ML18017A095
| ML18017A095 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 03/07/1980 |
| From: | Eltawila F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003270060 | |
| Download: ML18017A095 (66) | |
Text
+P,g RECI Ip
+
0 rm
/>>
+~*~+
~
< ~ ~
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 R 7 lo80
~~~fr pi]
Oocket Nos. 50-387/388 Applicant:
Pennsylvania Power and Light Company (PP&L)
Subject:
Meeting with PP&L to discuss Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES) plant unique containment program (February 28, 1980)
The purpose of the subject meeting was to discuss the preliminary observations made by PP&L during the GKM-IIM tests conducted by KMU (Germany) for the SSES to resolve certain NRC concerns regarding the differences in vent length be-tween the early 4T test facili.ty and a prototypical Mark II containment..
An attendance list and a copy of the meeting handout are enclosed.
~Summmr
,Several new tasks were disclosed during the meeting which will require additional efforts that were not anticipated by the staff.
A summary of the SSES plant unique containment program is provided below.
1.
GKM-IIM Test
~ KMU performed a total of 20 tests originally intended to verify the conden-sation oscillation design load specification used in SSES.
Chugging loads, vent lateral bracing loads and submerged structure loads were also recorded during these tests.
Preliminary results from these tests show pressure profiles that have ampli-'udes and frequencies that are beyond the values observed in the 4T facility and no distinction between C/0 and chugging.
This has lead to the PP&L de-cision to combine the load definition of C/0 and chugging into one load spe-cification based on GKM-IIM data.
The applicant indicated that the final load specification will be contained in a report to be submitted September 1980.
The report will include a dis-cussion of multivent effects with respect to test evaluation and analytical. ",-"
justification of the loads.
The staff expressed concern regarding the method used,to study the multivent effect, which.depends on multivent scaled test results'.
The staff also ex-pressed concern that the new load methodology was not anticipated-by-staff and will have a great impact on the staff's resout ces.
~g 7goco
I mal
~
~
0
' ga
~.
hl
Docket Hos. 50-387/388 "iMR 7 1880 2.
In-Plant Su ression Pool Load Tests (SRV discharge)
The applicant presented its proposed in-plant tests devised by SRI to mea-sure submerged structure'oads under simulated SRV air clearing and com-parative results from the Karlstein facility.
Preliminary observations indicate a basis for pursuing load reduction exists;
- however, the final decision whether or not this approach will be used will depend upon the equipment and piping analysis currently underway.
3.
LOCA Submer ed Structure Loads Due to time limitations the applicant was not able to complete its presenta-tion regarding LOCA submerged structure loads.
However, the handouts for this presentation were provided.
Farouk Eltawila, Acting A-8 Task Manager Containment Systems Branch Division of Systems Safety
I
SSES Meeting 2/28/80 Farouk Eltawila A. Kudrick C.
G.
R.
J.
Anderson Kleinstein H. Scanlan John R. Lehner C.
Economos C.
H.
D.
P.
M.
G.
D.
G.
H.
C.
T.
J.
Neil M. Howard C.
H. Luk A. Hashemi 0.
C.
D.
D. Parr R. Butler Cal de ron Sanchez Prelewkz Moe Michail M. Su Lin Clarice Hoffmann Antony-Spies Becker Class F.
Roth M.
Mead'.
Abrahamson Vernarr Siegert T. Coddington Lum A. Meyandt NRC/DSS/CSB NRC/DSS/CSB NRC/DSS/CSB BNL/NRC Princeton Univ./BNL BNL BNL/NRC BNL/NRC PPL KL(U K1JU KNU KFK PPSL PPSL SRI PPSL KWV PPSL Bechtel Bechtel Bechtel PP&L SRI NRC/DPM NRC/DSS'/CSB CNSNS CNSNS NUS Bechtel NRC/DSS/CSB
0
Mr. Earl A. Borgmann Vice President - Engineering The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company P. 0.
Box 960 Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 cc:
Troy B. Conner, Jr.,
Esq.
- Conner, Moore 5 Corber 1747 Pennsyania
- Avenue, N. M.
Washington, D. C.
20006 Mr. Nlliam J. Moran General Counsel The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company P. 0.
Box 960 Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 Mr. N111am G. Porter, Jr.
Porter, Stanley. Arthur and Platt 37 West Broad Street
- Columbus, Ohio 43215 Mr. Peter H. Forster.
Vice President Energy Resources The Dayton Power and Light Company P. 0.
Box 1247 Dayton, Ohio 45401 J.
Robert Newlin, Counsel The Dayton Power and Light Company P. 0.
Box 1034 Dayton, Ohio 45401 Mr. James D. Flynn
- Manager, Licensing Envirormental Affairs
.The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company P. 0. Box 960 Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 Mr. J..P.
Fenstermaker Senior Vice President - Operations Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Company 215 North Front Street
- Coulubus, Ohio 43215 David B. Fankhauser, PbD 3569 Nine Mile Road Cincinnati, Ohio 45230 Thomas A. Luebbers, Esq.
Cincinnati City Solicitor Room 214, City Hall Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Mr. Stephen Schumacher Miami Valley Power Project P. 0.
Box 252 Dayton, Ohio 45401 Ms. Augusta Prince, Chairperson 601 Stanley Avenue Cincinnati, Ohio 45226
Mr. Norman M. Curtfs I
Vice President - Engfnecdng and Construction Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 2 North Nfnth Street A11entown, Pennsy1vanf a 18101 Hr'. Earlc H. Mead Project Engineering Manager Pennsylvania Powr 4 Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentor, Pennsyl vania 18101 Jay Sflberg, Esq.
Shaw, Pfttman,.'Potts 5
Trowbi idge 1800 H Street, N. M.
Nshfngton, D. C.,
20036 Hr ~ Qf lliam E. Barber ich, Nuclear Licensing Group Supervisor Pennsylvania Power 4 Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsyl vanfa 18101 Edward H. Nagel, Esquire General Counsel and Secretary Pennsylvanfa Power 4 Lfgt Company 2 North Ninth Street Allento~, Penhsylvania 18101 Bryan Snapp, Esq.
Pennsylvania Power 4 Lfght Company g01 Hanflton Street Allentor, Pennsyl vanfa 18101 Robert H. Gallo Resident Inspector P. 0. Box 52 Shfckshinny, Pennsylvania 18655 Susquehanna Environmental Advocates c/o Gerald Schultz, Esq.
500 South Rfver Street Qf 1 kes-8arre, PA 18702 John L. Anderson Oak Ridge National Laboratory Union Carbide Corporation Bldg. 3500, P. 0 Box X Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Hr. Robert J. Shovlfn Project Manager Pennsylvania Power and Light Co.
2 North Ninth Street Al 1 entown, Pennsyl vani a 38 101 Alan R. Yuspeh, Esq..
Shaw, Pittman, Potts 4 Trowbridge 1800 H Street, N. M.
Mashfngton, D. C.
20036 Dr. Judith H. Johnsrud Co-Director Environmental Coalftion on Nuclear Power 433 Orlando Avenue State College, PA 16801 Hr. Thomas H. Gerusky, Director Bureau of Radiafion Protection Department of Envfronmental Resources Coamonwealth of Pennsylvania P
0 Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA 17 120 Hs Colleen Marsh Box 538A, RDt4 Mountain Top, PA 18707 Hrs. Irene Lemanowicz, Chafrpersoi The Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers P. 0.
Box 377 RDtl Berwfck, PA 18503
Mr. Byron Lee, Jr.
Vice President Coamon~ealth Edison Company P. 0. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 cc:
Richard E. Powell, Esq.
Isham, Lincoln 4 Beale one First National Plaza 2400 Chicago, Illinois 60670
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation ccs:
Arvfn E. Upton, Esq.
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Lefby & MacRae 1757 M Street, N.
W.
Washington, D. C.
20036 Anthony 2. Roisman, Esq.
Natural Resources Defense Council 917 15th Street, K.
W.
Washington, D. C.
20005 Hr. Richard Goldsmith Syracuse University
,College of Law E. I. White Hall Campus.
Sy'racuse, New York 13210 T, K. DeBoer, Director Technological Development Programs Kew York State Energy Office Swan Street Building Core 1 - 2nd Floor Empire State Plaza Albany, Kew York 12223 Niagara bhhawk Power Corporation ATQi:
Mr. Gerald K. Rhode, Vice President S'. stem Project Management 300 Erie Boulevaxd Nest
- Syracuse, New York 13202
Northern Znctiana Public Service ccs Meredith Hemphill, Jr. Esq.
Assistant General Counsel Bethlehem Steel Corporation 701 East Third Street Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18016 MilliamS. Eichhorn, Esp.
Eichhorn, Morrcar a Eichhorn 5243 Hckman Avenue Hamnond, Indiana 46320 Company Northezn Inchana Public Se~ce ~3ny ATIN:
Mr. H. P. Lyle, Vice President El~~c E roBr~ion 5 ~jeering
'265 Hohm ~ Avenue HsmxnB, Imiiana 46525 Ecaard H. Osann, Jr., Esq.
Wolfe, H~d, Leydid, Voit a Osann, Ltd.
Suite 4600
~ IBM PLaza Chicago, Illinois 6u611 Robert J. Vallen, Esq.
109 North Dearborn Street Chicago, ILLinois 60602 Porter County, Izaak Walton League of America, Inc.
Box 438 Chesterton, Illinois 463u4 Michael I. Swygert, Esp.
25 East Jackson Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60604 Richard L. Robins, Esci.
Lake Michigan Pederation
, 53 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60604 Nau'ice Axelrad, Esq.
Lcarenstein,
- Headman, Reis k Axelrad 1025 Ccanecticut Avenue, H. M.
washington, 0 C
20036 Jmes H. Cahan, Lq.
Russell Eggert, Esq.
Office of the Attorney General 188 Randolph Street Chicago, Illinois 60602
Long Island Lighting Company ccs:
Howard L. Blau, Esq.
Blau and
- Cohn, P.C.
217 Newbridge Road Hicksville, New for x 11801 Jeffrey Cohen, Esq.
Deputy Comrissioner and Counsel New York State-Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza
- Albany, New York 12223 Energy Research Group, Inc.
400-1'Totten Pond Road Maltharrr, M ssachusetts 02154 Irving Like, Esq.
Rei lly, Like and Schnieder 200 be~t Vein Street Babyl onNew Yorx 11702 J.
?. Novarro project Manager Shoreham thclear Power Station P. 0.
Box 618 Wading River, New York 11792 W. Taylor Reveley, III, Esq.
Hunton 8 Williams P. 0.
Box 1535 Richmond, Virginia 23212 Ralph Shapiro, Esq.
Cayner 6 Shaoiro No.- 9 East 40th Street New York, New York 10016 Ecward J.
'k'alsh, Esq.
General Attorney Long Island Lighting Company 250 Old Country Road H>neola, New York 11501 Dr. Hank Chau
'.on> Island Lightirg Co.
Nuclear Licensing Di vis i
"n r75 East Old Country Road Hicksville, New York 11801
Mr. Edward G. Bauer, Jr.
Vice President h General Counsel Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Penn~)vania 19101 CC Tro B. Conner, Jr Esq.
- Conner, oore !
rber 1747 Penn nia Avenue,'.
M.
Mashingt C.
20006 i
M.
11fam Anderson, Esq.
Oeputy Attorney General Rocm 512, Hain Capftol Building Harrisburg, Pennsylvanf a 17120 Frank R.. C1okey, Esq.
Special Assistant Attorney General Room 218, Towne House Apartments P. 0. Box 2063 Harrfsburg, Pennsylvania 17105 Honorable Lawrence Coughlin House of Representatives Congress of the United States Mashfngton, 0. C.
20515 Roger B. Reyno1ds, Jr., Esq.
324 Swede Street Morristown, Pennsylvania 19401 Mfllard C. Hetzel, Esq.
312 Main Street
~ East Greenvf lie, Pennsylvania 18041 Lawrence Sager, Esq Sager h Sager Associates 45 High Street Pottstown, Pennsyl vanf a 19464 Joseph A. Smyth Assistant County Solfcftor County of Montgomery Courthouse 4orrfstown, Pengsylvanfa 19404
cc:
Eugene J. Bradley Phfladelphfa Electrfc Cunpany
'ssocfate General Counsel 2301, Market Street Phf 1adelphf a, Pennsyl vanf a 19101
Washington Public Power Supply System CC:
Joseph B. Knotts, Jr.,
Esq.
Oebevoise 8 Liberman 1200 Seventeenth
- Street, N.
W.
Washington, D. C.
20036 Richard
- g. guigley, Esq.
Washington Public Power Supply System 3000 George Washington Way P. 0.
Box 968 Ri chl and, Mashington 99352 Nicholas
- Lewis, Chairman Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council 820 East Fifth Avenue Olynpia, Washington 98504
- 5. 0.
K. Earle Licensing, Engineer P. 0.
Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 Mr. Neil 0. Strand Mashington Public Power Supply 3000 George Mashington May P. 0.
Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 System,,,:,,:,:.
111II1111
.4I 4
&W'1N IA h
ggewvv'uer aassio<
maw mAc vcers (ggz)
So&tViEMEfo ~uc~kE A1BrHooowr y ~ Loca LoAD~MQ 5 (gfcgiE ~)
0 AGENDA GKM-SM
~
INTRODUCTION PPSL
~
TEST PLAN DR. BECKER TEST FACILITY,INSTRUMENTATION, AND OVERVIEN OF TEST RESULTS-MR. HOFFMAN PRELIMINARY EVALUATIONOF SELECTED TEST RESULTS*- DR. ANTONY-SPIES o
ANALYTICALJUSTIRCATION AND DETERMINATION OF AMPLITUDE FACTORS. DR. CLASS
PR G
TS P
GR'EBRUARY 14, 1979 BETHESDA, ilD PPRL IilFORNS I'lRC OF PLANS FOR GKl'1-IIN TEST i"ROGRAN NARCH 23, 1979 SR I I;"INTERNATIONAL NE!')LO P.NK, CA PPRL NEETS MITH ilRC TO DISCUSS KHU EXPERIENCE WITkl C. 0.
AND CHUGGING, GK~l-II l TEST PHILOSOPHY, TEST PARANETERS AID STRATEI Y FOR CONDUCTIr<G TESTS JULY 16, 1979 LEBANON,.'Ikl P~RL NEETS MITH NRC TO REVIEW STATUS OF GKi'3-IIN PROGRA,'l OCTOBER 22, 1979 START 9F GKil I I:1 TESTS
)OVENBER 12, 1979 NRC WITNESSES CKN-II > TEST RU'>
JANUARY 11, 1980 F INAL STEAN-LINE'EST FEBRUARY 11-15, 1980 RECIRCULATION-LI'AE TESTS FEBRUARY 28, 1989
- BETHESDA, ND PPRL NEETING WITH NPC TO REVIEH GC-IIN TEST RESULTS
PURPOSE OF TEST IS TO A)
RESOLVE NRC CONCERNS EXPRESSED IH iNUREG 0087 RE"ARDING THE DIFFERE."ACES I,"l VENT CONF IGURATIO,"J (LENGTH) BETHEE."l EARLY QT TEST FACILITY Ai'lD A PROTOTYPICAL NK II CONTAI lilENT B)
VERIFY THE "CO'$DENSATIO'.4 OSCILLATIO,'l" DESIGN LOAD SPECIFICATION USED Oil SUSDUEHA!4NA LEAD PLA,"JT BOUNDING LOADS IN ADDITION"l, DATA WAS RECORDED ON CONTAINMENT o
CHUGGING LOADS' VENT LOTERAL BRACI'l6 LOADS o
LOCA SUBNERGED STRUCTURES LOADS
1978 G <-
SC EDUE 1979 1980 FUEl LOAD 10 11 12 1
4 5
7 8
9 10 11 12 1
2 3
4 5
7 8
10 11 12 2
3 4
PRELIMINARY DESIGN FACILITY MODIFICATION AND INSTRUMENT INSTALLATION SYSTEM C'%LIBRATION AND SHAKEDOWN TESTS TESTING STlAM-LINE BREAK RCfs BREAK IHOULSE TESTS MODIFY FACILITY FOR RCL TESTS TEST EVAMATION PINAL LOAD SPEC
RESPONSE
SPECTRA EVALUATiON
TESTS HAVE SHn!;N:
1)
CONDEllSATIO:"< OSCILLATIO'l (C, 0 )
HENOME'lON NOT AS "CLEAN" AN EVENT AS SEE.'l IN PREVIOUS
>!T TESTS - f5NY FREQUENCIES INVOLVED.
2)
NO CLEAR DISTINCTION BETWEEN C, 0
A"lD CHUGGING, 3)
PRESSURE AftPLITUDES GREATER THAN-PREVIOUS 0T TESTS RESULTS.
THEREFORE, NE.WILL BE COf'IBINING THE LOAD DEFIllITIOHS FROf'I C, 0.
A.'<0 CHUGGING ItlTO ONE LOAD BASED OH GKf1-IIM DATA, GE"l fBTI'lG BUILDING RESPO 1SES FROM THIS COMBINED LOCA STEAM Coin'ENSATInN LO~D.
COMPARING BUILDING RESPO:"lSES FROM THE NEl$ CO!41.,I".lED LOAD TC THE COYBI."lED BUILDIilG RESÃNSES FROf1 THE DESIGN C, 0, AND CHUGGING LOADS,e
craftworkUrtloa" GKM II - M - Condensation Tests Hand out for the Meeting in Bethesda
- February, 1980
GO I I-H Test Hatrix Test Number Br'eak Size (mm) 0 210 (RCL) 8 190 (HSL)
9 110 (1/3 HSL) 80 (1/6 HSL) 234 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 'j8 24'C (75 F)
Pool Temperature 32 C (90 F) 55 C (130 F) 100 g Or'yvell Air Content S5 g(approx.)
Repeat Test
PAL A's9KS gc c 84&fk5 9.
t7f~jp ovEgvlsg
~nLPWv Time 8eeeas op use ntenr p~~angzs QSfW P.2
/fCR, CCVrrZ47
%$ DM~ > Sevwh~ p~m >~ Himiii<<s Ftol-MNPeru~
DVhJANL1c ftg)4 pg~g~g
< 4 ~azsssec pgaavgr m+~ Hisrog as NZ.
&WuRgog pox:gyugZ 5:)
Fg&g0&/c'v'l5m88QTloN5 5 nI b&IH @P Nhu4&L vA~vEs 5'5'Ãi4 PkQ4eWic INRuz~y Sg<>Ng
~reP~I uk',p EVAcuArrep/ p'goceudrRa 4.L FkfILI~cV piWRtguTlaMN 6.5.'%4 WHP %~red~
Vht vGs p I'gGC TIOhl 9/Sr@ QQilOQg p'ILIES V Eh!T C~egg~g q 7,K Ced06454Tlo 0
P4.I T4.I PQ Till
~I ~
<<It iI
~ I
<< It
~I
~I r
~<<
~I 4 P4.1 4<<t
~ I
~ ~ ~
Irrt irt
~OI Y
~rt ePIl g) TIT I
I<<hill v a TOT I
T 5.1 ywt I
~
~ 4
<<I
~tt 4 XItl QP1
~
lIII I II I YYYY Y 4<<t Y,
PI4 TII
~It Sp<<<<her 51 P11 411 I
Itv Y
Y T ~ 4 GKMX-M-Condensation Tests Test Stand Schematic Diagram
0
- 43600, 0
Kraftwerk Union R 541 C)
C)
CQ 43000
Rohr 609,6x10 C) 42160 P4 P) tD P7 I
41 3780 GKMII-M-Condensation Tests Test Tamk Normal Water Level
Fixed Parameters Drywell Volume including Vents 1)
Metwell Free Air Volume 1) 1)
Dr ywell/Metwell Air Volume Ratio Pool Area SSES Single Cell 77.9 m
48.4 m3 1.61 GKH II-M Test Vessel 75.6 m3 47.0 m3 1.61 small cell at containment wall mean value 3 '
m 5.8 m
3 '
m Downcomer Dimensions Length 0.
D.
Mall Thickness 13.86 m
0.6096 m
9.5 mm 13.76 m
0.6096 m
10 mm Downcomer Submergence Downcomer Clearance
{exit to pool bottom) 3.66 m
3.35 to 3.54 m
3.66 m
3.63 R
)
- 1) at high water level (12'/3.66 m submergence)
- 2) at the deepest point Comparison of fixed Parameters
¹aftwerk Union R 541 Legend; P Rmsure transducer.
T Temperature transducer L
Water Level OR Oxygen Rate T5.1 000 0
CV T S.C P 5.1 T5,2 Is dP5.6 0
0 0
0 OR 5.1 T6.9 P5.2 0
Ql tA IA
~+'5.51P 53 P 5.L 0
L6.2 0
C7 lA0 0
n 0
L6.1 T56/P55 0
ha Q SG6.9 SG6.10 t
GKMII-M-Condensation Tests Test Instrumentation
~ Normal Rater LeveL
legend: P Pressure transckcer T Thermo~
OG Oisplacement Gage LP level Probe LC Load Cell SG Strain Gage AF Air Fraction AG Accelerometer Gage Xrafhverk Vn/on R 541 LP 5.C OG 6.2 OG 63 OG6.6 OG6.5 P53 LP52 T6.1 0 LPK5 OOOO LC 6.1 G5,2 LP5L(
SG5.1 AG6.2 T6.1 P6 OG6.4 G6.1/SG6.2 O
O co O
CV Ol
~
>T6.2 LP5.3 LP52P P62 8
.P6.3 ITK3 G 6.3/SG6.4,
- SG6.5/SG65 SCIPSSIP6.6
- rS.C OO lO o
'o
~
~
OO
<O Section A-B I 'i55 Ill CV SG 6.7
~SG6.8 >
SG6.7 AG6.1 T63 P6.7 T62 I-Beam 5G 6.5,verticat SGM. horizon(at GK M Ij. -M-Cpfldprl+Qt )PQ 270 AF61/AF62.
) 160.
90o P 6.6 SG63,vertical SG6l, horizontal P 6.1... P S.C,P6.7 T 61...T S.C. T S.7 Tests Test InsfrUmentafion
<<Normal Water Level
~ 4ek +t Jr IWjIJ
~ Shr. Q 44uov&
tl Sobs Wl4
~~- 4Nklll %Ate~ ItttePt Qet+R
~RR'i ifWe RI SCaele
~
~
W'~e4, Ila ~
OSRR
~II
~ aaeg.Sa K~RMr4IRtba II'R R II IIR
~
I
~ ~
raftwerk Union R 541 0'G 6.1 8racing 1
~
4 90o 8racing 2 GKMII-8-Condensation Tests Bracing. Configuration
Wo, FRAMES P~
2 O'owN cornER DrAA@7-zp
'TIME INWARD>FtCAvtop:
B VE~ c~
Qg TEgT'g ~~g IfdLTlAL-fA~ Pl V)(: g,5~
Q /(~a~~
'XallnAl.
PoOL T~p:
2.Q t-UeNT C~aiWC, 3kllTIAI klASS FLIIy.; g< ~/j+a S)
XMITlAL, Ebon Tp~
~ ~e ~
~N~EhlSATlonJ 'TE~ gg~g~
+'~~'> +~NDs APrEP. lEs~ ~Tg~
~SAM SIASS F Lu>t:'Ig y
/(AI>S~
~L-TF-KPERAZulZP.:
t o~@.
C'OVPCgSAV'lOg ~Sr rU~gZ TIVE-: 3'6COh)b5 AFTF-R 'TEST'744T STSA%
IIIIASS FLUX:
9 Q /(III+S)
Pcet. TE~PemvtJRa C 5 c
GKN II N - TEST EVALUATION TO DATE MITH RESPECT TO SSES POOL BOUNDARY LOADS ls INTRODUCTORY REMARKS 2s NAIN PHYSICAL PHENOMENA OBSERVED IN THE TESTS GLOBAL SLOWDOWN-HISTORY AND PARAMETERS PRESSURE EVENTS IN THE POOL OSCILLATION FREQUENCIES DISCUSSION OF MULTI-VENT SYSTEM WITH RESPECT TO TEST EVALUATION 0s
.EVALUATION OF TESTS NOi 5 TO 10 AND SELECTION OF REPRESENTATIVE PRESSURE TRACES
'VALUATION METHOD PRESSURE AMPLITUDES AND FREQUENCIES SELECTION OF TRACES 5s PRELIMINARY SYMMETRICAL POOL BOUNDARY LOADS FOR SSES 6s ANALYTICALJUSTIFICATION OF THE LOADS AND CORRECTION OF AMPLITUDE FACTORS
5VQuE+nlNA /gp~~
SOPp&S5(oN fbca. MAp 7Bg~s
~ iN77ZoaucrionJ PP L
o 7E$ 7 PLAA/
. ygy<
MArau<
gESV <f$
gg. A ~kfZNl
> 5JZX
~u<wag PRssS<~ ~>>
ggg~~~SP 57lCVc'TIJ+<f 5 gAEgg 5p Wuc( AE~
A/ETAdg)a<66
@F ~e coQD&ls&ie WD/A)Cg5
~ puQOSE
~ cq<~u~z
< ed pRoceuoPE
~ cowc~u5iod
'P AN SUPP R ON POO 0
PRESENT QUE)<CHER LOAD DEFINITION FOR BOTH POOL EOUNDARY Ai'1D SUB."1ERGED STRUCTURES CONSIDERED VERY CONSERVATIVE o
BUBBLES OSCILLWTI0) "IN-PHASE" o
BOUNDI'lG APPROACH TO PRESSURE AHPLITUDES AND FREQUENCIES CONSERVATIVE NULTIPLIERS EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL LOAD REDUCTION EFFORT SHONED.THAT ACTUAL IN-PLiMlT TEST DATA >!OUB BE REQUIRED SRI DEVELOPED A I'1ECHANISi1 FOR.SIMULATING THE BUBBLE LOADS RESULTING FROl'1 SRV DISCHARGE o
Al'lPLITUDE Ai'lD FREQUENCY.
COULD BE V4RIED o
ONCE A GIVEN SOURCE l'lAS CHOSEN IT COULD READILY BE REPRODUCED THE S4NE SOURCE COULD.THEN BE USFD I!3 KARLSTEIf9 UNIT CELL AND SUSQUEHANNA SUPPRESSION POOL
!AE BELIEVE THAT THE TEST DATA PROVIDES A!N EXCELLENT BASIS FOR PURSUING LOAD REDUCTION FINAL DECISION ON OUR PURSUING THAT LOAD REDUCTION IS YET TO BE f1ADE
SSES SUBMERGED STRUCTURE TESTS A. Hashemi G. R. Abrahamson SR I Internationai Presented to NRC Bett mh, MD 28 February 1980
OBJECTIVES PRlMARY 1.
measure Submerged Structure Loads and Response Under Simulated SRV Air Clearing.
SECONDARY 2.
Verify Theoreticai Transposition of Karistein Air C/earing Loads to SSES.
3.
Obtain Data with Two Interacting Bubbles for Comparison with Theory.
OUTLINE Chaiaetteristics of Air Charing Bubbles in Karlstein Tes'ts.
Deve)opment of Bubble Source to Simu)ate SRV Air Clearing.
Bubb)e Calibration Tests at Karlstein SSES Tests.
~og
~ ~ ~
> ~
I 0
A
~,4
~r
-S 4
Jy P
~ C
'7 ~
qL r>>
- ~
)
1))~~sr C
IIS yi J
at lg)~
~ 1 yoO l,
'I t r >q
~k~
W MP 5881-109
SSES TESTS Bubble Locations Pool lnstru mentation SIogle Bubble Tests Double Bubble Tests
SLOVRVINI I'I l
~~gf - A N OaCVJfl044 lk 0 uvsgsnt - ie ega.eat'ty QAllfktlag j:4 48k
~ Ltd. tfw JH"W 815
~t ~r f10 fl g
P
+ >
N m
@+
+
yf.
@+
Qi 4
Qo
@ o~+
'g s.
0 IIO
,r C0 5 0
<5 VI 0~0
/
I Al~
0 I~
I'tl 5 00 a t 0 ~l ~5'l
~ 50
$ 050 A
55<0
'P ~ I 5 >to 5 Itl 00 n ASS 040 5 tt 5 0 ~
5 ~ 1 ~
~ ll 5 Sl V.t" 4 I a(
vtvt AsiC j~c W(. SIA
~ QVCVCq~
10'Ilk 41 I
AIv
~l
~
~
r 50.
0.00 I ~\\~
J
+IS ~
~ ~ 0 5 I0 ~
0 ~S~
I aa 5 ~ 0 0
QhCC~tRS
- LQ1QSL,
/
~ISA
~It~
r 1"'0.
~
vill
~&0 5 fl 5 50
~
~ ~
050
~
Atl P
P
~
I0.55 tv>>
~ Ie
~0r i Al~ g
>t0& gC 500 5 0
~~
~ 00 a4 5
1 MP-588$ -108
0 URflERGE S
RUCTUR S
OA S FOR HATER CLEARIi4t
- LOADS, 14E ARE FOLLOMI.IG LEAD PLANT APPROACH)
(LA SAI LE DAR) 4tILL BE DISCUSSING BOTH LOCA AIR BUBBLE CHARGING LOADS AND STEAN COilDENSATION LOADS APPROACH USED FOR.STEMS CO!lDENSATION LOADS 'HILL USE A SOURCE DEFINITION AS IN-PUT FIi4AL DEFIllITION OF SOURCE STILL OPEN
I
INDICATETHE SSES UNIQUE SUBMERGED STRUCTURE LOADCALCULATIONPROCEDURES
- 2. SHON THATTHE SSES UNIQUE PROCEDURES PROVIDE A MEtHOD CONSISTENT WITH OTHER MKII CALClJLATIONPROCEDURES 3.
DEM6NSTRATE THE SIMILARITYOF THE OVERALLSSES CALCIJLATIONPROCEDURES TO THE MKII SUBMERGED STRUCTURE PROGRAM
~
~
SSES UNIQUE I
IIII
. FLOSSY FIELD CALCULATIONS:,
(INEG8/MARS-SS)
Fohcma FUNC-nbm:
STRUCTURE INFORMATION:-
NODALIZATION&
NODE LOCATION pa sa aa ke ma~~~~~ ma ~~~~~
STRUCTURE INFORMATION:
STRUCTURE CHARACTERISTICS INTERFERENCE EFFECTS ON ACCELERATIOM Awnvelocnv HYDRO-DYNAMIC LOAD COEF FICIENTS AND FACTORS TIME DEPENDENT LOAD CALCULATION SUBMERGED STRUCTURE LOAD
STEAN CONDENSATION LOADS CHUGGING SOVACE HK II TAsK Aal6 IHEGS/MARS (NK II TAsK A.16)
SUPPRESSION POOL HOUNDARY LOADS C.O, SOUROR
~K II TAsK kil7
.CHUGGING SOURCE ANALYTICALR CODE NODI F I CATIONS IHEGS/HARS-SS SUPPRESSION POOL FLOH FIELDS CsOo SOURCE
STRUCTURE IMFORMATIOM:
INPUT:
- 1. STRUCTURE DIAMETER
- 2. STRUCTURE LOCATION S. STRUt:TuRE ORIENTATION OUTPUT)
- 1. NODALIZATIONOF THE STRUCTURE
- 2. NODE LOCATIONS ARE 1 STRUCTURE DIAMETER APART REFEREAICES:
- 2. GEMEAIC RESPONSE TO THE NRC CRITERIA, TASIC C.15
Foncelo Fumcmow (a.ocz ze sussex.
INPUT:
- 1. QUALIIIATIVEBASIS
- b. SOMiN, ETAL
'. 4TThST DATA
- d. EPRI ll'13.3 SCALE SINGLE CELL TESTS
- e. EPRI 'Il13.3 SCALE 30-TESTS
- 2. QUANTITATIVEBASIS
- a. 4T TIMIST DATA(INCLUDINGRECENT 4TCO TESTS)
- b. EPRI 'll13.3 SCALE SINGLE CELLTESTS
- c. EPRI 'll'l3.3 SCALE 39-TESTS
~
~
FORClblG FUNCTION (LOCAAlR BUBBLB(Cont)
OUTPUT LOCAAIABUBBLESGURCE, BOUNDING FOR THE PLANT PARAMEfERS IN THE SSES CONTAINMENT(THE SOURCE IS GIVEN.lbl(L3IT2) FOR INPUT INTO III(IEGSIMARS.SS)
REFERENICES:
- 1. NEDE-'(8468P
- 2. EPRI-SIIMLE CELL TESTS (DRAFT REPORT)
- 3. EPRI-Nl -441
FORCING FUNCTION (CHUGGING) l INPUT'o 4T TEST DATA Z.
GOT-E kF (SSES PRorme nRvf m>m Dava 3s 4TCO TEST DATA 4s GE BOUNDING CRITERIA OUTPUT:
CHUGGING SOURCE>
BOUNDING FOR SSES PARAMETERS (THE SOURCE IS GIVEN IN (L3/T )
F~R INPUT IN>0 IMEGS/NRS-SS).
REFERENCE:
NARK II-TASK A,16 GKN-IIM REPORT
FORCING FUNCTION (CONDENSATION OSCILLATION)t INPUT:
ls 0T TEST. DATA 2
0T. QLTESI. DATA.
3s GKN-IIN (SSES PROPRIETARY)
TEST DATA Os, GE BOUNDING CRITERIA OUTPUT:
CsOs SOURCE>
BOUNDING FOR SSES PARANETERS (THE SOURCE IS. GIVEN IN (L /T2)
FOR INPUT INTO IL1EGS/NARS-SS)
REFERENCEs NARK II TASK As17 GKN-IIN REP0RT
FLOW FIELD CALCULATIOMS:
INPUT:
1; NODE LodATION
- 2. FoRcING kuNCTION IN THE FoRM oF A SOURCE.
(DIFFERENt FOR EACH PHENOMENON)
OUTPUT
- 1. TIME DE atuDENT COMPONENTS OF THE ACCELERATION ANDVELot'ITVVECTORS (RADIAIAZIMUTHAI8 AXIAU USING IWBGSIMARS.SS. (IWEGS/MARS-Ss IS THE SAME CODE USEb To CALCULATETHE MARK-IICHUGGING, SOUNDARV LoADs; auT MODIFIEDTo CALCULATETHE FLow FIELbs IN THE PooL INsTEAD or-aouNDARv PRESSURES.
THE ANALYTICALSOLUTION REMAINS UNCHANGED)
- 2. ALLSOURCES (87 VENTS) ARE APPLIED IN PHASE
REFERENCES:
1.
MARK-IICHUGGING PROGRAM (TASK A.16)
OUTPUT 1.
STRUCTIJRE DIAMETER 2.
STRUCTIJRE ORIENTATION 3.
STRUCTIJRE CROSS SECTION (Ea. CIRCULAR,BOX, I-BEAM)
- 4. STRucTURE IseaMENTI imam E. SURRO0NDINa BTRUCTURES LOcATION,SIzE, AND ORIENTATION
>MTERFEREMCE EFFECTS GM ACCELEAATIGMAMDVELGCITY:
INPUY 1.
STRUCTURE 6IAMETER 2.
STRUCTURE ORIENTATION 3.
STRUCTURE CROSS-SECTION 4.
SEGMENT I.eh)6TH E. SuaaouNoiniG STRUCTURES I.OCATION,sIze, AND ORIENTATION
- 6. ACCEI.ERATidh ANOvei.ociTv ATTHE Nooe ovea TIME
~
~
>MTeRmaeNCE EI:F~c>s OM Acc~~~gAy~og Agp VELOCITY:(COnt)
OUTPUT:
1..CHANGE IM LOAD DUE TO INTERFEREMCE 2.. MODIFIED DAAG COEFFICIENTS
REFERENCES:
1.
NEDO-2'l730 h'EDO-2106'I 2.
NUREG-0487 3.
LEAD PLAM1'ESPONSE TO NRC CRITERIA (MUREG-0487) 4.
GENERIC RESPONSE TO NRC CRITERIA, TASI< C.16
HlRODYWIAMICLOAD COEFFICIENTS &
FACTORS tHAWD CALCuLATIOWS}:
. INPUT:
'I. STRUCTURE DIAMETER 2.
STRUCTURE ORIEMTATIOM 3.
STRUCTURE CROSS-SECTI0N 4.
MODIFIEDDRAG COEFFICIENTS (INTERFEREMCE)
E.
PHENOMENON'S CHARACTERISTICS (E.G. DOMINANT FREQUENCYI
HIRODVAIAMICLOAD COEFFICIENTS &
FACTORS {HANDCALCULATIONS): {Cont)
OUTPUT:
1.
INERTIA,DIAG,& LIFE COEFFICIENTS ANDVORTEX SHEDDING CREQUENCY 2.
EQUIVALEPJ'f DIAMETERS FOR NONCIRCULAR CROSS-SECTIONS 3.
ACCELERATIONAND VELOCITYMULTIPLICATION FACTORS
REFERENCES:
1.
NEDO-21730 & NEOO-21061 2.
NURE6-048]
3.
LEAD PLANT RESPONSE TO NRC CRITERIA(NUREG-0487I 4.
GENERIC RESPONSE TO THE MRC CRITERIA,TASK C.18
TIME MPEAIDEMTLOAO CALCULATIOMS:
INPUT 1.
STRUCTURE (NGDE) LGCATIGN 2.
STRUCTURE CRGSS-SECTIGN
- 3. SIUCTURE OIAMETER(OR EQUIVALENT'OIAanETEal 4.
STRUCTURE (SEGMENT) LENGTH 5.
INERTIA, DRA,G, O'FT COEFFICIENTS ANDVORTEX SHEDDINe dhEnuENCY
- 8. ACCELERATION&VELOCITYHISTORY ATTHE NODE 7.
ACCELERATION8 VELOCITYMULTIPUCATIONFACTORS
TIME DEPENlbEMT LOAD CALCULATIOM:(Cont)
OUTPUT:
TIME DEPENCIENT LOADIFA+FS+ FU IN A DEFINED 0 DIRECTION FA FORCE 6UE TO ACCELERATION FS FORCE HUE TO VELOCITY FL FORCE dUE TO LIFT ALLTHE FORCES ARE SUMMED VECTORIALLYAND PROJECTED ONTO THE 0 DIRECTION
- 2. TIME DEPENDENT LOAD(FA+FS+Fll IN THE RELATED 80 DIRECTION REFERENCES 1.
NEDO-21730, lllEDO-2'I061 2.
NUBEG-D487 3.
LEAD PLANT RESPONSE TO THE NRC CRITERIA lmuREG-04S7}
4.
GENERIC RESPONSE TO THE NRC CRITERIA,TASK C.16
INPUT 1.
STRUCTURE LOADWITHOUTINTERFEREMCE 2.
CHANGE IM'fHE LOAD DUE To IMTERFEREMCE OUTPUT:
THE SUM OF THE O> DIRECTION LO~DS ANDTHE SUM OF THE 90~ DIRECtIOM LOADS PROVIDE THE SUBMERGED STRUCTURE LdAD IM THE TWO CHOSEN DIRECTIONS
CONCLUSION:
IWEGS/MARS-SS PROVIDES A CONSISTENT METHODOLOGY FOR CALCULATING SUBMERGED STRUCTURE LOADS