ML18023B286
| ML18023B286 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 03/31/1975 |
| From: | Rooney F US HR (House of Representatives) |
| To: | Anders W NRC/Chairman |
| References | |
| Download: ML18023B286 (9) | |
Text
FROrd
- Ref Pres S. 'Roeuay (Pa.)
c TO
'Chalrum Aadars CONTROL NUMBER8471 DATE OF DOCUMENT 3j3lI75 ACTION PROCESSING DATES Acknowledged 4I/OjH Interim Reply Final FILE LOCATION ACTI MPLETION DEADLINE 4I15II5 PREPARE FOR SIGNATURE OF:
Ch i
D' fil g I ti dsse1cs ESC R I P T ION Origina I Q Copy Oorher
~
'acl ey'tL'e John T Eau&ma, Pennsylvaaf.n Pama 6 Light
- - concede@
4ehgr in stmt-vp of bN and the aÃect on the
- supply of 3
- eloacI, fed Xor thi Su~uehacam plant
'IECT 7$-2529 REMARKS REFERRED TO*
DATE IS NOTIFICATION TO THE JCAE RECOMMENDED?
- Laxson fjactQm 4ff175 cys: Gossip Rrha Sochet PS.les) 59 20K vm (2}
%-887 50-ass&
CXambusso Sha DIRECTOR OF REGULATION COMMUNICATIONS'CONTROL Copy sent PAR Ferro HQ-32 (1-73)
USAEC
s C
I ll
k hl S
75,. 252g 'RC LDGGINGDATE A r11 3
1975 SECH EYAIRIAT TO: CI OOMMISSIORER
'RTS:~~/
/75 0 GEN. MANAGER" GEN. COUNSEL '
INFO. SERVICES
, Q.DIR.+EGULATIOl}I "
PLAN. Ss ANALE '
SECRETARY xec.
D1r. for 0 erat1,ons I
I k
FOR THE COMMISSION:
WHEN SEPARATED FROM ENCLOSURES HANDLETHIS.DOCUMENT AS
, INCOMING:
.'=FRDM. 'ouse'of Representati ves k
i'
.';. ~ ",'.
-"TO:
a1rman n erS
=
DATE:
,,SUEIECT:
f 9
ng k
iR Q =.PREPARE REPLY FOR SIGNATURE OF.-
's "s.T h,' 0, COMMISSIONER o.".'.Es/
~,
.'+'
GM, DR,'C, PA, IS,SECY
'0
'IGNATURE BLOCK OMITTED
- -'.XX Exec.
Di r.'or 0 er ati ons 0 'LEASE RETURN ORIGINALWITH RESPONSE FOR DIRECT REPLY.
SEND COPY OF REPLY TO:
sEGY MAILFAGILITY(3)
Suspense Date:
85 0
- CHAIRMAN
. 0 COMMISSIONERS 0
SECRETARY 0
FOR APPROPRIATE ACTION 0
FOR INFORMATION 0
FOR RECOMMENDATION '
of incomino to OCA 4l DESS.
t.
" No e:
ee ec ticket 075-2519 Re
. Yatron to An ers,
~
2Q, Kauffman to Anders 8
75-1 7,
Deuster to n ers answered b
EDO on
~
. ~
h i
E 84 ~~ACTION SLIP S
pA I
FRED B. ROONEY MSMQSR OF CONOR KSS 15TN DISITDCT,PENMSTI.vAssu 2301 RAID<<<<IS Ho<<SE OFFICE BOIID<<IO WAss<<ssovosA D.C 80515 DISTIISCTOFFICES s 405 EAST 4IN STREET BEITaxsIEM, PEI<<ssvs.vAssu 18015 POST OfFICE BIIILDIIIO ALI4<<ssosttss, Esstssvl.vusu 18101 Kollgeess of tfje 'KIIitebStates Joule of Seyt:esnrtafibsd EHaNjirtgtott, S.C.
20515 March 3l, 1975 COMMIIIEEs INTKRSTATKAND FOREIGN COMMERCE SO<<COMMITTEES COMMUNICATIONSANO POWER COMMITTEEs MERCHANT MARINE AND FISHERIES SVSCOMMITTEESI MERCHANTMARINE FISH ANO WILOLIFECONSERVATION ANO TNE ENVIRONMENT COAST OUARO ANO NAVIOATION Mx. William A. Anders
'Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Mr. Chairman:
I am writing in regard to the enclosed correspondence from Mr. John T. Kauffman of Allentown, Pennsylvania.
Pennsylvania Power
& Light Company is facing some difficulties with the supply of nuclear fuel for their Susquehanna pl'ant. and I would greatly-appreciate any comments or information you may be able to provide pertaining to this inquiry.
ID III Cll C
~
CD Q w P) sit t FS I
'I With kind personal
- regards, X am Sincer ly yours, Fr d B. Rooney, M.C.
FBR:jmb Enclosure 847..
',Is I I sjS Igs,s (
~l~l I
\\
TWO NORTH NINTH 5 T, ALLENTOWN, PA. 18101 PHONEt12 21 SISI
)OtIN T. KALIFFMAN Vice President, System Power 8 Engineering 82 I.5043 March 26, 1975 Mr. William A. Anders, Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Mr. Chairman:
t It has been brought to my attention by Mr. Ralph Deuster, President of Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.
(NFS) that two major events have taken place recently which may seriously delay start-up of the NFS reprocessing plant and, in turn, have a serious detrimental effect on the supply of reload fuel for our Susquehanna Plant.
These events are the letter of Mr. Edson Case of the NRC relating to the possibility that the NFS final environmental statement may not be issued until the GESMO action is completed and the letter by Mr. ~ R.
W. Peterson stating that the Council on Environmental Quality believes that the GESMO Draft Impact Statement does not meet the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act.
<ge are not in a position to discuss the merits of these two actions, but we feel the issues should be attacked on an urgent basis and with considera-tion of the total impact on the U.S. Energy Supply.
We have already seen NFSt projected operating date delayed by a year since we began negotiations with them last September (culminating in a contract signed in January).
That delay, plus those which the above two letters might provoke, could prevent us from obtaining hoped for plutonium purchases in 19S2 c" recycle of our own plutoniu~ in 19S4.
We would then need additional U308 and enrichment with both the prices and sources uncertain.
A negative ruling on plutonium recycle would also considerably increase our needs for U308 even though the need for additional enrichment would then be satisfied by the contingency plan in our enrichment contracts.
These problems are recognized as common in the industry just as it is recognized that reasonable caution in the utilization of plutonium is necessary.
'We admit that readily acceptable solutions. are hard to find and we assume you are already using all due effort to schedule the hearings and make the judgments necessary to get plutonium recycle approved and reprocessing plants licensed under proper conditions.
As one additional, suggestion, we offer the concept of providing for plutonium safeguards by an adequate armed force both for transportation PENNSYLVANIA POWER 8
L I GHT COMPANY
Milliam A..Anders 3"rch 26, 1975 Page 2
and for guarding the xeprocessing plants and fabrication facilities.
Right now, a large enough force could be dedicated so that it would be immediately clear to all that it would be adequate.
As time went on, more detailed studies and hearings could perhaps justify a ma]or reduction in the force.
Eleanwhile, the plants could be in operation and the resultant electrical energy available.,
As another suggestion, we believe that reprocessing plants could be licensed without waiting for the GES110 decision.
Although this would result in production of plutonium which could partially frustrate a negative decision on plutonium recycle, the plutonium would then be located only in a few, very easy to guard, plants.
Also, a negative GEMO decision should be regarded as only a temporary situation because better safeguards technology or future acute need for plutonium could provide the impetus to reverse such a negative decision.
Zt is, of would not paved for amount of ahead.
course, possible that without plutonium recycle some reprocessors want to go ahead with their plans.
However, the way should be reprocessing licenses on their own merits so that a significant time could be saved if'the reprocessor does decide to go Thanl you for your consideration in these matters.
Very truly yours, John T. Kauffman Vice President System Power
& Engineering
\\
W l/
A r " i~,,"-~ "tr 'x",
", /r- =.s
>~oaecjwl4twrtPnnryfne art/IccrIt.toW~40~9$g~~
p' FROM Mm. A. Lochstet Central Pennsylvania
'.Comm.
on Nuclear Power, State College, Pa.
TO Dir. of Regulation CONTROLNUMBER
=
-'-- 8463 DATE OF DOCUMENT 3/31/75 ACTION PROCESSING DATES l~
Acknew ledged Interim Reply Fina I FILE LOCATION ACTION COMPLETION DEADLINE 4/11/75 PREPARE FOR SIGNATURE OF:
Ch i Direatorof Regelation X
Giambusso DESCRIPTION 3
rol.
//
/
/
Ltr QOrlginai/=
- Q Copy'..': 0 Other Req suspension of operations at Peach Bottom 2 and and construction of Limerick and Berwick until cont wiring is made fireproof
/ / /
REMARKS LPDR?
~/
/'r*.
/
k REFERRED.TO.
Giambusso
. f/action DO HOT DETACH THIS COPY DATE a/a/75 IS HOTIFICATIOHTO THE JCAE R ECOMMENDEDe Cye= CaSe Docket lyiles) 50-277 PDR 50-278 50-352 50-353 50<<387 50-388~
DIRECTOR OF REGULATION COMMUNICATIONS CONTROL L
Form H -32 (l-73)
USAEC
Central ennsylvania Committee on
!;uclear Poorer 1lP m e
'. ron Orhave State College, Pa.,
16801 31 f~'ar ch lo75 Directorate of Regulation U.S. Nuclear."".egulatory Commission
'shington, D.C.,
20~3 5 G ntlemen:
Tn vie>" of the fire "rhich burned control cables of the emerLency'core cooling system at the Bro;ms Ferry @lant on e
22?:.arch
- 1975, and that the
~each Bot-om units 2 and 3
locateo.
in 5brk County,;"a.
are of identical design
- swan, the Ce'ztral Pennsylvania Cor.".mittee on.'lear Po~;~er requests
\\
tn=t you suspend ooerations at Peach Bo.tom units 2
-hand 3
ntil such ti~e as the cont"ol 'r.'irinz can
'oe made fireoroof
,. oe z.reoroo
".. ~r";o" since
=our
. o"e i"e"."i.1 u-..i"s =re under cons"
~ ction in Dennsylv-.nia."t
'nt.=o"..=ry Co rty 7
zx-..eric(
1 and 2,, and at Luserne County:
Her~rick 1 and 2
tho I
p~~~l
> ~n 1
~
n
'A~
. e....svlv..nia oa."ii.,
o~
".. *cl
...'...c
=..-o~.er reoues~s that tne con rol ~wring to be installed in tIaese slants be reproof also.
These recuests are made in licht of your ""ov.'er under
'I 10 C.:..R.
50.100 to revoke licenses and z:ermits and crovxsions oz th Administrative Procedure Act.
Sincerely
~ours, T ochstet "Lair-:::~~,.xecu-:.'re Board C )
Central Comm.
on Nuclear Poi::er