ML18032A218
| ML18032A218 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 02/01/2018 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-II/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Southern Nuclear Operating Co |
| References | |
| Download: ML18032A218 (38) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: VOTLE APiDOD UJilT 3 DateofExamination:
Developed by:
Written: (lit L1 NRC II Operating (lit NRC3 Chief Target Task Description (Reference)
Examiners Date Initials
-180 1.
Examination administration date confirmed (Cia; C.2.a and b) 5 Zi5
-150 2.
NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) 5 2.3 15.
-150 3.
Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)
.g iS
-150 4.
Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) 7
[-120]
5.
Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3) 7 IS 15
{-90}
6.
Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-i, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1, ES-401-112, ES-401N-i/2. ES-401-3, ES-401N-3.
ES-401-4. and ES-401N-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) 7 5
{-85}
7.
Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h;C.3.e) 7 2-2i
{-60}
8.
Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3. ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, ES-401N-6, and any Form ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, or ES-301-2 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, 1, g and h; C.3.d)
Z-4-/c
-45 9.
Written exam and operating test reviews completed. (C.3.f) 2 2-4ia
-30 10.
Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (Cli; C.; E-202
-21 11.
Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) 9.i_
-21 12.
Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (Cli; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)
? 12-/6
- .L_
-14 13.
Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i7S-J02)
-14 14.
Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (.i;
-7 15.
Facility licensee management queried regarding the licensees views on the examination. (C.2 j)
-7 16.
Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; ; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) 3 ift.
-7 17.
Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)
-7 18.
Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and quetions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)
I fl
- Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.
They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.
£ni nthciIk1 c ecb.&L tn-AJvber ZOL OIeJaJe CAAf4t A7on1 Zt% d 7r4teQ %da-ycd ie.i1/ t4LY 2tt %tL 4 ftiSfo %pvvre ic&*Z.
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
,j, 3
Date of Examination:
Initials Item Task Description
a b
1.
a.
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N.
Ji
/4 Nj b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with
,t /
T Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.
tA
c.
Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or genetic topics.
N d.
Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KJA statements are appropriate, Ni tti 2.
a.
Using Form ES-301 -5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major S
M b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u
mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A
least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T
applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301 -4 and described in Appendix D.
L 3
a.
Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W
among the safety functions as specified on the form A
(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form L
(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)
K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T
the form.
H A
b.
Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form 4
91C U
(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified t.
G (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
H c.
Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of jj applicants_and ensure that no items are_duplicated_on_subsequent_days.
4.
a.
Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the
)
appropriate exam sections.
b.
Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
p c.
Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
J,,
R d.
Check for duplication and overiap among exam sections.
p A
C e.
Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (AC or SRQ),
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner f)
- d. NRC Supervisor Note:
It Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
N -:
Ka.I64 cvk1e r -1 ?4neA o c1k&1 Fo(wi
£S-2o1-Z o-
.--- 15
-I
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-207-2 Facility: /D... cx Jç1p 3
DateofExamination:
Initials Item Task Descnption 1.
a.
Verify that the outhne(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N.
b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with t.J /
T Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.
c.
Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
N d.
Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.
2.
a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major 77.
14 I S
M b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and U
mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at p
t A
least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T
applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and
quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
3.
a.
Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W
among the safety functions as specified on the form A
(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form p
(
L (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)
K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on I
the form.
H R
b.
Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1:
o (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form p
U (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified G
(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H
c.
Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
V
4.
a.
Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the p
appropriate exam sections.
G E
b.
Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
1) kF
?(
c.
Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
kfr R
d.
Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
P L
e.
Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
2D Ik
- a. Author Printed Name/
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
k 1ow V
I 7/2 I/Zc,
- c. NRCChiefExaminer(#)
12J4LO CA134i_L6t2<)
/
- d. NRC Supervisor Ci4ivrti/
7(zzf i Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
ri-(.
fAo 1--
-f - D M
( A.3 AcQ.vv f1.), whi o,tk-et&rr1rs ruz--
t1
- wtNEA)
Ex14n
/%N OilJL
- 1JetTrE,v
&rnti Liiii,c,
ES-201, Page 26 of 28 ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: AP-tctv @)
Voq-//& t1k* 3 V iw( Ukiif 5 Z3 Initials Item Task Description
1.
a.
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.
b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with 4/
T Section D.1 of ES-401 orES-401N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.
c.
Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
N 4J d.
Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate..
2.
a.
Using Form ES-301 -5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major S
M b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and U
mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A
least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the
-r applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
3.
a.
Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W
among the safety functions as specified on the form
,lj A
(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form L
(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)
K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on I
the form.
H R
b.
Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
a (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form U
(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified G
(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
H c.
Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
4.
a.
Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the j4 appropriate exam sections.
fi E
b.
Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
V
,ØL c.
Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
A d.
Check for duplication and overlap among exam Sections.
/
L e.
Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO a.
Author
/#k4E QIjç b.
Facility Reviewer (*)
4/74 47 c.
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
BRL.ULO 2
(S d.
NRC Supervisor Ckjfit 1itrt /
Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
Pc:.
j 1
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquued specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations for Vogtle Units 3 & 4 and V. C. Summer Units 2 & 3, scheduled for the week(s) of 02 November 2015 as of the date of my signature. I agree that will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinatIons from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable It the ndhiiduat does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility license&s procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately reporl to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best. of my knowledge, I did not divu ge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the weeks) ol 71 is t ;ic From the date [hat I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide perlormance feedback to those applicants who were administered those licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and autlioned by the NRC.
_)ç JRTE s.Dg& I CJ4at..S
_4kWg,-r.
.qLC 4r 7.
,-)O1flifl ithv
- a. A.ri rqs-ri 9.
klcL1çJe i 10.
51MAr 51-41 ATO1.
JlA# io4 1112E 15 Ii1-AWC NOTES:
.1 S1GNATURE(7)
DATE SjNATURE(2)
DATE NOTE otfof1c t/(7f OcfC.c(I 4/
1tif4,L.
_%c.Lt f)
_.*_.5 I fl...___ fLAkicT Zo 1iiik Ii I15_
hitc )
j j
c c1
(
. at PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY
- 2. :
3S
?
çr) it LrAI i/ iJI V(S fi LEJc.cD cPs (f,L.lL1T
.ç:P
/-
b b ez(A,4 VLOP&
Li.e..
cL3-, L
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement 2
- 1 Form ES-201-3 1.
Pre-Examination acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations for Vogtle Units 3 & 4 and V. C. Summer Units 2 & 3, scheduled for the week(s) of 02 November 2015 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 7 1 i-8 /aO?Co. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME 1
Cim5rcHcc 2.C-S,A-E
- 3. ArJEtT, TT+cA 1-(
4.
5.S:II. Or-_ t..
- 6. QA.LtST Ri6mPga. m.
7.
\\S
- 8. 5hoFer ic\\i 4.
9.
Kgess, RAad L.
10.l4WAt L
12.L..&E..
- 13. 74I1 LJ 4 g / C 14.1-/Aics.
).i:
15.
NOTES:
RIJT
--lv IIIiI DATE SIGNATURE (2)
DATE NOTE
- _/,
3- \\s I( 1S 2i I4-Lg, qsJtc.c Ii I iqh L///ic22*%(f-_-A
/L4,(
LJi,,r J-f Al Ioi D I/j/,r 6tIlLlI4 i
)2b))5 9cE2
,yj,iji
.rzfi..ale f-jj, I
iz/zlII<
JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
SI4tr HLR c-r Agje,,soje A,iyjj T
S$S-2 5tK. isAf(\\ Lt, i 7j/
5t.c
- r,1 1a
- 1 t-Ut4ZAg.
?&.Ir D4,1b. iLiik s
T i.i
P-e. 3.C 7 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Eorm ES-201-3 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations for Vogtle Units 3 & 4 and V. C. Summer Units 2 & 3, scheduled for the week(s) of 02 November 2015 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 1
. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME
- 2. IkYih1om PSOn
- 3. hxn pp-v 4 J-o IØeLSO%J 5.JkS FcC.vjkCe,J
- 6. 5cior rj 7.
,iJc)JT
,44-77r-)
8.
S?Q.D..IC1
- 9. tt 4,t-S 10.tI iij-°yJ 12./ (CCL
- .J%i
- 13. Vdu-;. V &mee.ky 14.t LJtZ1\\(e.C 1 5..k& uketArr NOTES:
JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SNATURE (1) 1JSTQUCtO1L D95 IJsr(wcrL t/S ç1r7 c/?g QjS IS7L(C_TOi Os
,I\\).sT-L1c-rOc 6? 7 nJ
-7d-Qft OLr.
tdL (&
WI-MULrOj 1@O jW4cI.
DATE SIRNATURE(2)
DATE NOTE
?k5
_-ittII&
_9-5-L Zppei
-/
_7/%
-I( ii.
7.(t(.
MJL7 3-9-4 7/Jfl, IC-8/Q/i i/rsj t
. tD L
%141(L I
a)
L\\
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-207-3 1.
Pre-Examination acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations for Vogtle Units 3 & 4 and V. C. Summer Units 2 & 3, scheduled for the week(s) of 02 November 2015 as of the date of my signature.
agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowlede, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 7ti%taoc
. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTEDNAME JOBTITLE/RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE(1)
DATE SIGNATURE(2)
DATE NOTE 1.
ss-r yi._--
/2/2,/fe
- 2. 5(rA,ii&14, 1 z C4I1h.L
,J t
4J/)
12/L5 I%I
TIqh(..
3.
3z,iJES, tflZC 2/i/i
- 4. vora
.7
).
5jJ yJy 6i 7.
i1cr
- 8. COr 9.
La
-iI/i
- 10. SOrJ) rP64S.
S S
- Z-7tt ]t(p W%1 L-
/ t(
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
NOTES:
s.
OL\\
/,e(?
7.
Pre-Examination Ai V /-
E2<.% i--
I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations for Vogtle Units 3 & 4 and V. C. Summer Units 2 & 3, scheduled for the week(s) of 02 November 2015 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, 1 am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 7/i &1/) From the date that i entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
1.
2.
3-P&v:(
4.
2
- 5. T)fkQtr-S*t5
- 6..
7.
t-*,%- _2F
- 8. L-1 L4tt
- 9. -c\\ -L 10.J4.e4J(:4 fft1.
11.
1:(Lc-v(c 12.
_w:;1 t..4oe/
14.
frAc
- 15. cI& t-frty NOTES:
Svtk-In4y-p P&z S- -
G G
,.tL
,-r ai i
H
/7 1j5I1e ES-201 Examination Security Agreement P?rm ES-20i-3 Pc5-7 PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY Mi SJ LAt7 1 3/-l
5c.-ft Ond,-
Fi LE
C.-,+zt-cSt Jcs TiE VCS 4M,qi
-,i-1 Vc
DATE NOTE SIGNATURE(1)
DATE SI NAT RE(2) c
- -s, jq2
/ )%
__ _//
/,a/t.
4L.L,g..
- -z sic 1
r-.-
(
S i t-E 1J tk L.t ctert zf Le 1..
- L-c 3jL 1 L.-L 7
I?Aft 5tM iJ TEL(
512Ai11_c_
(D 1-ce /
- °.2 J(J7/I
C? c ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations for Vogtle Units 3 & 4 and V. C. Summer Units 2 & 3, scheduled for the week(s) of 02 November 2015 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I wilt not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable ii the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowlpdge I id not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 7/t- &)13))f,
. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion af examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
NOTES:
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE! RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
/%r%
DATE SIGNATURE (2)
-T1c (2+
2._____________
S CI0 Z/i.of/4 3.
5 tC) 4.
$f.c 4
5.
íL, í//
6.
5ç,r/../
- 7. Ct.c,cI f(
f4
DATE NOTE
PL 1 C)f 7
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1,
Pro-Exomination I ackrowledge that have acquired secialiaad knoviedge about the NRC licensing examinations for Vogtle Units 3 & 4 and V. C. Summer Units 2 & 3, scheduled for the week(s) of 02 Novejgr 2015 as of the date of my signatire.
I agree that I wiH not knowinoly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that am not to metruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until comnietior ci tixarninatina administration, QXCt.pt as cpecihcally nct Ijelow and authorized by the NRC (C.9., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptab!e lf the ndividual does not select the training content or provid direct or ndirec:t feedhack). Furthermore, i am aware of the pyilcal Security measures nd requirements (as documented in the facility licensees proncdums) and tindorstond that viotion of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee, will nimedately report to facility rianaenmont or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestons that examination security may have been compromised.
2, Post-Examination To th best of my knowledue, I oil no diitiiqo to any utautlion;ted persons any informatini concerning the NRC licensin examinations adiiriisterod litton the (s of 7j1ig,]jt, trom the cia a ti t I entcrad n tl t sei ruy jrocrnni t wt I the comptcton of e,,mnati in adminRicat did rot nstruct, evaluate, or provide p.tfnriance feedback to those applicants who wCrC administered these licensing Oxaniltmtons, except as specifically naad hlcw and authoriaed by the MdC.
PRINTF.D NAME 103 TITLE/HESPONSIEULITY
, SIGNATURE (1)
DATE lGNATIJRE()
DATE NOTE
- 1. 4J L. ici
+/-Li__
2)
_t,d 3.
__ L2ztS..
/
tf,
,_,1.
(. ri
VC S i
0
- 8. tL{_ _J_
9.
\\.,
5-I...
I.
i Z
ZZZ7EEZEZJZZ ii+c1LCd :z z:z z. frzzzfzzrzzzzz:E 15.
NOTES:
ija S
Denhinger, Benjamin E.
From:
Vincent Martin <vmartin973@icloud.com>
Sent:
Monday, August 08, 2016 6:07 PM To:
Denhinger, Benjamin E.
Subject:
NRC Categories:
This email has been sent from an external address. Please use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.
- Ben, To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 18 July 2016. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations.
Sent from my iPhone
Denhinger, Benjamin E.
From:
Stille, Dana L.
Sent:
Thursday, August 11, 2016 9:36 AM To:
Denhinger, Benjamin E.
Subject:
RE: Vogtle 3&4 ILT-1 security agreement sign-off required
- Ben, I have read and agree with the bold statement regarding the license examinations that have taken place for Vogtle 3&4.
Dana L. Stille From: Denlinger, Benjamin E.
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 8:31 AM To: Stille, Dana L. <dlstille@southernco.com>
Subject:
Vogtle 3&4 ILT-1 security agreement sign-off required This email serves as a reminder to sign off the Vogtle 3&4 ILT-1 security agreement.
To all, Examination Security has been lifted for the Vogtle 3&4 ILT-1 NRC Exam. The Operating Exam was administered beginning the week of 07/18/2016 and the Written Exam was administered on 08/03/2016. Please stop by the Exam Development office (B145) in Training Center B to sign off the agreement and return your blue exam security badge.
If you are unable to sign off the agreement in person and would like me to sign you off, please reply to this email and respond with a statement similar to the following:
I have read and agree with the bolded statement below. Please sign me off the security agreement.
To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 7/78/2076. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
For those signing off the security agreement via email, I will attach your reply to the security agreement forms and forward it to the NRC Chief Examiner.
Thank you for your support during the development and implementation of the ILT-1 Audit and NRC Exams.
Respectfully,
- Beniamin. Denlinger // Operations Training Exam Development w 706-848-7837 II Southern Nuclear, Vogtle Units 3&4 II c 513-850-3303 2
Denhinger, Benjamin E.
From:
Richard <richardkress@me.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, August 10, 2016 4:29 PM To:
Denlinger, Benjamin E.
Subject:
RE: Vogtle 3&4 ILl-i security agreement sign-off required Categories:
This email has been sent from an external address. Please use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.
- Ben, I have read and agree with the bolded statement below. Please sign me off the security agreement.
To the best of my knowledge. I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 7/78/2076.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
Thank You Richard L. Kress From: Denlinger, Benjamin E. [1]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 4:26 PM To: richardkress@me.com
Subject:
Vogtle 3&4 ILl-i security agreement sign-off required This email serves as a reminder to sign off the Vogtle 3&4 ILl-i security agreement.
To all, Examination Security has been lifted for the Vogtle 3&4 ILT-1 NRC Exam. The Operating Exam was administered beginning the week of 07/18/2016 and the Written Exam was administered on 08/03/2016. Please stop by the Exam Development office (B145) in Training Center B to sign off the agreement and return your blue exam security badge.
If you are unable to sign off the agreement in person and would like me to sign you off, please reply to this email and respond with a statement similar to the following:
I have read and agree with the bolded statement below. Please sign me off the security agreement.
To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 7/78/2076.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
For those signing off the security agreement via email, will attach your reply to the security agreement forms and forward it to the NRC Chief Examiner.
Thank you for your support during the development and implementation of the ILT-1 Audit and NRC Exams.
Respectfully,
- Beiiarrain L Denlinger II Operations Training Exam Development w 706-848-7837 II Southern Nuclear, Vogtle Units 3&4 II c 513-850-3303 2
Denlinger, Benjamin E.
From:
Kotson, James Charles <James.Kotson@duke-energy.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, August 09, 2016 2:34 PM To:
Denhinger, Benjamin E.
Subject:
RE: Vogtle 3&4 ILT-1 security agreement sign-off required Categories:
This email has been sent from an external address. Please use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.
Sign me off Scotty!
/ have read and agree with the bolded statement below. Please sign me off the security agreement.
To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 7/78/2076.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
From: Denhinger, Benjamin E. [mailto: BEDENUN©southernco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 1:20 PM To: Kotson, James Charles
Subject:
Vogtle 3&4 ILT-1 security agreement sign-off required Exercise caution. This is an EXTERNAL email. DO NOT open attachments or click links from unknown senders or unexpected email.
This email serves as a reminder to sign off the Vogtle 3&4 ILT-1 security agreement.
To all, Exam ination Security has been lifted for the Vogtle 3&4 ILT-1 NRC Exam. The Operating Exam was administered beginning the week of 07/18/2016 and the Written Exam was administered on 08/03/2016.
If you are unable to sign off the agreement in person and would like me to sign you off, please reply to this email and respond with a statement similar to the following:
I have read and agree with the bolded statement below. Please sign me oft the security agreement.
To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 7/78/2076.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
For those signing off the security agreement via email, I will attach your reply to the security agreement forms and forward it to the NRC Chief Examiner.
Thank you for your support during the development and implementation of the ILT-1 Audit and NRC Exams.
Respectfully,
- Beia,tun E. Denlinger II Operations Training Exam Development w 706-848-7837 I/Southern Nuclear, Vogtle Units 3&4 1/ c 513-850-3303 2
Denlinger, Benjamin E.
From:
Werneke, Cynthia Shepheard Sent:
Monday, August 15, 2016 4:40 PM To:
Denlinger, Benjamin E.
Subject:
Re: Vogtle 3&4 ILT-1 security agreement sign-off
- Ben, I have read and agree wit/i the boicted statement below. Please sign iiie off the securth agreement.
To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorizedpersons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 7/18/2016. from the date that I entered into this security ftgreement until tlte completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide feedback to those applicants who were administered titese licensing examinations.
Please let me know if you require further information.
Cynthia Werneke Sent from my iPad On Aug 8, 2016, at 11:40 AM. Denlinger, Benjamin E. <BEDENLlN@southerneo.com> wrote:
I have read and agree with the bolded statement below. Please sign me off the security agreement.
To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 7/18/2076. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES3O1-3 Factliy Vfe.
t4Mk 3 4 Date of Examination: 3L414 1., 2LiIL Operating Test Number;
(/kP-oq)
Initials 1.
General Criteria
a b
c#
a The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with 4p sampling requirements te g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution) b There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating teats to be administered during
-4 i 73g(
this examination 11 c
The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section D 1 a) d Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within 4\\.
acceptable limits.
e It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level 2.
Walk-Through Criteria
a Each ]PM includes the following, as applicable.
initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific
- /
designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include
detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
system response and other examiner cues
statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
criteria for successful completion of the task
identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable b
Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-l and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance 3
criteria (e g tern distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2
3, SimulatorCriteria
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301 -4 and a copy is attached.
=
Printed Name I Signatu Date a.
Author ANbRVJ T NtcHoLc A) b.
Facility Reviewer()
CHUCK HOWARD c.
NRCChiefExarniner(#)
C.FcS,4LLEIIO d.
NRC Supervisor Ec ii&l1,uru.
NOTE:
The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c: chief examiner concurrence requited ES-301 Page 24 of 27
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: fP tO VO11e (1V.CtS Date of Examination: 7//i&
Operating Test Number:
- 1. General Criteria Initials a.
The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with Sam pling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
b.
There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
c.
The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section 0. l.a.)
- d.
Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within
,4-.,
acceptable limits.
).j t
e.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
V
- 2. Walk-Through Criteria a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
system response and other examiner cues
statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
criteria for successful completion of the task
identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable b.
Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-3d -1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
- 3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-Ac 301-4 and a copy is attached.
Printed Name / Signature Date a.
Author
¶ lC#OL5
/i /&
b.
Facility Reviewer()
t43WArd 7/
c.
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
34t1flP%U) i3 7ziiL Ali d.
NRC Supervisor
/ jsIj*yv 7(2211 (
NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
M 1.
7Lv /o o%y L41tL 7AJ JYn2 (mi A3 a Ace A.4-) wh e(IJkLit /nVL -
4.P 2&p iL aii k11-A-&
- 1 ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 SiLLL.j Facility: Voitle Units 3&4 Date of ExamAmW016 Scenario Numbers:
1 /2 / 3 / 4/ 5 / 6 Operating Test No.:
- UALITATWE ATTRIBUTES Inibals
a b
a#
1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
j_ l(
3.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) 4.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
J__ 1(
5.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
6.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
/3 j Cues are given.
7.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
8.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
9.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.
10.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
1 1. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors, (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified J4 f.
on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
N
13, The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)
Actual Attributes
1.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 4/2/4/3/3/4 j
2.
Abnormal events (2-4) 4/4/3/4/5/2
...A L.
3.
Majortransients(12) 1/1/1/1/2/2
,J,,,
4.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 1 / 1 / 1 / 2 / 1 / 1
5.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0 / 0/ 1 / 1 / 0 / 1 6.
EOP based Critical tasks (23) 1 /2/2/2/2/2 A j. 4g NOTE:
The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests,
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
=
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Vogtle Units 3&4 Date of Exam: April 2016 Operating Test No.:
A E
Scenarios 1
2 3
4 T
M L
N CREW CREW POSITION CREW CREW T
POSmON
POSmON T
C S
A B
S A
B S
A B
S A
B A
M A
T P
T 0
R 1
0 P
T 0
R T
o L
u 1
0 C
P 0
C P
0 C
P 0
C P
M()
E R
IU O-l NOR 11224111 I/C 3,6,7, 3,4, 3, 5, 1, 3, 25 4
4 2
910 6
SRO-U 79 6,8, 4,5, fl iot 9,
7,8, L__J 10, 9
11 MA]
8 8
7 6
4 221 TS 4, 5 5, 7 4, 6 3, 4 8
0 2
2 AX 1
I 110 AC NOR
0 111 IC SAC-I 10, 9, 10 8,
8, 9 11 9,
SRO-U 10 D
MAJ 8
8 7
6 4
221 TS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0
2 2
L NOR 11224111 x
I/C 3,6, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 3, 13 4
4 2
7 12 SAC-U ii 11 4,5 E
MAJ 8
8 7
64 221 IS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0
2 2
NOR 111 I/C 442 SROU MAJ 2
2 1
TS 022
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Vogtle Units 3&4 Date of Exam: April 2016 Operating Test No.:
A E
Scenarios P
V
P E
6 M
L N
CREW CREW POSITION \\
CREW CREW 1
0 I
I T
POSITION POSITION POSITION T
N C
S A
B S
A B
A B
S A
B A
M A
T 0
R T
0 R
T 0
A i
o L
u I
P 0
C P
0 C
P 0
C P
0 C
P M()
E A
I U
NOR ii 2111 I/C 12 4
4 2
7.
7,8, riu-u io 10, 11 D
MAJ 6,86 4221 TS 2,3 3,7 4
022 NOR 1
SRO-I I/C 3,
7, 8, 9
4 4
2 x
10, SRO-U MAJ 86 4221 TS N/A
N/A
N/A 0
2 2
AO AX 2
1 110 NOR 1
1 1
11 SRO-I I/C 4
4, 5 5
4 4
2 SAC-U F
MAJ 86j
4221 TS N/A N/A
N/A 0
2 2
AC AX 110 SROI NOR i11 I/C 442 SRO-U MAJ 2
2 1
D
Instructions:
1 Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RD applicants. ADs must serve in both the at-the-controls (AIC) and balance-of-plant (SOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-l) must serve in both the SRO and the AIC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
If an SAD-I additionally serves in the SOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2,a of Appendix D. () Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
3.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that requite verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
4.
For licensees that use the AIC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SAD-I applicants in either the ATC or SOP position to best evaluate the SAD-I in manipulating plant controls.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: VoQtle Units 3&4 Date of Examination: April 2016 Operating Test No.:
APPLICANTS AC El RQ/ATC 1 RO/BOP AC El SR0-I fj SRO-l
[
SRO-I j5 SAC-I El SAC-U El SAC-U El SAO-U El SAC-U El Competencies SCENAFO SCENAFUC SCENARK SCENARO 1234123412341234 Interpret/Diagnose 2.5, 142 41 I IIl I 9 8lI 640 3,6.
4.8 6.7.
46 Events and CondItIons 7-40 7.12
.4 I
Comply With and I
1 46-I-
I-2.5.
112 IlI I II 1-9 8Il 640 1.6.
4,8 6.7.
46 Use Procedures (1) 7-40 7.12
.11 II Operate Control 4f I
4-112 II 1-lI 4-9 81 I 6-IC)
.6.
4.8 6.7.
46 Boards (2) 2 1
Communicate I
4 4(
1 1
2.5.
112 II I II 49 811 610 3,6.
4.8 6,7, 16 and Interact 7,12
.1 Demonstrate 412 I-I III Ic)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ni N/A SupeIsory AbilIty (3)
A
A
Comply With and 57 4(
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ni N/A Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1)
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants license type and enter one or mote event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-I and ES-303-3 (Note: Based on the scenarios chosen and the crew makeup, ATC and GOP (UO) positions will be filled by RO or SRO-l candidates. Form completed for control room positions NOT individual candidates.)
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 FacUlty: Vogtle Units 3&4 Date of Examination: April 2016 Operating Test No.:
APPLICANTS RO H
RO/ATC RO/BOP1 RO H
SRO-!
j1 SRO-l
[
SRO-I SRO-I H
SRO-U H
SRO-U H
SRO-U H
SRO-U H Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 56 56 56 Interpret/Diagnose 1.3.
1.6-1.4 2.4 t-I1)
IIl 4,6-6,8,5.
Events and Conditions 9
0 Comply With and
1,6-i,4 2.4 IIt)
II I 4.6 6,8....
Use Procedures (1)
II 10 Operate Control I 6-
.4-2.4 I-Il)
I-lI 4.6-6.8.5.
Boards (2) 9 10
Communicate 1.3.
I 6 1.4-2.4 1It) 1I 1 4.6 6.8.5.
and Interact 9
Itt (i.9
Demonstrate 112 110 N/A N/A N/A NI Supervisory Abihty (3)
A
Comply With and 2,3 3,7 N/A N/A N/A N/
Use Tech. Specs. (3)
= = = = =
A
=
Notes:
(1)
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3 (Note: Based on the scenarios chosen and the crew makeup, ATC and BOP (UO) positions will be filled by RO or SRO-l candidates. Form completed for control room positions NOT individual candidates.)
ES-401N Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-4O1N6 Facitty, \\J j_
Date of Exam Exam LeveL HO SRO InitiSt tern Description a
1 Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility 2
a NRC (lAs are referenced for all questions b
Facitity earning oectives are retereirced as availabte 3
SRO questions are appropriate in accordance mth Section 02 cI of ES-401 4
Tire sampllng process was random and systematic (If more than tour HO or two SRO questions were repeated from the last two NRC licensing exams, consult the NRRINRO OL program office) 5 Question duplication from the licensee screeninglsudit exam was controlled as indicated hetow Icheck the item that applies) and appears appropriate The audit exam vms systematically and randomty developed, or the audit exam vms completed before the license exam was started, or the examinations were developed independently: or 1.)
if the licensee certifies that there is no ctuplir;etion, or other (explainl 6
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent trom the Bank I Modified New
,J Ii N1 IA bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest newer IPt
/tt
/
modified), enter tfie actual HO I SRO-only question
distribution(s) at right
,3/ j 13 / 3 57/ q p
7 Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the HO Memory CIA
/
,,j /
,i/
exarrr are written at the comprehension) analysis level, the P /
SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly
ç7 selected K/As support tIre higher cognitive levels; enter 3
/ O 43 / 15 Z
the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right.
pt 8.
References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in ttre elimination of distractors 9.
Question content conforms to specific KA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned, deviations are justified 10.
Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.
j 11 The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet Printed Name / Signatur
/
flute a.
Author 5.
Facility Reeiewer C) 11}WC.1 IJMZ I
Note The facility reviewers initials or signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations Independent NRC reviewer initials items in Initial column c, chief exaniirier concurrence required.
ES-401N, Page 47 of 51
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: VO3_
Date of Exam:
Exam Level:
RO E6RO Ri Item Description Initials 1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and
/
,,lj documented
/A 3.
Applicants scores checked for addition errors
(reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80,
as applicable, +/-4°n Sp-on)reewed in detail 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades
are justified 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date a.
Grader SW(WP 1PH/ )LIMJL S/LtJA
%11J0I 7YA A//A b.
Facility Reviewer(*)
Pt c.
NRC Chief Examiner (*) IZU d.
NRC Supervisor(*)
7LkQ.
rV\\41fti ci[)c
(*)
The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6
John Austin Training Director Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Plant Vogtle 3&4 A
Training Center B 9034 River Road SOUTHERN Waynesboro, GA 30830 NUCLEAR Tel 706.848.7800 Fax 706.848.7992 ASOUTHERN COMPANY April 11, 2016 ND-16-0579 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257, ATTN: Mr. Bruno Caballero VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT UNITS 3&4 NRC OPERATING AND WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS
Dear Mr. Caballero,
Provided by secure transmittal via FTP site please find the Vogtle 3 & 4 Operating and Written Examinations and supporting documentation. This examination date is to be determined at a later date. This exam package is being submitted in accordance with NUREG-1021 Revision 10. The following forms are included: ES-201-2, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, ES-D-1, ES-D-2, and ES-401N-6. The exam materials contained in this transmittal MUST be withheld from public disclosure until after the examinations are complete.
If you have any questions, please contact Chuck Howard at 706-848-7869.
Sincerely, 3CK Howard Lead Instructor - Exam Development Vogtle 3&4
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-16-0579 Page 2 of 3 Southern Nuclear Operating Company / Georgia Power Company Mr. S. E. Kuczynski (w/o enclosures)
Mr. J. A. Miller Mr. D. G. Bost (w/o enclosures)
Mr. M.D. Meier Mr. M. D. Rauckhorst (w/o enclosures)
Mr. J. T. Gasser (w/o enclosures)
Mr. D. H. Jones (w/o enclosures)
Ms. K. D. Fill (w/o encolsures)
Mr. J. G. Aufdenkampe Mr. J. D. Williams Mr. R. R. Connolly Mr. T. B. Saunders Mr. D. R. Madison Mr. D. M. Lloyd Mr. B. H. Whitley Mr. C. R. Pierce Mr. D. L. Fulton Mr. M. J. Yox Mr. C. B. Meadors Mr. W. A. Sparkman Mr. J. P. Redd Mr. R. K. Pope Mr. J. G. Austin Mr. F. D. Hundley Mr. S. M. Crosby Document Seryices RTYPE:
VND.LI.LOO File AR.01.02.06 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. V. M. McCree (w/o enclosures)
Mr. M. Delligatti (w/o enclosures)
Mr. L. Burkhart (w/o enclosures)
Mr. D. H. Jaffe Mr. C. Patel Ms. D. L. McGoyern Mr. B. M. Bayol Ms. R. Reyes Ms. M. A. Sutton Mr. M. E. Ernstes Mr. G. Khouri Mr. L. M. Cain Mr. J. D. Fuller Mr. C. B. Abbott Ms. S. Temple Ms. K. Stenddenbenz
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-16-0579 Page 3 of 3 Oqlethorpe Power Corporation Mr. M. W. Price Ms. K. T. Haynes Ms. A. Whaley Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia Mr. J. E. Fuller Mr. S. M. Jackson Dalton Utilities Mr. D. Cope CB&I Mr. J. Simmons (w/o enclosures)
Ms. K. Stoner (w/o enclosures)
Mr. C. A. Castell Westinqhouse Electric Company, LLC Mr. T. C. Geer (w/o enclosures)
Mr. S. W. Gray (w/o enclosures)
Mr. L. Woodcock Mr. P. A. Russ Mr. G. F. Couture Mr. M. Y. Shaqqo Other Mr. R. W. Prunty, Bechtel Power Corporation Ms. K. K. Patterson, Tetra Tech NUS, Inc.
Dr. W. R. Jacobs, Jr., Ph.D., GDS Associates, Inc.
Mr. S. Roetger, Georgia Public Service Commission Ms. S. W. Kernizan, Georgia Public Service Commission Mr. K. C. Greene, Troutman Sanders Mr. S. Blanton, Balch Bingham Mr. R. Grumbir, APOG
Karen D. Flu Southern Nuclear Site Vice President Operating Company, Inc.
Plant Vogtle Units 3&4 7825 River Road Waynesboro, GA 30830 Tel 706.848-7717 SOUTHERN Fax 706-848-5796 kdfili@southernco.com August 9, 2016 ND-I 6-1355 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257, ATTN: Mr. Bruno Caballero VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT UNITS 3&4 POST EXAMINATION PACKAGE
Dear Mr. Caballero,
Attached please find the Vogtle 3 & 4 RO/SRO Initial License Exam Post Examination material and supporting documentation. The operating test was administered during the weeks of July18 and July 25, 2016, and the written exam was administered on August 3, 2016. This post-exam package is being submitted in accordance with NUREG-I 021, Revision 10, Section ES-501 (Initial Post-Examination Activities).
Specific items provided include:
ES-201-3 (Examination Security Agreement) (preliminary)
ES-401 N-7 and ES-401 N-8 (Site Specific RO/SRO Written Examination Cover Sheets)
Each applicants original answer sheet One copy of each applicants original answer sheet Written examination performance analysis Questions asked by the candidates during the exam, with responses (electronic file of modifications provided)
Condition reports written for procedure revision suggestions, etc.
Applicant seating chart The Vogtle 3 & 4 facility has no post examination comments for this examination.
If you have any questions, please contact Chuck Howard at 706-848-7869.
Sincerely, Karen D. Fili Site Vice President
Karen D. Fili Site Vice President Plant Vogtie Units 3&4 September 19, 2016 Souttiern Nuciear Operating Company, inc.
7825 River Road Waynesboro, GA 30830 Tei 706.848-7717 Fax 706-848-5796 kdfiii @ southernco.com SOUTHERN COMPANY ND-16-1764 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257, ATTN; Mr. Bruno Caballero VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT UNITS 3&4 POST EXAMINATION PACKAGE - REDACTED
Dear Mr. Caballero,
This letter provides information related to the Vogtie 3 &4 Initial License Exam (ILT) operating test that was administered during the weeks of July 18 and July 25, 2016, and the written exam that was administered on August 3, 2016.
Enclosed is Westinghouse letter SVP_SV0_004186, which contains the following:
copy of "V3&4 copy of "V3&4 copy of "V3&4 copy of "V3&4 copy of "V3&4 copy of "V3&4 copy of "V3&4 copy of "V3&4 copy of "V3&4
- 1. One
- 2. One
- 3. One
- 4. One
- 5. One
- 6. One
- 7. One
- 8. One
- 9. One NRC ILT-1 Admin Job Performance Measures (JPMs)" (Proprietary)
NRC ILT-1 Admin JPMs" (Non-Proprietary)
NRC ILT-1 In-Plant JPMs" (Proprietary)
NRC ILT-1 In-Plant JPMs" (Non-Proprietary)
NRC ILT-1 Simulator JPMs" (Proprietary)
NRC ILT-1 Simulator JPMs" (Non-Proprietary)
NRC ILT-1 Simulator Scenarios" (Proprietary)
NRC ILT-1 Simulator Scenarios" (Non-Proprietary)
NRC ILT-1 Written Exam" (Proprietary) 1 Written Exam" (Non-Proprietary)
- 10. One copy of "V3&4 NRC ILT-Also enclosed is the Westinghouse Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure CAW-16-4480, accompanying Affidavit, Proprietary Information Notice, and Copyright Notice.
As Items 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 contain information proprietary to Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, it is supported by an Affidavit signed by Westinghouse, the owner of the information. The Affidavit sets forth the basis on which the information may be withheld from public disclosure by the Commission and addresses with specificity the considerations listed in paragraph (b)(4) of Section 2.390 of the Commission's regulations.
ND-16-1764 Page 2 Accordingly, It Is respectfully requested that the Information which Is proprietary to Westlnghouse be withheld from public disclosure In accordance with 10 CFR Section 2.390 of the Commission's regulations.
Correspondence with respect to the copyright or proprietary aspects of the Items listedabove or the supporting Westlnghouse Affidavitshould reference CAW-16-4480 and should be addressed to James A. Gresham, Manager, Regulatory Compliance,Westlnghouse Electric Company, 1000Westlnghouse Drive, Building 3 Suite 310, CranberryTownship, Pennsylvania 16066.
This lettercontains no regulatory commitments. Shouldyou have any questions, please contact John C. Howard at 706-848-7869.
Slncen Karen D. Fill Site Vice President, VEGP 3&4 Nuclear Development KDF/MC/am
Enclosure:
Westlnghouse letter SVP_SV0_004186, "CAW-16-4480 (Transmlttal of 'V3&4 NRC ILT-AdmIn JPMs,' 'V3&4 ILT-1 In-Plant JPMs,' 'V3&4 NRC ILT-1 Simulator JPMs,' 'V3&4 NRC ILT-1 Simulator Scenarios,' and 'V3&4 NRC ILT-1 Written Exam')"
cc:
Southern Nuclear Qperatlna Comoanv Mr. J. G. Austin (w/o enclosures)
Document Services RTYPE: VND.LI.LOO (w/o enclosures)
File AR.01.02.06 (w/o enclosures)
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 October 21, 2016 Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
ATTN: Ms. Karen D. Fili Site Vice President, Plant Vogtle Units 3 & 4 7825 River Road Waynesboro, GA 30830
SUBJECT:
VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT UNITS 3 & 4 - REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING OF PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE (ND-16-1764)
Dear Ms. Fili:
During the period of time from February 9, 2015 until August 12, 2016, Mr. John Chuck Howard, Lead Exam Writer, provided reference materials, job performance measures (JPMs),
simulator scenarios, and written examination test items to our staff. These items were provided to facilitate the development and administration of the NRC Initial Licensing examination, which was originally scheduled for November 2015, and eventually administered during the time periods of July 18 - 28, 2016 (operating test) and August 3, 2016 (written exam).
On September 19, 2016, you submitted letter ND-16-1764, which contained a Westinghouse Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure (CAW-16-4480), an accompanying Affidavit executed by the Director of Westinghouse AP1000 Configuration Control on September 16, 2016, Proprietary Information Notice, and Copyright Notice. The Westinghouse Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure requested that the items listed in your letter ND-16-1764, items numbered 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9, be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10CFR), Part 2, Section 2.390. The affidavit stated that the items should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons:
The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouses competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.
Its use by a competitor would reduce expenditure of resources or improve a competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.
K. Fili 2
Westinghouse AP1000 provided a non-proprietary version of each item listed in your letter. The nonproprietary version of each item listed, items numbered 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10, will be placed in the NRCs Public Document Room and added to the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Public Electronic Reading Room.
We have reviewed the Westinghouse AP1000 affidavit, CAW-16-4480, in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390, and on the basis of its statements, we have determined that the submitted information contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure. Therefore, the items listed in your letter ND-16-1764, which are designated as proprietary, will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.
If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.
If you have any questions regarding this this matter, I may be reached at (404) 997-4662, (Internet E-mail: Eugene.Guthrie@nrc.gov).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Eugene F. Guthrie, Chief, Operations Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos.: 52-025 License Nos.: NPF-91 cc: S. Shah, DRS B. Caballero, DRS S. Price, EICS
____ML16295A331____________
SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRS SIGNATURE SXS31 VIA EMAIL EFG NAME SHAH GUTHRIE DATE 10/20/2016 10/21/2016 10/ /2016 10/ /2016 10/ /2016 10/ /2016 10/ /2016 E-MAIL COPY?
YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO