ML18029A867
| ML18029A867 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry  |
| Issue date: | 09/04/1985 |
| From: | Mccloud D TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8509190192 | |
| Download: ML18029A867 (4) | |
Text
TENNESSEE VALLEYAUTHORITY CHATTANOOGA. TENNESSEE 37401 400 Chestnut
- Street, Tower II P,;"
<) p(g September 4,
1985 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II ATTN:
Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323
Dear Dr. Grace:
Please refer to J. A. Domer's letter to you dated June 12, 1985, which provided our response to OIE Inspection Report 85-18 for our Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant.
In our response to Item 3 we indicated that we would notify NRC by September 1,
1985 of our proposed method of ensuring maintenance records are properly maintained.
On August 30, 1985 Mike Hellums of my staff and Art Johnson of your staff discussed an extension to September 4,
1985 for submitting this information.
If you have any questions, please get in touch with R. E. Alsup at FTS 858-2725.
t To the best of my knowledge, I declare -the statements contained herein are complete and true.
Very truly yours, SEE VALLEY AUTHO ITY A~a@'.
E. McCloud Nuclear Engineer Enclosure cc:
Mr, James Taylor, Director (Enclosure)
Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 85091901M 850904 PDR ADOCK 05000259 6
PDR An Equal Opportunity Employer
~em
'I1
PlCLOSURE SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS.
50-259/85-18, 50-260/85-18, AND 50-296/85-18 ROGER D.
WALKER' LETIER TO H.
G.
PARRIS DATED bfAY 13, 1985 Enclosure Etem 3
Improvements in the maintenance record handling and review process have been implemented to enhance the traceabil ity of maintenance records.
1.
The tracking system for maintenance requests (hiR) provides for identification of bEs which have been reported field complete but for which planning and scheduling has not yet received the bR.
Review and reporting to management has been strengthened in that the tabulation of these bRs are now reviewed periodically by planning and scheduling and def iciencies resolved or included in the monthly report to maintenance mana g erne nt.
2.
The routing of maintenance records has been streamlined in that a
single contact has been established in mechanical and electrical maintenance for engineering review of records.
Handling requi.'rements have also been reduced in that records are now transmitted directly to records storage rather than through quali ty assurance.