Practice B 1'
<~ ~) t)a Page 13 Att. Page 5 of 11 SDSP-12.7 ATTACHMENT A (Cont'd).
SYSTEM NO.'
IV.
LICENSING/COMMITMENTS SYSTEM NAME SYS.
ENGR.
COG.
INDV.
l.
All NRC Commitments affecting system operability have been resolved by Site Licensing.
2.
All Site Commitments affecting system operability have been closed by PORS.
LICENSING PORS 3.
All NRC IE Inspection items that affect system operability have been resolved.
LICENSING 4.
All GE System Review items affecting system operability have been completed.
PORS 5.
All Employee Concerns affecting system operability have been dispositioned.
6.
All NSRS/KEG items that affect system operability have been closed.
EMPL CONCERNS PORS 7.
All NSRB items that affect system operability have been closed.
PORS 8.
All INPO items that affect system operability have been closed.
9.
Technical Specifications a.
All outstandin'g Technical Specification changes required for system operability have been approved by the NRC and implemented.
b.
All Technical Specification Interpretations outstanding against this system have been reviewed for impact on operability in the current plant condi:tion.
PLT MGR STAFF LICENSING PORS PORS
- 10. All Condition Adverse to Quality Reports (CAQR's) and Corrective Actions to CAQR's that affect system operability are dispositioned in accordance with SDSP-3.7.
PORS 0759p
Tennessee Valley Authorx Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Site Director Standard Practice ATTACHMENT (ii)00 A (Cont 'd)'age 14 Att. Page 6 of 11 SDSP-12.7 SYSTEM NO.
1 IV.
LICENSING/COMMITMENTS SYSTEM NAME SYS.
ENGR.
COG.
INDV.
- 11. All Corrective Actions Reports (CAR's) and Discrepancy Reports (DR's) that affect operability have been dispositioned in accordance with SDSP-3.1.
PORS
- 12. All Significant Condition Reports (SCR's) and corrective actions for SCR's that affect system operability have been dispositioned SDSP-15.2.
PORS DNE 0759p 1e
~ ~
Tennessee Valley Auth ty Site Director Standard Practice Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant RFV OOOO ATTACHMENT A (Cont'd)
Page 15 Att. Page 7 of 11 SDSP-12.7 SYSTEM NO.
V.
PROCEDURES SYSTEM NAME SYS.
ENGR.
COG.
INDV.
l.
All procedures affecting system operability have received their required periodic review.
SITE PROC STF 2.
All procedures affecting system operability are issued in the applicable upgraded format.
SITE PROC STF 3.
All procedures affecting system operability have been revised to reflect the current plant configuration.
OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE
.4.
All Surveillance Instructions required to be performed to establish system operability have been identified and are scheduled to be performed according to their specified frequency.
SI PLN & SCHD 5.
All "once-per-cycle" Surveillance Instructions affecting system operability have been evaluated for re-performance requirements.
SI PLN & SCHD 0759p
Tennessee Valley Autho Site Director Standard Practice Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant IL>V OOuO Page 16 Att. Page 8 of 11 SDSP-12.7 ATTACHMENT A (Cont'd).
SYSTEM NO.
SYSTEM NAME VI.
PROGRAMMATIC ISSUES SXS.
ENGR.
COG.
INDV.
1.
Design Baseline and Verification Program (DB&VP) a.
The DB&VP System Evaluation Report (SYSTER) for the system has been issued.
DNE b.
Unverified assumptions made in the SYSTER that are required to be completed for system operability are dispositioned.
DNE c.
Open items that affect system operability, identified in the
- SYSTER, have been dispositioned.
DNE d.
Remaining open items'enerated by the SYSTER review are included in the DB&VP Punchlist.
DNE 2.
Environmental Qualification program impacts have been evaluated and those affecting system operability have been dispositioned.
EQ PROGRAM 3.
Outstanding Electrical Issues have been evaluated and those affecting system operability have been dispositioned.
DNE 4.
Outstanding Seismic Issues have been evaluated and those affecting system operability have been dispositioned.
DNE 5.
Outstanding Instrument Sensing Line issues have been evaluated and those affecting system operability have been dis'positioned.
DNE 0759p
~'
Tennessee Valley Author Site Director Standard Practice Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Rl'-'Y 000o Page 17 Att. Page 9 of ll SDSP-12.7 SYSTEM NO.
ATTACHMENT A (Cont'd).
SYSTEM NAME VII.
DESIGN SYS.
ENGR.
COG.
INDV.
1.
System Design Completion Statement a.
The System Design Completion Statement and System USED have been issued for this system in accordance with BFEP PI-88-04.
DNE b.
Special requirements associated with the Design Completion Statement and System USED that affect system operability'ave been dispositioned.
DNE c.
Outstanding items resulting from the generation of the System Design Completion Statement are included on the DNEPunchlist.'NE 2.
DNE Need Sheets a.
DNE Need Sheets that affect system operability have been dispositioned.
DNE b.
Outstanding DNE Need Sheets affecting this system are scheduled on the DNE P2 system.
DNE 3.
Drawing Discrepancies (DD's) that affect system operability have been dispositioned in accordance with SDSP-9.1.
DD PROGRAM 0759p
Tennessee Valley Autho y
Site Director Standard Practice Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant R).V UOC0 Page 18 Att.
Page 10 of ll SDSP-12.7 SYSTEM NO.
ATTACHMENT A (Cont'd)-
SYSTEM NAME VIII.
OPEN DOCUMENTATION I
1.
SPOC Parts I, II, III, IV, V, VI and VII have been completed.
2.
A punchlist identifying outstanding items against the system is attached to this SPOC.
The items have been reviewed and it has been determined that they do not affect operability of this system.
SYS.
ENGR.
0759p Qle
Tennessee Valley Authori Site Director Standard Practice Browns Fe'rry Nuclear Plant R ) g (l 9 () 0 Page 19 Att. Page 11 of 11 SDSP-12.7 ATTACHMENT A (Cont'd)
SYSTEM NO..
~
SYSTEM NAME IX.
SYSTEM CONFIGURATION LICENSED SRO 1.
The clearance log has been reviewed and all clearances affecting equipment, required for system operability have been cleared.
2.
Operations walkdown of the system has taken place and items discovered during the walkdown that affect system operability have been dispositioned.
3.
Component labeling has been completed for the system in accordance with SDSP-12.3.
4.
The valve checklist (UCL) for the system is complete with exceptions dispositioned.
5.
The panel checklist (PCL) for the system is complete with exceptions dispositioned.
6.
The electrical checklist (ECL) for the system is complete with exceptions dispositioned.
7.
The instrument checklist (ICL) for the system is complete with exceptions dispositioned.
8.
The system status file is up to date and has been reviewed for any abnormal status.
Any abnormal status has been dispositioned.
9.
The system status board reflects the current status of the system.
- 10. PMI-12.12 has been reviewed for additional logs that will be required upon system operability.
- 11. Required system drawings are legible and available in the control room.
0759p
Tennessee Valley Autho y
Site Director Standard Practice Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant gyp
()g>(it)
ATTACHMENT B Page 20 Att. Page 1 of 1
SDSP-12.7 OPERABILITY ITEM DEFERRAL FORM ITEM IDENTIFYING NUMBER DESCRIPTION:
REQUEST FOR DEFERRAL TO:
milestone REASON FOR DEFERRAL:
SUBMITTED SYSTEM ENGINEER SIGNATURE I
DATE PRINTED NAME REVIEWED SYSTEM ENGINEER SUPERVISOR SIGNATURE DATE APPROVED RETURN TO SERVICE MANAGER SIGNATURE DATE 0759p
Tennessee Valley Authority Browns.Ferry Nuclear Plant Site Director Standard Practice RKV -0000 SANPLE Page 21 SDSP-12.7 Tennessee Valley Authority broms Ferry Huclear Plant Site Director Standard Practice sly i3 N~
Fora Page L of L
Fora SDSP-210 SDSP-L2.1 Systea Huaber FORH SDSP 210 SPOC Special Operating Conditions Systea Haae
) Ho Special Operating Conditions apply for this systea List any Special Operating Conditions applicable to this systea and vhen these speciaL conditions apply Systea Engineer Date TSS Superintendent Operations Superintendent.
Retintion Period l year Responsible Section Operations 07S9p LAST PACF.