ML18031A238

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Flaws in Des,Including Failure to Mention TMI, Radiation & Radioactive Waste Disposal,Archeological Survey of Site & Transmission Lines & cost-benefit Comparison of Coal & Nuclear Energy
ML18031A238
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/15/1979
From: Drazdowski T
Sierra Club
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7908210365
Download: ML18031A238 (1)


Text

SIERRA. CLUB PENNSYLVANIA.

RBpLy~: Thomas A. Drazdowski Chairman, Northeastern Group

ReDeg2, Box 59B Nicholson, PA. 18446 August 15, 1979 Director Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

2O555

Dear Sirs:

The Northeastern Group of the Sierra Club, which comprises Lackawanna,

Luzerne, Susquehanna,
Wayne, and Wyoming counties, is very concerned about the draft En-vironmental Statement for the PPEcL Berwick Nuclear Plant.

A preliminary review finds the report flawed and incomplete in the following:

1 ~ Three Mile Island is only mentioned in a footnote that states it has not been considered.

2. Discussion of the health effects of radiation and radoactive waste disposal do not note the present controversy among scientists con-cerning risks, safe dosage, and waste disposal techniques.
3. The project site and transmission lines have not had a competent archeological survey.
4. The new transmission line will cross the gorge of the Lehigh River, a Pennsylvania Scenic River candidate.
5. Nuclear energy is compared to coal unfairly because the potentially enormous benefits of revitalizing the anthracite area are not calcu-lated.

Please make these comments part of the official record.

Thank you for your co-operation.

TD, PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER f )I ~,,

I J II'if) p, Thomas A. Drazdowski Chairman Northeastern Group E4'

'"8

~opsS-oop~